Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

“Time Compression Theory” — They Have Been Lying To You For a LONG Time…

Once you get red-pilled and wake up, you start seeing the lies everywhere!

Mostly coming from the Government.

For most people, 9/11 was the event that woke them up.

For other people, it’s something else.

But then you start looking around and you go back in time and you find out it’s just lie after lie after lie.

Of course nowhere is that more obvious than with the Roswell incident in New Mexico in 1947, where the story kept changing over and over and over.

I’m not going to go deep into that story in this article, I only want to talk about one absolutely ludicrous lie from the Department of Defense in something they published in 1997 that they called the “Final Report on Roswell”.

How funny!

They tried to say this is the last time they are going to every talk about it, and in doing so they rolled out yet ANOTHER new version of what happened.

I had never heard about this before, so it might be new to you as well.

They claimed that what the eye-witnesses really saw at the crash site were not alien bodies but rather “test dummies” used by the air Force!

The only problem?

The Air Force didn’t start using those test dummies until well into the 1950s….

So what explanation did the Air Force offer?

These people were suffering from “time compression”.

What’s that you ask?

They were just “misremembering” events from the 1950s and kind of blending them with Roswell in 1947 in their minds.

In 1997, the Air Force released a second report, “The Roswell Report: Case Closed”, which aimed to debunk claims that extraterrestrial bodies were recovered from the crash site. One of the main explanations given in the report was that witnesses who claimed to have seen alien bodies were likely misremembering events involving anthropomorphic test dummies used in high-altitude parachute drops conducted in the 1950s.

Stunning to come up with such an obviously false statement.

You can watch it for yourself, and look how nervous this guy looks trying to sell this BS to the press reporters:

Backup on Rumble here:

What’s even more interesting is I asked ChatGPT about it and at first ChatGPT claimed to have no knowledge of such a press conference ever occurring:

When I pressed back, the “computer” suddenly remembered everything!

Isn’t that something!?

So the official Air Force explanation is essential misremembering things by a big group of people.

Mass psychosis by a bunch of people all at the same time and all having the same false memories.

In other words, something that simply does not happen, almost a statistical impossibility.

What’s funny is that’s the same explanation doubters over the years have given for Jesus’ resurrection — just 5,000 people who all claimed to see him risen and back on Earth with them, but they all just saw a mass hallucination.


Statistically and scientifically malpractice.

The enemy loves to try the same tactic over and over.

When I pressed ChatGPT one final time, it admitted that this theory doesn’t hold water in light of actual newspaper clippings from 1947.

Did those all have a mass hallucination too?

Of course not:

If you want even more on this, and how it all ties in to Aliens, Angels, Demons and UFOs, watch this video from Dr. Heiser.

Fascinating stuff!

Now let’s take it one step further, shall we?

Did you know it’s IMPOSSIBLE to prove the USA Moon Landings were real without using NASA or the Government (which are basically the same thing) or the Astronauts (who are almost all high ranking Freemasons)?

It’s true!

In fact, all the objective evidence we DO have points exclusively to the conclusion that the idea of landing human astronauts on the Moon in 1969 is patently absurd and would have been impossible for several reasons.

Did you know?

Oh the rabbit hole goes DEEP my friends….

Check this out:

MOON MAN: Bart Sibrel EXPOSES The Moon Landings

A couple days ago I had the pleasure of getting to sit down with someone who I’ve followed for a long time.

One of the first people to speak out and say the Moon Landings don’t add up….

One of the ONLY people in the world to get punched in the face by Buzz Aldrin….

And one of the best filmmakers out there.

I sat down with Mr. Bart Sibrel and we chatted for over an hour.

The time totally flew by, and I had about 20 additional questions for him that we just didn’t have time to get to.

After we had wrapped the interview, Bart commented to me that this interview flew by faster than any others he can remember doing recently, and I felt the same way.

Whether you are a NASA fanboy or a Moon Landing skeptic, I think you’re going to enjoy this one.

There’s a very real “cult of religion” surrounding the Moon Landings and so I know this is going to really ruffle some feathers.

But it must be discussed because the truth will always rise to the top.

In fact, Bart told me on air that he once came across a professor who said “even if I see Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong get on TV and confess to the world that the Moon Landings were fake, I will still believe they were true!”

Hard to imagine anything more “cultish” and “brainwashed” than that statement, but I know we’ll get some of that in the comments below.

Nevertheless, I am talking about this and I had Bart on my show because I believe this is one of the largest conspiracies ever to be covered up.

And you do know that “conspiracy theories” are only “conspiracy” until they are admitted or proven as true, right?

