Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Sen. Cruz Dismantles Kamala’s Ongoing Assault On The First Amendment


Among the many far-left policies put forward by Kamala Harris over the course of her career in public office, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) recently suggested that her attempt to silent dissenting viewpoints is among the most insidious.

He made his case during an episode of his “Verdict” podcast, as the Daily Wire reported:

“Kamala has a long, long history of calling for censorship, calling for silencing anyone who disagrees with her, of wanting to use government power to silence her critics,” Cruz said. “If Kamala Harris becomes president, I predict now she will try to muzzle X. She will try to ban X. She wants to follow Brazil’s path and ban X. She wants to use government power to go after big tech and force them to be her censors.”

Cruz said that Harris shows more disdain for the First Amendment than any other presidential candidate in more than two centuries.

“The last time we had a presidential candidate with this antipathy was John Adams, our second president, who had enforced the Alien and Sedition Acts and used them to persecute his political opponents,” he said. “It’s been two centuries since that has happened since then, and Kamala Harris displays an unprecedented willingness to use government power to silence you.”

Many other critics have chronicled Harris’ various threats:

A recent New York Post article compared Harris’ rhetoric on free speech to that of the current Brazilian regime:

Every two-bit authoritarian in history has justified censoring citizens as a way of protecting them from the menace of disinformation.

But social media sites, contra the reliably illiberal Harris, aren’t “directly speaking” to anyone. Millions of individuals are interacting and speaking to millions of other individuals.

Really, that’s what grinds the modern left’s gears: unsupervised conversations.

Take the Brazilian Supreme Court panel that unanimously upheld the decision by one of its justices to shut down Elon Musk’s X over alleged “misinformation” fears.

We must assume that the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, who once promised to ban guns via an executive order, agrees with Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ decision to shut down a social media platform for refusing to bend to the state’s demands of censorship.

The Associated Press reports that the Brazilian high court’s decision “undermines the effort by Musk and his supporters to cast Justice Alexandre de Moraes as an authoritarian renegade who is intent on censoring political speech in Brazil.”

Really? Because it seems to me that the state shuttering one of the popular social media sites unmistakably qualifies as a ban on political speech, whether one person is responsible or an entire government.

Here’s how Cruz summed up Harris’ campaign during a recent Fox News appearance:



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!