Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

HEART-ATTACK: Charlie Shamp Issues Urgent PROPHETIC WARNING For President Trump

It’s been a very heavy day around here with many urgent warnings suddenly all coming out at once.

I don’t mean to be an alarmist, but I do think we need to be informed and aware and wise.

I also think these warnings often arise to give the right people the ability to counteract them, to change plans, to issue counter-plans, etc., and for the rest of us to join in to pray against these things happening.

So that’s the spirit in which I post all of these today.

This one comes to us from Charlie Shamp, who is someone we’ve covered many times here before and who has an incredible track record with accurate prophetic words.

Here’s his latest:

Here’s the Full Text in case that’s hard to read:

ADVERTISEMENT

President Trump’s Heart | Prophet Charlie Shamp
We need to pray for President Trump’s physical heart and overall health. I believe there are dark forces that seek to harm him. During my prayers, I was shown that the enemy wants to target his physical heart with a heart attack. It is essential that we ask for strength and protection over him, both physically and spiritually.

Let’s come together in faith, seeking divine intervention to safeguard his well-being and guide him in his leadership. Our prayers can make a difference, offering support and hope in challenging times. In a vision, I saw the words “heart attack,” written over the president and I felt the Lord urging us to come against this threat. I was also shown that we should pray against a terror attack aimed at the heart of America.

I believe this warning comes from the Lord, and it is crucial that we pray diligently over these next four years.

-Prophet Charlie Shamp

There’s nothing ambiguous here, this is Shamp saying point-blank he believes President Trump is at urgent risk of a heart attack.

Which immediately makes my mind go the CIA “heart attack gun” weapon they created decades ago.

They can’t really try another shooting, can they?

Too obvious.

But a heart attack?  It was just natural causes!  Easy defense!

That’s what really has me concerned here.

ADVERTISEMENT

You do know this has been confirmed real, right?

Take a look:

Don’t believe me, listen to this CIA whistleblower from 1975 admitting they have the “heart attack gun” technology:

Even ChatGPT basically admits this technology exists, although it then claims there’s just wild conspiracy theories.  Sure, sure they are.  Is anyone buying that?

There have been numerous conspiracy theories and rumors about intelligence agencies like the CIA having advanced methods for assassination that can mimic natural causes of death, such as heart attacks. Historically, some specific claims include:

  1. Heart Attack Gun: In 1975, a CIA whistleblower testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee about a purported weapon that could induce a heart attack. The gun allegedly used a frozen dart laced with a toxin that could cause a heart attack and leave little to no trace.
  2. Biochemical Agents: There have been various reports and theories suggesting that intelligence agencies might use biochemical agents to induce fatal health events that appear natural. These could theoretically be administered through darts, aerosol sprays, or even contact with the skin.
  3. Poisoning: Various poisons can be difficult to detect and might mimic natural causes of death. For example, certain toxins can induce symptoms similar to a heart attack or other natural health conditions.

While these theories persist, it’s essential to approach them with skepticism. Confirmed cases of such advanced assassination techniques are rare, and much of the evidence supporting these claims comes from conspiracy theories or unverified testimonies. Officially, intelligence agencies like the CIA do not admit to using such methods for assassination.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now ask yourself this: if they had “heart attack gun” technology in 1975, what you think they have now, 50 years later?

You would have to be wildly naive to the point of ignorance to believe they don’t have highly sophisticated ways to kill someone….with no trace.

And that’s what worries me the most leading into these next two weeks combined with Charlie Shamp’s prophetic warning.

Please everyone pray against this!

Now watch this short video released by Charlie Shamp to go along with this prophetic warning:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

Charlie Shamp: The word of the Lord over this nation, and we can’t be afraid. We can’t be afraid when there are people that oppose the message of the cross, that want to see physical harm come.

We cannot step back. We cannot sit down. We have to boldly stand up in the face of tyranny, in the face of a demonic agenda—even if that means we face persecution like we’ve never faced in America before.