And you do know that MANY have moved from “conspiracy theory” to “proven fact” in the last century, right?

In fact, I recently asked ChatGPT to give me a top 10 list and you might be surprised to see this list of 10 events that were once considered “tin foil hat” conspiracy theories are all now either proven or admitted to be 100% true:

  1. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972): The U.S. Public Health Service conducted an experiment on African American men in Tuskegee, Alabama, allowing syphilis to progress untreated to study its natural history, even after the discovery of penicillin as a cure.
  2. Operation Northwoods (1962): This was a proposed plan by the U.S. Department of Defense to stage false flag acts of terrorism and blame them on Cuba to justify military intervention. The operation was never approved or carried out.
  3. MKUltra (1953-1973): The CIA ran secret mind-control experiments using drugs like LSD, hypnosis, and more on unsuspecting subjects, including U.S. and Canadian citizens.
  4. Operation Paperclip (1945-1959): After WWII, the U.S. government secretly recruited former Nazi scientists, engineers, and technicians, providing them with new identities to benefit from their expertise in various fields.
  5. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964): Originally presented as an unprovoked attack on U.S. naval vessels by North Vietnamese forces, further analysis and declassified information showed that the event was misrepresented, leading to the escalation of the Vietnam War.
  6. COINTELPRO (1956-1971): The FBI’s program aimed to surveil, infiltrate, and discredit civil rights and political organizations and their leaders.
  7. Operation Gladio: Post-WWII, NATO-backed secret armies were allegedly involved in terror and provocation operations to discredit leftist groups and stabilize political situations in Europe.
  8. The Iran-Contra Affair (1980s): Senior U.S. officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was then under an arms embargo, and used the proceeds to fund Contra rebels in Nicaragua, violating U.S. law.
  9. The poisoning of alcohol during Prohibition (1920-1933): The U.S. government knowingly allowed the poisoning of industrial alcohols, which bootleggers used to produce drinkable spirits. This led to thousands of deaths.
  10. Operation CHAOS (1967-1974): A covert CIA program to monitor and infiltrate anti-Vietnam War and civil rights groups in the U.S., despite prohibitions against domestic spying.

So now let’s talk Moon Landings….

Does that get moved to #1 on the list above at some point in the near future?

I think it might.

When it comes to the Moon Landings, I want to start with something Bart and I discussed….which is the fact that for everyone who thinks the Moon Landings were real, all the doubters used to be you!

We used to be you….

We all grew up hearing about the Moon Landings, looking up at Space and thinking how cool it was that we’d been to the Moon….

A lot of us had the posters on our wall growing up….

We had the Globe in every elementary school classroom growing up and we were taught about the Moon Landings every year in school.

We watched Star Trek and Star Wars and we loved it!

We honored and revered the Astroanuts.

We. Were. You!

But then “A Funny Thing Happened”….

I’ll just speak to my situation, but I think this is how it goes for most people.

I started hearing about how there was this group of people who said it never happened.

“INSANE!” we all thought!

But then eventually you decide, ok so what is going on here?

It’s so strange, how could they think that?

And then you go down the Rabbit Hole into Wonderland and once you start digging in you realize, hang on, some of this actually doesn’t make any sense!

And once you hit that point you often never go back.

It’s the famous quote:

There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance – that principle is contempt prior to investigation.”

The people who remain in contempt — holding all doubters in consternation — never investigate.

And according to that quote, “contempt prior to investigation” is a bar against all information, leaving man in everlasting ignorance.

So if that’s you, I challenge you to simply….investigate!

And when you start investigating, you’re going to come across two different categories of information.

The first category are what I call the micro-details.

This is stuff like the shadows in the images are all wrong, the flag is not blowing right, there is a lack of stars, one rock has a “C” on it so it looks like it was a movie prop, the dirt is the wrong color, etc.

There is a LOT of evidence in that camp, but that was never conclusive to me.

Every piece of evidence has a counterargument and you can get mired in that back-and-forth all day long.

It’s really the second category that seals the deal for me, which is what I call the logical proofs.

And the logical proof is simply this — without any special training, any tests, any evidence of any kind — you just simply need your brain and logic, and in order to believe we landed on the Moon in 1969-72, you have to believe the following:

In order to believe we landed on the moon in 1969 you have to believe this simple claim:

That we went 1,000 times FARTHER than we can currently send astronauts today…

50 years ago

On the first attempt

With one-millionth the computing power of today’s cell phone!

And then the kicker…..then we just never went back!

Each one of those elements has never happened before in human history, let alone all of them at the same time.

