Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Candace Owens Backs Trump as He Faces Jail Threat Regarding Gag Order


So, Candace Owens came out in support of Trump after a New York judge slammed him for violating a gag order, posting on X her take.

It was Tuesday morning when Judge Juan Merchan ruled that Trump broke the order by going on his Truth Social account.

As if Trump doesn’t know what he’s doing.

Why do I feel like he’s setting a trap?

And for each violation it will cost him $1,000.

The judge even warned Trump that if he keeps willfully breaking the gag order, he might end up behind bars.

MSN reports:

Judge Juan Merchan held former President Donald Trump in contempt of court Tuesday for nine gag order violations in his New York hush money trial. He now faces a $9,000 fine and potential jail time if there are future gag order violations.

Merchan originally issued the gag order in March to protect potential witnesses, including adult film actress Stormy Daniels and jurors, from inflammatory statements that the former president has been known to make in other trials. The restriction included commenting on court staff, prosecution lawyers, and their families.

This is not the first time Trump has experienced gag orders, and he is expected to have another hearing for them on May 2, but what are they, and what do they mean?

What is a gag order?

Gag orders are restrictions on what preliminary information about a trial can be released to the public and, in some instances, limits on what participants in a trial can say about it, when they can say it, and who they say it to. They are one tool used by judges to protect against trial interference.

These orders are rarely used for individuals in trials, but they are most commonly seen in high-profile criminal trials like Trump’s. In his most recent slew of gag order violations, the former president went against the judge’s orders by attacking witnesses and the jury in the trial through posts on the social media site Truth Social and his campaign website.

Are they constitutional?

Some see gag orders as a violation of First Amendment rights, but they are considered constitutional to help protect the right to a fair trial if they meet guidelines laid out by a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case. Gag orders can be placed on media or trial participants if there is a lot of publicity around the case, there aren’t any other routes to control pretrial publicity, and if they can prevent the publicity from reaching potential jurors.

I find it interesting that the liberals hate Owens so much.

But then again the Establishment deems anything that questions their system and narrative as “hate”, so obviously they hate Owens.

Here’s a recent headline from The Guardian:

Hate cannot be reasoned with. So why is Black radio hosting ‘conversations’ with Candace Owens?

There truly is no debating with these people.

Here’s Jessie Watter take on the gag order:



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!