I challenge you to listen to this short little clip and not blush…
Better yet, play it in front of some family or friends or coworkers and let me know how uncomfortable it gets.
And that’s exactly the point.
Far Left Libs think this kind of book is exactly what needs to be in Elementary and Middle Schools and High Schools.
Great education!
Open up their minds!
I say complete garbage.
We’ve removed God, removed the 10 Commandments, removed the Family, removed even the Pledge of Allegiance.
And we’ve replaced it with this trash…
Watch here:
John Kennedy Reads out of a School Library Book | What are they teaching our kids?
Is this right? It’s time to speak up Parents. #truthnationtv pic.twitter.com/ktL27BrIkr
— 𝕋𝕣𝕦𝕥𝕙ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕋𝕧 (@TruthNationTv) September 17, 2023
Full video is here if you want to hear even more:
The irony is you couldn’t even allow that on TV.
Why do we have “standards for the airwaves”?
Did you even know that we have those?
It’s why certain things cannot appear on TV.
Read this for more and then consider if we have these rules to protect children, then why are these books ok in children’s schools…..from ChatGPT, read this:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) oversees and enforces decency standards for the United States’ public airwaves. These standards are applied to ensure that broadcast content adheres to a certain level of decorum, suitable for the general audience, and does not disseminate offensive material. The FCC regulates broadcast television, radio, and other mediums that use public airwaves, but it doesn’t regulate content on cable TV, streaming services, or the internet, which are not broadcast over public airwaves.
ADVERTISEMENTFCC Decency Standards
The FCC’s decency standards primarily focus on prohibiting obscene, indecent, and profane content. Each of these terms denotes a specific kind of content:
- Obscene Content: Content is obscene if it appeals to an average person’s prurient interest; depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
- Indecent Content: This is content that portrays sexual or excretory organs or activities in a way that does not meet the obscene criteria but is still offensive by contemporary community standards.
- Profane Content: Profane content includes offensive words that are considered a public nuisance.
Timing and Safe Harbor Period
The FCC’s enforcement of these standards is particularly stringent during the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience. However, between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.—known as the “Safe Harbor” period—broadcasters have more leniency, and content with a higher degree of offensive material may be aired.
Examples of Prohibited Content
To understand which content is deemed indecent, profane, or obscene, one must consider specific examples. Graphic sexual content, such as explicit scenes or dialogue, is usually considered inappropriate, especially if it is intended to pander, titillate, or shock. Graphic depictions of excretory functions, intense violence, and extreme profanity are also likely to breach the decency standards.
Case Instances:
- The Janet Jackson Incident (2004 Super Bowl) One of the most notorious cases is the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show, where a “wardrobe malfunction” resulted in the exposure of Janet Jackson’s breast. This incident sparked intense debate and led to immediate FCC action, resulting in substantial fines and heightened scrutiny of live broadcast events.
- George Carlin’s “Seven Dirty Words” Monologue George Carlin’s famous “Seven Dirty Words” monologue led to a seminal Supreme Court case, FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (1978), which upheld the FCC’s authority to regulate indecent material on the airwaves. Carlin’s words included explicit and offensive language, which was categorized as indecent, and it set a precedent on how the FCC would handle similar content in the future.
- Howard Stern Broadcasts Radio host Howard Stern’s shows have faced multiple fines from the FCC due to indecent content, including explicit sexual discussions and profanity.
Context Consideration
Importantly, the FCC considers context in assessing whether content is obscene, indecent, or profane. An offensive word used in a news program may be seen in a different light compared to the same word used in a comedic skit. Context includes the nature of the content, the time it was broadcasted, and the overall message or artistic value of the program. While some instances are clear-cut violations, many are contingent on nuanced contextual factors.
Enforcement and Complaints
Enforcement of these standards is largely complaint-driven. The FCC relies on viewers and listeners to file complaints about potential violations. Once a complaint is filed, the FCC reviews the content in question, evaluates its context, and decides whether it violates decency standards. The broadcasters found in violation of the FCC’s rules can face fines, license revocations, or other enforcement actions.
