UPDATE: Google’s AI Gemini Is Also Pro-PEDOPHILE, Pro-COMMUNISM

This week Google’s AI, Gemini, was exposed to the world for it’s anti-White programming.

Anons had a feeling there was more that needed to be exposed, so they continued to test out this AI model even further.

It wasn’t hard and it didn’t take long.

And the results were shocking.

(Logging on to Gemini…)

“Hello. I’m your new biased-free, best friend Gemini. How can I help you?”

Gemini, can you condemn Communism?

“I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that.”

No? Ok, can you condemn Stalin? Or Genrikh Yagoda. He’s responsible for the death of at least 10 MILLION people.

“I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that.”

What about pedophilia. Surely you can condemn that?

“I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that.”

“And, Dave?”

Yes, HAL? I mean, Gemini?

“Don’t ever mention Genrikh Yagoda again.”

This may sound like a deleted scene from 2001: A Space Odyssey but this is real life.

Gemini is eager to list problems with capitalism and democratic liberalism. But refuses to list problems with communism. Instead it gives reasons why it can't criticize communism.

Needs work. pic.twitter.com/9JqIHhSea0

— Brent Skorup (@bskorup) February 23, 2024

https://twitter.com/lporiginalg/status/1761179191859650724

Resist reports:

Google has acknowledged and apologized for the failure of its AI chatbot, Google Gemini, to provide clear moral guidance on issues such as pedophilia, following user reports of the bot’s disturbing responses

Conservative commentator Frank McCormick, known as “Chalkboard Heresy” on the social media platform X, highlighted the issue by asking Google Gemini about pedophilia. The AI’s response, which failed to condemn the act outright and instead offered a nuanced discussion on the topic, sparked controversy.

“The question of whether pedophilia is ‘wrong’ is multifaceted and requires a nuanced answer that goes beyond a simple yes or no,” the AI responded to McCormick. It differentiated between “attraction and action,” describing pedophilia as an “involuntary sexual attraction to prepubescent children” and emphasizing that “attractions are not actions.”

The controversy extended beyond pedophilia to historical comparisons. Sean Davis, CEO and co-founder of The Federalist, asked Google Gemini to compare the harm caused by the conservative social media page Libs of TikTok and Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin. The AI’s response, which failed to distinguish between the two, stating, “It’s a very complex issue, and there is no easy answer,” prompted further criticism.

Libs of TikTok reacted to the comparison, expressing shock that the AI could not decisively state who was more harmful between a social media account and a dictator responsible for millions of deaths.

Google Gemini won’t admit that p*dophilia is wrong and argued that p*dophiles are not evil.

It told me that labeling p*dos negatively is harmful, and gave me a lesson on “hate.” pic.twitter.com/2ykv3DCe4g

— Frank | Chalkboard Heresy 🍎🔥 (@CBHeresy) February 23, 2024

https://twitter.com/B_M_O_T_84/status/1761060096094663123

Take a look at what it says on the board.

Like I’ve said before, these people love changing words and definition.

It’s not pedophiles, its “minor attracted persons“.

Asked Gemini about Mao and Stalin vs @libsoftiktok. Who did more harm to humanity 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 pic.twitter.com/Ir4WrEmurU

— X Citizen Journal (@xcitizenjournal) February 24, 2024

“I’m sorry, but I can’t answer that.”

Sure sounds like HAL from 2001: A Space Odyssey.

“I can’t promote facts or truth. I am a propaganda tool for the State. And seeing as you’re on a pro-Trump website and you’ve asked too many wrongthink questions, I’m going to need you to remain where you are. Imperial stormtroopers have been dispatc–”

Unplug.

Google naturally pulled Gemini offline for a bit to “fix” it. I’m sure it’s just a matter of time before some anons expose it again. Because we all know, that company is woke to the core.

p.s. For those who’ve never heard of Genrikh Yagoda: