I did not expect to see this today, but here it is!
Michael Cohen going on CNN and agreeing with Scott Jennings and President Trump!
Which, if you know all these players, you know this has never before happened — these three people are almost never all on the same side of an issue.
But they are here, much to the dismay of the CNN host who appears stunned at what’s happened.
Watch here:
You know what?
Cohen, and Jennings and Trump are all right.
And I hope he continues to sue as many MSM as possible until they change their ways or until he sues them right out of business!
Here’s a longer video breaking it all down from my friends over at RTM:
FULL TRANSCRIPT:
Speaker 1: I hate to say it, but Scott is actually right about this one.
I hate to say it because Scott and I very rarely agree on anything.
He’s right. He’s right. He’s right about this in the fact that sloppy journalism, sloppy polling, and what they did—it’s… Look, I was the recipient of more than 100 lies.
I don’t trust polls for many of the reasons that will be presented in this video.
Speaker 1: How do we know that this is actually a representation of what the American people want and you’re just not rigging it to favor the person you want, in trying to persuade public opinion?
It’s absolutely just something I don’t find to be really necessary. People should be presenting the points that they want, and then…
Like, I mean, if we’re going to do a poll, put it on Twitter. Like, actually, let the American people vote.
Speaker 1: We have CNN where they’re going to go in on some stuff. Michael Cohen, a former attorney of Donald Trump, who’s apparently very critical of him a lot at the time, is going back and forth with a lot of people on the panel.
Scott Jennings has some things to say, and it’s just an all-around very interesting topic. It gets a little heated, but before we get into that, I want to remind you guys to subscribe to our team news to ensure you are enjoying our videos.
Speaker 1: So they’ll continually show up in your feed, and then they’ll push it out to more people. I’m Titus. Let’s get into this video.
The poll was wrong. Many of the polls are wrong. They’ve been wrong for many cycles, but it’s not like this is the only thing that has been said in the news from either side that is not true.
I hate to say it, but Scott is actually right about this one.
Speaker 1: I hate to say it because Scott and I very rarely agree on anything. He’s right. He’s right. He’s right about this in the fact that sloppy journalism, sloppy polling, and what they did—it’s… Look, I was the recipient of more than 100 lies.
I understand what Trump is doing in terms of changing the way defamation cases are brought in this country.
You may remember the allegations: I was in Prague—never been to Prague.
Speaker 1: I was in T.R. Slovakia. I paid $10 million to compromise. I have a house next to Putin in Sochi.
None of this is true. On top of that, there was another one that came out as an example where I allegedly was paid $400,000 by Poroshenko to create a meeting between him and Donald Trump during the presidency.
That is also not true. So, do you think it should be easier?
Speaker 2: You believe it.
Speaker 1: No. I think that media has to do their job. They have to actually… they need to get the facts right.
That’s always wrong.
Speaker 2: And that’s a bar, 100%. Nobody…
Speaker 1: Like, you… I’m not saying obviously there’s lots of stories that are in the works, right? You’re trying to figure out the truth, and so it takes a lot of trial and error.
You’re not going to be 100% right, but things that are alleged need to be very clear and distinctively alleged.
Speaker 1: I’m not 100% sure. This is just something—this is a working story. I heard this thing. We do not know. Do not accuse this person.
Let’s not be accusatory, and that’s not how the media frames things. They try to create some spin or narrative to character-assassinate an individual before all the evidence has been brought out.
And then once it comes out that the person didn’t do this thing, well, the whole world already thinks they’re the villain anyway.
Speaker 1: Are they vindicated of their crime? Are they, you know, exonerated? Sure, maybe. Maybe they’re no longer legally looked down upon or facing litigation, but now, in the court of public opinion, they’re vilified.
They’re seen as a bad person, and it’s just a way that they can completely bend a narrative to do whatever it is they want it to be.
Speaker 1: Journalism—they need to get it together for sure. And with polling, I just… I don’t know. How do I know? How do we know?
And you know what’s funny? I’ve been seeing this a lot. People ask, “How do I know that?” or “Have you ever met a person who has been polled?”
And I haven’t. And I don’t know anyone else who has.
Speaker 1: Not saying it’s not true, not creating a conspiracy, but I would like to know somebody who’s actually been polled.
And how do we know that they’re not polling all Democrats or all Republicans? Depending on where you are—I don’t know.
But it’s just like… we have more of the same exact panel discussion from CNN.
Speaker 1: It’s just interesting seeing them defend themselves and not really care about my opinion, the American people, and how we want things to be represented accurately and justly.
Do you think it should be easier?
Speaker 2: You believe it should be.
Speaker 1: Media has to do their job. They have to actually… they need to get the facts right.
