DC Judge Strikes Down President Trump’s Request For Critical Evidence

What is up with this Trump-hating Judge Tanya Chutkan?

First, she issued a gag order against the former President, and now she has denied the Trump legal team’s request for critical evidence in this ongoing fake election subversion case.

President Trump’s legal team requested a subpoena for the January 6th Committee’s materials—a completely fair request given the scope and subject matter of the case. Of course, she denied that request as confirmed by The Epoch Times:

Her seven-page decision criticized the scope and alleged vagueness of President Trump’s requests.

It also argued that he was improperly applying Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 to information that could be obtained through other means.

Now, I am no legal expert, but if it takes seven pages for a judge to outline why a defendant can’t obtain critical materials and evidence directly pertaining to a case, that judge is engaging in partiality and injustice.

She is dancing around the fact that a highly politicized committee organized to smear the President was allowed to shape the narrative post-January 6th. This narrative has colored everything to do with President Trump since that date.

You can read the entirety of her seven-page ruling below to get a full understanding (or not) of her decision:

CNN reported:

Trump’s attorneys had claimed in their motion to subpoena records from the committee, its Chairman Bennie Thompson, and others that the committee and federal officials withheld some materials related to the investigation.

His defense lawyers also argued that special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump had “significant overlap” with the House select committee’s investigation.