Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Federal Judge BLOCKS President Trump’s Government Funding Freeze


Just moments before President Trump’s order to freeze all federal grants and loans went into effect, a federal judge stopped it in its tracks!

U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan has put a temporary block on the freeze until another hearing can be held on February 3rd.

Take a look at the breaking news:

Alex Jones had a lot to say on this:

The block comes amid outcry over President Trump’s policy from the likes of leftists like Tim Walz and AOC, who (falsely) claimed that the order would harm everyday Americans who depend on federal funding programs like Medicaid.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here are just a few of those posts:

However, President Trump’s new Rapid Response fact-checking social media account was quick to shut down those lies:

It also comes as NY AG Leticia James announced a lawsuit against President Trump over the federal funding freeze.

More details on that here:

LAWFARE 2.0 – NY Attorney General Letitia James FILING SUIT Against Trump Administration!

U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan says that the temporary block on the freeze is meant to maintain the "status quo" until all litigation can be settled.

USA Today reported:

ADVERTISEMENT

A federal judge temporarily blocked a Trump administration policy Tuesday that aimed to review grants and loans to ensure they complied with his priorities, which lawmakers and legal experts blasted as unconstitutional.

The lawsuit challenging the policy announced in President Donald Trump's second week back in office hit the docket less than 24 hours after news of the policy became public.

U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan ordered the Trump administration not to halt grant funding until at least Feb. 3, when another hearing will be held on the dispute.

The judge said her temporary ruling was intended to "maintain the status quo." It does not block the Trump administration from freezing funding to new programs, or require it to restart funding that has already ended.

A coalition of advocacy groups represented by Democracy Forward – the National Council of Nonprofits, the American Public Health Association, the Main Street Alliance and SAGE advocates for LGBTQ+ – asked the court to block the policy to avoid “catastrophic” harm to people in various aspects of their lives.

Diane Yentel, CEO of the National Council of Nonprofits, cheered the judge's order but cautioned the funding halt is temporary.

"We have a lot more work to do in the courts, through Congress and in other ways to ensure that this reckless action, or attempted action, by the OMB can't move forward in the long term."

Those fighting against President Trump's mandate might have scored a temporary win on this, but the battle is from over...

ADVERTISEMENT

In times like these, I can't help but wonder how Kamala or Biden would have responded in such a situation?

Bad Hombre on X made a great point:



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!