Spencer Pratt Calls Out Sketchy 'Coincidence' in Sudden 43,000 Vote Swing: "Seen That Number Before..." | WLT Report Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Spencer Pratt Calls Out Sketchy ‘Coincidence’ in Sudden 43,000 Vote Swing: “Seen That Number Before…”


Spencer Pratt just pointed out a glaring coincidence in the numbers game playing out after election night.

One number in particular stands out — a very particular 43,000 votes.

Days after the primary election for Los Angeles’ race for the next mayor, the ballot counting has resulted in tens of thousands more votes.

And they are still pouring in.

ADVERTISEMENT

The vast majority of those have gone to someone who WAS considered a distant competitor; the little-known Nithya Raman.

Pratt dropped a social media post last night questioning not only Raman’s sudden surge in the polls…

But he very poignantly called attention to those 43,000 votes that suddenly appeared in her favor long after polls had closed.

Because, as he said, he had seen that number somewhere else in regards to Los Angeles, before…:

While Pratt sarcastically quipped that the coincidence is ‘probably nothing’, I’ve learned something over the years.

It doesn’t take long studying the Bible to discover that in God’s universe, COINCIDENCE isn’t a kosher word.

Those 43,000 votes, as Pratt sarcastically pointed out, line up rather circumspectly with the often-noted 43,000 HOMELESS in Los Angeles.

If that’s just a coincidence, it’s a big one.

And that 43,000 net gain for Nithya Raman isn’t some fudged number created by mathematic gymnastics to make it SEEM like it lines up with Los Angeles’ homeless count.

ADVERTISEMENT

It has been articulated in all the election coverage, including this from CNN:

Nithya Raman pulled ahead of former reality TV star Spencer Pratt in the race for the second spot in the November election for Los Angeles mayor after a vote update Sunday evening.

Raman, a city councilmember, won about 40% of the nearly 48,000 votes Los Angeles County reported Sunday, winning 10,000 votes more than Pratt and leaving her about 3,000 votes ahead.

Across all votes reported in the June 2 primary since the close of election night counting, Raman has outperformed both Bass and Pratt, gaining 43,000 votes on Pratt and increasing her overall share of the vote by about 5 points.

Reports this weekend were her strongest of the contest, with Raman winning about 40% of each batch and Pratt around 18%.

California elections often take several days to resolve, a function of the nation’s most populous state running a largely mail-in election in which properly postmarked ballots received up to seven days after Election Day can be counted.

We’ll get more into this later in the story, but it should be noted that Nithya Raman is NOT a well-known personality in Los Angeles.

She’s a city councilmember as was noted in that excerpt from CNN, but she has nowhere near the public visibility of either Pratt or Karen Bass.

ADVERTISEMENT

In case you missed it, President Trump was one of the first to call out the alleged election fraud happening front-and-center in the California primary election.

He dropped this Truth Social post last night, calling out the alleged “cheating”:

Here’s the full text of the President’s post for easier readability:

ADVERTISEMENT
NATIONAL POLL: Who Is The More Beautiful "First Daughter"? image

Has anybody been watching the CROOKED Election going on in California. Two great Republican Candidates are being cheated, and so is America, which if the Dumocrats are able to fulfill their mission, great trouble and consternation will follow. Watch this “Election” closely!!! President DJT

No — that’s not a typo.

The President (once again) called the Democrat politicians “Dumocrats”.

But I’d says they’re being “dumb” like a fox, in California.  And as President Trump noted in that post, if they succeed in stealing yet more elections…

There will be trouble to pay.

And in case you put a lot more stock in those coincidences than I do…

Check this out.

Just three weeks ago the Assistant US Attorney General announced a PLEA DEAL in which homeless people in Los Angeles (remember that 43,000 count???) were being PAID to register to vote:

ADVERTISEMENT

Little wonder, then, that conservatives… Republicans… and really ANYONE who is fixated on election integrity… are all fit to be tied!

It seems we are watching the complete re-run of 2020 happen all over again in California.

And if Spencer Pratt is correct, they’re using Los Angeles’ 43,000 homeless population to help pull it off.

But California’s voting system basically INVITES election corruption with it’s flimsy mail-in voting system, as described in this report by Newsweek:

President Donald Trump and prominent voices in the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement have voiced their fury with California’s elections after Spencer Pratt dropped into third place in the Los Angeles mayoral race.

The slow vote-counting process in California has been under scrutiny since primaries were held last week, in which right-leaning candidates held leads over left-leaning rivals in the initial count in the mayor and governor elections.

In California’s top-two voting system, all candidates are on the same ballot regardless of party, and the top two advance to the general election.

With 83 percent of ballots counted, Raman, is now in second place with 27.1 percent of the vote ahead of Pratt’s 26.7 percent. Bass is on 34.7 percent.

Conservative political commentator Clay Travis said in a post on X: “Five days after the LA election, Spencer Pratt falls to third place and a woman who hardly anyone voted for in person, Nithya Raman, totally dominated in mail voting to come in second. No one with a functional brain believes these results.”

Former Fox News host Monica Crowley said: “Literally no one believes the LA election ‘results.’ Another stolen election in broad daylight. Enough is enough. Pass the SAVE AMERICA ACT or our country is finished.”

I want to draw your attention to that quote from Clay Travis in the story above, in case you skimmed past it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nithya Raman ‘DOMINATED’ the entire mail-in votes.

She didn’t perform anywhere near that good with the in-person voting — so why would a lesser-known candidate completely STOMP all the competition (therefore HELPING Karen Bass’s re-election chances) in the mail-in voting only?

I would suggest THAT is why ‘coincidence’ isn’t a kosher word, in God’s universe.

Because it makes no sense unless you factor in possible corruption.

Still, Spencer Pratt isn’t ready to throw in the towel.

He is urging his supporters to hold the line as “hundreds of thousands” of more votes are yet outstanding:

Nevertheless, Pratt is now in the third-place spot, pushed out by the Raman.

The question is whether or not the DOJ can act on the alleged election corruption in time to impact the outcome of this election.

Or, to put it another way…

Can the Department of Justice do in hindsight what the SAVE America Act SHOULD be doing on the front-end of things?

I don’t think we need one more reason for Sen. Thune to follow through on getting President Trump’s SAVE Act passed.

But if we did, this would be it.



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!