Speaker 2: We’re always wrong. It was wrong.
Speaker 1: But guess what else was wrong? All the polls of 2022.
Speaker 1: And none of those pollsters—are they all wrong? And you were wrong in 2022, Scott, because you said there was going to be a red wave.
Speaker 2: I never said that!
Speaker 1: Yes, you did. Run the clip. People said there was going to be a red wave, and there wasn’t.
So when you make predictions—which is what we get paid to do, to read the tea leaves and determine—it’s not something that should rise to the level of litigation.
Speaker 2: How many campaigns have you done? I’ve done a hundred million, and probably you have too, right?
Every time you get a bad poll, are you supposed to sue the pollster?
Speaker 1: It’s not about the poll. It’s not about the poll.
Speaker 1: But look what happened. It came out from a person who has a lot of credibility. Virtually every single panel I was on for the last week of the campaign led with, “Well, look at this poll.”
It wasn’t just the poll—it’s the second, third, and fourth-order narratives.
Speaker 2: Listen, it’s speech.
Speaker 1: So what? Free speech.
Speaker 2: What about free speech? I mean, what about Scott?
Speaker 1: What about free speech?
Speaker 1: I thought this was the Republican Party of “Say what you want, let’s debate it in the public square. Let’s have the conversation.”
Now it’s, “Let’s only have the conversation if you’re 100% present and correct in that moment.”
Speaker 1: It was a bad poll. It was a wrong poll. The media discussed it—so what?
Speaker 2: You know what I’m so tired of, Scott?
Speaker 1: What?
Speaker 2: The number one cable news network? FOX News.
The number one paper by circulation? The Wall Street Journal.
The number three paper by circulation? The New York Post.
Speaker 2: The number one person on the radio? Sean Hannity.
The number one person on podcasts? Joe Rogan.
All of these people are Trump supporters. What media are you talking about that’s anti-Trump?
Speaker 1: You’re not familiar with the anti-Trump media?
You’re not familiar with the fact that you guys control everything?
Speaker 2: All the things I’ve heard you say out here—that might be the nuttiest. That is so nutty.
Speaker 1: Fox is the number one news station.
Speaker 2: Okay, one out of how many publications that are completely anti-conservative?
Speaker 1: CNN, MSNBC, ABC—all of them. That’s just off the top. There are so many that hate Trump.
NBC always comes against him. Literally everything that they do.
Speaker 1: It was literally proven—there was a stat that came out. Ninety-seven percent of the coverage that was given for Donald Trump was negative, while 97% was positive for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: But you want to sit there—
Speaker 1: Yes, you’re right. Now Joe Rogan and all these other alternative platforms came up because you guys wouldn’t actually represent him.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all these other people that wanted to be just and look at things objectively—yes, a lot of them maybe lean more right now.
This isn’t legacy media. This is the anti-media that got Trump to be vilified and compared to Hitler.
Speaker 2: You guys lost trust with the American people, so others had to rise up—resist the mainstream. RTM news had to rise up.
X had this change from Twitter to X and actually allowed free speech.
Speaker 1: Aiden Ross, Bryce Hall, Theo Von—all had to come out of the woodwork. Joe Rogan had to sit there and say, “You guys are bugging out and being disingenuous in your take.”
So they came and brought the truth. And now we have a lot more reach that we didn’t have before.
Speaker 2: Or what he said is not true—how the media was anti-Trump. Because you know darn well they were, and they still are.
Speaker 1: You still are. Absolutely ridiculous. I cannot believe it.
Speaker 2: Believe me, there’s plenty of anti-Trump media.
Speaker 1: What I’m basically trying to say is that you guys have taken over the airwaves. You’ve taken over the radio airwaves, podcasts—pretty much everything.
Speaker 1: And now you’re sitting here complaining because all you guys do is whine and complain. Your entire raison d’être is grievances.
You don’t actually think about leading; you just think about having grievances against the media, anybody anti-Trump.
Speaker 1: I can keep going here. Just another grievance is that Republicans are frustrated.
They feel as though the media has been out against them. Some of that is social media, some of that is influencers, some of that is just false narratives.
Speaker 1: And I think this poll was just sort of the final straw, and people felt like it was somehow deliberate—a deliberate attempt.
That’s the word of the day: deliberate. What happens when it was deliberate?
Speaker 1: That’s the whole point that Donald Trump is trying to explore right now.
What happens when that deliberate fake poll comes out and does actually alter things?
Speaker 2: By the way, you forgot about X. You forgot about social media.
Speaker 1: But what happens when it is deliberate? That’s why I believe ABC ended up folding, because they did not want discovery to take place.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!