President Trump Pulls The National Guard From Chicago, LA and Portland -- But There's A GREAT TWIST! | WLT Report Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

President Trump Pulls The National Guard From Chicago, LA and Portland — But There’s A GREAT TWIST!

33.6k views

President Trump just announced on TruthSocial that despite tremendous decreases in crime, he is pulling the National Guard from Chicago, Los Angeles and Portland.

Full announcement here:

But if you even slightly read between the lines, you can see he’s telegraphing exactly what will come next….

ADVERTISEMENT

Crime will rise again.

And per the directions he just received from the Supreme Court, he will then send in the Military under the authority of the Insurrection Act and he will then SWIFLY clean these cities up!

The blue state Governors vastly overplayed their hands.

BioClandestine nails it here:

🔥HOLY SHIT🔥

Trump just said he is removing the National Guard from Chicago, LA, and Portland, but says “we will come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form”.

HE IS TALKING ABOUT SENDING IN ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY VIA THE INSURRECTION ACT!!!

This comes after the Supreme Court ruling in Trump Admin v. Chicago, where they ruled that Trump was not allowed to send NG troops to Chicago to defend federal buildings, but Kavanaugh outlined in his opinion that Trump would be allowed to send Active Duty US MIL into Chicago via the Insurrection Act.

We are one step closer to Trump invoking the Insurrection Act!

ADVERTISEMENT

One (very big) step closer to the Insurrection Act indeed!

Before you go, check out this AWESOME new shirt we just made!

FREEDOM IN JESUS’ NAME!

Grab one here if you want:

RELATED REPORT:

Supreme Court Just Gave President Trump The Roadmap!

Earlier today, I told you the Supreme Court issued President Trump a rare defeat.

ADVERTISEMENT

In case you missed it, you can see that full report here:

BREAKING: Supreme Court Hands President Trump BIG 6-3 DEFEAT — But Gives The Path To Fix It

But now I want to focus more on what they telegraphed to him amidst that defeat.

Basically this:  "SCOTUS: Hey Donald, just declare the Insurrection Act and you're golden!"

Holy shit I think it’s actually happening.

I am reading through the Supreme Court ruling in Trump vs. Illinois, and they ruled that Trump needs to invoke the Insurrection Act in order to send the troops into Chicago.

Kavanaugh in his dissent even says that this ruling “could cause the President to use the US military more than the National Guard”.

The Supreme Court just admitted that Trump has the authority to invoke the Insurrection Act to bypass Posse Comitatus and send the troops to Chicago, and any other city he wants.

Trump tried to exhaust every legal avenue possible before resulting to the Insurrection Act, but the Dems resisted and refused to cooperate.

Sounds to me like Trump just got the green light. INVOKE THE INSURRECTION ACT!

More:

ADVERTISEMENT

Can you see it now?

And to anyone who says he can't do that, I'm sorry but you're just wrong.

He has WIDE discretion:

So get ready folks, this is coming extremely soon!

Two things need to happen very early on in 2026:  (1) the Insurrection Act and (2) Nuke the Filibuster!

RELATED REPORT:

President Trump Just Called The Ball — Get Ready For The Insurrection Act!

Folks, it's about to go down...

Everything we've waited for over the last 10 years is about to pop off, and I am NOT exaggerating.

We're about to see President Trump invoke the Insurrection Act and step in with full authority and clean house.  EVERYTHING.  All the traitorous, treasonous people who hate this Country and are trying their best to destroy it from within.....

ADVERTISEMENT

President Trump has tried every other avenue available to him, and the Deep State is so diseased and so entrenched that nothing but the nuclear option is viable at this point.

And when faced with the choice of turning a blind eye to "keep the peace" or wrapping the band-aid off to save this Country, President Trump will chose the latter option.

CHECK THAT: he already has chosen the latter option, because he just told us today on TruthSocial, and I'm going to prove it to you.

It all starts with this report that we brought you yesterday:

SHOCKING: Elected Democrats Tell the Military to Ignore Trump’s Orders — This Is TREASON?

You can see I posed the question: "Is This Treason?"

Well, as I have confirmed many times over the years, I know President Trump reads WLT Report and he clearly read this article was started responding to it directly on TruthSocial.

Is it Treason?

POTUS made VERY clear how he answers that question, take a look:

So that's pretty clear I would say...."Seditious behavior from traitors!"

