President Trump immediately addressed the Nation this morning speaking from Mar-a-Lago after his landmark Supreme Court win.
If you missed it, I’ve got it for you here.
It’s only about 16 minutes including a Q&A session.
Watch here:
https://rumble.com/embed/v4emzuo/?pub=lzerp
Backup here if needed:
🟢 President Trump Addresses The Nation After Historic 9-0 Supreme Court Win 3-4-24 https://t.co/HAwJqJgbM3
— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) March 4, 2024
And if you missed the details on the big win, I’ll put those below:
9-0: Supreme Court Unanimously Sides With President Trump In Landmark Ruling
HE’S BACK!!
President Trump is back on the ballot in Colorado (and all other States dabbling in this nonsense of trying to remove him) thanks to a historic, landmark UNANIMOUS decision by the Supreme Court!
I told you it would be a landslide against Colorado and it was.
9-0.
BREAKING: Supreme Court reverses Colorado 14th Amendment decision in #Unanimous 9-0 victory for President Trump! 🚨🚨🚨 pic.twitter.com/wvFb1kiR4M
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) March 4, 2024
9-0 UNANIMOUS 🚨🚨🚨Supreme Court rules that Donald Trump can run for President, will remain on the 2024 ballot.
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) March 4, 2024
I love this quote: “You know the Regime has overreached when even all the liberal justices concur:
Unanimous decision from the Supreme Court on the Colorado case.
You know the Regime has overreached when even the liberal justices concur. pic.twitter.com/va2wgtnQ6m
— Kevin Roberts (@KevinRobertsTX) March 4, 2024
Yes folks, even these three:
You know the Deep State Biden Regime has gone way too far when even these three say you're way out of line!#Sotomayor#Kagan#Jackson#SCOTUS #TrumpWins pic.twitter.com/3SiXXh8t5s
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) March 4, 2024
Here’s more on the breaking story from Fox News:
The U.S. Supreme Court sided unanimously with former President Trump in his challenge to the state of Colorado’s attempt to kick him off the 2024 primary ballot.
The high court ruled in favor of Trump’s arguments in the case, which will impact the status of efforts in several other states to remove the likely GOP nominee from their respective ballots.
The court considered for the first time the meaning and reach of Article 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars former officeholders who “engaged in insurrection” from holding public office again. Challenges have been filed to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot in over 30 states.
“We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the Court wrote.
The state of Colorado had argued that because they determined Trump’s behavior related to 2020 election interference – culminating with the Jan. 6 Capitol riots – amounted to an “insurrection,” he should be removed from the state’s ballot.
In more than two hours of spirited, often tense arguments last month, the nine justices asked tough questions of both sides about whether the president or a presidential candidate is exempt from the constitutional provision adopted after the Civil War.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh spoke for colleagues when saying they were confronting “difficult questions.”
ADVERTISEMENT“When you look at Section 3, the term insurrection jumps out,” Kavanaugh said. “And the questions are, what does that mean? How do you define it? Who decides? Who decides whether someone engaged in it?”
Kavanaugh noted the courts looked at these questions in an 1869 decision, known as “Griffin’s case,” which found that an act of Congress was necessary to enforce the 14th Amendment’s ban on insurrectionists holding federal office.
“These are difficult questions, and you look right at Section 5 of the 14th Amendmentm … and that tells you Congress has the primary role here,” Kavanaugh said. “I think what’s different is the processes, the definition, who decides questions really jump out at you when you look at Section 3.”
Chief Justice John Roberts questioned Colorado’s attorney Jason Murray about the “consequences” of the state’s position.
I love the word “unanimous”:
https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1764668830998229167
And from ABC News:
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of Donald Trump in a historic case challenging his ability to seek the Republican presidential nomination under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment due to his actions around the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.
The court was unanimous in reversing the unprecedented decision out of Colorado that would kick Trump off the ballot under the provision after a state trial court found he participated in “insurrection” on Jan. 6 through incitement.
“For the reasons given, responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States,” the Supreme Court opinion read. “The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand. All nine Members of the Court agree with that result.”
The court held that only Congress had the power to enforce the provisions under Section 5 of the amendment and would apply nationwide.
NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Support Donald Trump?
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!