Prosecuting President Trump would be a double-edged sword for the deep state and the political establishment.
Why the powers that be haven’t caught onto this is beyond me, maybe they think they’re truly untouchable, maybe they’re just so consumed with TDS that they are this short-sighted.
Justice Samuel Alito recently schooled one of Jack Smith’s prosecutors regarding Presidential immunity and posed some very obvious and elementary arguments to the attorney.
During the exchange with Jack Smith’s attorney Micheal Dreben, Alito explained that if Presidential immunity is stripped then most American Presidents would be facing charges.
Justice Alito provided the examples of FDR, Barack Obama, and George W. Bush. Listen to the exchange below:
At Trump’s immunity arguments hearing, SCOTUS Justice Alito questions whether FDR would have been prosecuted for putting Japanese Americans in concentration camps, which is viewed as an official presidential act. pic.twitter.com/e6cEpiXREP
— The Recount (@therecount) April 25, 2024
Alito gets it! https://t.co/JtTjfRsRq4
— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) April 25, 2024
UPDATE: Based on oral arguments today, it looks like a strong Supreme Court majority agrees with Trump and is set to vindicate US Constitution and effectively end the sham criminal cases against Trump by Biden Regime and allied Democratic politicians in Fulton County, GA. pic.twitter.com/hzGa1TZjMT
— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) April 25, 2024
According to Fox News, Alito also asked the DOJ attorney:
“Now if an incumbent who loses a very close, hotly contested election knows that a real possible nullity after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off into a peaceful retirement, but that the president may be criminally prosecuted by a bitter political opponent.
Will that not lead us into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our country as a democracy?
The Vigilant Fox presented some of the examples provided by Justice Alito:
“George W. Bush could have been charged with lying to Congress to induce the U.S. to enter the war in Iraq. Barack Obama could have faced charges of murder for the deaths of U.S. citizens abroad caused by drone strikes.
Franklin D. Roosevelt could have been charged under conspiracy against civil rights (18 USC 241) for his decision to intern Japanese Americans during World War II.”
Supreme Court Justice Destroys Anti-Trump Prosecutor With One Question
This is epic.
Justice Samuel Alito posed a brilliant question to DOJ prosecutor Michael Dreeben during oral arguments on the President Trump immunity case regarding January 6.
Justice Alito wondered why… pic.twitter.com/hiZeQzAqG8
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 26, 2024
HAHAHA: Justice Alito Exposes Flaws in D.C. Court Opinion Being Used Against Trump After Special Counsel Attorney Claimed Grand Juries Are Layers Of Protection, Says That May Not Be True Since Even Ham Sandwiches Aren't Safe from Grand Jury Indictments! LISTEN pic.twitter.com/ueYZXcdN0r
— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) April 25, 2024
Breitbart presented yet another question Justice Alito posed to Micheal Dreben:
“If a president has the authority to pardon himself before leaving office and the D.C. Circuit is right that there is no immunity from prosecution, won’t the predictable result be that presidents on the last couple of days of office are going to pardon themselves from anything that they might have been conceivably charged with committing?”
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!