While that post ended with a question: "Lock them up??" the next post immediately upped the ante, making clear POTUS does not believe prison is sufficient.

POTUS says Sedition and Treason is punishable by DEATH:

I told you, President Trump is NOT joking around.  And he's done playing their games.  He will soon declare the Insurrection Act and swiftly and decisively round them all up and clean this all up.  It must be done.  Or we lose our Country.

He knows the time is now.

This is his legacy....

As he is heading into his 80s and doesn't have much time left, and as he is in his Second (Third?) term, he knows the timing is perfect.  It's now or never.

I quite literally believe he was born for this.

The weight of the world rests on his shoulders as does the fate of this Country, and deploying the nuclear option will not be easy.   You think they fight him now?  This will be all out war, literally and figuratively.

They will try to impeach him again.

It will get very ugly.

ADVERTISEMENT

I truly believe only President Trump could navigate what is about to come, and even for him it will press him to the limits.

Back to TruthSocial for another post:

QUOTE: "An example must be set."

Arrest them and put them on trial.

Yes!

He is 100% right.

If a SEVERE example is not set, and yet that might include execution for Treason, this will NEVER stop.

To be very clear, I am not calling for violence or riots or mob justice, I am simply calling for REAL JUSTICE.  I am simply calling for our Chief Law Enforcement Officer in this Country, POTUS, to enforce the very clear laws we have in this Country and save our Nation.

Now if all of that wasn't clear, next came the ReTruths....

Starting with this:

ADVERTISEMENT

Quote: "Hang them George Washington would !!"

That was reposted by POTUS.

He's not wrong, I don't believe for one second George Washington would have stood for any of this.

Executions for Treason may be the only penalty severe enough to stop this from ever happening again.  Televised live on TV.

Again, I want to be clear that is not me, Noah, calling for that. I am REPORTING that President Trump just reposted that, seemingly giving it his agreement.

But maybe that was just one, right?

Just a one-off?

No.

How about four more:

Karoline Leavitt also weighed in:

Folks, right now we're in the final stages of the biggest game of chicken you've ever seen in your life.

EVERYONE knows what is coming next....

Trump knows...

The Democrats know....

I know...

And as BioClandestine rightly points out, the Democrats are telling you they know by how much they are panicking right now and melting down:

So true!

They know it's coming.

They know they can't stop it.

Also spot on:

I'll end with this video which I thought was excellent, but which might be down by the time you read this.

Not sure why, but this guy often deletes his videos later after he posts them, not sure why.

But if this is up, it's a great summary:

And I'll end with this....

Just remember, I've been telling you this was coming for months and now we're in the final stretch.

In fact, I would go as far as to say that the massive Stock Market and Crypto selloff we experienced today is directly tied to this.

When you have the POTUS openly talking about hanging people and executing them for Treason, the markets will freak out!  The markets know a time of extreme uncertainty is coming and the markets do not like uncertainty.

So I believe that's exactly why we saw the massive selloff today, and why I think more is coming.

(SPOILER ALERT: buying opportunity of a lifetime)

WATCH: President Trump Is Telling You The Insurrection Act Is Coming!

President Trump is telling you about as clearly as he can that invoking the Insurrection Act is coming soon!

Notice how every time he talks about the ANTIFA thugs in Portland he constantly refers to them as "Insurrectionists"...

He is building a case and getting that word and concept out into the public square so people are not caught off guard when he invokes the Insurrection Act.

After all, if people hear about "Insurrectionists" destroying our great cities for month after month, and then President Trump finally steps in to take action and clean things up by invoking the "Insurrection Act" it will make a lot of sense.

Watch this short clip from just this morning:

I'm not the only one picking up on this...

Check out what BioClandestine also posted today:

RELATED REPORT:

UPDATE: President Trump and Invoking The Insurrection Act

I think many of you are connecting the dots extremely well right now, but for anyone wondering "what is happening" I want to fill in the gaps.

Because I think it's pretty clear exactly where we are going.

With the indictment of James Comey, raid and likely future indictment of John Bolton, and likely a lot more to follow, plus the deployment of troops to major blue cities across America, it seems fairly obvious that something BIG is coming.

And all credit to BioClandestine who I think put forth some excellent analysis and explanation on where we are going.

Trump’s plan is genius.

POTUS technically does not need to invoke the Insurrection Act to send US Military to defend federal property, it’s considered a federal function, NOT local policing.