Let’s break those down…

Currently, even by NASA’s own admissions, we cannot send human beings any farther than Low Earth Orbit (where the Space Station is) — yet, in 1969 we went to the Moon which is 1,000 times farther.  Really?

That was 50 years ago, and so we could do it back then but can’t do it now.

So technology went backwards?

That would be like having the Internet in 2023 and then in 2073 the Internet is gone and we’re back to computers with no online connection and we’re back to using floppy disks.

Technology has never gone backwards like that, ever.

For all the visual learners, this:

Watch this stunning clip here:

Then you have to believe we did it perfectly on the first try!


Oh and we vertically landed the rocket on the Moon, meanwhile, it took Elon Musk 5 tries to vertically land a rocket in 2023.  They all kept blowing up!

But we did it perfect, on the first try, thousands of miles away from Earth.

With…..less computing power than we all currently walk around with on our cell phones.

Think of that.

NASA had ONE-MILLIONTH the computing power of our current cell phones.

I can’t even get the WiFi to work in my house half the time, meanwhile, with 1/1,000,0000th the computing power, we remotely landed a rocket on the Moon?  And then packed it up and flew it back home again?  Really?

And then the big one….

After all that, we went back a couple times in the 1969-72 range and then we just never went back again for over 50 years and counting.


That has also never happened in human history.

That’s like discovering America in 1492 and then never going back again.

Just decided to let it be!

That ONLY happens if you CAN’T go back again, not because you choose not to.

So to me, it’s this logical argument that catches my attention and says something is wrong here, something is very, very wrong here….

And with that, please enjoy my interview with Bart Sibrel, where we go much deeper on all of this.

Watch safely here on Rumble:

And on YouTube here:

If you want more, you need to get Bart’s book, “Moon Man”.

Bart’s book, plus a TON of free resources are all available at his website 👉

The best place to get his book is on his website, but if Amazon is more convenient for you you can grab his book Moon Man right here:

Bart is most famously known for his film: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon.

For anyone who believes the moon landings are 100% real and beyond any reproach, I challenge you to watch this 45 minute video and then report back to me.

I’ve never heard from anyone who has watched this and not had their eyes opened:

Backup here (since that will likely get taken down by the Tube):

And one more backup here:

Now let’s examine the big Press Conference Buzz, Neil and the third guy had when they got back from WALKING ON THE FREAKING MOON!

You’d think they’d have smiles from ear to ear that simply wouldn’t wipe off…right?

You know, something like how Sir Edmund Hillary looked after climbing Mount Everest — see below:


Instead they looked like this…☝️

You might say they looked exactly as you or I might look if you had just faked a Moon Landing and deceived and entire nation.

But that’s just my take, you be the judge.

Do these look like guys who just walked on the Moon?

You can watch the whole solemn press conference here on Rumble — it’s stunning:

So…did Neil and Buzz and the third guy really walk on the Moon?

Well let’s talk about Buzz for a second.

Did Buzz Aldrin just admit (again) that the moon landings were faked?

Well, it sure looks like it.

But we’ll give you all the evidence and let you decide.

A clip of Buzz Aldrin on Conan O’Brien’s Late Night Show from 2000 is suddenly going viral right now thanks to this post on TikTok:


Wait Til The End…🧐 #MsMastaFoXX #MyCreatorLife #Buzz #buzzaldrin #Nasa #Conspiracy #conspiracytiktok #Woketok #Viral #fyp #conanobrien #MoonLanding

♬ original sound – MsMastaFoXX-WellnessZoneStore

In the clip, Buzz pretty clearly says the video of the astronauts walking on the moon was fake.

I don’t know how else you interpret that.

I mean, I know this is a comedy show, but nothing about this clip appears to be a joke or a bit.

Even Conan is taken aback and temporarily at a loss for how to respond (and it’s his job to never be caught off guard as a talk show host).

So watch the clip for yourself.

And for anyone shouting “CONTEXT!” I’ve got you covered.

Here is the full interview to watch the segment in context:

The Reuters Fact-Check team has already investigated and determined what you heard Buzz say is totally “False”.

Just another one we all got wrong!

God bless the fact-checkers, I don’t know where we’d be without them!

So somehow they’ve labeled this as “False” despite the part I bolded below where they seem to even admit that the footage is, in fact, mostly made of animations.

This is their full report:

Social media users are sharing a video of astronaut Buzz Aldrin being interviewed by American television host Conan O’Brien and claiming that Aldrin discussing parts of the moon landing broadcasts being animated is proof that it was all faked.

He was referring to animations used by broadcasters at the time in their coverage of the moon landing, intercut with real footage. The moon landing did take place and men did walk on the moon.

Examples of the erroneous social media posts can be seen ( here ) and ( here ).

