President Trump is planning to liquidate the Nancy Pelosi Federal Building in San Francisco, CA.
He says that he wants to sell the building in order to save money and eliminate maintenance costs.
However, Democrats are claiming it’s all motivated by vengeance.
Either way, you have to admit, this is a hilarious move…
Take a look for yourself:
🚨 LMAO! President Trump is moving to liquidate the Nancy Pelosi Federal Building in San Francisco
Fancy Nancy’s gonna be BIG mad 🤣 pic.twitter.com/7cg4zwLmvs
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) February 22, 2025
OMG. Trump is trying to sell the ‘Nancy Pelosi Federal Building’ in San Fran
He can’t be stopped. 😭 pic.twitter.com/vtfY0FVOrc
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) February 22, 2025
The federal building, which President Trump once referred to as one of the ugliest buildings in America, was re-named after Nancy Pelosi in her honor a few months ago.
Just take a look at this monstrosity:
No wonder it was named after Nancy Pelosi…
Along with the Nancy Pelosi Federal Building, several other federal buildings are reportedly slated for liquidation.
San Francisco Chronicle reported:
When the slender, 18-story San Francisco office tower debuted at the corner of Mission and Seventh streets nearly two decades ago — one side sheathed in glass and the other featuring an undulating, perforated metal screen — it was deemed a bold and forward-thinking architectural statement by its owner, the federal government.
But the 640,000-square-foot building at 90 Seventh St. — formally renamed the Speaker Nancy Pelosi Federal Building last year — has drawn the ire of Republican detractors in recent years over its design and the grim street conditions around it.
Now it is one of two cornerstone federal government properties in San Francisco’s Mid-Market and Civic Center neighborhoods that could be on the chopping block as part of an effort by newly elected Republican President Donald Trump and billionaire associate Elon Musk to shrink the size of the federal government — and its real estate — in the name of efficiency, the Chronicle has learned.
These neighborhoods have long struggled with vacancy, blight and security issues, and with the eventual loss of government employees who were ordered to return to physical offices full-time this year, more economic impact could be on the way.
An internal U.S. General Administration Services document viewed by the Chronicle has identified two federal properties in San Francisco as “non-core” assets earmarked for potential sale: the Seventh Street building as well as the 360,000-square-foot, 1930s-era federal office building at 50 United Nations Plaza that serves as the GSA’s regional headquarters.
ADVERTISEMENTThe list includes at least a dozen other government properties throughout the state, primarily in Los Angeles and Sacramento. The Leo J. Ryan Federal Building, a federal archive and office facility in San Bruno, is also listed as a “non-core” asset.
ABC7 News added:
The Trump administration says it will save money by avoiding maintenance on the buildings, selling the properties, then leasing office space for federal workers.
Former Congresswoman Jackie Speier says it’s just about vengeance.
“It’s another example of how he is coming after Democrats. He’s coming after California, and it’s all about payback,” Speier said, noting that the sales wouldn’t make sense.
“The lease will keep going up and you will end up paying the property taxes of the lessor, whereas you don’t pay federal taxes when you are a federal government,” she said.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!