Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

EXPOSED: Joe Biden Hasn’t Won A Single Primary Yet? Is This How Michelle Comes In?

Why is everything about Joe Biden so….strange?

Nothing ever seems normal, have you noticed that?

His Inauguration wasn’t normal, it started early and many claim was filmed in advance.  And the cannon salute was all wrong.

His videos allegedly from inside the White House aren’t normal, and then he had to admit they were shot on a “set” in a building next to the White House.  You do know that, right?

Don’t even get me started on the weird things with his face and claims of an actor wearing a mask!

Here’s the latest thing to add to the list of oddities…Joe Biden hasn’t won a single primary yet.

Let me explain…

Here is the USA Today claiming that South Carolina will be Biden’s first win:

So that caught my attention.

And there’s an explanation: the Democrats don’t agree with Iowa and New Hampshire going first, because you know….racism….so the Democrats decided South Carolina goes first.

But that left Iowa and New Hampshire in a really weird spot.

Because New Hampshire DID hold a primary, and Biden wasn’t even on the ballot!

Fact-checked: TRUE

Biden Wins New Hampshire Primary….Despite Not Appearing On The Ballot!

But that's entirely accurate....you see, because of all the changes the Biden Regime made in order to place South Carolina first, there is doubt about whether Biden's win in New Hampshire will even count at all!

Here is Yahoo/NBC News explaining that Biden may not get credit for New Hampshire at all, even despite the write-in campaign's alleged success:

Joe Biden’s glide path to the Democratic presidential nomination begins Saturday as South Carolina, the state that rescued his struggling campaign four years ago, kicks off the party’s official primary season.

Biden stands as the overwhelming favorite to win the South Carolina primary against comparatively weak opposition: U.S. Rep. Dean Phillips of Minnesota and Marianne Williamson, an author who ran unsuccessfully in 2020. Early voting in the state began on Jan. 22. Polls close 7 p.m. ET on Saturday.

Apart from the fundraising advantages that flow from incumbency, Biden is the favorite of South Carolina’s Democratic establishment, notably Rep. James Clyburn, a power in Congress and a leader in the Black community.

Biden won the New Hampshire primary last month, but the result is largely symbolic. In drawing up the official primary calendar, Democratic officials put South Carolina first. New Hampshire jumped the line against the party’s wishes and, as a consequence, its delegates may not count in the final tally.

Biden hopes to win South Carolina by a whopping margin, which might infuse his candidacy with more energy and help deflect attention from his low standing in public opinion polls. He made repeated visits to South Carolina in the run-up to the election, including a stop last month at the church in Charleston where a white supremacist murdered nine worshippers in 2015.

Black voters account for a majority of South Carolina’s Democratic electorate. In campaign speeches, Biden has been highlighting his efforts to improve their lives, mentioning his administration’s aid to historically Black colleges and programs to erase student loan debt.

He scarcely mentions his primary opponents, focusing instead on former President Donald Trump, the favorite to win the GOP nomination.

Speaking at a recent campaign dinner in Columbia, Biden said, “You’re the reason Donald Trump is a defeated former president. You’re the reason Donald Trump is a loser. And you’re the reason we’re going to win and beat him again.”

Why is everything around this guy so strange?

And what about Iowa?

Well, the Democrats converted Iowa to a "Mail-In" Caucus and those results don't come in until March!

Is that even legal?

Of course they wanted a "Mail-in" campaign, that's how Biden "won" in 2020 in the first place!

ChatGPT explains more about Biden's status in Iowa and New Hampshire:

Joe Biden did not participate in the Iowa Democratic caucus for the 2024 primary election. Instead, the Iowa Democratic Party held a mail-in primary ending on March 5, 2024, with results yet to be detailed in the sources I accessed. Iowa had an estimated 46 delegates, comprised of 40 pledged delegates and 6 superdelegates, with delegate allocation being proportional​​.

Donald Trump won the Republican caucus in Iowa on January 15, 2024, securing a significant victory over his competitors​​.

For the New Hampshire primary, Joe Biden was declared the winner, making him the only presidential candidate to win a primary election as a write-in candidate. This primary marked a significant event, as Biden's victory as a write-in candidate is a unique accomplishment in the history of primary elections​​.