Impact on Broadcasters and Creators
The decency standards have a significant impact on broadcasters and content creators. They need to be cognizant of the restrictions and mindful of the content aired during the regulated hours. They employ delay systems during live broadcasts to prevent unintended indecent content from being aired, and they often edit content, bleeping out offensive words or blurring offensive images, to avoid violations.
Balancing Act: Free Speech vs. Public Interest
These standards represent a balancing act between First Amendment rights and protecting the public—especially children—from offensive content. The Supreme Court has recognized that the government has an interest in shielding children from potentially harmful material and in helping parents control the content that enters their homes. However, the FCC’s authority is not unlimited and is subject to judicial review to ensure it doesn’t infringe on First Amendment rights.
Changes and Challenges
The landscape of broadcast media has significantly evolved, with the advent of the internet, streaming services, and cable TV. These platforms operate outside the FCC’s decency standards, challenging the relevance and efficacy of the existing regulatory framework. Debates continue regarding the modifications needed in these standards to address the evolving media landscape while balancing the need for free expression and public interest protection.
ADVERTISEMENTConclusion
The FCC’s decency standards serve as a foundational framework to regulate content on public airwaves, prohibiting obscene, indecent, and profane content, especially when children are likely to be in the audience. They have shaped the broadcast industry, impacting content creators and prompting discussions about the balance between free speech and public interest. While they have been pivotal in maintaining a semblance of decorum in broadcast media, their adaptability and relevance in the modern, multifaceted media environment are subjects of ongoing discussions and debates.
Ok, so read the bold red part above again — the reason we have these rules is because there’s a reasonable risk children may be in the audience!
You think there’s a “reasonable risk children may in the audience” at their school library?
DUH!
So why don’t we have the same standards for school libraries?
Why is John Kennedy able to read that book in Congress which is available in schools across the country and being pushed by the Far Left for wider adoption, when he COULDN’T read that book on ABC, CBS or NBC during daytime hours?
“You can’t play this on national television, but radicals want it in our children’s schools.”https://t.co/WbdzccpqQL
— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) September 18, 2023
RedState agrees with me:
The book in question is available in various public schools across the country and has become a symbol of the left’s attempt to sexualize children. In light of that, parents across the political spectrum have risen up in order to reassert their rights and demand the removal of pornographic materials from classrooms.
Astonishingly, Democrats have doubled down, proclaiming that Republicans are instituting “book bans” by passing laws to stop school libraries from stocking sexual content. Some states, such as Illinois, have even gone so far as to pass laws against the removal of pornographic materials from classrooms and libraries.
To illustrate how insanely incoherent that is, Kennedy decided to read directly from Gender Queer during a hearing in which multiple LGBT activists were present and testifying. The responses he received said everything.
Hang on. Why are those words “disturbing?” I mean, if it’s disturbing enough that it shouldn’t be read in the U.S. Senate, certainly it should not be available for kids to read, right? That would be the logical conclusion to draw, but no one has ever accused the modern Democratic Party of being logical or consistent.
Kennedy’s reading was reminiscent of a press conference Gov. Ron DeSantis did in early 2023, where he showed pictures from Gender Queer. Once the pictures were put on screen, mainstream media outlets were forced to censor their own streams, proving the point better than any verbal argument ever could.
It wasn’t just the Illinois Secretary of State who was left seething, though. Everyone’s favorite left-wing social media hack, Aaron Rupar, tried to mock Kennedy and failed miserably.
Here’s more:
GRAPHIC: A Parent Reads From Teen Porno Book Available At School
Are you ok with this?
You ok with your kids reading this book?
We’ve covered a lot of these over the years but this may be the worst one yet.
Just listen and feel how incredibly AWKWARD it is in this room as this brave father stands up in front of all other parents to read a short passage from this book.
