Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

RFK Jr: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these GIANT bonuses!”

This is perhaps the most important — and most dangerous — article I have ever posted.

But I have to print the truth wherever I find it.

Let’s start with this clip from RFK Jr. explaining how pediatricians are given an incentive to vaccine your children with ALL the vaccines produced by Big Pharma:

Backup here if needed:

So to summarize what he just said, he claims that pediatricians are given a monetary payout — a BONUS — if they vaccinate a high rate of children in their clinic.

He claims it can be as high as $400/child….

ADVERTISEMENT

But ONLY IF they maintain high levels of vaccination overall at the clinic.

Which is why they freak out on you if you refuse to get the vaccines or don’t want to follow the CDC schedule.

It’s not hard to imagine in this scenario where they start to see each little kid with a dollar sign over their heads instead of a patient!

RFK Jr. explains how the business model is to increase traffic into the clinic.

Unlike when we were kids, and you only went to the doctor if you got hurt, now you go all the time!

Why?

“BUSINESS MODEL”.

Sorry folks, but I don’t think the term “business model” should be connected to treating our children, do you?

Especially our HEALTHY children.

They’ve even come up with a name for it, have you noticed that?

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you paying attention?

They put it right in front of your face….

When a child goes to the doctor even when they’re healthy, it’s often called a well-child visit or a checkup. These visits are routine appointments meant to monitor the child’s growth, development, and overall health, as well as to provide preventive care like vaccinations.

How very, very wrong!

A “well child” should be outside playing in the sun and getting Vitamin D, not drug into a doctor’s office to get jabbed!

But….”BUSINESS MODEL”.

This reply to RFK’s post really caught my eye:

ADVERTISEMENT

Now let’s dig into this for a minute….

That Twitter post links to this article on WellnessAndEqulity:

If you want to be sure your pediatrician has your child’s best interest, this is mandatory reading. Pediatricians around the country have begun refusing to accept families who opt out of some or all vaccines. Thanks to a tip sent to Wellness & Equality by a reader, now we know why.

When my friend’s child suffered a life-threatening reaction to a vaccine a week after her first birthday, my friend assumed her pediatrician would write her a medical exemption from future vaccines. Shortly after receiving a routine set of vaccines, the happy, vibrant one-year-old spiked a 106 degree fever, began having seizures, and was hospitalized. When the unexplained “illness” passed after a week in the hospital, the little girl had lost her ability to walk. My friend describes how her daughter, who had learned to walk several months earlier at 9 months, suddenly “stumbled around like a drunk person” for weeks following the vaccines. My friend met with a team of pediatricians, neurologists, and naturopathic doctors, and they agreed: Her daughter had suffered a brain injury caused by a reaction to one of the vaccines. Hoping the injury would be temporary and that she might recover and ease her brain inflammation if they could help her small body quickly eliminate the vaccine additives that caused the reaction, my friend’s daughter underwent an intensive detoxification program overseen by a nutritionalist. Slowly, her daughter relearned to walk.

My friend is a practicing attorney who graduated from a Top 10 college. The evidence was overwhelming that her daughter’s reaction had been caused by vaccines, she told me.

But a few months later, when she took her daughter back into the pediatrician for a visit, he wanted to vaccinate her daughter again. She was baffled. Why?

After a reader sent us a link to a PDF file of Blue Cross Blue Shield’s Physician Incentive Program available online, Wellness & Equality learned that insurance companies pay pediatricians massive bonuses based on the percentage of children who are fully vaccinated by age 2. 

BCBS_ProviderIncentiveProgram.png

So how much money do doctors really make from vaccines? The average American pediatrician has 1546 patients, though some pediatricians see many more. The vast majority of those patients are very young, perhaps because children transition to a family physician or stop visiting the doctor at all as they grow up. As they table above explains, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays pediatricians $400 per fully vaccinated child. If your pediatrician has just 100 fully-vaccinated patients turning 2 this year, that’s $40,000. Yes, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of 2. If your doctor manages to fully vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000. 

