Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Joe Biden Appears Wildly Disoriented After Earlier Faux Pas With Macron

Joe Biden is having a bad day, even for him.

The day started off with the Internet convinced he had just did a poopsie doopsie in his pants while hanging out with French President Macron.

Yes, I really had to actually cover this, so sad:

Did Biden Just Take Another DUMP In His Pants?

But things got worse from there.

After Biden was whisked away from the event with Macron (some claim to have a change of pants), when he later emerged again for the first time he was caught on camera looking wildly confused, staring off into space mouth agape, doing his trademark pivot left and pivot right while he seemingly tries to scan the area seeing if there is anyone or anything that he notices.

This is so sad, take a look:

ADVERTISEMENT

Backup video here:

And in case you missed the earlier report about the #2 in his drawers, I can't believe it but this is an actual news story from earlier this morning:

Did Biden Just Take Another DUMP In His Pants?

You know, when I set out to start this website nearly 10 years ago, I envisioned covering national and world events.

The glamour....

The prestige...

The honor and dignity!

Never in my wildest dreams did I think I'd have to cover the (alleged) President of the United States and ANALyze whether or not he just did another poopsie doopsie in his pants.

And yet here we are.

And yes, it's an actual news story -- not something I am just making up.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here's what people are saying (and then keep reading for what I've found about this):

After that incident, many pointed out Biden was swiftly "whisked away", leaving French President Macron to greet the Veterans by himself:

My favorites are the ones who say they immediately recognized this "move" because it's the exact same stance their toddler takes when dropping a huge load in their pants:

ADVERTISEMENT

It's definitely not the first time we've seen Joe Biden do this "move"....

Remember when he stopped mid-walk and "assumed the position" and once again I was left here writing a story to analyze whether or not our (alleged) sitting President just dumped in his pants?

Watch this:

So....did he really do it?

Did he just poop his pants on stage with Macron?

Well, the short answer is I don't know for sure.  I wasn't there, I (fortunately) didn't get the chance to smell it.  So I don't know.

And I'm not in the business of giving Joe Biden the benefit of the doubt because he has never once demonstrated he deserves it, but....we're also in the business of fair and honest reporting.

So credit to Fletch17 for this one...watch below and you will see the video everyone keeps sharing is cut off early and the full version shows Biden may not have been "assuming the position of the Toddler dump" but rather just sitting down too early -- equally embarrassing -- but watch this:

Still, it doesn't change the truth that he was also whisked away early and did not stay to greet the Veterans, leaving Macron to do it alone.

So what really happened?

ADVERTISEMENT

I don't know for sure, you will have to make up your own mind.

At the very least, he violated protocol and sat down too early, either because he's old and senile, old and tired, old and confused, or old and pooped his pants.  Or some combination of all of the above.

Then we know he was whisked away prematurely, and we don't know why.

So there you go!

We also know this....

This is (sadly) far from the first time I've had to write about Joe Biden pooping his pants or screaming out "My Butt's Been Wiped!".

Remember this?

Did We Finally Just Find Out Why Joe Biden Shouted “My Butt’s Been Wiped”?

And this?

Did Biden Poop His Pants At The Vatican?

Absolutely despicable.

RELATED REPORT:

Joe Biden Now Using a "Team of Walkers"

Joe Biden has a new strategy to try and hide his failing health.

A team of walkers!

Like a bunch of blockers forming a wedge for the Running Back in Football, Biden now has his own team of "Walkers" designed to flank the media from noticing his failing health and awkward gait.

Take a look:

More here:

Why does he look so weird when he walks?

Like he's got a corncob stuck up his anus or a huge dump in his pants!

Come on now, we've all been there....

Not the first one but the second one.

We've all had that horrible moment when we trusted a fart more than we should have and we end up with some liquid in our drawers.

Do not tell me it's never happened to you....

And when it does happen, how do you walk?

EXACTLY like this:

The Telegraph had more on the new development:

Joe Biden is using a team of “walkers” around him to disguise his shuffling gait from photographers, it has been claimed.

The US president, 81, has begun walking across the White House lawn surrounded by a group of aides when boarding Marine One, his helicopter.

Traditionally, presidents approach the helicopter alone to give photographers a clearer shot but Mr Biden’s team became concerned that footage of him walking alone emphasised his shuffling gait and could worsen concerns about his age, Axios reported.

They said that walking slowly across the grass alone made Mr Biden look older.

The team has reportedly tasked a team of advisers also travelling with Mr Biden to walk alongside him for the Marine One shot, obscuring Mr Biden’s legs.