So Trump can move troops to ICE facilities, have forces in place preemptively, then if he chooses to invoke the Insurrection Act, troops will already be in position, on standby.

The Insurrection Act would be needed if US MIL were to be engaged in riot control, general law enforcement, or quelling rebellion not on federal property.

Trump is putting himself in position so that if he does choose to invoke the Insurrection Act, he already has troops in place at areas of need, and can flip the switch at any moment from defense to offense.

My guess is that the decision is already made. Trump is getting his ducks in a row before he strikes, which is generally his modus operandi.

Battles are won before they begin.

And part 2:

For argument’s sake, let’s assume Trump and his administration end up following through with high-profile arrests of Deep State actors for treason/sedition.

There is a high probability that there would be some form of public backlash. The MSM will make their sheep riot.

Wouldn’t it make sense to have some sort of standing deterrent on-hand to deal with any uprisings or rebellion? Wouldn’t it be necessary to have security in place BEFORE any high-profile arrests can be made?

Food for thought as Trump begins to move US MIL troops to cities nationwide while high-profile actors like Comey are beginning to be indicted.

Some stars are aligning if you watch the moves on the chess board. Trump is setting the stage to save the Republic.

Makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

More confirmation here:

INSURRECTION ACT: President Trump Just Told You What’s Coming Next

President Trump just posted this to TruthSocial:

FULL TEXT:

The Federal Government, under my auspices as President of the United States of America, has stepped into the complete criminal mess that was Washington, D.C., our Nation's Capital. Because of this, D.C. has gone from one of the most dangerous and murder ridden cities in the U.S.A., and even around the World, to one of the safest - In just a few weeks. The "place" is absolutely booming, with restaurants, stores, and businesses packed and, for the first time in decades, virtually NO CRIME. It has been a beautiful thing to watch but, now, under pressure from the Radical Left Democrats, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has presided over this violent criminal takeover of our Capital for years, has informed the Federal Government that the Metropolitan Police Department will no longer cooperate with ICE in removing and relocating dangerous illegal aliens. If I allowed this to happen, CRIME would come roaring back. To the people and businesses of Washington, D.C., DON'T WORRY, I AM WITH YOU, AND WON'T ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. I'll call a National Emergency, and Federalize, if necessary!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!! President DJT

Ok so what does it all mean?

Very simply, he is putting all 50 states on notice that one way or another he is going to clean up the cesspools of crime and violence in this country.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Mayors and Governors can either work together with him or he will do it himself -- through the Insurrection Act.

This was already in play, but after the Charlie Kirk assassination I believe all restraints are off and our President has very little patience left.

WarClandestine agrees:

If you've been around here for a while, you know I've been telling you this was coming:

CHICAGO IS NEXT: President Trump About To Invoke The Insurrection Act?

In less than two weeks, President Trump has nearly entirely cleaned up Washington, DC.

And I keep telling you he's getting ready to roll out that model to about 20 other major US cities.

In fact, I wrote about it pretty extensively right here:

Trump is Setting the Stage…

As usual, our reporting is spot on and President Trump himself basically just told you again that he is going to Chicago next.

He just posted this to TruthSocial today:

But....how would that work?

And would it be legal?

Yes, there is a legal framework for doing it.  It's rarely used, but a good case can be made that it fits here.

I actually told you about it a few months ago right here:

REPORTS: President Trump Is Planning To Invoke The Insurrection Act!

Ok, buckle up folks because I've got a LOT to unpack here....

A lot of rumors are flying about what President Trump will or won't do soon, and most of it centers around rumors that he will soon invoke these 18th century Presidential Powers like the "Wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1978" or the "Insurrection Act of 1807".

We covered the first one earlier today:

President Trump Will Invoke Wartime Alien Enemies Act Of 1798

Now I want to dig into the other one, because they are, in fact, two totally different things, but rumors are flying about both and I'm seeing a lot of people conflating the two.

