Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Umm, WHAT? Biden-Harris Appointee “Queering Nuclear Weapons”, Key To Nuclear Security (UNBELIEVABLE!)

This story may give new meaning to the phrase “social justice”.

Sneha Nair was appointed to the nuclear security wing of the United States Department of Energy in February of this year.

The Biden-Harris White House appointed her as Special Assistant at the NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration).

Her entire job has to do with security protocols for nuclear weapons.

It just so happens that Sneha Nair is a big believer in “queer theory”. What is “queer theory”, you might ask? So glad you asked! Because I found the following explanation on the website lgbtqnation.com, which I now share with you:

Queer theory is a field of study that challenges existing traditional ideas about identity, sexuality, and gender – particularly that of heteronormativity, or the belief that heterosexuality is the natural, moral, or “normal” expression of sexuality. For queer theorists, heteronormativity permeates various aspects of society, is reinforced by institutions (think the Church and the legal realm), and is ultimately a way to yield power and control. In a sense, queer theory is the study of what we as a society deem as “normal” and why these assumptions exist in the first place. It seeks to understand who benefits from and who is “othered” or isolated by these constructs. However, in the same way that the origins of queer theory may be difficult to pinpoint, it is hard to distill the queer theory definition into a single idea or concept. Queer theory emerged from a variety of studies and cultural movements, including feminism, gay and lesbian studies, sexual subcultures, and black activism, particularly around the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Notice a few points from that explanation of “queer theory” —

  • “challenges existing traditional ideas…”
  • “particularly that of heteronormativity…”
  • “the belief that heterosexuality is the natural, moral, or “normal” expression of sexuality…”

Please realize.  Please…. tell me you realize… that “queer theory” is at it’s core ALL about challenging the “norms” of sexuality?

Because that is what it is.  In it’s own words, that is what it is.

Let’s stick that in our back pocket going forward.  Please hang on to that.

So, it turns out that Nair (our Biden-Harris appointee) has published several articles and papers connecting “queer theory”, DEI principles in general, and nuclear security all together.

(Remember that game – “one of these things is not like the other…” ???)

Let’s get a little summary of the overall situation from our friends at Fox News:

Nair believes in eradicating purported “White supremacy” in the nuclear field as well as “queering nuclear weapons” as part of a diversity, equity and inclusion push she believes is essential for deterring threats to nuclear energy facilities in the U.S.

“Finally, queer theory informs the struggle for nuclear justice and disarmament,” she wrote last year. “Queer theory helps to shift the perception of nuclear weapons as instruments for security by telling the hidden stories of displacement, illness, and trauma caused by their production and testing.”

Nair argues that DEI, more broadly, “is essential for creating effective nuclear policy.”

Before she joined the administration, she worked for the Stimson Institute, which has received hundreds of thousands from Soros’ Open Society Foundations and millions from “The Embassy of the State of Qatar” over the years, Fox News Digital’s review of their funding sources revealed.

Ah. Did you catch that? She worked for the Stimson Institute prior to joining the U.S. Department of Energy for work on nuclear security. Is there anything or anyone that George Soros DOESN’T have tentacles attached to?

Look, I’m sorry – but if you’re talking about infusing queer principles into the realm of nuclear weapons???

And you worked for a George Soros funded organization prior to an appointment to the National Nuclear Security Administration???

Every single conspiracy theory I can possibly come up with is fair game. Got it? This story is absolutely COVERED in absurdity.

Soros funded your organization.  Then you wrote multiple papers about using “woke” concepts in the realm of nuclear weapons.  Then Joe Biden and Kamala Harris appoint you to a Special Assistant with the National Nuclear Security Administration???

Is this a joke???

According to her June 2023 article (which I will link to here for anyone who wants to completely destroy atleast a full third of their brain cells), Nair believes that “queer theory informs the struggle for nuclear justice and disarmament.”

Please understand: this is a real story. I am not making this up. This is not a joke.

And I want to emphasize that her appointment to Special Assistant came AFTER she wrote the above linked article, and an April 2023 paper titled, “Converging Goals: Examining the Intersection Between Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Nuclear Security Implementation”.

Please believe me when I tell you it is just as mind-blowing as the other article. I’ll put a link HERE, if you need to see for yourself.