They include Bruce Reed and Annie Tomasini, his deputy chiefs of staff, and Mike Donilon, his close adviser.

Mr Biden himself has told aides he would prefer a “less formal” walking style in photographs, after his doctor revealed he had “spinal arthritis” and “mild sensory peripheral neuropathy of the feet” that made his gait stiffer.

The new strategy began earlier this month and Mr Biden has been seen walking with advisers nine in 10 times since April 16.

It comes after Mr Biden’s team suggested he wear “maximum stability” shoes to stop him from falling over.

Yeah, I would have to say the new strategy is NOT working as we can still (unfortunately) see him.

I think you all need to run a tighter formation.

But not shocking that these incompetent asshats can't even manage to get this correct.

RELATED:

Biden Panicked That Trump Will Invoke The Insurrection Act" -- Here's What That Actually Means

We've heard a lot about "Insurrection" over the last 3 years...

Way more than I ever care to hear for the rest of my life.

A made up and fake "scandal" designed to divert your attention from the truth.

Basically, this meme:

But while we've heard copious amounts of talk about "acts of insurrection" we haven't heard much about the "Insurrection Act".

Two very different things.

I'm going to explain the "Insurrection Act" to you in just a moment, but first let me show you this very angry, panicked video from a recent Biden speech.

If you ask me, they know what's coming and they are terrified:

Biden says that “Trump plans to invoke the Insurrection Act which will allow him to deploy US military forces on the streets of America.”

This panic-ridden speech is absolutely hilarious. It’s so cartoonish that they are either scared to death of what’s to come or they are purposely sabotaging themselves.

Cartoonish is absolutely right.

Just look at how his face contorts with anger and evil, that's some wild stuff!

But back to the topic at hand, why is Joe Biden so panicked about President Trump using the Insurrection Act?

Let me explain....

Trump May Deploy "Ironic" 1795 Law To Clean Up America

Occam's Razor says that the simplest answer is usually correct.

Elon Musk often jokes that the most "ironic" outcome is usually the most likely to occur.

And he might just be right on this one.

What is the one word the Crooked Media and Crooked Congress has tried to sink President Trump with since January 2021?

"Insurrection"

In that context, people afraid that President Trump will win again (big league) in 2024, have tried to use the "Insurrection Clause" of the 14th Amendment to bar him from the ballot:

  1. Prohibition Against Holding Office: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that no person shall hold any office, civil or military, under the United States or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

Of course we know that's completely bogus, but did you know there is actually a different law on the books from 1795 called The Insurrection Act?

Totally different thing, and the irony above all ironies is that President Trump may deploy it on Day 1 of his Presidency to clean up America:

The Insurrection Act of 1795 is a United States federal law that empowers the President to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in specific circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion. The key aspects of this act include:

  1. Authorization for Use: The Act allows the President to use the armed forces to address an insurrection in any state which requests it, or in situations where it's necessary to enforce federal law.
  2. Conditions for Deployment: Before deploying troops, the President must first issue a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse within a limited time. If the situation does not resolve after this proclamation, the President can then use military force.
  3. Historical Context: Enacted in 1795, the law was a response to the Whiskey Rebellion, a 1794 uprising against federal tax collections in western Pennsylvania.
  4. Subsequent Amendments: The Act has been amended several times, most notably by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which limits the use of military personnel under federal command for law enforcement purposes within the United States.
  5. Modern Usage: The Insurrection Act has been invoked on several occasions throughout history, including during the Los Angeles riots in 1992 and in response to Hurricane Hugo in 1989.

America has become a third world country.

Our major cities are not even safe to walk in any more.

Have you seen this from Chicago?

Or this filth from New York?

Or this TERRIFYING attack on a woman in Chicago?

Time to clean it up, and President Trump is just the man to do it.

Here is The Associated Press:

“You look at these great cities Los Angeles, San Francisco you look at what’s happening to our country… We cannot let it happen any longer. And one of the other things I’ll do.. Because you know you’re supposed to not be involved in that you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in…

The next time, I’m not waiting. One of the things I did was let them run it, and we’re going to show how bad a job they do,” he added.

You can see the clip in this speech at the 1:50:00 mark -- the play button should cue it up right to that spot:

Here's more from the Associated Press on how it may play out:

The Insurrection Act allows presidents to call on reserve or active-duty military units to respond to unrest in the states, an authority that is not reviewable by the courts. One of its few guardrails merely requires the president to request that the participants disperse.

