Let's Talk About The Artemis II Moon Launch | WLT Report Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Let’s Talk About The Artemis II Moon Launch

Ok, it’s time to address the NASA Artemis II Moon Mission…

Are we really going back to the Moon for the first time in over 50 years?

Longtime readers of WLT Report will know I am highly skeptical of that claim.

But what about the Artemis II?  Doesn’t this prove the Moon missions are real?  See, we’re going back right now, it’s really happening!

ADVERTISEMENT

Ehhh, I’m not so sure.

But let’s take a look at what new information we have now that we do have the new Artemis II launch.

We can start with this….a hallmark of NASA launches is with each new launch we get the obligatory new photo of the Earth.

And here’s the newest 2026 version:

Incredible right?

To see our home planet from Space?

It would be if it were real, sure!

But how do we know this one is real this time when each new one we get always looks so different?

Let me show you what I mean…

ADVERTISEMENT

Here are 8 images NASA has told us it took of the Earth.

Will the real Earth please stand up?

Not only do those 8 not look like each other, but none of them resemble the new image was just got from Artemis II.

Strange, don’t you think?

And take another look at the 2026 image….you can see the large brown land mass in the bottom left area seems to be Australia, right?

But then look again and look specifically at its size.

Australia looks MASSIVE!

ADVERTISEMENT

This guy did a great job explaining exactly how Australia could not possibly be that big when viewed from Space:

Gotta love how he prefaces his post with “I’m not a Flat-Earther but….”

I think we’re going to start seeing people say that a lot more often going forward.

They don’t want people to think they’re crazy so “I’m not a Flat-Earther” but….I can also see that things are not adding up here.  What they are telling us is true is not what I am seeing.

Backup of that video here on Rumble if needed:

And then we always have this beauty…

If you’ve ever watched a rocket launch, you know it always follows this pattern.

It goes up, then hits a peak, and then seemingly starts going down again.

It looks like this:

ADVERTISEMENT

I know, I know….it can’t go straight up because it has to kind of go sideways and build up escape velocity kind of like how you can’t swim directly against a rip tide current in the Ocean, you have to kind of swim mostly parallel to it.

I’ve heard it all before, and maybe that’s right.

But I also know my eyes see.

Here’s the Artemis II launch, filmed by a man with a Nikon P1000:

Then we have the Astronauts before the launch, and I’m not saying there’s any big smoking gun here but they just seem “off” to me and they seem to be making some really strange comments.

Watch here:

I don’t know, they sure seem a lot more like polished actors than Space Astronauts, but maybe that’s just me.

Speaking of the Astronauts, am I the only person who thinks this looks totally staged and fake?

ADVERTISEMENT

So they have to through this ridiculous process of suiting up for hours before the leave but what about the return trip home?

What about when they’re in Space and have to change outfits to go pee?

Who suits them back up like this for the return trip?

Here they are allegedly in Space right now just hanging out, not in their gear anymore, so I ask again who suits them up for the return trip home?

Or how about this….is this Buzz Aldrin admitting flat out that we never went to the Moon?

Watch here:

And then there’s the fact that we can never get an uncut, live feed of the entire launch from Earth to Space.

Go search, you won’t find one.

Every single video you will find has multiple cuts in it.

We never get to see the full thing, unedited.

Wonder why that is?

And then we just have the practical questions that don’t add up.

I still find it impossible to believe that we went to the Moon from 1969-1972 and then just stopped going.

For over 50 years, we just never bothered to go back.

That would be like discovering North America and then Europe deciding they didn’t really have any interest in exploring it, colonizing it, and expanding their empires.

Folks, that has NEVER happened ever in the history of humanity that we reached a new place, a new discovery, and then just chose to not go there anymore.

Of course, NASA’s Don Pettit explains that the real problem is NASA “lost” the technology.

No joke, watch here:

Look, I’ve lost my car keys, I’ve lost my homework, I even once lost my little sister for a few hours, but you’re telling me that an entire Government Agency with Billions of dollars in budget each year just lost the technology for the most important achievement of mankind?

ADVERTISEMENT

Really?

What, like you taped over the VHS tapes?

Didn’t run the computer backup?

Misplaced the files in your filing cabinet?

You expect me to believe this?

There’s also the fact that technology never moves backwards.

We somehow figured this out back in 1969 and got it right on the very first try too, but now 55 years later we cannot reproduce it?

You do realize Artemis II is not actually landing on the Moon, right?

Isn’t that a little weird?

They’re just going to go joyride around it and then come home, but not actually land on it.

Why?

ADVERTISEMENT

Because NASA is literally not capable of doing that right now.

In 55 years, we someone regressed in technology.

Can anyone explain that?

