Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Department of Defense Sued in ‘Groundbreaking Case’


The Department of Defense faces a lawsuit from the family of a 24-year-old man who died as a result of COVID-19 jab-induced myocarditis.

The family of George Watts Jr. sued the Department of Defense for “willful misconduct” because it allegedly misled the public about the safety and efficacy of the experimental shot.

Watch this report for further info on George Watts Jr.:

“Mr. Watts received two doses of Pfizer vaccines (Exh. 1, 5 of 13)—an unlicensed product produced under the auspices of the DOD through its leadership role in Operation Warp Speed (“OWS”)—later renamed the HHS-DOD COVID-19 Countermeasures Acceleration Group (“CAG”),” the complaint reads.

“Through its officials, the DOD directed and oversaw vaccine development, and directed supply, production, and distribution with HHS to provide support,” the complaint adds.

“DOD caused accelerated production and then pushed out hundreds of millions of vaccines for hundreds of millions of Americans while engaging in a deliberate and calculated mass-deception campaign specifically designed to obfuscate the fact that OWS’ vaccines weren’t licensed “safe and effective,” were merely experimental, and legally could only be characterized as “may be effective” but could not be pronounced safe,” it continues.

“By intentionally blurring the line of the critical distinction between “licensed” and “experimental,” DOD duped millions of Americans, including Mr. Watts, into being DOD’s human subjects in its medical experiment, the largest in modern history. While Mr. Watts cared about the safety of OWS’ vaccines, DOD sadly did not,” it adds.

The Defender reports:

According to the complaint, the DOD “capitalized on a quintessential ‘bait and switch’ fraud,” using the fact that Comirnaty was FDA-approved to bolster its claims that the vaccine authorized for emergency use was “safe and effective,” in a move that intentionally misled millions of Americans.

The DOD did this despite being fully aware that drugs granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) cannot legally be marketed as “safe and effective” because the FDA standard for EUA is only that drugs “may be effective.”

That means the DOD intentionally, without justification and with disregard for the risks, misrepresented an experimental vaccine as “safe and effective” when it could not legally use that terminology, the lawsuit states.

As a result, the lawsuit alleges, George Watts Jr. was misled into taking the investigational vaccine and he died as a result.

.

.

.

Let’s rewind to an explosive report in January by Clayton Morris of Redacted revealing claims that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the very beginning.

“According to newly-obtained documents, the Pentagon used a combination of shady approval authorizations that are still in use, including the PREP Act, the emergency use authorization, and other transaction authority (the OTA), all of which shielded Big Pharma, agencies, medical participants that delivered unregulated vaccines from any liability and protected them,” Morris explained.

Morris was joined by Sasha Latypova, the former executive of a pharmaceutical contract research organization, who discussed what she found in the FOIA documents.

WATCH:

Here is a Rumble backup:

Sasha Latypova wrote in her substack, Due Diligence and Art:

All Covid countermeasures, including the biological warfare agents marketed as “Covid-19 vaccines”, were ordered by the US DoD as a “large scale manufacturing demonstration” via Other Transactions Authority contracts.

Hundreds of Covid countermeasures contracts became available via FOIA and SEC disclosures in redacted form.  Review of these contracts indicates a high degree of control by the US Government (DoD/BARDA) and specifies the scope of deliverables as “demonstrations” and “prototypes” only.  In other words, the US Government and DOD specifically ordered a fake theatrical performance from the pharmaceutical manufacturers. Just to make extra certain that the pharmas are free to conduct the fakery, the contracts include the removal of all liability for the manufacturers and any contractors along the supply and distribution chain under the 2005 PREP Act and related federal legislation.

The contracts are structured under Other Transactions Authority (OTA) – OTA method of contracting allows federal agencies to order otherwise-regulated products bypassing any such regulations, as well as financial accountability mechanisms that cover standard government contracting, and other laws that regulate disclosure and Intellectual Property (IP) derived from publicly funded research.

“Other” is a catchall category that is not a contract, not a research grant, not a procurement, etc.: not any normally regulated/accountable government contracting.

Latypova included a link to a list of “COVID-19-related contracts obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests, Securities & Exchange Commission filings, and HHS reading room files.”

From Knowledge Ecology International (KEI):

Below are links to copies of the contracts entered into by the US government for technologies to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. KEI is updating this page as we gain access to more contracts, and less redacted versions. Agreements related to the Medical CBRN Defense Consortium (MCDC) whose agreements are executed by Advanced Technology International (ATI) are noted with “(via ATI)”.

KEI has also created a US COVID-19 contract spreadsheet to track metadata of the agreements, as well as to compare the terms contained therein for intellectual property rights, data, and other topics. (Note: At this time, this spreadsheet is being continually updated.)

KEI maintains a separate page of US government contracts concerning needle and syringe production related to the COVID-19 response.

The list below contains COVID-19-related contracts obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests, Securities & Exchange Commission filings, and HHS reading room files. The bulk of KEI’s database of contracts, however, was obtained via FOIA requests and lawsuits filed by KEI.

KEI included a link to all U.S. government COVID-19-related contracts obtained via FOIA.

Review the full complaint filed against the U.S. Department of Defense HERE.



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!