Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

NASA Says This Is Mars….What Do You Think?

Exciting news to share!

We have not only landed on Mars but we’re receiving hi-res photos back from the red planet!

I know, I know….half the time I can’t even get WiFi to work in my house, but NASA is super serious about this that these are real photos of Mars sent back from its Rover that’s tooling around up there.

So I had to pass them on to you.

Take a look:

Zoomed in:

ADVERTISEMENT

And here:

Zoomed in:

Here’s what NASA and Space.com say about that last one:

Composed of 18 images, this natural-color mosaic shows a boulder field on “Mount Washburn” in Mars’ Jezero Crater. The Perseverance science team nicknamed the light-toned boulder with dark speckles near the center of the mosaic “Atoko Point.” The images were acquired by NASA’s Perseverance Mars rover on May 27, 2024, the 1,162nd Martian day, or sol, of the mission. (Image credit: NASA)

Why are they always Composite images from NASA?

My iPhone can take a panorama, why can’t NASA?

My iPhone can zoom out to .50x and get a widescreen shot….why can’t NASA?

Very strange.

ADVERTISEMENT

I’m not going to tell you what I think, I just wanted to post these and ask what YOU think?

Think we’re finally getting a glimpse about what the Red Planet looks like?

FreedomFighter on Twitter isn’t sold, says it looks like Nevada:

And MAGA Dave says it looks like many places around the world that he’s been to:

But they are obviously tin-foil hat Conspiracy Theorists!

How dare they (Greta) question NASA!

ADVERTISEMENT

Why would NASA lie about this?

That’s clearly not Greenland or the Nevada desert….it’s obviously Mars!

Meanwhile, have you heard of the Nikon P900 and P1000 cameras?

Here’s a quick summary:

Nikon P900 and P1000 Cameras

Nikon P900:

  • Megapixels: 16 MP
  • Optical Zoom: 83x (equivalent to 24-2000mm)
  • Digital Zoom: 4x
  • Sensor: 1/2.3 inch CMOS
  • Video: Full HD 1080p
  • Features: Built-in GPS, Wi-Fi, NFC

Zoom Capability: The P900’s 83x optical zoom allows it to capture subjects at extreme distances. It can capture details of the moon and distant wildlife, effectively making it possible to see objects several kilometers away with clarity, depending on atmospheric conditions and the size of the object.

Nikon P1000:

  • Megapixels: 16 MP
  • Optical Zoom: 125x (equivalent to 24-3000mm)
  • Digital Zoom: 4x
  • Sensor: 1/2.3 inch CMOS
  • Video: 4K UHD
  • Features: RAW shooting, 3.2-inch vari-angle LCD, built-in GPS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth

Zoom Capability: The P1000’s 125x optical zoom extends even further than the P900, making it one of the most powerful zoom cameras available. It can photograph craters on the moon, and distant wildlife or landscapes with significant detail. This translates to capturing objects clearly from several kilometers away, with the actual effective range varying based on conditions.

Discontinuation and Market Status

Both the Nikon P900 and P1000 are no longer in production. They were discontinued due to several factors:

  1. Market Demand: Consumer interest has shifted toward cameras with interchangeable lenses and more advanced sensors, such as mirrorless cameras.
  2. Technological Advancements: Newer technologies and models have emerged that offer better performance, image quality, and features.
  3. Production Costs: Maintaining production for these specialized super-zoom cameras might have become less economically viable for Nikon.
  4. Business Strategy: Nikon has been restructuring its product lineup to focus on more profitable segments, such as professional-grade cameras and lenses.

While these models are discontinued, they can still be found on the secondhand market or through some retailers that have remaining stock.

Both discontinued now, which is very interesting.

Per above, ChatGPT claims it was due to “market demand” however these cameras sold out almost immediately upon hitting the shelves each time.

Why?

Because people are hungry for the truth.

ADVERTISEMENT

And here’s what people discovered when using those cameras and pointing them at The Heavens….

