Hegseth Hits Back After Top US Commander – Reportedly Critical of Drug Boat Strikes – Abruptly RESIGNS

With thousands of US troops now staged in the Caribbean, a menacing armada of Naval power at the near ready, B-52’s encroaching on Maduro’s Venezuela —

And President Trump stating openly that he has given the greenlight for covert CIA ops inside Venezuela to combat drug and terror-linked groups…

The top Admiral commanding US Southern Command responsible for that entire theater of operations has abruptly resigned his post.

That news broke on Thursday, along with reports that Admiral Alvin Holsey was stepping down in protest to the Trump Administration’s consistent targeting of Venezuelan drug boats.

Those strikes have been ramping up ever since this strike reported by Fox News on X was made public back in early September:

WATCH: The U.S. military destroyed a Venezuelan drug boat in international waters with 11 Tren de Aragua narcoterrorists aboard, the Trump admin says. pic.twitter.com/qpOq1Yk2Lz

— Fox News (@FoxNews) September 2, 2025

The controversy surrounding those strikes created the backdrop for current reporting that, though unsubstantiated, continues to be reported as fact.

President Trump addressed the controversial nature of those strikes this afternoon, emphasizing in his delivery that from his perspective… they aren’t all that controversial:

.@POTUS: "We attacked a submarine. That was a drug-carrying submarine built specifically for the transportation of massive amounts of drugs — just so you understand. This was not an innocent group of people." pic.twitter.com/4dTsbysG3c

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) October 17, 2025

But it has been widely reported that Admiral Holsey has been openly critical of those strikes, even (allegedly) addressing the matter personally in a recent meeting with Hegseth and the Joint Chiefs.

I want to be clear — the validity of that reporting can not be confirmed, and has not been substantiated with anyone willing to go on the record; only anonymous sources.

And the public account from Hegseth, his second in command at the Pentagon, and Holsey himself do not currently bear out that he resigned in protest over those strikes.

Nevertheless, multiple top mainstream personalities are continuing to stand behind the story that Holsey’s resignation was designed to throw a wrench in the buildup towards a wider campaign against Venezuelan targets.

Case in point, here’s CNN anchor and chief national security analyst Jim Sciutto’s post yesterday, sharing the NY Times article which relies exclusively on those anonymous sources:

NYT: “One of the U.S. officials, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters, said that Admiral Holsey had raised concerns about the mission and the attacks on the alleged drug boats.” https://t.co/qQXtQCLt4z via @NYTimes

— Jim Sciutto (@jimsciutto) October 16, 2025

Sciutto wasn’t credited in this story…

But here’s CNN’s own version of that NYT article in which they relied just as heavily on anonymous sources to claim Holsey is standing up against the so-called illegal strikes against the drug boats originating from Venezuela.

But notice the actual TIMING of the Admiral’s departure, as noted towards the end of this report from CNN:

The admiral overseeing US Southern Command, which has responsibility for forces in the Caribbean, where the US has carried out multiple legally ambiguous strikes against alleged drug cartels, is retiring one year into his tenure, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a social media post on X on Thursday.

The news comes just days after the US military conducted its fifth known strike on a boat alleged to be trafficking drugs off the coast of Venezuela, killing six people. It also comes one day after President Donald Trump said publicly that he had authorized the CIA to operate inside Venezuela to clamp down on the flow of drugs and migrants. Also on Wednesday, US Air Force B-52 bombers flew off the coast of Venezuela for more than four hours, CNN previously reported.

Tensions had been simmering between Hegseth and Adm. Alvin Holsey for weeks before the admiral announced he was leaving, two sources familiar with the matter told CNN. Hegseth did not believe Holsey was moving quickly or aggressively enough to combat drug traffickers in the Caribbean, and he complained about not being given the information he needed about the operations, the sources said. But SOUTHCOM was concerned about the operations not being lawful, the sources added.

The tensions came to a head during a meeting between Hegseth, Holsey and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine on October 6 at the Pentagon, one of the sources said. Holsey offered to resign during the meeting, the source said, but the idea was tabled and his departure was not announced until over a week later. His departure will also not be imminent — instead, he’ll retire at the end of the year.  (Emphasis added.)

ADVERTISEMENT

That doesn’t sound like someone who is departing out of protest of the current mission set.

I’m leaving because I denounce these illegal strikes… but I’ll stay on for another 3 months just for fun?

That doesn’t track.

And Hegseth’s chief spokesman called that reporting completely false in a direct response to CNN’s Sciutto:

This is a total lie. Never happened. There was no hesitation or concerns about this mission.

Just more Fake News. https://t.co/a0VHfoBIpa

— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) October 17, 2025

Could that be political cover to keep Holsey’s resignation from becoming fodder for the Trump Administration’s political opponents?

Maybe — but that’s a big gamble to take if you’re relying on someone who is willing to give up their top spot at US SouthCom to also not SPEAK about those same strong convictions.

Logic would argue that if you’re willing to quit that command job for some serious personal conviction, you’re probably chomping at the bit to TALK about it, as well.

If that’s the case, then Hegseth and Parnell just made a bad gamble that could wind up biting them in the rear.

