Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Loy Brunson Gives BIG Update On His DOCKETED Supreme Court Case!

Remember the Brunson Brothers?

As I shared with you a couple weeks ago, they are NOT done.

They haven’t given up.

And they currently have their second case Docketed with the Supreme Court.

Loy just gave a new update on where everything stands.

Please watch this video below where he explains why simply having this case Docketed has already told us quite a lot.

And spoiler alert: it’s good news!  VERY good news!

Watch here:

Backup here:


Update May 7,2023 Loy Brunson Supreme Court Case 22-1028 Rule 11

♬ original sound – LoyArlanBrunson

Here’s more information on the new case and why it’s different from the first one.

The Sequel: Brand New Brunson Brothers Case Docketed At SCOTUS!

You didn’t think the Brunson Brothers were finished, did you?

I told you last month that they had a Second Act planned, and here it is!

Not just “planned” but already docketed with the Supreme Court!

Check it out:


Loy shared more here:

And here is Raland with more:

I’ve confirmed it’s real, and you can see the Court Docket right here:

Here’s a zoom in:

You can see it for yourself here on the SCOTUS website:

And you can see and read the entire filing here if you like:

CedarHillCitizens shared more details:

I just got off the phone with Raland Brunson seeking updates on his brother Loy’s NATIONAL EMERGENCY filing under Rule 11 at the Supreme Court.

Remember that LOY is from our very own Cedar Hills, and was neighbors with “Barbie & Ken” Cromar (Councilman from July 1994 to January 2000) living 7 houses apart.  What is in the Cedar Hills water to inspire such Patriotic efforts to fight to save our Constitution.

Raland was excited to tell me that they had just learned a few minutes ago that the Supreme Court had DOCKETED their case (under Loy Arlan Brunson’s name) as LOY ARLAN BRUNSON vs. ALMA S. ADAMS et al. Supreme Court of the United States case #22-1028.

The 388 Defendants’ (385 members of Congress including Pelosi, and Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and Mike Pence, 388 total) response is due by May 24 2023.

The actual SCOTUS Clerk Stamped filing will be posted here as soon as the Supreme Court makes it officially publicly available.  In the meanwhile, here’s a sneak peek….

Watch for regular updates on this NEW Brunson Brother’s case under consideration by the Supreme Court for actual hearing.

NOTE:  Raland Brunson’s case #22-380 made national news when as per the NEW draft of AFFIDAVIT OF GRIEVANCE for supporter to consider sending to SCOTUS in support. It reads in part:

On January 9, 2023 You denied The Petition for Writ of Certiorari, docket No. 22-380, and February 21st the Petition for Rehearing was “DENIED”, and the second such Petition for Rehearing received March 16 at 6:43 am, was “Declined” March 24th, and not docketed, which three instances demonstrates failure to reverse Your decision. On April 25, 2023 a second case by the Brunson Brothers filed as LOY ARLAN BRUNSON vs ALMA S. ADAMS et al. has been docketed at the Supreme Court under 22-1028, and herewith verifies this affidavit and gives You constructive notice of, but not limited to, the following:

a.)  The said respondents named in the said Writ have taken an Oath to protect and defend the said Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

b.)  A rigged election is an act of war against, but not limited to, the said Constitution. This Honorable Court has already ruled that one need not pick up arms in order to “levy war” in US v Burr (1807) 4 Cranch (8 US) 469, 2 L.Ed. 684.

[NOTE: An additional five points can be seen in the proposed AFFIDAVIT for public as We the People can consider signing and sending to SCOTUS at bottom.]

UPDATE on “The Raland SURPRISE”:

Raland J. Brunson  vs. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Brown

Speaking of Raland J. Brunson vs Adam S. Adams et al case #22-380, most are still unaware that in a stealth move on March 17, 2023 – St. Patrick’s Day — he filed a surpise! suit in SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH – case #23091367 against THREE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES in Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Katenji Jackson Brown for denying his right to Hearing in the Supreme Court.

Raland’s Federal Court Judge issued an order telling the three defendants to respond to Raland’s case
or be removed from office.

What did the three justices do?  They lawyered up.

Yes, they complied with the Federal Court order and asked the judge, through a motion to not let Raland’s case move forward.

With their terminology they told the judge that they were too important for this case and that they should be immune from such lawsuits.

If the justices don’t like the Federal Court’s decision, they could then appeal it to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, and if they don’t like the decision from the Appellate Court, then they could appeal it to the US Supreme Court.

Said Raland “I gave them a settlement offer, that if they would grant me a hearing on my Brunson v Adams case, then I would drop my case against them, otherwise, this is headed toward the US Supreme Court”.

Presumably the three Justices would have to recuse themselves from deciding if the case will be heard by SCOTUS leaving that decision to the remaining SIX of the nine total justices.

Now THAT would be an interesting situation, right?

More here:

Please keep the prayers going for this case and for our Country!


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!