Real video of “planets” taken with a Nikon P1000.

Now you know why they took that camera off the market…..

One more….

Is Space fake?

Or is it just not what we’ve been told?

Here is REAL video from Nikon P900 and P1000 cameras showing what “planets” and “stars” actually look like….

Now do you see why they had to take those cameras off the market?

Have you ever heard someone say “Trust the science”?

“Science” is exactly what people were doing with these cameras.

Doing their own tests and not just trusting what NASA tells them to beLIEve.

And what happened immediately afterwards?

Both cameras pulled from the shelves.

Hmmmm…..

RELATED REPORT:

“Was The Moon Landing Fake?”

Was the Moon Landing Fake?

That’s not my question…

That was Patrick Bet-David’s question to Avi Loeb, the author of “Interstellar”.

I found the clip to be very fascinating.

The short answer from Avi?

No.

The reason?

Moon Rocks.

Yes, really.

I’ll let you watch below, but what I find most compelling is exactly what PBD brings up when he questions Loeb.

To me, the single-most compelling question or piece of evidence is not camera angles, or “wrong shadows” in old footage, or foot prints on the moon, or strange landscapes…

All of that is interesting, but to me it’s not the PRIME thing.

To me, the primary question is a simple and basic one: why did we (we meaning all of Earth) go to the Moon in 1969 and then just never go back for over 50 years?

Have we EVER gone back?

Many say we haven’t.

So….did we really go the first time?

THAT is the question.

Watch Pat ask Ari:

It’s actually not the first time PBD has gone down this road.

Pat is a smart guy….VERY smart.

Intuitive.

I think he knows something is very wrong here.

Check out his prior interview with Bart Sibrel.

I think from that interview to this latest one with Ari, I sense Pat becoming more and more skeptical of the original Moon Landing story.

Maybe that’s just me, but I can feel it.

Pat was skeptical to Bart about his claims it was fake, but flash forward and Pat now seems much more skeptical of the original story itself.

Check it out:

FACT CHECKED: So We Never Actually Landed On The Moon?

Earlier today I was joking around on Twitter and I posted this Tweet below…

Read this.

But read it slowly:

If you don’t get it, read it again.

It’s a joke.

A stolen joke, I admit it.

It was a throwaway joke from the inimitable Norm Macdonald.

Miss that guy so much, but at least we have YouTube.

Anyway, back to the serious topic at hand.

While I was joking in the tweet above, a very serious question remains: Did we truly go to the moon back in 1969?

I smell a FACT-CHECK coming!

Now you might think that’s a crazy question, but if you start to dig into it you quickly realize there is a very logical, rational, and evidence-based argument to claim that no, we did not.

COULD not have done it even if we wanted to!

So I wanted to show this interview to you.

This is Patrick Bet David, a guy who I’ve really come to respect.

PBD plays it right down in the middle in this one, challenging his guest Bart Sibrel but doing it respectfully and allowing him to state his case.

And his case is remarkable clear.

Some people get caught up in analyzing the photos and the shadows and all this other nonsense or the reflections in the glass and claiming it was faked because of some really hard to follow technical details.

Sibrel doesn’t do that.

He simply states a very clear and logical case that goes like this:

In order to believe we landed on the moon in 1969 you have to believe this simple claim:

That we went 1,000 times FARTHER than we can currently send astronauts today…

50 years ago…

On the first attempt…

With one-millionth the computing power of today’s cell phone!

In fact, Werner von Braun, the lead scientist of the space mission for NASA, stated the odds of them going to the moon, successfully, with 1960s technolgoy, was a 1 in 10,000 chance!

That’s your lead brainiac saying that!

There is no other example in history where we achieved a technological advancement and then 50 years later could not replicate it.

No other example in history.

In every other example, we are not only replicating it but exceeding it just a few years later.

Certainly, 50 years later the advancement from that first breakthrough is many multiples greater.