It would be like this….imagine right now you have your iPhone 17, super powerful, we have AI chatbots that can literally answer any question you ask it, our Teslas drive us automatically anywhere we want to go without touching the wheel or pedals, it’s all pretty wild.  But then imagine we jump forward to 2076, 50 years in the future, and you look around and for some reason the best anyone has is that old Nokia brick phone, no AI chatbots, and the cars have all gone back to 1970s era cars.

Would that make any sense?

Of course not!

But that’s what we’re told we have to believe about NASA and Space exploration.

Sorry folks, I just don’t buy it.

And neither does my man Bart Sibrel.

A few years ago, I had him on my show over on The Daily Truth Report and it was an incredible chat where we went deep on all of this stuff.

If you haven’t seen it yet, you’re in for a real treat:

MOON MAN: Bart Sibrel EXPOSES The Moon Landings

A couple days ago I had the pleasure of getting to sit down with someone who I've followed for a long time.

One of the first people to speak out and say the Moon Landings don't add up....

One of the ONLY people in the world to get punched in the face by Buzz Aldrin....

And one of the best filmmakers out there.

I sat down with Mr. Bart Sibrel and we chatted for over an hour.

The time totally flew by, and I had about 20 additional questions for him that we just didn't have time to get to.

After we had wrapped the interview, Bart commented to me that this interview flew by faster than any others he can remember doing recently, and I felt the same way.

Whether you are a NASA fanboy or a Moon Landing skeptic, I think you're going to enjoy this one.

There's a very real "cult of religion" surrounding the Moon Landings and so I know this is going to really ruffle some feathers.

But it must be discussed because the truth will always rise to the top.

In fact, Bart told me on air that he once came across a professor who said "even if I see Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong get on TV and confess to the world that the Moon Landings were fake, I will still believe they were true!"

Hard to imagine anything more "cultish" and "brainwashed" than that statement, but I know we'll get some of that in the comments below.

Nevertheless, I am talking about this and I had Bart on my show because I believe this is one of the largest conspiracies ever to be covered up.

And you do know that "conspiracy theories" are only "conspiracy" until they are admitted or proven as true, right?

And you do know that MANY have moved from "conspiracy theory" to "proven fact" in the last century, right?

In fact, I recently asked ChatGPT to give me a top 10 list and you might be surprised to see this list of 10 events that were once considered "tin foil hat" conspiracy theories are all now either proven or admitted to be 100% true:

  1. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972): The U.S. Public Health Service conducted an experiment on African American men in Tuskegee, Alabama, allowing syphilis to progress untreated to study its natural history, even after the discovery of penicillin as a cure.
  2. Operation Northwoods (1962): This was a proposed plan by the U.S. Department of Defense to stage false flag acts of terrorism and blame them on Cuba to justify military intervention. The operation was never approved or carried out.
  3. MKUltra (1953-1973): The CIA ran secret mind-control experiments using drugs like LSD, hypnosis, and more on unsuspecting subjects, including U.S. and Canadian citizens.
  4. Operation Paperclip (1945-1959): After WWII, the U.S. government secretly recruited former Nazi scientists, engineers, and technicians, providing them with new identities to benefit from their expertise in various fields.
  5. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964): Originally presented as an unprovoked attack on U.S. naval vessels by North Vietnamese forces, further analysis and declassified information showed that the event was misrepresented, leading to the escalation of the Vietnam War.
  6. COINTELPRO (1956-1971): The FBI's program aimed to surveil, infiltrate, and discredit civil rights and political organizations and their leaders.
  7. Operation Gladio: Post-WWII, NATO-backed secret armies were allegedly involved in terror and provocation operations to discredit leftist groups and stabilize political situations in Europe.
  8. The Iran-Contra Affair (1980s): Senior U.S. officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was then under an arms embargo, and used the proceeds to fund Contra rebels in Nicaragua, violating U.S. law.
  9. The poisoning of alcohol during Prohibition (1920-1933): The U.S. government knowingly allowed the poisoning of industrial alcohols, which bootleggers used to produce drinkable spirits. This led to thousands of deaths.
  10. Operation CHAOS (1967-1974): A covert CIA program to monitor and infiltrate anti-Vietnam War and civil rights groups in the U.S., despite prohibitions against domestic spying.

So now let's talk Moon Landings....

Does that get moved to #1 on the list above at some point in the near future?

I think it might.

When it comes to the Moon Landings, I want to start with something Bart and I discussed....which is the fact that for everyone who thinks the Moon Landings were real, all the doubters used to be you!

We used to be you....

We all grew up hearing about the Moon Landings, looking up at Space and thinking how cool it was that we'd been to the Moon....

A lot of us had the posters on our wall growing up....