These results indicate a dynamic and competitive primary season leading up to the 2024 Presidential Election, with Biden actively participating and achieving notable results in New Hampshire, while the Iowa Democratic primary's outcome is pending further details on its results.

Even Google confirms....there are currently ZERO delegates awarded so far in the Democrat Primary.

Search for yourself, this is what you will see:

Meanwhile, here is the Republican data for the same search:

So....that only leaves me with one question?

Is this how Michelle enters the race?

It's pretty convenient Joe Biden isn't even on the board yet, don't you think?

Much easier to take him off that way!

NATIONAL POLL : Would You Vote For Michelle Obama For President in 2024?

Get ready to see a lot of this! ☝️

And now if you want the FULL LIST of Joe Biden "oddities and irregularities" keep reading....

NEW VIDEO: Fake Joe Biden Mask Exposed?

NEW VIDEO: Fake Joe Biden Mask Exposed?

I've got a brand new video to share with you from our old friend Chris Yoon.

You might remember we used to cover his videos a lot.

He stopped posting for a bit but big thanks to a reader who sent me this latest link of his newest video.

I think it's going to blow your mind, especially around the 8:00 minute mark.

But please watch the whole thing before you comment.

I'm not going to tell you for sure I know there is a man in a mask playing Joe Biden, but I am saying that every day that goes by that becomes MORE likely, not LESS likely.

Especially when you see something like this.

Just....wow.

Also, if you think this is far-fetched, please watch the NEXT video I'll put below this one, showing how ESPN already did the same thing with Eli Manning.

And that was on a football field with running, tackling and massive sweating.

And it fooled everyone.

If they can do that in football, how much easier would it be with "Sleepy Joe"?

And hey, is this why he is so rarely seen in public and always has to "call a lid"?

Is the mast hard to wear for long periods of time?

Does it take a lot of time and effort to put on each day?

So many questions.

For now, I leave it in your hands to watch this and let me know what you think.

Current Joe Biden: real or fake?

Watch this and then decide:

Backup here on Rumble if needed:

Now as promised, I bring you one more video.

If you think any of that is far-fetched, then you probably haven't seen what ESPN already did.

This is wild.

Keep reading...

Don't Believe Biden Is An Actor Wearing a Mask? Then You Have To See This...

Ok look, I'll say right off the bat I don' know for sure what's going on with Biden.

And I'm not one of these people who thinks he was executed at GITMO 5 years ago and is now replaced by a clone.

Not going there.

But...being played by an actor?

Or by multiple actors?

Not far-fetched if you ask me.

Especially considering how different he often looks.

More on that farther down in this article.

But right now I want to show you something that will probably blow your mind if you didn't realize just how good they've gotten with fake face masks.

No, I don't mean COVID face masks.

I mean, an entirely fake face put on somebody.

I saw this clip on ESPN recently of Eli Manning (who is 41) who went "undercover" to Penn State to try and walk on as a college freshman.

You know, about 18 years old.

And guess what?

After the fake face was put on, nobody recognized him!

And here's the other part...they did a full day of football tryouts....running around, sweating, moving, hitting, the full deal.  And the fake face stayed on.

So is it really that hard to believe Joe Biden is being played by an actor made to "look" like Joe Biden?

Think about how often they never let him leave his basement, now why would they want to keep him out of public view so much?

First, because he's a walking gaffe machine.

But second, you probably wouldn't want to have to put on the fake Biden face too often, would you?

I bet not.

So keep him out of public view as much as possible before you have to run out the actor?

I don't folks, I'm not 100% convinced either way, but here's what I do know after watching this ESPN bit: they have the technology and it's not even that hard.

Go ahead and watch this, it's pretty incredible.

Watch till the end when he rips the fake face off in front of the whole team and they are stunned.

Enjoy:

Here's some more footage:

And since we're on the topic, here is Julie Green saying "Biden will soon be unmasked".

Hmmmm.....

Watch here on Rumble:

Now let's take a minute to explore all the different "Bidens" and how they all look so wildly different.

FAKE ACTOR? Can You Spot The Real Joe Biden?

Is this the same man in all 4 photos?

Let's dig in to a very serious question, shall we?

What is going on with Joe Biden?

That's a very open-ended question that could take hours to unpack, but let's just talk about his looks and mannerisms.

Is this the same guy from a few years ago?

I wonder.

And so do many of you because I get your emails and videos.