Here's a quick summary:

Alien Enemies Act of 1798
  • Enacted: Part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, signed into law on July 6, 1798, by President John Adams.
  • Purpose: Allows the President to apprehend, restrain, and deport "alien enemies" (non-citizens from a country the U.S. is at war with) during a declared war.
  • Key Features: It applies only in wartime, targeting foreign nationals deemed a threat to national security. It does not involve military deployment domestically against U.S. citizens.
  • Current Status: Still technically in effect (codified in 50 U.S.C. § 21-24), though rarely used. It was notably invoked during World War I and World War II (e.g., internment of Japanese, German, and Italian nationals).
Insurrection Act
  • Enacted: Originally passed in 1807, with significant amendments over time (e.g., 1871 during Reconstruction).
  • Purpose: Authorizes the President to deploy federal military forces or federalize state militias within the U.S. to suppress insurrections, rebellions, or domestic violence when local authorities cannot maintain order.
  • Key Features: Focuses on domestic unrest, not foreign nationals. It can be used in peacetime or wartime and involves military action against U.S. citizens or residents if necessary.
  • Current Status: Codified in 10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255, it remains in effect and has been invoked in cases like the 1992 Los Angeles riots.
Key Differences
  1. Scope: The Alien Enemies Act targets foreign nationals during wartime; the Insurrection Act addresses domestic unrest, regardless of citizenship.
  2. Military Use: The Insurrection Act explicitly involves military intervention, while the Alien Enemies Act focuses on detention and deportation without necessarily requiring military force.
  3. Trigger: The Alien Enemies Act requires a declared war; the Insurrection Act can be triggered by civil disorder or rebellion, even absent a formal war.

Rumors have swirled since the "Summer of Love" in 2020 that President Trump would invoke the Insurrection Act:

And quite frankly?  I think he should have during all the BLM and ANTIFA chaos.

That's exactly what it was made for.

But President Trump exercised extreme restraint and did not use it.

That's our first clue as to whether or not President Trump might use it now in 2025....if he didn't use it when BLM and ANTIFA were burning down major US Cities, is it likely he will use it now?  It could surely happen, but let's just say I'm not fully convinced.

But Liberals are melting down:

So why is this coming up now?

Because of an Executive Order signed by President Trump on his first day in office back on January 20th titled: "DECLARING A NATIONAL EMERGENCY AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER OF THE UNITED STATES".

In that Executive Order was this paragraph:

(b) Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a joint report to the President about the conditions at the southern border of the United States and any recommendations regarding additional actions that may be necessary to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.

So to be fair, the Democrats aren't freaking out for no reason....it turns out they actually read the Executive Order -- or at least one person did and then it started going viral.

And that 90 day period is up on April 20th, but that's just the deadline -- it could happen earlier.  In fact, the report could already be on President Trump's desk, we don't know for sure.

Fox News had more analysis:

On his first day back in office, the president signed a litany of executive orders, including one declaring a state of emergency at the southern border.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the order, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security have 90 days to submit a report about the conditions at the border and any recommended actions that need to be taken to secure, "including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807."

Here’s what the act is, and what it could mean if invoked:

What is the Insurrection Act of 1807?
Dig deeper:
The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails requires the president to request that the participants disperse.

Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice, told The Associated Press it’s an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement.

"It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore," he added.

It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes.

VP Vance Delivers Remarks at U.S.-Mexico Border
Vice President JD Vance toured the U.S.-Mexico border Wednesday, meeting with law enforcement to highlight immigration policies that the White House says have led to fewer arrests since Trump’s second term. Accompanied by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard, Vance is among the highest-ranking Republicans to visit the border. After a helicopter tour of Eagle Pass, they visited a Border Patrol facility and joined a roundtable discussion.

Past use of the Insurrection Act
The backstory:
Presidents have issued a total of 40 proclamations invoking the law, some of those done multiple times for the same crisis, Nunn said. Lyndon Johnson invoked it three times — in Baltimore, Chicago and Washington — in response to the unrest in cities after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968.

During the Civil Rights era, Presidents Johnson, John F. Kennedy and Dwight Eisenhower used the law to protect activists and students desegregating schools. Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, to protect Black students integrating Central High School after that state’s governor activated the National Guard to keep the students out.

George H.W. Bush was the last president to use the Insurrection Act, a response to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of the white police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King in an incident that was videotaped.

Could Trump invoke the Insurrection Act?
Almost anything and everything is on the table during a Trump presidency.

Big picture view:
He’s already fired top Pentagon officials and military lawyers, leading some critics to say the firings are an ominous sign, given that Trump has long made clear his desire to involve the military in his domestic policy goals, including his crackdown on immigration.

In Congress, which has the power to restrict the use of military force through funding and other authorizations, Republicans are largely on board with Trump’s plans.

The other side:
Democrats in Congress tried to update presidential powers like the Insurrection Act before Trump’s second term but found little success.