She wrote those papers arguing NOT ONLY for DEI principles and practices at the NNSA, but for the very ideas of “queer theory” to be pushed into every aspect of nuclear weapons.

And then… the Biden-Harris White House appointed her to Special Assistant. I have to assume, at this point, it was because the Biden-Harris White House liked what was in the papers.

Let’s have a quick look at a reaction post on X, and then we’ll dive into a few more facts:

So that is Sneha Nair.

Her goal is to apply “queer theory” to nuclear weapons. I feel like I’m paraphrasing an introduction at a Gay Nukes Anonymous meeting:

“Hi, I’m Sneha, and I want to make nukes gay!”

“Hi….. Sneha!!!”

Ok, ok – I’ll try to keep it civil. No promises. This is a level of absurdity I’m just not use to dealing with. And sometimes, well, ya just gotta go… (ok, ok – I won’t say it).

NUCLEAR weapons… are not sexual in nature. Can I just throw that out there? Phallic symbol? That shape is for aerodynamic purposes. If that makes it a phallic symbol… okay.

Could it be that the exhaustive THEORETICAL analysis-half-to-death of the modern psychological “experts”… might just be reaching a little?

Maybe they have penis envy? (I’m sorry, I’m sorry – I couldn’t resist. Back on track…)

Part of me isn’t the least bit surprised by this anymore. We really are living in clown world.

One final point. Have a quick glance at this excerpt from ABC 6, a local affiliate out of Columbus, Ohio:

That article, published during Pride Month 2023, described how “disparaging tweets” directed at a 2022 LGBT panel by the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation showed a public belief that “the relationship between queerness and nuclear policy is intended to push a social agenda rather than to address substantive issues.” This, Nair said, proved that “discrimination against queer people can undermine nuclear security and increase nuclear risk.”

Nair continued, explaining how non-diverse groups of decision makers are prone to “groupthink,” making them “hostile to critical examination of baseline assumptions about how adversaries construct and identify nuclear threats and risks.” Introducing LGBT people in nuclear policy discussions can widen the definition of perceived threats and increases security, she wrote. “Queer theory is also about rejecting binary choices and zero-sum thinking…

Let’s look at that a little more closely, as I wrap this up.

Here is the problem with her agenda, as I see it.

Firstly, it IS an agenda. A social agenda. Which is vying for serious bandwidth within an arena that should be fully dedicated to the substantive issues of nuclear security risk and mitigation.

I don’t think queer theory stands up as a theory – much less does it stand up with any substantive value-add within the real-world of nuclear proliferation and deterrence.

I am not pro-discrimination, towards anyone. Even if I disagree with a lifestyle choice on moral grounds. But the idea that some lapse in the inclusion of a specific self-identifying group of people into this subject realm could “undermine nuclear security and increase nuclear risk”?

Completely asinine.

That one statement alone proves out the entire issue with DEI practices; it is COMPLETELY fixated on an ever-changing theoretical social design structure, to the COMPLETE AND UTTER lapse of grounding in real-world, merit-based reality.

And it simply is not true. Self-evidently untrue, to those who have not chosen willful blindness for the sake of redesigning reality to provide an outlet for their general and/or specific frustrations with life.

And one more thing — groupthink is a real thing. I agree, it is a serious danger. A thing that builds and resonates within the confines of forced social norms. Not, however, just because there ARE “norms”.

“Groupthink”, and every blind spot it creates, is in fact VERY dangerous. No matter the domain we’re talking about.

But just like every potential calamity put forth as an argument in favor of this “woke” nonsense, it is the very concepts of “queer theory”… DEI… and all the other buzzword concepts themselves that are MOST GUARANTEED to bring about the very problems they purport to avoid, and solve.

You want to guarantee a deterioration in nuclear security?

Force overlay a social construct that does not align with reality onto the real-world functionality of systems which have ebbed and flowed with both technological and geopolitical trends over decades – and you will instantly degrade every mechanism in place below it’s current state of effectiveness.

God help us, if this sort of meritless idiocy is allowed to continue unabated in the organizations, companies, and leadership of this nation.

It is funny – because it is STUPID.

But it is dangerous for exactly the same reason.


 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.