Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Kamala Harris Achieves Historic Election Low Not Seen Since 1932


Who says you can’t still set records when you lose in a landslide?

Kamala Harris isn’t letting that stop her, she just achieved a feat not seen since 1932!

But before we get to that, have you noticed people have been generally happier since November 5?

I mean out in public, at stores, you name it….there’s just a lighter, happier tone in the air.  Have you noticed?

Of course I think most of that is thanks to the optimism for the incoming Trump Administration….but perhaps an overlooked aspect is the fact we haven’t had to see much of Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Tim Walz, and the whole crew.

I honestly believe having the “Party of Joy” jammed down our throats on a weekly basis (no pun intended, Kamala) wore on us more than we all realized.

Now that black cloud is gone and I’m back to maybe covering Kamala Harris once a week or less, which seems like just about the right ratio.

Zero would be nice, but then I wouldn’t be able to bring you this report…

ADVERTISEMENT

Kamala Harris just became the first President since Herbert Hoover in 1932 to not flip a SINGLE county nationwide:

Here’s a zoomed in look:

This map originated from Tin Foil Matt over on Substack who had more to say here:

Is it just an odd trivia tidbit?

I came across an interesting fact about the 2024 election—while former President Donald Trump won 83 counties that had voted for President Joe Biden in the prior election, Vice President Kamala Harris only flipped… zero.

Not a single one.

Trump was able to hold onto every county that he won in 2020, all 2,497 of the more than 3,100 counties across the country. And then he went on to win an additional 83 counties while barely clinging to 50% of the vote.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lots of red, some blue. A little purple.

But where’s the yellow? To not have that fourth color is a striking anomaly.

Different regions of the U.S. and diverse social or ethnic groups align with presidential candidates in distinct ways. A candidate’s articulation of values and positions on key issues—especially in contrast to rivals or previous party nominees—can significantly influence voting patterns across counties, regions, or entire states.

Even within the same party, no two candidates are identical. As a result, it is expected that some counties may shift or change party allegiance when a new candidate emerges.

In the 2016 election (results pictured), some counties flipped Democratic, while some other counties flipped Republican. The majority of voters in those counties didn’t exhibit consistent party loyalty; instead, their voting behavior was influenced by the usual variety of factors: candidates’ individual platforms, current events, economic conditions, or shifts in social and cultural dynamics. These external influences regularly cause some counties to swing or change party allegiance with each new candidate.

Even in the rare case of a rematch between the same two candidates, changing factors—like economic conditions or the incumbent’s perceived competency—can shift voter behavior differently in each county. What benefits one county may not in another, as voter preferences are shaped by complex local and national dynamics. This should make it inevitable that some counties will swing from Trump in 2020 to Harris in 2024, reflecting the evolving nature of voter decisions.

That’s doubly true with how divisive Trump is on so many issues, from democracy itself to reproductive rights, and with the unprecedented level of support Harris received from Trump’s former staffers and other prominent Republican figures.

It also seems highly implausible that Americans across the nation would vote with such remarkable consistency between the 2020 Trump vs. Joe Biden race and the 2024 Trump vs. Harris election, given that Biden and Harris differ significantly in age, gender, ethnicity, background, and birthplace. It seems safe to assume such stark contrasts between the Democratic candidates would influence voter behavior and lead to shifts in electoral outcomes.

ADVERTISEMENT

But they didn’t. There wasn’t a single place in the country, from sea to shining sea, where Harris’ strengths or Trump’s weaknesses caused a county’s electorate to flip-flop from red to blue.

What’s really astonishing about this report from Tin Foil Matt is that he describes himself as being on the Left — he’s definitely not MAGA — yet he reported honestly about the massive Kamala Harris failure here:

I am not a professional journalist. Nor do I have any special insider information.

Here’s what I do have:

The relatively rare ability to see the big picture while still paying attention to the important details.
A professional background in a field that requires compiling a lot of information into compelling stories.
Left of center political views.
A tin foil hat. This one’s important.
Combine these with rabid news consumption about U.S. politics and international events, and I notice patterns, connections, and possibilities others miss.

I sounded the alarm about COVID-19 when it was still 2019. I also knew about January 6 months in advance. I’ve correctly guessed the password to Donald Trump’s Twitter account in 2021 (it was “RiggedElection2020”). And I predicted a blowout electoral win for Kamala Harris in 2024.

It’s this last one that caused me to create this substack, because it led me to uncover the truth—that Donald Trump conspired to steal the election and America’s future.

You can subscribe to him on Substack here if you like: https://tinfoilmatt.substack.com/

It turns out the “Joy” never really existed, not even in one single county in the entire country:

Worst candidate of all time?

ADVERTISEMENT


 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!