That left them instead issuing dire warnings that Trump now has fewer guardrails on how he could use the military. He has shown an ability to bend institutions to his goals, from a Supreme Court willing to reconsider long-standing interpretations of presidential powers to a military scrubbed of officers and leaders likely to push back on his plans.

Newsweek had more on what we're hearing from key figures:

What People Are Saying

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, in a recent statement: "The drop in illegal border crossings has been fantastic: 95% since President Trump took office. We'll keep our military at the border until it is entirely closed."

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, on X, formerly Twitter, on Monday: "In February, there were just 8,326 apprehensions at the U.S. Mexico border. That is lowest number in recorded history. President @realDonaldTrump has delivered a powerful message and the world is taking notice: America's borders are CLOSED to lawbreakers."

President Donald Trump, in a March 4 address to Congress: "The territory to the immediate south of our border is now dominated entirely by criminal cartels that murder, rape, torture and exercise total control. They have total control over a whole nation. posing a grave threat to our national security."

Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian and political commentator, on X on Friday: "Americans, Trump is apparently now considering the invocation of the Insurrection Act. He has asked Hegseth & Noem to weigh in on the issue. Autocrats use such measures to speed power consolidation, repress protests and demonstrate force to the world."

White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Politico in February: "After four years of a lackadaisical approach to border security and immigration, every lever of executive power is now being marshaled to enforce our laws, mass deport criminal illegal immigrants, safeguard our borders, and put American citizens first."

Brett Wagner, a retired professor of national security decision making for the U.S. Naval War College, in an opinion piece in the San Francisco Chronicle on Wednesday: "Many of us are now holding our collective breath, knowing that the report and what it contains could put us on the slippery slope toward unchecked presidential power under a man with an affinity for ironfisted dictators."

Here's a deeper analysis on how likely this is to happen:

What It Would Take for Trump to Invoke the Insurrection Act

The Insurrection Act (codified in 10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255) grants the president broad authority to deploy federal troops under certain circumstances. Below is an organized overview of the conditions, practical scenarios, administrative steps, political justification, and the likelihood analysis regarding its potential invocation by Trump.

Legal Triggering Conditions

For the Act to be invoked, the president must determine that an “insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy” exists. This determination typically falls into one of two categories:

  • State-Requested Intervention (§ 251):
    When a state is unable to enforce its own laws and formally requests federal assistance from its legislature or governor.

  • Federal Law Enforcement Impediment (§ 252–253):
    When domestic disturbances hinder the execution of federal laws or infringe on constitutional rights to the extent that ordinary judicial processes become impracticable.

Additional Note:
No formal congressional approval is required; however, the president must issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse before deploying troops (§ 254).

Practical Scenarios

Several potential scenarios might provide a pretext for invoking the Act:

  • Border Security Crisis:

    • Trump’s administration has underscored a southern border emergency.
    • An executive order mandates a report from the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security within 90 days (due around April 20, 2025).
    • Should the report cite overwhelming illegal migration or violence (e.g., cartel-related unrest) as an "unlawful obstruction" to federal immigration law, it could justify invoking the Act.

  • Widespread Protests or Riots:

    • Significant civil unrest, such as mass protests against Trump’s policies (immigration crackdowns, tariffs, or D.E.I. rollbacks), could be portrayed as an insurrection if it disrupts federal operations or state governance.

  • State Resistance:

    • If a state—such as sanctuary cities resisting federal immigration enforcement—refuses to comply with federal directives, it might be argued that this obstruction necessitates military intervention.

Administrative Steps

The decision-making process would likely involve several key actions:

  • Consultation:

    • Trump would consult with key advisors (e.g., Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz) and review the outcomes of the border report.

  • Proclamation and Deployment:

    • A public proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse would be issued.
    • This would be followed by the deployment of active-duty military or federalized National Guard units.

Political Justification

To justify such a drastic measure, Trump would need to frame it as a necessary response to a crisis:

  • Rhetorical Framing:
    • Emphasizing "law and order" and national security, as seen in his March 4, 2025, congressional address.
  • Selling to the Base and Public:
    • The move would be presented as decisive leadership during a time of crisis, aligning with his history of strong executive actions.

Historical Precedents

  • 1992 Los Angeles Riots:
    • The Act was invoked during the riots under President George H.W. Bush.
  • Enforcement of Desegregation (1957):
    • President Eisenhower also relied on the Act to enforce desegregation.

While the threshold is not exceedingly high, historical uses of the Act have been tied to acute, visible disorder.

