Gov Gavin Newsom is upset about the National Guards showing up during those LA riots.
I mean, if he wants the city to go up in flames, doesn’t he have the right to let it happen as governor?
Sorry, doesn’t work that way, Gavy.
And if our leader, President Trump, sees that the governor isn’t taking care of the people, isn’t doing his job, well then he’s going to send in the troops.
Did you Vote for this?
National Guard and DHS agents RUSH to take down a rioter who threw objects at them!
NO MORE OF THIS!!
They are NOT messing around!! pic.twitter.com/ehPvO8Qtkz— Johnny Midnight ⚡️ (@its_The_Dr) June 11, 2025
Gavin Newsom’s legal fight against Donald Trump continues over Guard troops in LA https://t.co/cwqEnCBc7O
— Fresno Bee (@FresnoBee) June 23, 2025
Local News, Sacramento Bee reports:
Lawyers for California Gov. Gavin Newsom continued their court battle on Monday against President Donald Trump’s deployment of the National Guard and other military personnel to Los Angeles during protests over immigration raids.
The case is the latest flash point between the Democratic governor and the Republican president, and court briefs filed by both sides in San Francisco federal court on Monday come days after a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Trump’s favor, saying he “likely” did have the right to activate the guard and take over its control despite Newsom’s opposition.
The guard has been in Los Angeles since June 8, after large crowds gathered to protest immigration raids targeting day laborers seeking work at Home Depot stores and undocumented employees in the city’s garment district. Newsom filed a lawsuit two days later, alleging that Trump had broken the law by activating the Guard without his consent and in violation of laws limiting the use of military personnel in domestic situations.
Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer issued a temporary restraining order against the deployment and ordered Trump to return control of the guard to Newsom. But the three-judge appellate panel stopped the order from going into effect, citing laws allowing the president to use the guard in situations where federal law could not otherwise be enforced.
If Newsom “wins”, think President Trump will just let it slide?
I don’t think so.
He’ll take it to the Supreme Court.
The rule of law was at the heart of the appeals court hearing between lawyers for Trump & Gavin Newsom today over POTUS' takeover of troops in LA https://t.co/gBEI6aIYDM
— Deadline (@DEADLINE) June 23, 2025
Funny how the Left was okay with this:
Liberals were perfectly fine with Tim Walz using the National Guard to keep people locked up during COVID..
.. but they’re mad at Trump for using them to STOP vioIent riots pic.twitter.com/fqzLsTPMC0
— American AF 🇺🇸 (@iAnonPatriot) June 10, 2025
Liberals against the National Guard seem to have a looong history.
And knowing what we know now, I’m looking at famous protests/riots of the past in a different light.
Remember The Kent State riots?
Think we were taught the whole story?
Guess the Left have always been like this…
That’s because the students had been rioting for days and chased the National Guard as they attempted to retreat. When the National guard members ran into a dead end they returned fire on the protesters who were hurling rocks at them. pic.twitter.com/yITuarbRY7
— memetic_sisyphus (@memeticsisyphus) March 17, 2025
I didn’t learn this in school
— feritas (@4thSpoliaOpima) April 20, 2024
Until this post I've never heard any alternative explanation of the Kent state "massacre." It was in my 2000s high school history textbook as an unprovoked shooting.
This isn't the first time I've had to relearn something from that particular history class.
— Smug Scarecrow (@Saxdonut) March 17, 2025
Here’s Crowder on that topic:
The loss of life is a tragedy, always, but do you even know WHY the National Guard was sent to Kent State?
They rioted for three days. There was looting. They were burning buildings. They successfully burned down the campus ROTC building which had live rounds stored which began… pic.twitter.com/5FJGFvcTej
— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) April 26, 2024
What’s your opinion?



Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!