European Country Withdraws ALL COVID-19 Jab Recommendations

According to reports, Switzerland has withdrawn all COVID-19 jab recommendations.

Doctors in Switzerland can now only administer the toxic shot in rare, unique cases but will be liable for any damages they cause the recipient.

“This is big news!” Dr. Robert Malone tweeted.

This is big news!
"Switzerland stops the Covid vaccinations: All vaccination recommendations have been withdrawn""https://t.co/1WTuthz7sN

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) April 8, 2023

“This is very much, in part, your result, the interview that you gave us in Switzerland was watched by some very powerful and influential Swiss bankers and politicians whose own children have been maimed and sterilised by the lethal injections. They paid attention and acted,” John Mappin responded to Dr. Malone’s tweet.

“Several of their friends in the banking community internationally are now taking action in their respective countries.”

Well done Robert @RWMaloneMD!!

This is very much, in part, your result, the interview that you gave us in Switzerland 🇨🇭 was watched by some very powerful and influential Swiss bankers and politicians whose own children have been maimed and sterilised by the lethal… https://t.co/w8VEYNqEAA

— John Mappin (@JohnMappin) April 8, 2023

🇨🇭Switzerland stops #CovidVaccines: All vaccine recommendations withdrawn; doctors can now only administer vaccine in unique cases.

How many medical professionals will now be giving these jabs if they are personally legally liable for #vaccineinjuries ?
https://t.co/8NSGGSAET5

— Dr Anthony Hinton (@TonyHinton2016) April 8, 2023

SWITZERLAND- Not on Your Media…

Has withdrawn ALL Covid vaccinations, Drs can only give them in specific instances but they will be have liability for damage!

Oh… pic.twitter.com/Ewmeb7wm9X

— Elander & the News (@ElanderNews) April 8, 2023

“Switzerland stops the Covid vaccinations: all vaccination recommendations have been withdrawn, doctors can only administer the controversial vaccines in individual cases under certain conditions – but then bear the risk of liability for vaccination damage. When will countries like Germany and Austria follow this example?” Report 24 stated.

From Report 24 (translated):

The Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) and the Federal Commission for Vaccination Issues (EKIF) state, as of 3.4.23, in their vaccination recommendation ( can be found on this website ):

In principle, the FOPH and EKIF will not formulate a recommendation for vaccination against Covid-19 in spring/summer 2023 due to the expected low virus circulation and the high level of immunity in the population.

Vaccination is only possible in individual cases – namely:

Vaccination is possible for people who are particularly at risk (BGP) ≥ 16 years of age if the attending physician considers it to be medically indicated in the respective epidemiological situation in the individual case, a temporarily increased protection against serious illness is to be expected and the last vaccination dose at least 6 months ago.

However, no vaccination recommendation for risk patients is explicitly given here.

In the following, it will be discussed that the effectiveness of vaccinations against current variants is reduced and short-lived – especially for people who are at risk. The adaptation of the mRNA vaccine could not keep up with the development of the variants. The recommendations of the BAG could change if there is a new wave of outbreaks, but even then, according to the document, vaccinations are no longer recommended for people under the age of 65.

No positive risk-benefit ratio

The remarks on “adverse effects of vaccination” (UIE) are also piquant:

According to the current state of knowledge, the risk of severe UIE with a recommended vaccination is much lower than the risk of a complication from Covid-19, against which the vaccination protects. The benefit of the vaccination administered according to the recommendation therefore outweighs the possible risks.

In the case of the valid non-recommendation, this essentially means that there is no longer a positive benefit-risk ratio for any Covid vaccination.

Liability: the federal government is out, doctors have a duty

The new recommendations also have consequences for liability. This is what the BAG document on the Covid vaccination strategy (as of November 29th, 2022) says:

Compensation by the federal government to injured persons for vaccination damage can only be considered for vaccinations if they were officially recommended or ordered (see Art. 64 EpG).

However, the federal government only stepped in if the damage was not covered by the vaccine manufacturer, the person vaccinating or an insurance company. The person vaccinating – i.e. generally the doctor – can be held liable if he has violated the duty of care. In this context, it is pointed out that the same rules regarding patient information apply to the Covid vaccination as to all other vaccinations.