Likelihood Analysis

Supporting Factors

  • Border Focus:

    • Early executive orders and the upcoming border report might provide a tailored justification if they highlight significant disorder linked to migration.

  • Historical Precedent and Advisory Support:

    • Trump’s consideration of the Act during the 2020 George Floyd protests, coupled with recent Pentagon purges and consultations with hawkish advisors, indicates a readiness to flex executive power.

  • Political Climate:

    • With a Republican-controlled Congress and strong base support, there is less immediate legislative pushback against a decisive, albeit controversial, action.

Countervailing Factors

  • Lack of an Acute Crisis:

    • As of March 12, 2025, there are no widespread insurrections or riots on the scale of previous events (e.g., the 1992 LA riots).

  • Judicial Oversight:

    • The potential for federal courts to intervene if the use of the Act appears disproportionate or politically motivated.

  • Congressional and Public Reaction:

    • While some Republicans may support such a move, moderates and Democrats could mobilize against perceived overreach, particularly if public opinion (as per recent polls) favors addressing economic issues over security theater.

  • Military Reluctance:

    • There may be internal military resistance to deploying troops domestically, especially given sensitivities following January 6, 2021.

Probability Assessment

  • Short-Term (Next 3 Months):

    • Moderate Likelihood (40–50% chance):
      The outcome of the border report is pivotal. Should it provide a clear justification tied to specific incidents, action might be taken by May 2025. In the absence of a clear crisis, however, Trump is likely to refrain.

  • Longer-Term (Within the First Year):

    • Higher Likelihood (60–70% chance):
      If his policies continue to provoke protests or state defiance, Trump may find sufficient pretext to invoke the Act as part of a broader strategy to expand executive power.

Critical Perspective and Conclusion

The narrative in mainstream media (e.g., NYT, WaPo) suggests that Trump’s flirtation with the Insurrection Act borders on authoritarian overreach. While his supporters may view it as decisive leadership, the truth seems to be opportunistic rather than premeditated. The upcoming border report is critical; a mild report may keep this hypothetical, whereas an alarmist one could significantly increase the odds.

In summary:
For Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act, a plausible crisis—whether at the border or in the form of civil unrest—must emerge, providing both legal and political justification. Presently, the necessary groundwork (executive orders, loyal advisors, and a supportive base) is in place, but no definitive crisis has materialized. The likelihood is moderate in the near term, with potential to rise if conditions change.

I actually first warned you about this nearly a year ago...

We were one of the first outlets to even cover this idea.

ADVERTISEMENT

See here from early 2024:

Biden Panicked That Trump Will Invoke The Insurrection Act” — Here’s What That Actually Means

ADVERTISEMENT

Biden Panicked That Trump Will Invoke The Insurrection Act" -- Here's What That Actually Means

We've heard a lot about "Insurrection" over the last 3 years...

Way more than I ever care to hear for the rest of my life.

A made up and fake "scandal" designed to divert your attention from the truth.

Basically, this meme:

But while we've heard copious amounts of talk about "acts of insurrection" we haven't heard much about the "Insurrection Act".

Two very different things.

I'm going to explain the "Insurrection Act" to you in just a moment, but first let me show you this very angry, panicked video from a recent Biden speech.

If you ask me, they know what's coming and they are terrified:

Biden says that “Trump plans to invoke the Insurrection Act which will allow him to deploy US military forces on the streets of America.”

This panic-ridden speech is absolutely hilarious. It’s so cartoonish that they are either scared to death of what’s to come or they are purposely sabotaging themselves.

Cartoonish is absolutely right.

Just look at how his face contorts with anger and evil, that's some wild stuff!

But back to the topic at hand, why is Joe Biden so panicked about President Trump using the Insurrection Act?

Let me explain....

Trump May Deploy "Ironic" 1795 Law To Clean Up America

Occam's Razor says that the simplest answer is usually correct.

Elon Musk often jokes that the most "ironic" outcome is usually the most likely to occur.

And he might just be right on this one.

What is the one word the Crooked Media and Crooked Congress has tried to sink President Trump with since January 2021?

"Insurrection"

In that context, people afraid that President Trump will win again (big league) in 2024, have tried to use the "Insurrection Clause" of the 14th Amendment to bar him from the ballot:

  1. Prohibition Against Holding Office: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that no person shall hold any office, civil or military, under the United States or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

Of course we know that's completely bogus, but did you know there is actually a different law on the books from 1795 called The Insurrection Act?