We had the Globe in every elementary school classroom growing up and we were taught about the Moon Landings every year in school.

We watched Star Trek and Star Wars and we loved it!

We honored and revered the Astroanuts.

We. Were. You!

But then "A Funny Thing Happened"....

I'll just speak to my situation, but I think this is how it goes for most people.

I started hearing about how there was this group of people who said it never happened.

"INSANE!" we all thought!

But then eventually you decide, ok so what is going on here?

It's so strange, how could they think that?

And then you go down the Rabbit Hole into Wonderland and once you start digging in you realize, hang on, some of this actually doesn't make any sense!

And once you hit that point you often never go back.

It's the famous quote:

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation."

The people who remain in contempt -- holding all doubters in consternation -- never investigate.

And according to that quote, "contempt prior to investigation" is a bar against all information, leaving man in everlasting ignorance.

So if that's you, I challenge you to simply....investigate!

And when you start investigating, you're going to come across two different categories of information.

The first category are what I call the micro-details.

This is stuff like the shadows in the images are all wrong, the flag is not blowing right, there is a lack of stars, one rock has a "C" on it so it looks like it was a movie prop, the dirt is the wrong color, etc.

There is a LOT of evidence in that camp, but that was never conclusive to me.

Every piece of evidence has a counterargument and you can get mired in that back-and-forth all day long.

It's really the second category that seals the deal for me, which is what I call the logical proofs.

And the logical proof is simply this -- without any special training, any tests, any evidence of any kind -- you just simply need your brain and logic, and in order to believe we landed on the Moon in 1969-72, you have to believe the following:

In order to believe we landed on the moon in 1969 you have to believe this simple claim:

That we went 1,000 times FARTHER than we can currently send astronauts today...

50 years ago...

On the first attempt...

With one-millionth the computing power of today's cell phone!

And then the kicker.....then we just never went back!

Each one of those elements has never happened before in human history, let alone all of them at the same time.

Let's break those down...

Currently, even by NASA's own admissions, we cannot send human beings any farther than Low Earth Orbit (where the Space Station is) -- yet, in 1969 we went to the Moon which is 1,000 times farther.  Really?

That was 50 years ago, and so we could do it back then but can't do it now.

So technology went backwards?

That would be like having the Internet in 2023 and then in 2073 the Internet is gone and we're back to computers with no online connection and we're back to using floppy disks.

Technology has never gone backwards like that, ever.

For all the visual learners, this:

Watch this stunning clip here:

Then you have to believe we did it perfectly on the first try!

Amazing!

ADVERTISEMENT

Oh and we vertically landed the rocket on the Moon, meanwhile, it took Elon Musk 5 tries to vertically land a rocket in 2023.  They all kept blowing up!

But we did it perfect, on the first try, thousands of miles away from Earth.

With.....less computing power than we all currently walk around with on our cell phones.

Think of that.

NASA had ONE-MILLIONTH the computing power of our current cell phones.

I can't even get the WiFi to work in my house half the time, meanwhile, with 1/1,000,0000th the computing power, we remotely landed a rocket on the Moon?  And then packed it up and flew it back home again?  Really?

And then the big one....

After all that, we went back a couple times in the 1969-72 range and then we just never went back again for over 50 years and counting.

Really?

That has also never happened in human history.

That's like discovering America in 1492 and then never going back again.

Just decided to let it be!

That ONLY happens if you CAN'T go back again, not because you choose not to.

So to me, it's this logical argument that catches my attention and says something is wrong here, something is very, very wrong here....

And with that, please enjoy my interview with Bart Sibrel, where we go much deeper on all of this.

Watch safely here on Rumble:

And on YouTube here:

If you want more, you need to get Bart's book, "Moon Man".

Bart's book, plus a TON of free resources are all available at his website 👉 https://www.sibrel.com

The best place to get his book is on his website, but if Amazon is more convenient for you you can grab his book Moon Man right here:

Bart is most famously known for his film: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon.

For anyone who believes the moon landings are 100% real and beyond any reproach, I challenge you to watch this 45 minute video and then report back to me.

I've never heard from anyone who has watched this and not had their eyes opened:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdQHKf48Mfw

Backup here (since that will likely get taken down by the Tube):

ADVERTISEMENT

And one more backup here:

Now let's examine the big Press Conference Buzz, Neil and the third guy had when they got back from WALKING ON THE FREAKING MOON!

You'd think they'd have smiles from ear to ear that simply wouldn't wipe off...right?

You know, something like how Sir Edmund Hillary looked after climbing Mount Everest -- see below:

Nope!

Instead they looked like this...☝️

You might say they looked exactly as you or I might look if you had just faked a Moon Landing and deceived and entire nation.

But that's just my take, you be the judge.

Do these look like guys who just walked on the Moon?

ADVERTISEMENT

You can watch the whole solemn press conference here on Rumble -- it's stunning:

So...did Neil and Buzz and the third guy really walk on the Moon?

Well let's talk about Buzz for a second.

Did Buzz Aldrin just admit (again) that the moon landings were faked?

Well, it sure looks like it.

But we'll give you all the evidence and let you decide.

A clip of Buzz Aldrin on Conan O'Brien's Late Night Show from 2000 is suddenly going viral right now thanks to this post on TikTok:

@msmastafoxx

Wait Til The End...🧐 #MsMastaFoXX #MyCreatorLife #Buzz #buzzaldrin #Nasa #Conspiracy #conspiracytiktok #Woketok #Viral #fyp #conanobrien #MoonLanding

♬ original sound - MsMastaFoXX👽CF👁️Neocodeist🧬

In the clip, Buzz pretty clearly says the video of the astronauts walking on the moon was fake.

I don't know how else you interpret that.

I mean, I know this is a comedy show, but nothing about this clip appears to be a joke or a bit.

Even Conan is taken aback and temporarily at a loss for how to respond (and it's his job to never be caught off guard as a talk show host).

So watch the clip for yourself.

And for anyone shouting "CONTEXT!" I've got you covered.

Here is the full interview to watch the segment in context:

The Reuters Fact-Check team has already investigated and determined what you heard Buzz say is totally "False".

Just another one we all got wrong!

God bless the fact-checkers, I don't know where we'd be without them!

So somehow they've labeled this as "False" despite the part I bolded below where they seem to even admit that the footage is, in fact, mostly made of animations.

This is their full report:

Social media users are sharing a video of astronaut Buzz Aldrin being interviewed by American television host Conan O’Brien and claiming that Aldrin discussing parts of the moon landing broadcasts being animated is proof that it was all faked.

He was referring to animations used by broadcasters at the time in their coverage of the moon landing, intercut with real footage. The moon landing did take place and men did walk on the moon.

Examples of the erroneous social media posts can be seen ( here ) and ( here ).

A longer video of the interview, dated May 17, 2000, can be seen on YouTube ( here ).

At the 1:29 mark, O’Brien says: “Let’s talk about this because this is fascinating. I remember very clearly; I think anybody who was alive at the time does. I remember my parents waking me up and we went down, and we watched you guys land on the moon.”

Aldrin responds: “No, you didn’t. Because there wasn’t any television, there wasn’t anybody taking the picture. You watched animation so you associated what you saw with… you heard me talking about, you know, how many feet we’re going to the left and right and then I said contact light, engine stopped, a few other things and then Neil said ‘Houston, tranquility base. The Eagle has landed.’ How about that? Not a bad line.”

The moon landing took place on July 20, 1969 with astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. NASA said in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. However, in 2009 NASA released a complete digital make-over of the original landing footage that clarifies the blurry and grainy images of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the surface of the moon ( here ).

A video compiled by CNN shows the available footage from the mission ( here ), including takeoff and the astronauts climbing down and walking on the moon.

An article ( here ) by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum explains the challenges of recording footage of the moon landing and walking.

NASA contracted with Westinghouse for a black and white camera costing $2.29 million to capture the iconic moment, according to the museum. Photographs of the camera, which was stored in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly near the ladder Armstrong can be seen climbing down, can be seen ( here ).

“For us today, we can thank technicians for having recorded the broadcast, though the tapes assumed to be of the highest quality were never located despite searches for them in the last few decades,” the article reads. “What we see now on YouTube or in films are high definition scans of those best available copies.”

An article by Vox ( here ) says some television networks built sets to recreate some of the moments that were not able to be captured on video.

The National Science and Media Museum discussed the Apollo 11 broadcast on its website ( here ): “Many broadcasters used simulations to flesh out their Apollo programming. Networks paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for scale models of Apollo command modules and rockets. During the broadcast, these were used to create simulations of the mission which were then intercut with real footage.”

“The thing to remember is what news was like in the late 1960’s, not 24-hour continuous coverage,” Margaret Weitekamp, Chair of the Space History Department at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, said by phone. “The coverage of that trip needed to be explained to the public without the ability for continuous relay of video we are now used to.”

“Animations would have been a part of a constellation of different ways that that story was told over a series of days. At the time, the coverage would have been combined with animations that helped provide a broader picture of what was being done. But this certainly doesn’t invalidate that those landings took place.”

There is no evidence that the moon landing was faked or that astronauts did not walk on the moon. However, there is plenty of evidence that it happened. Reports about the landing can be seen ( here ), ( here ) and ( here ).

Photographs of the moon landing can be seen ( here ), ( here ), and ( here ).


,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.