And I tell you, my friends, it is coming. I just recently wrote an article for Charisma that I believe will be out in the month of September, where I lay out several points that the Lord had shown me at the beginning of the year. One of those things was concerning terrorism that would be coming to America.

But the Lord had spoken to me, and He had told me that this type of terrorism would look very different than what it had looked like in the past. In fact, I’m pulling it up right now. I saw the word Resurgence and that there will be a resurgence on terror.

We will see the word Resurgence used many times in the coming days. A resurgence of the war on terror will come, but in many ways, it will look much different than what we have known it to be in the past.

It’s important for us to understand that what we thought and what we have known to be terroristic is going to be redefined in this hour. Those that we thought were of a certain religion, and terroristic activity came from that particular group—there is now going to be a new narrative.

ADVERTISEMENT

FBI now believes that the suspect was acting alone but was inspired by ISIS. What does this tell us about the influence ISIS has, and do you believe that this could be a resurgence of ISIS?

Well, I certainly do, Christie, and I think it’s a terrible day for America—first off, that you have a tragedy of this magnitude, but then secondly, that it was perpetrated by a member of the U.S. Military.

And to your point, this ideology is just pure evil. In this case, we know Jabar was raised in Texas. He obviously was raised in a Christian faith, but something dark happened along this journey that caused him to turn his back on not only the country that he served, but he had made statements after his conversion that he wanted to kill his family.

So to your point, we are seeing a resurgence of terrorism. ISIS and Al-Qaeda—they’re back in the game again, and it should concern Australia and the United States in a big way.

You get the event of just this past week in New Orleans—you get a resurgence of ISIS, you get Al-Qaeda back growing again after what happened in Afghanistan. This is a set of failed policies that lead directly to increased risks all across America, in our cities, and all across this country.

New Orleans attack—was he radicalized here in the United States? Typically, we would ask, did he travel? Was he online? But now we also have to ask if it happened here within the country.

We also have not been going after ISIS as aggressively as the first Trump Administration was in places like Syria and other locations. And that has allowed a resurgence of ISIS, which also is not good, especially from a recruitment and radicalization standpoint.

So, I think as President Trump comes back into office, we’re going to see a focus, obviously, on the national security threats that are here within the United States.

There’s no mistake that we’ve been infiltrated as a country due to those open borders, to tie it back to that. And also that we’ve taken our foot off the gas with respect to ISIS overseas, and that will increase and change also under the Trump Administration.

I don’t believe it’s any coincidence that this all comes directly on the heels of what I just published a few hours ago:

But now I want to advance the story and show you a SPECIFIC THREAT that has been confirmed against President Trump during these next two weeks.

It comes from Patrick Bet-David who personally vetted this source with his team over several hours in person in Florida.

BREAKING: Patrick Bet-David Issues New URGENT Warning For President Trump’s Life!

Patrick Bet-David just released one of his most powerful shows he has ever done and it included an urgent warning for President Trump's safety.

We all know the time leading up to January 20th is a very dangerous time, we've been shouting it from the rooftops around here.

But Patrick added significant new information and that's what I want to share with you right now.

He started by noting this article from the WaPo, which notes how deeply strained the Secret Service will be from now until January 20th with "unprecedented prominent events" in a short period of time:

Why does that matter?

We all saw that back in July in Butler, PA the Secret Service was woefully unable to protect President Trump from an assassination attempt.

The reasons given were many, but one was that there was a competing rally with Jill Biden and they were spread too thing.

While I think that's a joke, imagine how much worse it will be in the two weeks leading up to January 20th?

The WaPo is right, this is unprecedented with Jimmy Carter's funeral, related events and demonstrations stretching out for a week's period of time, plus President Trump's Rally on January 19th in D.C. and the Inauguration on the 20th in D.C. and it's all just too much:

In a span of 15 days, law enforcement will be providing security for three “national special security events,” the highest federal protective status, for the electoral count on Monday, former president Jimmy Carter’s state funeral on Thursday and the inauguration on Jan. 20. In between, there will also be demonstrations and other events, such as President-elect Donald Trump’s rally at Capital One Arena on Jan. 19.