But the Trump Administration’s political enemies ARE using this as fodder to attack them over the drug boat strikes, as covered in this report from ABC News:

Holsey has overseen a major buildup of military assets in the region with some 10,000 troops now operating around Latin America. His departure was announced a day after the military sent three B-52 bombers from an Air Force base in Louisiana to fly in circles near Venezuela, which Trump accuses of orchestrating drug shipments.

Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the unexpected resignation “troubling.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“At a moment when U.S. forces are building up across the Caribbean and tensions with Venezuela are at a boiling point, the departure of our top military commander in the region sends an alarming signal of instability within the chain of command,” Reed said.

“Any operation to intervene militarily in Venezuela — especially without congressional authorization — would be unwise and dangerous,” he added. “Admiral Holsey’s resignation only deepens my concern that this administration is ignoring the hard-earned lessons of previous U.S. military campaigns and the advice of our most experienced warfighters.”

Here’s NBC News as they brought the news of Holsey’s resignation when it first broke.

Just listen to the Admiral’s own words — not a hint of anything bitter, or the least bit negative in his resignation statement:

Secretary of War Hegseth also had nothing but good to say about the Admiral following his resignation.

He posted a rather lengthy statement HONORING Admiral Holsey yesterday:

On behalf of the Department of War, we extend our deepest gratitude to Admiral Alvin Holsey for his more than 37 years of distinguished service to our nation as he plans to retire at year's end. A native of Fort Valley, Georgia, Admiral Holsey has exemplified the highest…

— Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (@SecWar) October 16, 2025

Here’s the full text of Hegseth’s post ‘extending our deepest gratitude to Admiral Alvin Holsey”:

On behalf of the Department of War, we extend our deepest gratitude to Admiral Alvin Holsey for his more than 37 years of distinguished service to our nation as he plans to retire at year’s end. A native of Fort Valley, Georgia, Admiral Holsey has exemplified the highest standards of naval leadership since his commissioning through the NROTC program at Morehouse College in 1988.

Throughout his career—from commanding helicopter squadrons to leading Carrier Strike Group One and standing up the International Maritime Security Construct—Admiral Holsey has demonstrated unwavering commitment to mission, people, and nation. His tenure as Military Deputy Commander and now Commander of United States Southern Command reflects a legacy of operational excellence and strategic vision.

The Department thanks Admiral Holsey for his decades of service to our country, and we wish him and his family continued success and fulfillment in the years ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whizzco

Is that simple political theater to create cover amid escalating strikes on Venezuelan targets which is sure to draw fire from Democrats?

I’m not going to say it couldn’t be — because it COULD be.

But the only thing vouching for the veracity of him resigning in PROTEST are a handful of anonymous sources and someone’s presumption — at best.

If the ‘resigning in protest’ proves to be true, it certainly isn’t provable based on current reporting.

Besides Hegseth and Parnell’s pushback against that current reporting, there’s also ANOTHER anonymous source that has been quoted refuting all the other anonymous sources.

It’s ANONYMOUS versus ANONYMOUS!

That specific anonymous source is highly dismissive of all the other anonymous reporting, and shows up in this report from The Telegraph:

The reasons for his move are unclear, but one official told The New York Times he had expressed concerns about attacks on alleged drug trafficking boats.

Sources also told CNN Adml Holsey had reservations about the legality of the campaign and clashed with Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, who blamed him for not aggressively tackling drug trafficking in the Caribbean.

However, a Pentagon source pushed back on the claims. “Admiral Holsey didn’t resign in protest,” they told The Telegraph, adding: “Anyone writing that has no clue what they’re talking about.” (Emphasis added.)

Is it fair to say all the anonymous sources simply cancel each other out, and we’re left with the FACTS as they are known?

All things considered, both Admiral and the Pentagon are being oddly silent about the reasoning behind the abrupt resignation.

He did just step into that role less than a year ago.

But even CNN’s report with another retired top Admiral, James Stavridis, who characterized Holsey’s resignation as ‘very strange’…

Went on to outline at least one really good plausible reason BESIDES a personal problem with the current mission that could have led to the resignation.

I’ll cue that video to start around the 1:26 mark, when Stavridis — a former NATO Commander as well — gives his comprehensive take:

That retired Admiral’s second point was sort of buried amidst the first and third options he put forward that could explain the sudden departure.

But people leave jobs of all kinds every day of the week for exactly the second reasoning Stavridis put forward — private health or family related issues.

I’m very curious to know the truth behind this situation just because it does come at a time when operations are ramping up in that neck of the woods.

But other than that eye-catching timing, there’s really nothing in the public domain — EXCEPT those anonymous sources — that currently corroborates the story that Admiral Holsey is resigning in protest of the strikes he is operationally responsible for conducting.

And everything points to the likelihood that he’ll be conducting MORE of those strikes in the next few days and weeks before he actually leaves his command post.

We’ll keep our eyes on the scenario playing out between the US military and Maduro’s Venezuela as President Trump’s war on drug, trafficking, and smuggling operations by the cartels intensifies.

But I’ll keep one eye on the operations being conducted under Admiral Holsey’s authority in particular — in case something more substantial pops up on the radar.