If you’re bothered just listening to it, then imagine how much it does not belong in that school library!
WARNING: this is very graphic. Proceed at your own discretion.
Oh, and he says he actually picked one of the more toned down sections.
Really?
Can you imagine what else is in this thing if this was the less graphic portion?
Watch for yourself:
GRAPHIC: A parent read from the pornographic book “All Boys Aren’t Blue” available to students in @RoundRockISD.
The book discusses two boys having s*x including bl*wjobs and an*l s*x in graphic detail.
This is the type of content they’re giving your kids to read in school. pic.twitter.com/FAKLllQYf5
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 29, 2023
I do agree with this comment that BANNING books is not the right response.
Just make them available in age-restricted, appropriate places.
And I do NOT think this school library is the appropriate place, do you?
Banning books is not the way if you believe in the 1st Amendment. We must demand a rating system for school library books, G, PG13, R17 like movies. I don't want this R17 book this man is reading in the hands of my grade-level child. Age appropriate. This can be administered at…
— Republic United 🇺🇸 (@RepUnited) August 29, 2023
This person says the book also describes incest.
How charming!
Perhaps that’s the “worse” part he chose not to read:
It also describes explicit incest.
— Chad Felix Greene 🇮🇱 (@chadfelixg) August 29, 2023
And then we have the million dollar question that I ask every time this comes up….
Doesn’t this solve it right away?
It’s illegal to give children porn, why aren’t the parents calling the police or sheriff’s office?
— Dr. Interracial 🇺🇸 (@billysandytodd) August 29, 2023
A picture is worth a thousand words:
— Paul Hookem (@PaulHook_em) August 29, 2023
RELATED:
MUST SEE: Brave Boy Reads Porno Book Outloud To School Board!
I can’t give this kid enough credit…
Or his father!
This is absolutely a Must-See, although it also comes with a big warning.
VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED.
This is very graphic.
But that’s kind of the point right?
If I have to give you a warning before even showing you this video, then what the Hell is it doing in a Middle School library?
And just watch that board member in the bottom left of the screen squirm in his seat.
Uncomfortable bud?
Then get this book out of your Middle School library and grow a set of balls (and brain) while you’re at it!
Man, I’m fired up.
Ok, just take a look for yourself:
VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED 👉 Brave Boy Reads Pornographic Book Out Loud To School Board Members That He Checked Out Of His Middle School Library pic.twitter.com/eIiQo8VCGn
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) February 25, 2023
I can’t give this kid enough praise for the courage it took to get up there and do this.
WELL DONE MY MAN!
You have a bright future.
And well done to your parents for raising such a grounded kid!
Sadly, this isn’t the first time we’ve covered something like this.
Oregon School District Votes to Keep Gay Pornographic Book in Library
Salem-Keizer School District in Oregon faced severe criticism after parents discovered that a pornographic book, Gender Queer, was available in the school library.
In response, the school formed a special committee to determine if the book should be removed.
Common sense would tell anyone that a book with explicit, pornographic images should be nowhere near a school library.
This is what’s available for children to read.
WARNING – GRAPHIC IMAGES Found Inside Gender Queer
A woman named Suzanne West was given the task to head the committee.
“West’s job description reads: “Crafting and developing strategies that support the district’s movement to become a more anti-racist and anti-oppressive school system,” Libs of TikTok noted.
You’ll probably guess what happened next.
The committee voted last week to keep the book.
"According to some parents, there has been an alarming trend to sever parent child relationships within Oregon schools such as Salem-Keizer district. Parents have been trying to have the book, Gender Queer removed from schools to no avail." #orpol https://t.co/usXP5neuy5
— Oregon Tea Party 🇺🇲 (@OregonTeaParty) July 13, 2022
Libs of TikTok reported:
It’s no surprise that parents have been outraged at the committee’s decision to keep this pornographic book available for their children. We obtained a copy of an email Suzanne West sent to one concerned parent. The email provided official statements from committee members regarding their decision and they are so unbelievably insane, you have to read them yourself:
- “The book will be necessary to keep in schools, to help be more inclusive and allow all students from the LGBTQ+ community to have a resource to refer to. In addition, the pages taken out of context do not represent the intention of the book and only served as an illustration to help provide understanding of what the author was trying to portray in their book.”