But here’s the catch: Under Blue Cross Blue Shield’s rules, pediatricians lose the whole bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu vaccine. So it’s not just $400 on your child’s head–it could be the whole bonus. To your doctor, your decision to vaccinate your child might be worth $40,000, or much more, depending on the size of his or her practice.

If your pediatrician recommends that your child under the age of 2 receive the flu vaccine–even though the flu vaccine has never been studied in very young children and evidence suggests that the flu vaccine actually weakens a person’s immune system over the long term–ask yourself:  Is my doctor more concerned with selling me vaccines to keep my child healthy or to send his child to private school?

That article also includes this critical update:

ADVERTISEMENT

Update 4/30/2017: After Wellness & Equality published this article, Blue Cross Blue Shield locked online access to their incentive program and then removed the page altogether. Clearly this incentive program was never intended to be public knowledge and created a bit of PR issue for them. Fortunately, another website managed to save the entire BCBS incentive program booklet and has published it in entirety online… You can read it here:  Blue Cross Blue Shield Physician Incentive Program

That link directly above appears to continue the BCBS manual referenced in the post above and which is exactly what RFK Jr. is referencing.

To be fair, we cannot independently verify if the massive document shown in that link is authentic or not, but if there are any pediatricians reading this please comment below and let us know if this has been your experience.

The document is far too voluminous to reprint here, but I note this page in question does appear to show a $400/child bonus is paid for fully vaccinating a child:

We like to report openly and honestly and fairly here, so I’m going to end with two more things to show you to perhaps balance this out and then let YOU decide what you think.

First, I asked Grok if this was true:

So Grok appears to confirm it’s real, and even references the 2016 Performance Recognition Program by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan guide, which is EXACTLY what claims to be hosted in that website linked above.

But Grok says the numbers are “not that high”.

Ok, interesting…

And to be ultra fair, PolitiFact rates the claim as FALSE:

Misleading claims that Blue Cross Blue Shield is paying doctors to meet child vaccination quotas have been spreading across social media.

“Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating at least 100 patients under the age of two,” an Instagram post claimed. “Under Blue Cross Blue Shield’s rules, pediatricians lose the whole bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu vaccine. So it’s not just $400 on your child’s head — it could be the whole bonus. To your doctor, your decision to vaccinate your child might be worth $40,000, or much more, depending on the size of his or her practice.”

This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

Blue Cross Blue Shield is an association of 35 independent U.S. health insurance companies. The association does not provide bonuses for vaccinating a set number of child patients.

“Every (Blue Cross Blue Shield) company sets its own value-based contracts with local providers,” said a Blue Cross Blue Shield spokesperson. “The purpose of any performance-based incentives, where they exist, is to reward implementation of well-established evidence-based best practices in the care of our members. While vaccinations may fall into that category, they would not be the sole performance measure. Any incentives cover a broad collection of best practices.”

“As always, decisions around whether to vaccinate ultimately rest with the provider and the patient (and) parent,” said the spokesperson.

Childhood vaccines are considered standard medical practice. The American Academy of Pediatrics “strongly recommends immunizations as the safest and most cost-effective way of preventing disease, disability, and death.” The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also encourages parents to immunize their children against preventable and potentially life-threatening disease, providing a schedule of standard vaccinations given to children starting at birth and going up to age 18.

Blue Cross Blue Shield chief medical officer Vincent Nelson told Lead Stories, “Physicians (and) providers can be incentivized through their work with independent Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies, but the implication in this post that physicians (and) providers pursue childhood vaccinations solely for financial reasons is false.”

We rate this claim False.

We report, you decide!

RELATED REPORT:

You Will Be SICK To Learn How Much Pediatricians Are Paid For Vaccinating YOUR Kids!

You Will Be SICK To Learn How Much Pediatricians Are Paid For Vaccinating YOUR Kids!

Perhaps the ONLY good thing to come out of the Pandemic is the massive red pill currently happening about vaccines.

Not only the COVID jab, but ALL vaccines.

People are realizing this is not good, and it's not normal.

And they just keep adding more!

Here is a visual depiction of a baby surrounded by all the shots it will have to get by the time it turns 5:

Enough is enough.

I've shared this story before, but I'll share it one more time here because it's directly relevant for what I'm about to show you....

