Judge Freezes Trump’s $1.8 Billion Anti-Weaponization Fund

President Donald Trump’s effort to provide relief to Americans wrongfully targeted by the government has, like all of his proposals, faced knee-jerk backlash from his leftist rivals.

And continuing a trend that has dominated both of his terms in the White House, it appears that an activist court has at least installed a hurdle between Trump’s so-called “anti-weaponization fund” and those who would otherwise qualify.

Backup here if neeeded:

Wait a minute! ACTIVIST JUDGE BLOCKS Trump’s $1.8 BILLION Anti-Weaponization Fund pic.twitter.com/G67pv8tz6L

— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 29, 2026

CBS News provided this update Friday afternoon:

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema said in a brief order dated Thursday that the temporary hold allows her time to consider whether to grant longer-term relief sought by a group of plaintiffs who are challenging the new fund, which was announced by the Justice Department earlier this month.

Brinkema’s order prevents the Justice Department from “taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation” of the program “to ensure that no funds are irreversibly disbursed” from it. It covers the transfer of money to the fund, consideration of any claims submitted and disbursement of any payments.

A Justice Department spokesperson said it “remains extremely confident in the legality of the Anti-Weaponization Fund which is supported by ample precedent, including Obama-era settlements.” 

“We will not allow the policy preferences of judges to interfere with our efforts to provide restitution to victims of lawfare,” the spokesperson said. 

The temporary setback quickly fueled social media discussion:

Guess President Trump will be forced to keep the money and hand it out personally to those who deserve reimbursement. 😂

— NevadanforLife (@nevadanfor) May 29, 2026

I hope the settlement gets reversed & Trump takes the entire 10 BILLION originally offered, and opens a nonprofit to help those targeted by their government on the behalf of Democrats. 😊🤪🤣🤣🤣

— Mit O'Connor (@mitsme72) May 29, 2026

Many posts pointed to facts that critics of the fund conveniently omit:

Let's examine what REALLY happened.

When Donald Trump was a private citizen, a government contractor stole his private tax data and leaked it to the media. Because the government failed to protect his private records, Trump and his family sued the IRS for $10 billion.

On May…

— Biff Zeppe (@BZsSaloon) May 23, 2026

Here’s the full text from the post above:

Let’s examine what REALLY happened. 

When Donald Trump was a private citizen, a government contractor stole his private tax data and leaked it to the media. Because the government failed to protect his private records, Trump and his family sued the IRS for $10 billion. 

On May 18, 2026, the Justice Department settled the case. Trump agreed to walk away with zero dollars for himself. In exchange, the government put $1.776 billion into an “Anti-Weaponization Fund” to help ordinary citizens who say they were also unfairly targeted by federal agencies. The government also agreed to completely drop its ongoing tax audits against Trump’s businesses.

Trump declined $10 billion he was statutorily entitled to under 26 U.S.C. § 7431 and converted it into a compensation pool for other citizens, so calling this a corrupt enrichment scheme is factually backwards.

If anyone else got that award they would have taken it and ran. Joe Biden and every other Democrat out there. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The fund’s text explicitly says “there are no partisan requirements to file a claim,” meaning Democrats, independents, and Republicans are equally eligible.

The audit waiver is bound to pre-May-18-2026 conduct, not “perpetuity immunity forever” as the ridiculous media and out of job former attorney Liz Oyer claims. 

Biden pardoned Hunter for crimes he was actually convicted of and Jim Biden while Jim was under two active federal investigations, with an 11-year window and zero public-facing remedy and the same commentators called that defensible. Literally. 

So the Biden family could issue pardon for crimes committed and active investigations but Trump, who was actually agreed and is statutory entitled to this money set up a fund to help Americans who were victims of political persecution, and the demented media is calling it some kind of corrupt act?

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course that same demented media wants judicial oversight. Would that be the judicial oversight that consistently rules incorrectly in any case involving Trump and gets overruled sometimes 9-0 at the Supreme Court?

Not one prior U.S. president has faced this volume of criminal prosecution, civil litigation, and unauthorized disclosure of confidential financial records simultaneously, so pretending this is a normal political cycle is dishonest bs. 

The Obama administration used the exact same Judgment Fund mechanism in Keepseagle $760M, no congressional appropriation and the press called that justice. But it was actually much worse because in the Obama case this settlement was made against the advice of career DOJ officials who thought they could win at court.

Trump personally receives zero dollars, zero damages, and zero direct financial benefit from the settlement the only thing he gets is the audit waiver as protect protection so he won’t be targeted by the same Weaponized government should they ever get power again. 

Congress will never legislatively compensate Jan 6 defendants, FACE Act defendants, or dismissed-case targets, so the choice was this fund or no remedy at all for documented victims of politically motivated federal action.

The media is very dishonest in this country and there’s a lot of experts who are even more dishonest.  I am not an expert at anything except research and common sense. It is just basic common sense that when you have a president issue blanket, pardons for crimes that nobody even knows about that may or may not have been committed on his way out, and the media doesn’t bat an eye, but then you have a president who is actually wronged and who uses his settlement money to help those who are also politically persecuted smeared as corrupt the problem is the media.

-Insurrection Barbie

And here’s an update from The Hill:

Brinkema is an appointee of former President Clinton who serves on the federal bench in Alexandria, Va. 

Various groups have challenged the Justice Department’s new $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, which was created as part of a settlement in a suit Trump filed against the IRS. The fund will be used to give payouts and issue “formal apologies” to those who pursue settlements because they believe they were wronged by the government. 

As it has left some lawmakers fuming, the plan has come under several legal challenges. 

Brinkema is hearing a lawsuit brought by a former federal prosecutor who worked on cases related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot; a California professor arrested at an immigration protest; the city of New Haven, Conn.; the National Abortion Federation; and Common Cause. 

Here’s how Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent responded to a separate attack from California Gov. Gavin Newsom on would-be beneficiaries of the fund: