Greg Kelly: Did Merrick Garland Commit Perjury?

Yesterday, Merrick Garland was in the hot seat before Congress.

I know, I know….I can’t stand him either.

Seriously, there are some people who are so filthy, so smarmy, so sanctimonious, and just so plain evil that it’s hard to watch them for too long.

But that’s our job here and I covered it yesterday.

In case you missed it, here’s the FULL video:

But what I really want to show you is this EXCELLENT segment from Greg Kelly last night.

The title says it all — Did Merrick Garland commit perjury?

Greg Kelly thinks he’s found some incredible statements and I agree with him.

Watch here:

In case you’d rather read, I’ve got you covered.

Here’s the full transcript:

I know I’m sick of him to Merrick Garland one day of this stuff, and we’ve been chewing it over and chewing it over and it’s important that we do because I think this man has a big role in bringing down this country potentially on purpose.

Look uh, I saw some things that I don’t think anybody else saw. I’ll get to those in a moment, but we all saw That he was deceptive that he was evasive that he was obnoxious and most of all, sanctimonious, huh? Sanctimonious You know, we hear about Rhonda sanctimonious, which is what we sometimes forget. What is sanctimony mean the action or practice of acting as if one were morally superior to other people. While that Is Merrick Garland. Absolutely.

Take a look. Attorney general, I need a simple yes or no to the following. Just yes or no? Because we don’t have much time . Do you agree that traditional Catholics or violent extremists? Yes or no? Let me answer what you’ve said in that long list of control to answer all of those attorney Jimmy Control With time I’m going to ask you to answer the questions. I controlled time by asking me a substantial number of things and I didn’t ask you those things. I made a statement. Attorney general through the chair, I ask you, Do you agree that traditional Catholics or violent extremists?

I have no idea what you’re what traditional means here. The idea. Let me just go to church. I answer your question. Yes, idea that someone with my family background Discriminate against any religion is so outrageous. So, Absar dude. Well it’s exactly what your FBI did multiple times in multiple cities. What’s he talking about ? His family background? Well kind of to preempt some of this criticism at the outset of the hearing, he told us that he lost his grandmother’s sister in the Holocaust, which is awful. My wife Her ancestors. Plenty of them were lost in the Holocaust . It doesn’t mean she gets to push around Catholics today, and that’s what our DOJ Is doing and I’m sorry. How about a straight answer? He had to be pushed and cajoled into finally saying Not much. Are the extremists or not, attorney general.

I think that the extremists or not, attorney general, that memo is the extremists or not. I’m asking a simple question. Say No. If you think that was wrong, not extremists. No. The question was traditional Catholics are the extremists. I don’t know what traditional means. So he dropped traditional. So let’s say Catholics who do not believe that gay pride flag should be flown over schools, right? Um are we traditional Catholics, right? Does that make us extremists? What’s going on here? This is serious stuff it is and the deceptive nous. Take a look at Kristen Welker’s interview with Donald Trump.

Just for a moment. This is from Sunday. I’m facing for Biden indictments, he told the Justice Department to indict him or America, Garland said. Let’s indict him. So this came up a lot. Was it a Biden ordered indictment? The answer from Merrick Garland, I thought was very revealing. So that statement the president made on Sunday was false. I’m just going to say again that no one has told me who should be indicted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Uh and, uh, in any matter like this, and the decision about indictments made by Mr Smith, no one has told me no one has told me when he first said that I thought, he said, we can’t tell if he’s a matter or manner. I thought it was manner. Whatever Let’s pretend it’s manner for a moment or let’s go with matter.

Um no one told him but the signal was sent. I do believe Joe Biden last year. We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power. By if we if he does run, making sure he, uh, under legitimate efforts of our constitution does not become the next president again. So he’s talking about Donald Trump in November of last year. I know he’s gonna mumble and talking for but we broke it down, and we made a mini transcript of those comments, and they’re rather chilling.

We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power if he does run on making sure he under legitimate efforts of our constitution does not become the next president again. That sure isn’t saying we’re going to beat him at the ballot box, does it? No And this signal was sent America, Ireland . I know. I read it in the newspaper The New York Times they were pressuring him all last year. Garland faces growing pressure on January 6th investigation as it widens and take a look inside that story. He was as recently as late last year, Mr Biden confided to his inner circle that he believed

Load More