And yet, not so with the moon.

We haven’t been back.

No other country has been back.

In fact, NASA now says the technology to do it “hasn’t been invented yet!”

Why?

Because there’s a massive thing called the Van Allen Radiation Belts that would cook you alive!

The clip of the NASA rocket scientist saying that is right in the video below.

So without further adieu, I give you Patrick Bet David asking Bart Sibrel: was the moon landing FAKED?

Watch here:

Backup here:

If that caught your attention, let’s go much deeper…

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon…

WARNING!  WARNING!

Time for another installment of hard-hitting investigative journalism…where we aren’t afraid to create a little cognitive dissonance along the way!

Some of you will be very bothered by this article…

“How dare he question the moon landings!”

Sorry folks, but we don’t create the news here…we just report on it.

We also don’t create the “truth”…we just seek it out and set it free.

So buckle up buttercup, this could get bumpy for a few of you.

I can already hear many others saying “it’s about time Noah covered this!”

So here we go….

Did Buzz Aldrin just admit (again) that the moon landings were faked?

Well, it sure looks like it.

But we’ll give you all the evidence and let you decide.

A clip of Buzz Aldrin on Conan O’Brien’s Late Night Show from 2000 is suddenly going viral right now thanks to this post on TikTok:

@msmastafoxx

Wait Til The End…🧐 #MsMastaFoXX #MyCreatorLife #Buzz #buzzaldrin #Nasa #Conspiracy #conspiracytiktok #Woketok #Viral #fyp #conanobrien #MoonLanding

♬ original sound – MsMastaFoXX👽CF👁️Neocodeist🧬

In the clip, Buzz pretty clearly says the video of the astronauts walking on the moon was fake.

I don’t know how else you interpret that.

I mean, I know this is a comedy show, but nothing about this clip appears to be a joke or a bit.

Even Conan is taken aback and temporarily at a loss for how to respond (and it’s his job to never be caught off guard as a talk show host).

So watch the clip for yourself.

And for anyone shouting “CONTEXT!” I’ve got you covered.

Here is the full interview to watch the segment in context:

The Reuters Fact-Check team has already investigated and determined what you heard Buzz say is totally “False”.

Just another one we all got wrong!

God bless the fact-checkers, I don’t know where we’d be without them!

So somehow they’ve labeled this as “False” despite the part I bolded below where they seem to even admit that the footage is, in fact, mostly made of animations.

This is their full report:

Social media users are sharing a video of astronaut Buzz Aldrin being interviewed by American television host Conan O’Brien and claiming that Aldrin discussing parts of the moon landing broadcasts being animated is proof that it was all faked.

He was referring to animations used by broadcasters at the time in their coverage of the moon landing, intercut with real footage. The moon landing did take place and men did walk on the moon.

Examples of the erroneous social media posts can be seen ( here ) and ( here ).

A longer video of the interview, dated May 17, 2000, can be seen on YouTube ( here ).

At the 1:29 mark, O’Brien says: “Let’s talk about this because this is fascinating. I remember very clearly; I think anybody who was alive at the time does. I remember my parents waking me up and we went down, and we watched you guys land on the moon.”

Aldrin responds: “No, you didn’t. Because there wasn’t any television, there wasn’t anybody taking the picture. You watched animation so you associated what you saw with… you heard me talking about, you know, how many feet we’re going to the left and right and then I said contact light, engine stopped, a few other things and then Neil said ‘Houston, tranquility base. The Eagle has landed.’ How about that? Not a bad line.”

The moon landing took place on July 20, 1969 with astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. NASA said in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. However, in 2009 NASA released a complete digital make-over of the original landing footage that clarifies the blurry and grainy images of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the surface of the moon ( here ).

A video compiled by CNN shows the available footage from the mission ( here ), including takeoff and the astronauts climbing down and walking on the moon.

An article ( here ) by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum explains the challenges of recording footage of the moon landing and walking.

NASA contracted with Westinghouse for a black and white camera costing $2.29 million to capture the iconic moment, according to the museum. Photographs of the camera, which was stored in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly near the ladder Armstrong can be seen climbing down, can be seen ( here ).

“For us today, we can thank technicians for having recorded the broadcast, though the tapes assumed to be of the highest quality were never located despite searches for them in the last few decades,” the article reads. “What we see now on YouTube or in films are high definition scans of those best available copies.”

An article by Vox ( here ) says some television networks built sets to recreate some of the moments that were not able to be captured on video.

The National Science and Media Museum discussed the Apollo 11 broadcast on its website ( here ): “Many broadcasters used simulations to flesh out their Apollo programming. Networks paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for scale models of Apollo command modules and rockets. During the broadcast, these were used to create simulations of the mission which were then intercut with real footage.”

“The thing to remember is what news was like in the late 1960’s, not 24-hour continuous coverage,” Margaret Weitekamp, Chair of the Space History Department at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, said by phone. “The coverage of that trip needed to be explained to the public without the ability for continuous relay of video we are now used to.”

“Animations would have been a part of a constellation of different ways that that story was told over a series of days. At the time, the coverage would have been combined with animations that helped provide a broader picture of what was being done. But this certainly doesn’t invalidate that those landings took place.”

There is no evidence that the moon landing was faked or that astronauts did not walk on the moon. However, there is plenty of evidence that it happened. Reports about the landing can be seen ( here ), ( here ) and ( here ).

Photographs of the moon landing can be seen ( here ), ( here ), and ( here ).

Reuters has previously debunked claims that the moon landing was faked ( here ), ( here ), ( here ).

VERDICT False. Astronaut Buzz Aldrin explaining that broadcasters used animations during their coverage of the moon landing does not prove that it was faked.

But that’s far from the first time Buzz has seemed to admit the whole thing was a fake.

You have to wonder if on his death bed Buzz will finally and unequivocally confess to the fake?

Watch this clip on Rumble where an 8-year old girl asks Buzz why we never went back to the moon after 1972…

A GREAT question!

Because there is no other example in recorded history where something new was discovered and then we just stopped going there.

Imagine discovering America in 1492 and then the Europeans just decided to never send another boat.

Right, didn’t happen.

Would never happen.

Doesn’t pass the smell test.

So watch this short clip where Buzz says the reason we never went back is because we never went in the first place!

It must have felt good to finally get that off his chest I guess?

And again, if you want the full context and full interview, I have that here:

Oh, then there was this gem…

Bart Sibrel (more on him in a minute) caught Buzz one day out on the street and he asked him something simple: swear on this Bible that you actual went to the moon.

Buzz becomes visibly agitated and then punches Bart in the face.

Watch:

https://twitter.com/HaymakerHub/status/1528208649306390528

Cause that’s normal, right?

For more on Bart, his book Moon Man is a must read:

Bart is most famously known for his film: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon.

For anyone who believes the moon landings are 100% real and beyond any reproach, I challenge you to watch this 45 minute video and then report back to me.

I’ve never heard from anyone who has watched this and not had their eyes opened:

Backup here (since that will likely get taken down by the Tube):

And one more backup here:

Now let’s examine the big Press Conference Buzz, Neil and the third guy had when they got back from WALKING ON THE FREAKING MOON!

You’d think they’d have smiles from ear to ear that simply wouldn’t wipe off…right?

You know, something like how Sir Edmund Hillary looked after climbing Mount Everest — see below:

Nope!

Instead they looked like this…☝️

You might say they looked exactly as you or I might look if you had just faked a Moon Landing and deceived and entire nation.

But that’s just my take, you be the judge.

Do these look like guys who just walked on the Moon?

You can watch the whole solemn press conference here on Rumble — it’s stunning:

So…did Neil and Buzz and the third guy really walk on the Moon?


,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.