“That has never happened before,” William “Matt” McCool, the special agent in charge for the Secret Service’s Washington Field Office, said at a news conference Friday, referring to hosting three national special security events so close together.

In fact, just a few days ago we wrote that President Trump should consider a significantly scaled down rally in a secure location somewhere other than DC:

Could Trump Inauguration Be Somewhere Other Than DC?

Many of you agreed with that idea.

Then we have Dan Bongino who spent years in the top ranks of the Secret Service saying this:  "Do not trust the FBI or Secret Service until there’s a full change in management" . Your life is at risk:

One more also from Dan Bongino....

Watch here as Dan Bongino says to cancel the January 19th victory rally -- it's not safe:

But that's not where this article ends, that's only where this article begins.

Because mostly we've all already know these facts.

The new information comes from Patrick Bet-David who says a man contacted him with inside information about a threat on President Trump's life before the Inauguration.

Running a show as large as the PBD Podcast, they get calls like this all the time.  And they initially dismissed it.

But then the man boards a plane and flies to Florida to meet, and PBD and his team personally vet him in person for hours.

They record a long interview that may or may not ever air.

But PBD comes away from the meeting with confirmation that the man is authentic, he is credentialed, and he is a reliable source.  And the threat is real.

Listen to PBD tell it in his own words:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

Anyways, long story short, after 2 hours of talking to me, he’s—you know, just think about an Eastern European man. And he starts showing me things on his computer. Very disturbing, some of the stuff he showed me.

And then I said, look, finally it was at a point—the whole team is waiting to see if we’re going to do anything or not. I said, look, here’s what it’s come down to. If you don’t tell me your name, I have to wrap this up. My kids are going to school the next day. It’s their first day back from holidays. We’ve got to wrap it up.

So he’s getting very uncomfortable at this time. So finally, he says—he makes a couple of phone calls—and he says, “Here is my name.” And he shows me his ID.

I think that’s when you walked in, right? When he walked in and you saw him give me the ID? I look at the name. So I go online, and I’m like: interviews with him from 15 years ago on YouTube, ten years ago, nine years ago, seven years ago, six years ago, three years ago—having nothing to do with politics.

All to do with technology and engineering and chips. That’s the business he’s in. Nothing to do with that.

So then I’m like—so finally I said, “Okay.” And I noticed something: that he got an award, which I don’t want to be too specific about because if I tell you the award, you’ll know.

Yeah. So all this stuff is documented.

Okay. So I said, “If we do this, I don’t recommend you do this, but I’m going to talk about somebody I met without giving any intel. I’ll talk about it tomorrow.”

And he’s getting more and more nervous. I said, “If we do it, we’ll cover the face, do the audio.”

“Well, I don’t want to do audio. Let’s have me tell John, and then John tells you.”

I said, “I’m not going to compromise our relationship, our reputation, what we have with the podcast. People trust us. When we talk, they want to listen to them, and I want to vet it. I recommend you not do it at this point.”

Rob’s in the room. Rob, you’re in the room. I think it’s me, you, and him, and another one of our guys that’s in the room as well.

And I said to him, “Don’t do the interview. Fly back home.” You were there when I specifically said that, correct?

Right. Okay. I said, “If we do it, we have to do it in this following way.”

That took around how long? The entire conversation.

The entire conversation?

This is after two and a half hours of me being with him, then you come in.

About 45 minutes.

About 45 minutes.

45 minutes later, he’s extremely uncomfortable.

“I got to use the bathroom. I got to use the bathroom.”

Okay, great. Boom, boom, boom.

We get on the golf cart. We go to the other building to start the interview.

At this point, I want to say I remembered when we started the interview—it was 8:41. So when we started, the start time was 8:41, and we ended up like 9:30 or something like that.

And then, you know, he was here. We had to order food because nobody had eaten anything for hours, and our production team was waiting.

You can watch the full PBD Podcast episode right here, and this comes fairly early on in the show:

PLEASE SHARE!


, ,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.