“The principal constraint on the president’s use of the Insurrection Act is basically political, that presidents don’t want to be the guy who sent tanks rolling down Main Street,” said Joseph Nunn, a national security expert with the Brennan Center for Justice. “There’s not much really in the law to stay the president’s hand.”

A spokesman for Trump’s campaign did not respond to multiple requests for comment about what authority Trump might use to pursue his plans.

Congress passed the act in 1792, just four years after the Constitution was ratified. Nunn said it's an amalgamation of different statutes enacted between then and the 1870s, a time when there was little in the way of local law enforcement.

“It is a law that in many ways was created for a country that doesn’t exist anymore,” he said.

It also is one of the most substantial exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits using the military for law enforcement purposes.

Trump has spoken openly about his plans should he win the presidency, including using the military at the border and in cities struggling with violent crime. His plans also have included using the military against foreign drug cartels, a view echoed by other Republican primary candidates such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley, the former U.N. ambassador and South Carolina governor.

What do you think?

Here's something else that's very interesting....

Apparently, AI was asked what would have happened if President Trump had used the Insurrection Act back in January of 2020 before he left office....

The answer?

It would have destroyed the country.

In other words, this is EXACTLY why we had to have the 3-year "Pause".

President Trump Once Again Explains “The Pause” — This Time In More Detail

WOW: AI Confirmed The Insurrection Act Would Have Destroyed The Country

This is really interesting...

Yes, this is from the Charlie Ward show, but let me explain.

I've been fairly public over the years of saying I'm not a big fan of Charlie Ward and I'm a much lesser fan of Simon Parkes.

But I do really like Juan O'Savin (which I'm sure is not his real name).

I do believe Juan is not just a casual observer, I believe he's probably someone very connected, which I assume from the way he speaks.

Just my two cents.

I also really appreciate his Biblical world view.

Even in this interview he tells people to not "follow a guru" but to get a direct connection to "Our Father in Heaven".

And he's made many comments in the past that lead me to believe that's a Biblical, Christian view of God and not what these evil Elites think of their "gods".

But anyway, back to the interview.

Juan was on with Charlie Ward and Simon Parkes and while I d0n't put too much stock in what they say, I did find the interview fascinating.

And most of it was Juan speaking.

This is an entirely new interview, so even if you've heard some of his recent interviews there is a lot new in here.

Perhaps the most interesting part to me was his discussion of The Insurrection Act and whether or not Trump signed it.

Juan says absolutely not.

And for the record, President Trump has also said absolutely not.

Although it was considered.

According to Juan, President Trump was extremely close to signing it but then decided not to after Artificial Intelligence computer modeling ran all the scenarios and determined it would send our country into a new Civil War (65% vs. 35%) -- one we likely would never have recovered from.

There's a lot more in here too, including a full breakdown of the Brunson Supreme Court case and why it's likely to succeed.

FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING.

The whole interview is great (just take Charlie and Simon with a grain of salt, although they do say we're going to have a very good Christmas, so that is encouraging if true).

Please enjoy this one...

Watch here on Rumble:

And speaking of the SCOTUS case, we could use your help!

Brunson vs. Adams, Here's What Can You Do To Help!

Calling all patriots!

Since early November, I've been telling you about the Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case, Brunson v. Adams.

I've been telling you it's special.

I've been telling you it's unlike all the rest.

And now I'm calling for your help...

Thanks to WomenImpactingNation and PrayingMantis, I've got a great Q&A for you to answer some of the top questions...

...as well as a call to action that everyone can help with!

I know the deadline says December 15, but if you take action today it may still make a big difference.

So please jump in.

From WIN (originally sourced from PrayingMantis), please read the following:

This post is about the very important Brunson vs. Alma S. Adams, et al. case that is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Please read to the end!

THE INFORMATION BELOW HAS BEEN REPRINTED IN PART WITH PERMISSION FROM PRAYING MANTIS at SUBSTACK.  Links to the full, original posts are at the end of this article, with instructions and links to the letter you are being asked to write and mail ASAP!  It must be mailed BEFORE DECEMBER 15!

 

If you attended the W.I.N. Christmas party, you heard a little intro to what’s going on.  Perhaps you have read a newsletter or an online media report about how critical this case is to our freedom.

You need to know what is at stake and the “Hail Mary” action that we the people must take to save our United States of America republic.
Please read this post in its entirety to get a better understanding of what the case is about and how it impacts every American.

,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.