BREAKING: Video From Different Camera Angle Found Of Charlie Kirk Shooting | WLT Report Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

BREAKING: Video From Different Camera Angle Found Of Charlie Kirk Shooting

A new video showing a different camera angle of the Charlie Kirk shooting has now emerged.

Quite frankly, I am still surprised we have not seen HUNDREDS of different videos from different angles, given that everyone has phones and most people in that crowd had their phones out.

So I’m most surprised at the complete LACK of videos we have seen so far, but here’s a new one from the angle that is most interesting to me.

Was Charlie shot by someone slightly behind him and to his right?

ADVERTISEMENT

I don’t know for sure, but I know there’s a lot of evidence saying that makes much more sense.

Watch this new video here, where I believe you can see Frank Turek in the foreground:

https://x.com/_therealbee_/status/1965900423442977279?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg

More here:

https://x.com/MaimunkaNews/status/1965866604094423531

One more here:

https://x.com/Uncensorednewsw/status/1965887474917642636

And if those are now working (I’m noticing some extreme censorship of that video on X) try this instead:

ADVERTISEMENT

One more here, with a third view….

Does this video show the bullet entering from the (video) left and then exiting out (video) right?

https://x.com/block1capital/status/1967986063114375338?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg

And one more backup here in case that link isn’t working either:

So there you go folks…

What do you think?

ADVERTISEMENT

For more on why I think it’s very possible Charlie Kirk was shot from the back and to his right, read this DEEP DIVE I put together:

DEEP DIVE: Did We All See An EXIT Wound Or An ENTRANCE Wound? — It’s JFK All Over Again!

Ok folks, I have sat on this story for 3 days now because I have been digging into it and researching and did not want to publish this prematurely.

I still have more questions than answers, but I think we have to at least ask this question now:  Was Charlie Kirk's neck wound we all saw and the gushing blood an entrance wound or an exit wound?

Seems crazy to even ask right?

Yes, at least until you start digging in and then you realize there seems to be perhaps more evidence for it being an exit wound than for the narrative we have all been fed.

I'll show you and then I'll let YOU decide what you think...and we can all keep researching this together.

I'll start with my friend Mike Adams, the HealthRanger who asks this very respectful question, pointing out that a 30-06 rifle would leave a huge exit wound and almost certainly blood all over the back white wall.  And yet...we don't have either of those things:

I don't mean to be graphic, and I mean no disrespect to Charlie Kirk and his tragic assassination, but shouldn't we be asking why there doesn't appear to be an exit wound and blood splatter on the large white banner directly behind Charlie when he was shot? If the shot came from the roof with a front-facing shot, there would be unmistakable blood splatter directly behind Charlie. A 30-06 rifle round would have traveled all the way through the flesh and would have made a very large exit path, carrying blood and tissue with it. Again, apologies for being graphic, but I don't know any other way to ask this question. It's just that this is one more thing that isn't adding up. And like you, I just want answers. I want to know who did this.

More here:

No blood of any kind on the back white wall.

ADVERTISEMENT

Within 15 minutes the rear camera is dismounted and taken away, not by authorities.

This is the heart of the crime scene and it's almost immediately cleaned up and no blood found at all.

I want to be very clear I am not accusing anyone specifically in the crowd, just trying to get angles and trajectories and asking questions about things that don't make sense.

The more you study the videos and the more angles you look at, it sure does seem like Charlie was shot close up, from his right:

More here:

I apologize for the graphic nature of this video, but this shows it pretty well:

Why has no one shown us the footage from this camera?

Mark it down folks, you will NEVER see what this camera recorded:

ADVERTISEMENT

https://x.com/OwenShroyer1776/status/1968307396633137488

WE NEED TO SEE THIS CAMERA:

This video breaks it down REALLY well...

Watch this:

For a longer breakdown, this is really good too.

Watch here:

Make it make sense...

MJTruth is spot on here:

And meanwhile, they've already paved over the crime scene?

Is that normal?

Why would you do that?

Then you have this...

Have you seen this?

This kid was giving an eye-witness testimony about what he saw and he was almost immediately cut off and manhandled:

Why not let him speak?

ADVERTISEMENT

That is REALLY weird!

Many are saying it was a palm pistol and I want to make clear I am not accusing anyone of anything:

Folks, my head is spinning but I can no longer ignore all of this.

Help me out, what do you think?


,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.