When we had our first child, even back then I already knew vaccines were not safe.

I knew I probably couldn't avoid them altogether, but I figured my next best option was to space them out.

I asked my doctor if we could deviate from the official "CDC" schedule by spacing the shots out.  I would (begrudgingly) still do them all, but instead of giving 3 on one day for example, space them out two weeks apart.

At first I got the runaround and all the BS reasons why that won't work....

"That will be a lot of work for you having all those appointments."  I don't care, I replied.

"That will be extra cost, all the extra copays."  I don't care, I replied.

"That's highly unusual."  What's the big deal, I replied?  Can you explain to me why we can't do that?

That's when his whole demeanor changed, he got all red and blotchy in the face, he started tripping over his own words, looked down and refused to look me in the face and angrily shouted "We don't do that here!"

Wow, weird right?

Why have such an emotional response?

Isn't your first duty to the health of your patients?

Well, it turns out it is NOT.

For most pediatricians, I'm sad to say, their first duty has changed and they now have two masters: The all-powerful US Dollar and Big Pharma!

How lovely.

That's where RFK, Jr. comes in.

This guy is literally blowing the lid off this whole thing.

You have to see this latest short clip where he explains EXACTLY why Pediatricians won't let you NOT vaccinate your kids (or even spread them out), and like almost everything else it all comes down to money:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr on the Real Reason Pediatricians Won't Accept You If You Don't 💉 Your Kids

"A typical pediatrician's office makes about 50% of its funding from vaccines. Not actually from selling the individual vaccines, but from the traffic...And pediatricians who vaccinate 80 or 85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses...Huge amounts of money, hundreds of thousands of dollars that they make, making sure that 85% of the kids are vaccinated. And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back. It's not because they care so much about your particular kid, it's that you'll throw off the metrics and you'll lose them their bonuses."

At the end of the clip, he says go research the Blue Cross Blue Shield payment schedules that detail how big these bonus payments are -- it's all public record.

So I did.

I started with ChatGPT, which confirmed that what RFK, Jr. said is true....they do offer these "pay-for-performance" models (hey, it's that what we call a QUID PRO QUO?  I thought those were bad or something) but it couldn't give me the specifics on the dollar amounts:

Yes, some health insurance companies, including Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) and its regional affiliates, may provide incentives or bonuses to healthcare providers, including pediatricians, for meeting certain quality measures, including vaccination rates among their patients. These incentive programs are part of what's often referred to as "value-based care" or "pay-for-performance" models.

Here’s what is generally known about such programs:

Incentive Programs for Vaccination Rates:

  1. Quality Improvement Programs: Many Blue Cross Blue Shield plans participate in quality improvement programs such as the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) or similar measures. HEDIS includes childhood immunization status as a quality measure. Providers who achieve high vaccination rates may receive higher reimbursement rates or bonuses.
  2. Performance-Based Bonuses: Pediatricians and clinics can receive bonuses for achieving high rates of vaccinations. These bonuses can be linked to the percentage of patients who are fully vaccinated according to the CDC's immunization schedule.
  3. Reimbursement Adjustments: Some programs offer tiered reimbursement rates based on achieving specific targets. For example, a pediatric office might receive higher reimbursement for services provided if 80% or more of its patients are fully vaccinated by a certain age.
  4. Specific BCBS Programs: Blue Cross Blue Shield programs, like the Blue Quality Physician Program (BQPP) or the Quality-Based Reimbursement (QBR) program, vary by state and region. These programs generally assess various performance metrics, including immunization rates, to determine reimbursement levels or additional payments.

Specific Data by Region:

  • BCBS of Michigan: In Michigan, BCBS offers incentive payments to providers who meet pediatric immunization goals. Providers can receive an additional amount per vaccinated child if they meet specific coverage rates (e.g., 80% or 90%).
  • BCBS of North Carolina: Offers performance-based incentive payments tied to immunization rates, which are part of the broader value-based payment model to ensure children are up-to-date with their vaccinations.
  • BCBS of Texas: The Blue Premier program incentivizes healthcare practices to increase preventive care measures, such as childhood immunization rates. Higher vaccination rates can lead to bonuses or higher reimbursements.

How to Get Specific Data:

  1. Direct Inquiries to BCBS Affiliates: Each BCBS affiliate (such as BCBS of Michigan, BCBS of Texas, etc.) may have specific programs with varying criteria. Direct contact with these affiliates can provide specific details.
  2. Review Publicly Available Contracts and Guidelines: Some BCBS affiliates publish their provider guidelines and performance metrics criteria online. Reviewing these documents can provide details on incentive structures.
  3. State Health Departments and Transparency Programs: Some states may require insurers to disclose performance metrics and related payment incentives, which can be accessed through state health department websites.

So I went to Grok.

And Grok delivered.

I'll copy the full answer below but basically a pediatrician can get $40,000 for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of 2, and it jumps to $80,000 if they get to 200!

But drop below 63% and you lose all bonsues.

Yes, according to information available up to 2024, Blue Cross Blue Shield does offer financial incentives to pediatricians for vaccinating their patients, but there are specifics and context to consider:
  • Incentive Programs: Blue Cross Blue Shield has had performance-based incentive programs where pediatricians could receive bonuses for vaccinating children under the age of 2. A commonly cited figure from a 2016 program by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan mentioned a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of 2. If the pediatrician managed to vaccinate 200 patients, this bonus could jump to $80,000.
  • Conditions for Bonuses: However, these bonuses come with conditions. Pediatricians would lose the entire bonus unless at least 63% of their patients under the age of 2 were fully vaccinated, which includes receiving the flu vaccine.
  • Context and Misconceptions: The figures and conditions mentioned have often been cited on social media and have led to some misconceptions. The actual payments and conditions can vary significantly by state, the specific Blue Cross Blue Shield plan, and over time. The numbers from 2016 were specific to one program and not necessarily representative of current or universal practices across all Blue Cross Blue Shield associations.
  • Purpose of Incentives: These incentives are part of broader quality care metrics, not solely focused on vaccination. They aim to encourage best practices in preventative care, which includes vaccinations among other health services like BMI assessments, developmental screenings, and more.
  • Current Data: Specific up-to-date figures for 2024 or detailed breakdowns post-2016 regarding how these incentives might have changed aren't provided in the search results or X posts, but the practice of offering some form of incentive for vaccination rates as part of broader quality care initiatives continues to be part of how insurance companies operate.
  • Critical Perspective: While these incentives are designed to promote health care practices that prevent disease, they've also been criticized or viewed with skepticism by some who worry about the potential for financial incentives to influence medical decisions, possibly prioritizing quantity over individual patient care or consent.

And now you see why my doctor got so red and blotchy in the face and started shouting.

Because he was BANKING on that $40,000 or $80,000 and I was standing in his way.

You see, even if I got all the vaccines but spaced them out, we wouldn't hit the 100% by Age 2 because we'd be spaced out to older ages.

And bye bye pay day.

Here is an MD backing up the truth of what Grok told us above:

Excuse me and (sorry Franklin) but how the FUCK is this even legal?

Incentivized pay to force vaccines on babies where parents don't necessarily want them?

And despite the lies Big Pharma will tell you, they are NOT proven safe, quite the contrary!

This should be absolutely 100% criminal if you ask me.

Sick, sick stuff.

History will not look back kindly on what has been done here.

Evil greed and just one additional way for "Moloch" to kill children.

RELATED REPORT:

Marin County Defies CDC Vaccine Schedule, Experiences Decline in Autism Rates?

Big shout out to my friends over at ThePeople'sVoice (hello Sean) who are the first I've seen to run with this story (source here).

It caught my eye in a big way, so I wanted to pass it on to you and also provide an additional Fact-Check on this incredible story.

Here is the Twitter post that first caught my eye:

That's an incredible claim!

And it basically all boils down to two claims that you read together, which are that: (1) parents in Marin County, CA around the year 2000 started following a different (reduced or eliminated) childhood vaccination schedule than what the CDC pushes on the rest of us, and (2) that as a result, 20+ years later, they have experienced a counter-trend DECLINE in Autism rates compared to what is seen in the rest of the Country.

Wow, right?

So is it true?