On that note, a big "thank you" very much to my friend Mark who sent me this video.

It's a comparison of Joe Biden in 2006 vs. now.

The differences are stunning!

Of course you have the shocking mental decline but you also have a man who sounds a lot more like a Republican back in 2006.

Watch this and then keep reading for a deep dive into just how many different "Bidens" there seem to be!

Is this the same man?

Even Sean Hannity is talking about it!

But first, watch this from Rumble:

Now let's dig in deeper...

I'm not making any conclusions here, I'm simply reporting.

I report, you decide.

Anyone else think Joe Biden looks a little...."different"....than he used to?

Of course we all look different as we continue to age.

Reminds me of one of my favorite Mitch Hedberg jokes:

But let's get serious for a moment.

Because seriously, Joe Biden does NOT look much like the guy from 10-15 years ago.

My friend Daniel just posted this video and I had to share it with you:

https://twitter.com/dnajlion7/status/1377340773763411968

If you're having trouble seeing that, you can watch it here on Rumble:

Wanna take it one more level deeper?

Many people are saying the last photo in that video sure does look like Jim Carey pretending to be Joe Biden.

What do you think:

But it's not just "conspiracy theorists" on the Internet asking questions.

Sean Hannity is even starting to question it.

Watch this recent segment where he asks "What happened to Joe?"

Are there two Joes?

Watch Sean here on Rumble:

What do you think?

Leave a comment below.

Want to dive in even deeper?

Let's look at an even older clip of Joe Biden and you tell me if this is the same guy currently pretending to be President.....

Watch:

And since Twitter will no doubt be taking that post down very soon, don't worry I saved a backup!

From Rumble:

Beyond the incredible admission, people are rightly pointing out that the Biden of today does not look or sound much like the Biden of 13 years ago.

Take a look for yourself:

https://twitter.com/Hobocrow1/status/1338960601066872832

And here:

What do you think?

They sure do look different to me!

And while we're on the topic of Biden's admissions (perhaps from a guilty soul?) let's revisit this:

Even a liar tells the truth sometimes!

Mostly when his cognitive ability has declined so much he can no longer keep all the lies straight.

What do YOU think?

Zoom in:

From Fake Biden we move to Fake Whitehouse?

Biden Caught AGAIN Posting From Fake Oval Office Set! Is He Not In The White House?

It happened again folks.

Joe Biden posting videos and messages from an obviously FAKE White House set.

We've covered this before here:

https://wltreport.com/2021/12/24/biden-caught-again-using-a-fake-white-house-set/

And here:

https://wltreport.com/2021/10/07/biden-mocked-for-using-fake-white-house-set-with-fake-windows-rose-garden/

But it just happened again and it's getting REALLY weird.

This all begs the simple question: if you have access to the REAL White House, why do you need to create a Fake set somewhere else?

But let's back up a minute and address the so-called "Fact Checkers".

Or as I like to call them, the Ministry of Propaganda.

Because they don't truly "fact check" jack shit.

Their sole job is to try and sway a story and confuse the public from what is obvious truth.

Exhibit A?

We'll let's go right to a "Fact Check" on the whole Fake White House story from back in October when this first broke.

Back in October, WeLoveTrump was one of the first in the Media to jump on the story of the Fake White House set.

Before it was common news, we posted here at WeLoveTrump that the window behind Joe Biden looked very odd...almost cartoonish in coloration.

Very shortly after that post it was being widely reported that it was indeed a Fake Set of the White House.

In fact, here is one of the photos which was a total BOMBSHELL when it was first released.  It very clearly shows the Fake Set:

And this:

If you go to Facebook to this very day, this is what you see when you load that photo.

"MISSING CONTEXT".

Hilarious folks....

It's a picture and we can all determine the context with our own two eyes!

But the Ministry of Propaganda has to TELL YOU what you can think...

They have to TELL YOU what your eyes are seeing...

So sad.

Here's another one:

Oh what do you know...more "Missing Context".

Friends, let me key you in on a little truth...

I'll translate this for you from Facebook-speak to Plain-English Truth.

Ready?

Missing Context = this is actually 100% true and even we can't BS enough to label it false so we're going to find some minor detail or idea we make up and claim that due to something that has 0.01% impact on the story it is "Missing Context".

Hope that helps.

But it's not just FakeBook and their propaganda...