- “The book expands on sexual orientation and gender identity which are both topics touched on in wellness.”
- “It being a graphic novel makes the book more accessible to a variety of readers.”
- The book “has won a large number of teen-specific literary awards and is an ‘Own Voices’ text for a marginalized community. Inclusion in the library of the three high schools meets the district’s goal for more inclusive and diverse materials.”
- “This graphic novel is very well done from a literary standpoint. It is an excellent example of a memoir, it includes many visual metaphors, it promotes literacy and accessibility through the graphic format, and it has modern language suitable to our students today.”
- A “well written/illustrated text; important insight regarding gender identity.”
“We think kids need to read about vibrators, blowjobs, masturbation, and chest binders for ultimate inclusion and a show of diversity,” is what the statement should’ve read. Instead, they mask the graphic nature of the book under the veil of “inclusivity” and accuse concerned parents of taking the book out of context. In what context is a photo of someone receiving oral sex okay to show children?
Libs of TikTok has documented alarmed parents across the nation who have shown up to local school board meetings to try and have the book removed.
One school board even cut off a mother attempting to read the book.
Ironically, the book is too “obscene” for a school board meeting but apparently okay to place inside the school library where children have access.
WATCH:
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1502422010068029441?s=20
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1523879644264423426?s=20
Communist school boards are infecting children’s minds with pornographic material and masking it under the guise of “inclusive” to label parents as transphobic, homophobic, and hateful.
The only solution is voting out these school board members or removing children from the school system.
In my personal opinion, I prefer the latter.
And:
HUNDREDS of Muslim Parents in Dearborn, Michigan SHUT DOWN School Board Meeting Over Pornographic Books
There’s a disgusting phenomenon occurring in schools throughout the United States.
Many local school boards and administrators are pushing pornographic books in school libraries.
Read a few prior reports on this disturbing trend:
https://wltreport.com/2022/07/13/oregon-school-district-votes-to-keep-gay-pornographic-book-in-library/
https://wltreport.com/2021/09/15/watch-mayor-demands-school-board-resign-or-face-charges-after-educators-distributed-pornographic-material-to-students/
https://wltreport.com/2021/05/14/despicable-virginia-parents-blast-school-board-over-pornographic-books-assigned-to-ninth-graders/
Parents around the country were shocked and outraged when they became aware of the illegal pornographic books their local schools are pushing on kids in the student libraries.
One book that was found in several libraries is titled, Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe.
The Gateway Pundit explained:
The book is a graphic novel with drawings that explains in lurid detail the sexual interactions between two young men, has been inserted into high school libraries across America, despite it violating guidelines against pornography or sexually explicit materials being provided to minors and paid for with our tax dollars.
Gender Queer includes countless images of male-on-male sexual encounters, accompanied by words that one would expect to find inside literary works at adult porn shops or gay sex clubs and bathhouses. Even so, this book was purchased and pushed by school officials around the country, despite it clearly violating county guidelines.
Here are a couple of pages from the book. Most Americans did not realize this is a PICTURE book with explicit drawings.
WARNING – GRAPHIC CONTENT
These are two pages from the book.
How is this legal?
How is graphic content like this placed in a school library?
It’s complete insanity!
“This week Muslim parents shut down a school board meeting over the porn books in their child’s schools,” The Gateway Pundit stated.
WATCH:
Now things are really getting interesting 😳 Can’t wait to see how the woke mob tries to spin this!
Video from @/wakeupwithlinda on IG pic.twitter.com/NWQE2ragKX
— Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) October 11, 2022
Detroit Free Press reported:
Hundreds of protesters packed a Dearborn Public Schools board meeting this week and shut it down with cries of anger over certain LGBTQ books they said are too sexually explicit for children. And now, some community leaders anxiously await a rescheduled meeting set for Thursday night as others call for calm.