It rings true to me just in my gut, but that's not sufficient enough for a Fact-Check.

I will tell you right upfront that the evidence I was able to find is a bit "scant" at best, but that's not surprising.  If something like this were true, you know they'd go to great lengths to scrub it from the Internet.

So here's what I did find....

First, I was surprised to see that when I asked ChatGPT about the first claim, it confirmed the alternate vaccine schedule in Marin County around the year 2000 DID in fact occur:

I find that especially interesting given that the Far-Left ChatGPT would typically not admit something like this.

So that seems to be decent confirmation of the first claim.

Also, Marin County, CA is a VERY wealthy and VERY liberal area....and what do we know about ultra wealthy, white liberals?

We know that they LOVE telling you what to do (usually some horrific Far-Left trope) and then they themselves do the opposite.

For example, walls are racist and we need to bring as many migrants into the Country as possible! But....I have a massive wall around my huge house and I'm damn sure not housing any migrants here or even anywhere in my City!

That kind of hypocrisy.

So it doesn't surprise me at all that they would do something like that in Marin County.  It's textbook!

Then we have the second claim: Did Autism rates go down?

Well, according to this study published on the official PubMed.gov website....YES!

See the study here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32193763/

Leading expert Toby Rogers ties it all together:

Now let me wrap it all up by presenting a bit of the counter-argument by those who want to shoot holes in this.

Because that's what we do here...I give you as much information as I can and I let you decide!

So I asked ChatGPT if the entire claim (part 1 and part 2) are true, and as you might expect it claimed there was no evidence to suggest a linkage between Claim 1 (reduced vaccines) and Claim 2 (reduced Autism).  Here's what it told me:

There was a trend in Marin County, California, particularly around the early 2000s, where a significant number of parents opted out of the recommended childhood vaccination schedule or chose alternative schedules due to concerns about vaccine safety. This was part of a broader movement among some communities in the U.S., where vaccine hesitancy led to lower vaccination rates.

However, this deviation from the CDC's recommended vaccination schedule was not officially sanctioned or systematically adopted as a county policy. Instead, it reflected a growing movement among parents influenced by misinformation linking vaccines to autism—a link that has been thoroughly debunked by extensive scientific research.

Regarding autism rates, there is no credible evidence to suggest that Marin County, or any other community that adopted alternative vaccination schedules, experienced lower autism rates as a result. In fact, numerous studies have confirmed that vaccines do not cause autism. The apparent increase in autism diagnoses during the same period has been attributed to broader diagnostic criteria, increased awareness, and better diagnostic practices, rather than changes in vaccination practices.

It is important to note that lower vaccination rates in Marin County and similar communities have been associated with outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, underscoring the public health risks of not following the recommended vaccination schedules.

So that's a pretty textbook reply, just spewing the "there is no credible link between vaccines and Autism" BS that we've heard for years.

Sorry, but I don't find THAT CLAIM credible!

When I pressed on the issue, it responded by claiming that the decreased Autism rates were rather due to "access to private care" by the wealthy parents -- yeah, because "private care" can stop Autism?

The study you referenced does not establish a causal link between changes in vaccination schedules and declining autism rates in wealthy white populations in Marin County. While the article notes a decline in autism rates in these demographics, it attributes the trend to factors like access to private care or alternative interventions rather than vaccination practices. The relationship between vaccination schedules and autism has been extensively studied, and no credible evidence supports a causal connection between vaccines and autism rates.

In a related report, it is nice to see so many people red-pilling and speaking out on this issue:

MUST SEE: Top American Financier Now Speaking Out About Forced Childhood Vaccinations

Satan always overplays his hand...

Every.

Single.

Time.

So you can always take solace that when things look the worst, that's likely the time when Evil has just overplayed its hand and the boomerang is about to swing back hard in the other direction, placing Satan farther behind than when he started.

I believe that just happened with vaccines.

Allow me to explain....

For decades, Americans endured a vastly increasing schedule of forced childhood vaccines.

Even if we didn't like it, most of us just went along with it because they were mandated and you had to get them in order to send your kids to school.

And in reality, most people didn't even give it a second thought.

Surely the medical doctors are only doing what's best for me!

Right?

