The more we learn about the Charlie Kirk assassination and suspect Tyler Robinson, the weirder it all gets.
Candace Owens just released a new, never-before-seen (alleged) photo that appears to show Tyler Robinson at a Dairy Queen close to the Utah Valley University campus where Charlie Kirk was shot.
Owens says that the photo was repeatedly dropped in her tipline.
However, we cannot independently verify its authenticity, aside from what Owens says.
Take a look at the photo and see what you think for yourself:
BREAKING:
Candace Owens releases an unseen photo of Tyler Robinson at a Dairy Queen, in Orem at 6:38 p.m., after the shooting.
He is seen, unbothered and calm, in a maroon shirt, blue jeans, hat, and sunglasses.
The Dairy Queen is about 17 minutes from campus. pic.twitter.com/4MYVjLR9Qz
— Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸 (@EvanAKilgore) September 18, 2025

The photo, which Owens says was timestamped at 6:38 PM on September 10th, would have been taken just hours after Robinson allegedly shot Charlie Kirk.
If this is true, then it’s very odd, to say the least.
Watch:
HOLEE SHIZZLES ‼️
Candace Owens reveals Never released Images of Tyle Robinson at a nearby Dairy Queen, Hours AFTER Charlie Kirk was Assassinated
Seen at 6:38PM.
What is wrong with this picture?With this timeline, he can be TRACKED by nearby cameras.
Something is very… https://t.co/FPydbduuI7 pic.twitter.com/QyDNU5cpsF
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 18, 2025
It’s kind of strange how closely this parallels United Healthcare CEO assassin Luigi Mangione, who was caught at a McDonald’s…
I guess assassins tend to have a fast food addiction?
Tyler Robinson at Dairy Queen.
Luigi Mangione at McDonald’s.Why does the FBI always want us to believe that “highly trained assassins” will risk it all for some fast food? pic.twitter.com/SJ053Gtzb5
— HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) September 19, 2025
Now, to be clear: we can’t say for sure if this photo is even real or not.
It could be AI.
However, when you run it through AI image detectors, it turns up a low chance of being AI-generated.
See here:

A second AI image detector gave more mixed results, but also agreed that it was most likely a real image:

That second AI image detector broke down in detail why this photo is most likely real and specifically noted that was probably captured by a security camera.
Here’s the detailed report I got:

Full text in case that print is hard to read:
Detailed analysis report
🧑⚖️ Person and ExpressionThe person’s face and posture appear natural but slightly blurry, consistent with typical surveillance camera footage. The skin texture lacks fine detail, which can sometimes be mistaken for AI effects but here is due to camera quality and lighting. The expression looks candid and unstaged.🏢 Environment and BackgroundThe setting appears like a typical convenience store or small shop, showing realistic details such as tiled flooring, posters on the walls, and a counter. The lighting creates natural shadows and reflections on the floor, consistent with real-world photography.📦 Object DetailThe red box held by the person has reasonable detail but is somewhat pixelated, again consistent with lower resolution video or image from a security camera rather than AI generation. The cup in the other hand also appears natural in shape and lighting.🎥 Overall Image QualityThe entire image has a slight grain and blur typical of surveillance footage, including uneven lighting and slight pixelation. These are not typical features of AI-generated imagery, which tends to optimize clarity and detail.Summary:The image is predominantly human-captured, likely from a security camera. The highest likelihood of AI influence could be attributed to the slight blurriness and pixelation, but this is most probably due to camera quality rather than synthetic generation.
If this photo is indeed real and was taken when Candace Owens claims it was, then this raises some pretty big questions.
Would someone who just assassinated a political figure and was trying to avoid getting caught really go put it all on the line just to get some Dairy Queen?
Does he just have the same weakness as Joe Biden?..
As Owens noted, it also pokes a big hole in the FBI’s official narrative about his clothes changes.
Very fishy.
Your thoughts?



Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!