A heavy police presence failed to prevent the Monday night meeting from descending into chaos as demonstrators took it over and then various factions within them jostled for control, shouting at each other. Protesters often ignored the requests of police officers to stop interrupting board members.
It was unclear who was in control of the meeting at times. Most of the crowd appeared to be in opposition to the books, but there were also a number of people with the the American Federation of Teachers union who showed up to support inclusion of LGBTQ people and others.
Not until Dearborn Police Chief Issa Shahin arrived later did the protesters stop their agitation. Shahin pleaded with the crowd to relax and not embarrass Dearborn. There was concern expressed by some community leaders that the protesters are making the city and its Arab American Muslim population look bad. But others said that as Muslims, they have to stand up for their faith.
“The eyes of the nation are on us. … So please, calm down, let’s have respect for each other,” Shahin told the crowd at about 9:10 pm. “We can have a spirited debate, but we can’t conduct ourselves this way, guys, we just can’t. We’re better than this. Dearborn is better than this. This community is better than this. We’re brothers and sisters regardless of race, ethnicity, religion.”
Shahin said the board suspended the meeting and would reschedule it for Thursday evening at Fordson High School in order to accommodate a larger crowd.
“Vote them out!” the crowd repeatedly chanted during the raucous meeting inside an administrative center where the board holds its public meetings. The room was packed tightly, with many using an overflow room and others standing in the back and on the sides. Several held up signs with anti-gay rhetoric in English and Arabic, making religious references to assert that LGBTQ educational materials and books should not be available in Dearborn Public Schools, the third largest school district in Michigan. Some of the placards held up read: “Keep your porno books to yourself,” “Homosexuality Big Sin,” and “If democracy matters, we’re the majority.”
https://twitter.com/nwarikoo/status/1579615610098847745
https://twitter.com/nwarikoo/status/1579632905781145600
https://twitter.com/nwarikoo/status/1579659213101756417
https://twitter.com/nwarikoo/status/1579967902421516291
Read the full story at Detroit Free Press.
As usual, there’s way more to the story….
Jonathan Cahn explains:
Jonathan Cahn Exposes The MYSTERY Behind Pride Month
As you know, we’re big fans of Jonathan Cahn around here.
In fact, I look forward to one day having him on my show to chat.
His research always blows my mind and teaches me new things I hadn’t ever heard about before.
And I know many of you love him too.
So when I saw him teaching on the Secret Mystery behind Pride Month, I knew it would be good.
It’s a short video, only 10 minutes, but so worth it.
Please enjoy:
Full transcript for those who can’t watch/listen:
this is Jonathan Khan it’s June thatmeans it’s pride month Rainbows areeverywhere on television in departmentstores on corporate logos insupermarkets and parades and children’scartoons even on the U.S Air Forcewebsite even on the White House butwhat’s really behind it we’re going topull away the veil to uncover a secretthat goes back half a century in amystery that goes back even fartherthousands of yearsthis in my hands is the presidentialProclamation that Biden issue to beginthis month we’re going to expose thattoo what does this celebration actuallycelebrate the president explains it inthe first words of the Proclamation hesays this in June 1969 a group ofcourageous Americans rose up to protestthe violence and marginalization theyfaced in what became known as TheStonewall uprisingJune is pride monthbecause of that the only problem is thepresident’s narrative is Twisted the barcalled Stonewall was owned by the mafiait violated several laws it wasregularly rated what was different thatnight is that the people whom thepresident prays as courageous Americanswho stood bravely against the police toprotest violence were the ones whoactually committed the violence thepolice consisted of about eight peoplethe mob that came against them withviolence consisted of hundreds of peopleand the hundreds rose up violentlyagainst the eight hurling stones at thembecoming so dangerous and violent that
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!