A longer video of the interview, dated May 17, 2000, can be seen on YouTube ( here ).

At the 1:29 mark, O’Brien says: “Let’s talk about this because this is fascinating. I remember very clearly; I think anybody who was alive at the time does. I remember my parents waking me up and we went down, and we watched you guys land on the moon.”

Aldrin responds: “No, you didn’t. Because there wasn’t any television, there wasn’t anybody taking the picture. You watched animation so you associated what you saw with… you heard me talking about, you know, how many feet we’re going to the left and right and then I said contact light, engine stopped, a few other things and then Neil said ‘Houston, tranquility base. The Eagle has landed.’ How about that? Not a bad line.”

The moon landing took place on July 20, 1969 with astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. NASA said in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. However, in 2009 NASA released a complete digital make-over of the original landing footage that clarifies the blurry and grainy images of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the surface of the moon ( here ).

A video compiled by CNN shows the available footage from the mission ( here ), including takeoff and the astronauts climbing down and walking on the moon.

An article ( here ) by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum explains the challenges of recording footage of the moon landing and walking.

NASA contracted with Westinghouse for a black and white camera costing $2.29 million to capture the iconic moment, according to the museum. Photographs of the camera, which was stored in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly near the ladder Armstrong can be seen climbing down, can be seen ( here ).

“For us today, we can thank technicians for having recorded the broadcast, though the tapes assumed to be of the highest quality were never located despite searches for them in the last few decades,” the article reads. “What we see now on YouTube or in films are high definition scans of those best available copies.”

An article by Vox ( here ) says some television networks built sets to recreate some of the moments that were not able to be captured on video.

The National Science and Media Museum discussed the Apollo 11 broadcast on its website ( here ): “Many broadcasters used simulations to flesh out their Apollo programming. Networks paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for scale models of Apollo command modules and rockets. During the broadcast, these were used to create simulations of the mission which were then intercut with real footage.”

“The thing to remember is what news was like in the late 1960’s, not 24-hour continuous coverage,” Margaret Weitekamp, Chair of the Space History Department at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, said by phone. “The coverage of that trip needed to be explained to the public without the ability for continuous relay of video we are now used to.”

“Animations would have been a part of a constellation of different ways that that story was told over a series of days. At the time, the coverage would have been combined with animations that helped provide a broader picture of what was being done. But this certainly doesn’t invalidate that those landings took place.”

There is no evidence that the moon landing was faked or that astronauts did not walk on the moon. However, there is plenty of evidence that it happened. Reports about the landing can be seen ( here ), ( here ) and ( here ).

Photographs of the moon landing can be seen ( here ), ( here ), and ( here ).

Reuters has previously debunked claims that the moon landing was faked ( here ), ( here ), ( here ).

False. Astronaut Buzz Aldrin explaining that broadcasters used animations during their coverage of the moon landing does not prove that it was faked.

But that’s far from the first time Buzz has seemed to admit the whole thing was a fake.

You have to wonder if on his death bed Buzz will finally and unequivocally confess to the fake?

Watch this clip on Rumble where an 8-year old girl asks Buzz why we never went back to the moon after 1972…

A GREAT question!

Because there is no other example in recorded history where something new was discovered and then we just stopped going there.

Imagine discovering America in 1492 and then the Europeans just decided to never send another boat.

Right, didn’t happen.

Would never happen.

Doesn’t pass the smell test.

So watch this short clip where Buzz says the reason we never went back is because we never went in the first place!

It must have felt good to finally get that off his chest I guess?

And again, if you want the full context and full interview, I have that here:

So…..was it all faked?

And if it was faked, was it faked because….it has to be?

Perhaps because there is a FIRMAMENT over our world, like Genesis tells us?

It’s literally in the first 7 verses of the Bible, almost as if God wanted to make it pretty hard to miss?

Genesis 1:

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

Almost as if we couldn’t be through the firmament, let alone get to the Moon, even if we wanted to?

I asked Bart about the Firmament near the end of our interview and even pressed him a second time on it.

It was a fascinating part of the chat.


The obvious place this whole discussion leaves us is with the question of a Flat Earth.

The three biggest red pills usually go in this order:  9/11, Fake Moon Landings, Flat Earth.

Where are you on that list?

0, 1, 2 or 3?

To be fair, Bart is a 2.

He does not believe in Flat Earth.

I don’t know what is true myself, but I do know this:  I can’t prove a Globe Earth without using NASA and Masonic Astronauts, so it’s not high on my conviction list.

Is it Flat?

I don’t know.

What do you think?

And what do you think of the Moon Landings?


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!