Trump Administration Moves To Lock Down Federal Leaks With New Government-Wide NDA

President Trump’s administration is moving to plug the leak problem that has plagued federal agencies since day one of this term.

The Office of Personnel Management announced a proposed standardized nondisclosure agreement template for federal employees and contractors who handle sensitive government information. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 27 and comments are due by June 26, 2026.

The move comes after a string of damaging unauthorized disclosures that put lives at risk and undermined enforcement operations. Leaks related to immigration enforcement plans, a U.S. action overseas, and the doxxing of ICE employees made it painfully clear that existing accountability mechanisms were not enough.

OPM also pointed to unauthorized disclosures of internal government materials, including pre-decisional documents and interagency comments. The agency said those disclosures can disrupt orderly decision-making and weaken trust inside the government.

As OPM stated in its release:

That last point is important because the usual suspects will immediately claim this is designed to silence brave truth-tellers.

OPM has explicitly stated that lawful disclosures and protected whistleblower disclosures remain fully intact under the proposed agreement.

What the NDA targets is the unauthorized leaking of confidential government information outside lawful channels. There is a world of difference between a whistleblower following proper legal channels and a disgruntled bureaucrat texting a reporter to undermine a policy they personally oppose.

As FedSmith explained, the current patchwork of agency-specific confidentiality policies has created gaps and inconsistencies across the federal workforce. A standardized template would establish a clear, uniform expectation for every employee and contractor with access to sensitive material.

The proposal is a template now open for public comment.

If finalized, individual agencies would have discretion over implementation.

That matters because the Federal Register notice frames the form as an optional government-wide tool, not a same-day order to every federal worker.

The direction is unmistakable.

The Trump administration is telling the federal workforce that leaking sensitive information will carry real consequences.

The leak culture inside Washington did not develop overnight.

For years, anonymous sources inside government agencies have fed corporate media outlets with internal fights, policy drafts, and operational details.

This time around, the administration is not waiting for the next damaging disclosure to act. The NDA proposal is a structural fix, not a reaction to a single scandal.

Reuters framed the move as part of the administration’s broader push to stop leaks to journalists:

Trump administration proposes NDAs for federal workers to crack down on leaks to journalists http://reut.rs/49YWDDh http://reut.rs/49YWDDh

— Reuters (@Reuters) May 26, 2026

The comment period through the Federal Register gives the public and federal employees until June 26 to weigh in. Expect the usual coalition of media lawyers and government employee unions to oppose it loudly.

The rest of the country, which expects federal workers to protect sensitive information rather than weaponize it for political purposes, will likely see it differently.

OPM posted the announcement directly on X:

OPM released a proposed NDA template for federal employees and contractors handling sensitive government information. The proposal strengthens accountability and safeguards sensitive data while fully preserving whistleblower protections under federal law. Read the release here: https://www.opm.gov/news/news-releases/opm-prepares-nda-for-federal-employees/

— U.S. Office of Personnel Management (@USOPM) May 26, 2026

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management announced the proposal this way:

OPM issued a template nondisclosure agreement for public comment.

The template is aimed at federal employees and contractors who handle sensitive government information.

OPM said the covered material includes personally identifiable information, operational plans, personnel records, and other protected information.

The agency tied the proposal to recent unauthorized disclosures involving planned immigration enforcement operations.

ADVERTISEMENT

OPM also cited confidential operational details disclosed before a U.S. action overseas.

The agency pointed to personal information belonging to about 4,500 ICE employees that was released without authorization.

If finalized, the template could become an official government form that agencies may use during onboarding.

OPM Director Scott Kupor said private-sector workers who handle sensitive business or customer information routinely sign confidentiality agreements.

Kupor said the federal government should not be held to a lower standard.

OPM said the template remains consistent with federal whistleblower protections and lawful disclosures of waste, fraud, abuse, or misconduct.

The Federal Register notice laid out the formal comment process and scope:

The Federal Register notice was published May 27, 2026.

ADVERTISEMENT

The document is titled Confidential Government Information Nondisclosure Agreement.

It requests comment on a draft NDA for use by federal agencies with both new and existing employees.

The comment deadline is June 26, 2026.

OPM defines confidential government information as non-public, confidential, or proprietary information.

That includes internal agency operations, personnel matters, procurement processes, and sensitive pre-decisional or deliberative material.

The notice says the proposal does not create new substantive restrictions on employee speech or disclosure rights.

It says the NDA expressly preserves disclosures authorized by law, including protected whistleblower disclosures.

OPM expects the form to be optional, meaning agencies would have discretion whether to use it.

The notice asks for public comment on scope, clarity, privacy notice, agency actions if employees refuse to sign, and whether the form clearly explains potential consequences.

FedSmith explained what the proposal means for the federal workforce:

OPM is considering a government-wide NDA aimed at stopping leaks and unauthorized disclosures.

Agencies would have discretion to require employees to sign the template if it is adopted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whizzco

New hires could complete the form as part of onboarding.

Current employees could be asked to sign when moving into a new position or role.

The proposal goes beyond classified national-security information.

The form would also cover non-public internal information, including agency operations, personnel issues, procurement matters, and deliberative materials.

Federal employees already face several layers of nondisclosure obligations.

Those include Standard Form 312 for classified material and agency-specific agreements for controlled unclassified information.

Existing agreements can also cover controlled unclassified information, procurement-sensitive material, and certain highly sensitive internal projects.

That makes the proposed template broader than some current narrow agreements, while still operating inside existing federal disclosure law.

NDA language must preserve whistleblower rights for disclosures to Congress, Inspectors General, or the Office of Special Counsel.

The Associated Press added the broader leak-crackdown framing:

The Trump administration wants current and future federal employees to sign nondisclosure agreements as part of a crackdown on media leaks.

The proposal was announced Tuesday on OPM’s website.

It was expected to be officially published in the Federal Register on Wednesday.

The draft NDA would be used by federal agencies for both new and existing employees.

The notice seeks public comment on whether the NDA should cover only unclassified information.

It also asks what actions agencies should consider if new or current employees choose not to sign.

The broader fight is simple.

The administration says sensitive information should not be leaked through unauthorized channels.

Critics are already framing the proposal as a speech fight.

OPM says lawful whistleblower disclosures remain protected.

The public-comment process gives the administration, federal workers, and outside groups a formal venue to fight over the details before the form is finalized.