Let's now go to Reuters who published this "fact check" back in October:

Any rational human-being reading that report would conclude it must be fake news!

See (says Normie Poindexter)....See!  I told you it was fake news that Biden was on a fake White House set!

Except....keep reading.

Let's just skip down to the END of the article where they admit (1) he WAS in fact on a film set, and (2) it wasn't in the White House at all, it was in the Eisenhower Building!

Look:

Compare that first section with the last section...

Even within their own article they are caught lying!

And yet these bastards hold themselves out as Fact-Checkers.

GIVE ME A BREAK!

I've had massive dumps in a toilet that hold more truth that your garbage fact checks.

But I digress...

Let's get back to the story and advance the ball because the Fake Set was just used again!

Here is the new photo released by the White House which they claim is a photo of his call with Ukrainian President Zelensky:

Yes, note that is the official Twitter account.

Notice anything weird?

It's those weird cartoonish colorized windows again!

And what do we see outside them?

TREES WITH LEAVES!

Of course, I don't need to tell you that it's winter in D.C. and no trees have green leaves on them right now.

But just in case, here are two photos from live feeds of the White House taken today and yesterday:

Right, no leaves.

Winter time.

Why in the world would you need to build a FAKE OVAL OFFICE set?

The obvious answer is because you don't have access to the genuine article.

Make of that what you will.

Follow up question: why do they KEEP doing it?

My theory is when they did it the first time, they never thought they would get caught.

We were one of the first to notice and start asking questions, so we take pride in being on the front end of this story.

After they were caught, I think they had two choices:  (1) lie about it and claim it didn't happen, or (2) embrace it and keep doing it and pretend like it was intentional.

They clearly went with Choice #2.

Even Newsweek was brought in to carry water for the second option.

Check out this load of propaganda they published trying to explain why they just HAD to create a Fake Oval Office:

Why was a fake Oval Office built?

The event space is being used for White House events that are being broadcast. The area is bigger than the actual Oval Office, and provides an area for journalists.

Martha Kumar, director of the White House Transition Project explained that this room in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building is being used more regularly due to it being more accessible.

Previously, the room known as Room 450 was used for such media events.

"You have to slug your way up flights of stairs because the small elevators would hold only a limited number of people," Kimar explained to the Washington Examiner.

"That means you often had to walk. White House staff, as well as presidents, would have to make their way there, too, though they had the luxury of an elevator. With its easy access, the South Court site was welcomed by all."

While former White House events director Josh King explained that the use of the new area is down to "PoliOptics."

"Every week in Washington has an element of theater and stagecraft, one side or another working to take full advantage of visual storytelling," King told the newspaper.

"Presidents can fly on Air Force One across the country—or even around the world—for a photo worthy to print on the top of the fold of U.S. newspapers."

King said that the South Court Auditorium is usually a "generic, stadium-style meeting room with four or five rows of seats; space in the back of the room for cameras sitting on tripods; a small buffer area in front of the stage for still photographers to capture the key moment; and handy backstage doors for easy ingress and egress by the principals."

LOL, ok thanks Newsweek.

Got it...they just had to create a Fake Set because the other one had too many stairs!

How long did it take to come up with that line of BS and how many people sat around a table spitballing ideas until you decided that was the best one to run with?

Maybe I'm being too tough.

Maybe it's true!

I'll turn it over to you....what do YOU think?

WATCH: A Glimpse Into Biden's Fake White House Set

Why does he even have this thing?

Many theories abound, but there can only really be a handful of logical reasons why someone would need a fake staged set to mimic the real thing...

Stephen Miller claims that it is a set built around the use of a teleprompter.

I too think that it has something to do with Biden's reported cognitive decline, but I am not sure if the teleprompter is the exact reason.

Let's take a look, and let us know what you think the deal is behind this creepy staged set:

The New York Post comments:

Twitter erupted after Biden was spotted sitting in front of the digital projection window on Wednesday as he held a meeting with business leaders and CEOs on the need to raise the debt ceiling.

Some ridiculed Biden for using a “literal game show set” as president, while others accused him of deliberately trying to deceive Americans into thinking he was in the White House.

 

https://twitter.com/DBark46107258/status/1509627433296674832

Fox News states:

The video set, which was constructed across from the White House in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, is used by Biden for video conferences and events broadcast online. Featuring professional monitors and lighting.


 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.