SO IT BEGINS – Stephen Miller’s ‘America First Legal’ Just SUED Chief Justice John Roberts!

It’s beginning.

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has been SUED by the legal group formed by Trump-loyalist and America First true believer Stephen Miller.

The TOP JUDGE IN THE LAND has been sued in his capacity of the Chief Justice, and the implications are HUGE!

The more I look in to this lawsuit, the more I realize the legal BRILLIANCE of Stephen Miller.

Stephen Miller's America First Legal has filed a lawsuit against Chief Justice John Roberts.

Its beginning. pic.twitter.com/wFAYQqq3de

— X22 Report (@X22Report) May 6, 2025

And just to set the tone, before we even get in to this story, I want to present this clip of Stephen Miller completely eviscerating the mainstream media during a White House briefing just a few days ago.

Just in case you need a refresher to REALLY GET who Stephen Miller is, the man whose legal group just sued the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, watch this:

Stephen Miller is an absolute BEAST!

He just completely destroyed the media.

This man is one of the best in the entire administration at articulating what AMERICA FIRST truly means! pic.twitter.com/LXyStxoyUe

— Joey Mannarino 🇺🇸 (@JoeyMannarinoUS) May 1, 2025

That man is sharper than a double-sided tack, and quicker than… (insert witty / corny saying here).

That man just sued Chief Justice Roberts, and it could wind up being EXACTLY the slap in the face the runaway judicial branch needs!

Here’s what happened in a nutshell, and why it matters.

Everything started when America First Legal filed a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request with two entities: the Judicial Conference, and the Administrative Office for the U.S. Courts, which is overseen by the Judicial Conference.

With that BRILLIANT MOVE… the trap for the ROGUE ACTIVIST JUDGES was set!

Stick with me here, and I’ll explain.  (Trust me, this is good!)

To keep it simple, think of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts as basically the support agency for the federal courts – whatever the logistical or administrative needs of the courts, that’s what the Administrative Office does.

The Judicial Conference is basically the supervisory committee that oversees the Administrative Office – comprised of chief judges representative of the different regions and levels of the federal court system.

And the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is the top dog in the Judicial Conference, overseeing the Administrative Office.

Those two entities — the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office — are essentially headed up by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Director of the Administrative Office, who is appointed by the Chief Justice.

Chief Justice John Roberts (head of the Judicial Conference) and Robert J. Conrad (whom Roberts appointed last year to the position of Director of the Administrative Office overseen by Roberts) are therefore the key people involved in these entities.

So when America First Legal filed a FOIA request with the Administrative Office (which is overseen by the Judicial Conference) for communications between the courts and two very specific elected officials… (we’ll get to that in a moment)… and it was REFUSED…

With that, the trap was SPRUNG.

Those two elected officials happen to be a U.S. Senator and a U.S. Representative who have been highly connected to stirring up legal and ethical problems for Supreme Court justices — specifically, conservative Supreme Court Justices who don’t vote to the liking of certain non-conservative groups.

Would it surprise you to learn that those two Congressmen are Democrats?  (Probably not.)

Here they are — Rep. Hank Johnson on the left, and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse on the right:

But Stephen Miller’s legal group wasn’t simply going after that information to expose the corruption of sitting Congressmen conspiring with the judicial branch to make life hard for conservative Justices like Alito and Clarence Thomas (though that was part of it).

Beneath that very real attempt to expose corruption was a far more brilliant attempt at unravelling the DEEP STATE SYSTEM embedded in the current judiciary.

The FOIA request was refused on the basis that the FOIA doesn’t apply to the judicial branch.

And that’s when America First Legal sued — arguing that in fact the Judicial Conference (headed by Roberts) and the Administrative Office (headed by Conrad) are not operating within the Constitutional bounds of the judiciary — but rather as an independent agency involved in the creation of guidelines for the judiciary.

And that, according to Stephen Miller’s legal group, is a function of Congress… a function which Constitutionally is overseen (checks and balances and all that) by the EXECUTIVE BRANCH, as explained in more detail in an article on the legal website Reason:

The suit was prompted by the refusal of the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office to respond to AFLF’s FOIA requests for copies of communication with the offices of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson, two legislators who have worked overtime to stir up ethical allegations against sitting Supreme Court justices. The Judicial Conference and Administrative Office rebuffed the requests on the grounds that each are exempt from FOIA.

The basis for AFLF’s suit is that the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office are not part of the judiciary, but are instead executive branch agencies subject to FOIA. According to AFLF, neither entity is a “court,” and insofar as each has other responsibilities, including the promulgation of rules governing federal courts and responding to Congressional inquiries, each is an “agency” under FOIA. It further claims that insofar as the Chief Justice is able to appoint members of Judicial Conference committees “then he must be acting as an agency head, subjecting the Judicial Conference to the FOIA.” (Cf. Art. II, section 2, which authorizes Congress to delegate authority to appoint inferior officers to “the Courts of Law.”)

The suit does not merely seek fulfillment of the FOIA requests. It seeks to have the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office declared “independent agencies within the executive branch.” It further suggests, but does not allege, that the President should have the power to appoint and remove the Presiding Officer of the Judicial Conference and the Director of the Administrative Office.  (Emphasis added.)

In other words… if the judiciary wants to play legal games and conspire along with Democrat legislators to target conservative justices with the threat of never-ending ethics investigations, Stephen Miller’s legal group just shouted “GAME ON” in legal terms.

And not only does the functions that Roberts and Conrad were engaged in expose them to the FOIA, but it also exposes the chief justices from the different federal courts — right up to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court — to EXECUTIVE OVERSIGHT.

Boom.  Maybe now a few federal judges would like to rethink their agenda-driven activism from the bench?

Here’s a great post that highlights the main purpose of the lawsuit; not just getting at the corrupt coordination between the judges and the Democrats in Congress – but “ensuring the judiciary sticks to judging, not politicking!”:

BREAKING NEWS:

Holy SHIIIIIIIT!

And we’re off…

Stephen Miller’s America First Legal Takes on Chief Justice John Roberts in Bold Lawsuit! 🚨

In a fiery move to restore executive authority, America First Legal, led by Trump’s powerhouse advisor Stephen Miller, has filed a… pic.twitter.com/JRbSyYxVgJ

— Mila Joy (@MilaLovesJoe) May 6, 2025

Here’s the full text of that post for easier viewing:

BREAKING NEWS:

Holy SHIIIIIIIT!

And we’re off…

Stephen Miller’s America First Legal Takes on Chief Justice John Roberts in Bold Lawsuit! 🚨

In a fiery move to restore executive authority, America First Legal, led by Trump’s powerhouse advisor Stephen Miller, has filed a blockbuster lawsuit against Chief Justice John Roberts and Robert J. Conrad, head of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

The suit demands that the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office—accused of overstepping their judicial bounds—be placed under rightful presidential oversight, ensuring the judiciary sticks to judging, not politicking!

AFL argues these agencies perform executive functions, like cozying up to Democrat lawmakers pushing anti-conservative witch hunts against Justices Thomas and Alito.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whizzco

This is a major win for President Trump’s agenda to drain the swamp and protect the separation of powers!

In essence, in their corrupt cooperation with legislators who were looking to stir up trouble for conservatives, Chief Justice Roberts and Director Conrad engaged in actions that would be defined as functions requiring oversight by the executive branch.

As opposed to… the Judicial Branch providing it’s OWN oversight — if you catch my sarcastic drift.

Because that is EXACTLY what is happening, and that’s why the judiciary thinks it can get away with ANYTHING simply because they are judges!

It wasn’t always like this.

Back in the day, until the early 1900’s, the judiciary WAS under the oversight of the Executive Branch!

That all changed around the same time that the Progressive push of the early 20th century started making tweaks to the original system, ultimately giving us what we have today.

Now, we have judges so “independent” (that was the motto for making these changes to begin with) that they can OVERTHROW a President!

A single judge can now literally issue an order negating the clear Constitutional authority of the President — and everyone acts like that’s okay!

It’s NOT okay.

And if this lawsuit by America First Legal proves as solid as it looks on first glance, this could end up being the very SMACK DOWN we’ve all been waiting on for the growing list of rogue judges.

The lawsuit specifically claims that the Judicial Conference’s duties are “executive functions, and MUST be supervised by the Executive Branch, according to a report by Fox News:

The lawsuit was filed by the America First Legal Foundation against Roberts in his capacity as the official head of the U.S. Judicial Conference and Robert J. Conrad, who serves as the director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

The complaint accuses both the U.S. Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts of performing certain regulatory actions that go beyond the scope of resolving cases or controversies, or administratively supporting those actions, which they argue are the “core functions” of the judiciary.

It also argues that records held by the Roberts-led U.S. Judicial Conference should therefore be subject to the Freedom of Information Act requests, or FOIA requests, as a result.

AFL cited in its lawsuit recent actions taken by both the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office in 2023 to “accommodate” requests from Congress to investigate allegations of ethical improprieties by Justices Thomas and Alito, and subsequently to create or adopt an “ethics code” for justices on the high court.

“Under our constitutional tradition, accommodations with Congress are the province of the executive branch,” AFL said, adding: “The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office are therefore executive agencies,” and must therefore be overseen by the president, not the courts.

Plaintiffs for AFL, led by attorney Will Scolinos, argued in their lawsuit that the Judicial Conference’s duties are “executive functions,” and functions they allege must be supervised by executive officers “who are appointed and accountable to other executive officers.”

Further, AFL argued, “Courts definitively do not create agencies to exercise functions beyond resolving cases or controversies or administratively supporting those functions.”

In their view, this is also sufficient to put the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts — as it is overseen by the Judicial Conference — under the executive branch as well.

As court cases go, time will tell if the intended result will prove forthcoming.

The proof is always in the pudding, and until such time as a ruling can withstand the immediate attempts to appeal and re-litigate it… nothing is certain.

But this is the work of fixing the broken system.

And if anyone can pull it off, it’ll be President Trump and his firebrand advisor, Stephen Miller.

Someone had to take the first serious step towards putting the judiciary back in its intended lane.

With this lawsuit, it looks like Stephen Miller is that man.

What’s your opinion?