North Carolina Finds 34,000 Dead Names on Its Voter Rolls After Federal Database Check | WLT Report Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

North Carolina Finds 34,000 Dead Names on Its Voter Rolls After Federal Database Check


Dobbs Building in Raleigh, home to North Carolina State Board of Elections offices.

North Carolina got a hard look at the condition of its voter rolls, and the picture is not pretty.

The North Carolina State Board of Elections announced that it identified roughly 34,000 deceased individuals on the state’s voter registration list.

The finding came after the board compared its records against the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database, better known as SAVE.

On April 17, 2026, the State Board submitted 7,397,734 voter records to SAVE as part of an effort to tighten the accuracy and integrity of the state’s rolls.

ADVERTISEMENT

Election-integrity activists were still tying the same 34,000 figure to the SAVE Act on June 5:

To be precise about what this is and what it is not: identifying dead names on a registration list is not the same thing as proving fraudulent ballots were cast. The board said so plainly, and we will too.

What it does prove is that the rolls were carrying tens of thousands of records that should not have been there.

The primary purpose of the SAVE comparison was citizenship verification, making sure only eligible voters are registered in North Carolina. The deceased registrations surfaced as an added benefit of that process, along with duplicates and name mismatches.

State Board Executive Director Sam Hayes said the total was bigger than the board expected.

The North Carolina State Board of Elections laid out the scope of the finding and the work ahead in its official announcement:

The North Carolina State Board of Elections has identified approximately 34,000 deceased individuals on the state’s voter rolls following a comprehensive data comparison with the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database.

On April 17, 2026, the State Board submitted 7,397,734 voter records to the SAVE system as part of its initiative to strengthen the accuracy and integrity of the state’s voter registration list.

The discovery comes as an added benefit of the State Board’s ongoing effort to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The primary goal of comparing voter registration records with the SAVE database is to identify any non-U.S. citizens on the voter rolls and ensure that only eligible individuals are registered to vote in North Carolina, but we expect that this process will also help identify other anomalies such as duplicate registrations, name mismatches and, as highlighted here, deceased voters.

“While we expected to find some cases, this is higher than we anticipated,” said Sam Hayes, executive director of the State Board of Elections. “The benefit of entering into cross-state and federal database checks is that it allows us to uncover issues like this.

ADVERTISEMENT

Our goal is to use every available and legal tool at our disposal to achieve the most accurate voter rolls possible. Now, we must roll up our sleeves and begin the hard work to act of verifying that every person registered to vote in North Carolina is eligible.

Our team, along with our state and federal will do what’s necessary to meet this responsibility.”

Election officials emphasize that list maintenance is a routine and necessary function to ensure compliance with state and federal law. The identification of deceased individuals on the voter rolls does not necessarily indicate that illegal votes were cast in their names, but it does underscore the importance of regular updates and strong interagency coordination.

The State Board will follow established procedures to verify records and will work with county boards of elections to remove deceased individuals from the voter rolls in accordance with state and federal law. These processes include cross-checking additional state and federal databases and providing due process before any removal occurs.

The board said it will verify each record before anyone is removed.

That means cross-checking other state and federal databases, coordinating with county boards of elections, and providing due process before any name comes off the list.

North Carolina already gets weekly death information from the state Department of Health and Human Services for residents who pass away inside the state.

The gap the SAVE process closes is the out-of-state problem. It helps catch people who registered in North Carolina, moved away, and later died somewhere else, where the local death record never made it back to the county.

ADVERTISEMENT

State Auditor Dave Boliek backed the effort and framed it as basic election hygiene.

Boliek said voter-roll maintenance is “a core component of election integrity,” adding that the State Board was taking “another positive step toward ensuring our state has secure elections, where only eligible voters are casting ballots.”

The North Carolina Republican Party also praised the announcement and credited the current board leadership for taking the issue seriously.

NCGOP Chairman Jason Simmons said the announcement showed the board was taking election-integrity concerns seriously after previous concerns about deceased registrations had been ignored under prior board control.

ADVERTISEMENT
NATIONAL POLL: Should Mamdani Be Charged With Treason? image

None of this happens without the federal database comparison, and that is the point conservatives have been making for years.

You cannot fix a list problem you refuse to measure. When you finally run the numbers against a serious federal system, you find out what was really sitting on the rolls.

Thirty-four thousand dead names is a lot of room for trouble, even if every single one of those records turns out to be an honest oversight.

The verification work comes next, and the board says due process will be followed before any removals. That is exactly how it should run, and it is a far better starting point than pretending the problem was never there.



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!