ADVERTISEMENT

Totally different thing, and the irony above all ironies is that President Trump may deploy it on Day 1 of his Presidency to clean up America:

The Insurrection Act of 1795 is a United States federal law that empowers the President to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in specific circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion. The key aspects of this act include:

  1. Authorization for Use: The Act allows the President to use the armed forces to address an insurrection in any state which requests it, or in situations where it's necessary to enforce federal law.
  2. Conditions for Deployment: Before deploying troops, the President must first issue a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse within a limited time. If the situation does not resolve after this proclamation, the President can then use military force.
  3. Historical Context: Enacted in 1795, the law was a response to the Whiskey Rebellion, a 1794 uprising against federal tax collections in western Pennsylvania.
  4. Subsequent Amendments: The Act has been amended several times, most notably by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States.
  5. Modern Usage: The Insurrection Act has been invoked on several occasions throughout history, including during the Los Angeles riots in 1992 and in response to Hurricane Hugo in 1989.

America has become a third world country.

Our major cities are not even safe to walk in any more.

Have you seen this from Chicago?

Or this filth from New York?

https://twitter.com/Rob1865_/status/1729523513147461731

Or this TERRIFYING attack on a woman in Chicago?

Time to clean it up, and President Trump is just the man to do it.

Here is The Associated Press:

“You look at these great cities Los Angeles, San Francisco you look at what’s happening to our country… We cannot let it happen any longer. And one of the other things I’ll do.. Because you know you’re supposed to not be involved in that you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in…

The next time, I’m not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it, and we’re going to show how bad a job they do,” he added.

You can see the clip in this speech at the 1:50:00 mark -- the play button should cue it up right to that spot:

Here's more from the Associated Press on how it may play out:

The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails merely requires the president to request that the participants disperse.

“The principal constraint on the president’s use of the Insurrection Act is basically political, that presidents don’t want to be the guy who sent tanks rolling down Main Street,” said Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice. “There’s not much really in the law to stay the president’s hand.”

A spokesman for Trump’s campaign did not respond to multiple requests for comment about what authority Trump might use to pursue his plans.

Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Nunn said it's an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement.

“It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore,” he said.

It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes.

Trump has spoken openly about his plans should he win the presidency, including using the military at the border and in cities struggling with violent crime. His plans also have included using the military against foreign drug cartels, a view echoed by other Republican primary candidates such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley, the former U.N. ambassador and South Carolina governor.

What do you think?

Here's something else that's very interesting....

Apparently, AI was asked what would have happened if President Trump had used the Insurrection Act back in January of 2020 before he left office....

ADVERTISEMENT

The answer?

It would have destroyed the country.

In other words, this is EXACTLY why we had to have the 3-year "Pause".

President Trump Once Again Explains “The Pause” — This Time In More Detail

WOW: AI Confirmed The Insurrection Act Would Have Destroyed The Country

This is really interesting...

Yes, this is from the Charlie Ward show, but let me explain.

I've been fairly public over the years of saying I'm not a big fan of Charlie Ward and I'm a much lesser fan of Simon Parkes.

But I do really like Juan O'Savin (which I'm sure is not his real name).

I do believe Juan is not just a casual observer, I believe he's probably someone very connected, which I assume from the way he speaks.

Just my two cents.

I also really appreciate his Biblical world view.

Even in this interview he tells people to not "follow a guru" but to get a direct connection to "Our Father in Heaven".

And he's made many comments in the past that lead me to believe that's a Biblical, Christian view of God and not what these evil Elites think of their "gods".

But anyway, back to the interview.

Juan was on with Charlie Ward and Simon Parkes and while I d0n't put too much stock in what they say, I did find the interview fascinating.

And most of it was Juan speaking.

This is an entirely new interview, so even if you've heard some of his recent interviews there is a lot new in here.

Perhaps the most interesting part to me was his discussion of The Insurrection Act and whether or not Trump signed it.

Juan says absolutely not.

And for the record, President Trump has also said absolutely not.

Although it was considered.

According to Juan, President Trump was extremely close to signing it but then decided not to after Artificial Intelligence computer modeling ran all the scenarios and determined it would send our country into a new Civil War (65% vs. 35%) -- one we likely would never have recovered from.

There's a lot more in here too, including a full breakdown of the Brunson Supreme Court case and why it's likely to succeed.


,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.