Enter 2020.

And all of a sudden one vaccine was forced upon the entire country.

One vaccine, three makers....

By the way, Moderna, Pfizer and J&J are all competitors right?

Can anyone explain to me how they all suddenly developed a vaccine for COVID all at the same time and all on their own?

Are we really supposed to beLIEve that?

Folks, it's absolute HORSE-SHIT, and don't get angry about my language that is the only descriptor accurate enough to use.

If you really believe that all three Big Pharma companies all just suddenly, overnight, developed vaccines for COVID all working independently of each other, and they all did it in record time and all finished at the same time....then you have just failed the IQ Test.  I'm sorry.

That's hogwash!

Oh, and don't forget that they were also so similar and so compatible that you could mix and match!

Remember that?

Got the J&J for your first dose?

No problem, get Moderna for your second dose!

You kidding me with this garbage?

And so many people FINALLY woke up from their slumber and started saying this isn't right...

Perhaps it was when they were bribed with Krispie Kreme donuts if they would just go get the shot!

Or perhaps it was the fact that the shot was free....

NOTHING in life is free, you're paying for it some way.

Or maybe it was the fact that you were told you'd be fired from your job (and many were!) if you didn't take the jab!

What happened to My Body, My Choice?

Why were they so desperate to get this jab into your body?

So....millions of Americans FINALLY woke up from their slumber and realized something was wrong here, something was very, very wrong here.

And that's where we pick up our story, because now that millions are awake, they're not just questioning the COVID jab, now they're questioning all forced vaccinations, including those on the smallest, weakest, most defenseless among us: Babies.

In fact, this might blow your mind, check out how much forced vaccinations on babies has increased over the last century:

Even since 1984 it's a dramatic increase!

Enter Bill Ackman.

Many of you may know him, but he's a very successful American financier.

Here is a short bio:

Bill Ackman is a renowned American financier, hedge fund manager, and philanthropist, known for his strategic investment acumen and impactful philanthropy. As the CEO and founder of Pershing Square Capital Management, Ackman has established himself as one of the most influential and successful investors in the finance industry.

Ackman graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College in 1988, where he earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Social Studies. He later received his MBA from Harvard Business School in 1992, further solidifying his strong academic foundation.

Career Accomplishments:

  1. Pershing Square Capital Management: Founded in 2004, Pershing Square Capital Management has grown into one of the most successful hedge funds in the world, managing billions in assets. Under Ackman’s leadership, the firm has delivered outstanding returns for its investors through astute market predictions and strategic investments.
  2. Herbalife Short Position: Ackman is well-known for his high-profile short position against Herbalife in 2012, where he publicly declared the company a pyramid scheme. Although the trade faced significant controversy, Ackman's advocacy brought widespread attention to the issue of multi-level marketing companies.
  3. Successful Investments: Ackman’s investment prowess is evident in several high-profile successes, including his investments in companies like General Growth Properties, where his intervention helped the company emerge from bankruptcy and provided substantial returns for investors. His investment in Canadian Pacific Railway led to significant operational improvements and enhanced shareholder value.
  4. COVID-19 Market Prediction: In early 2020, Ackman made a bold and correct market prediction regarding the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. He implemented a strategic hedging strategy that resulted in a $2.6 billion profit for Pershing Square, demonstrating his foresight and strategic thinking.

Awards and Accolades:

  1. Institutional Investor's Hedge Fund Manager of the Year (2014): Ackman was named Hedge Fund Manager of the Year by Institutional Investor, recognizing his outstanding performance and leadership in the hedge fund industry.
  2. Harvard Business School Alumni Achievement Award (2015): Ackman received this prestigious award, which honors alumni who have made significant contributions to their industries and communities.
  3. American Academy of Arts and Sciences: Ackman was elected as a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, an acknowledgment of his contributions to the finance industry and his philanthropic efforts.

Philanthropy:

Ackman is also known for his philanthropy. He has pledged to donate a substantial portion of his wealth to charitable causes through The Giving Pledge, a commitment by the world's wealthiest individuals to dedicate the majority of their wealth to philanthropy. Ackman and his family have supported various causes, including education, healthcare, and social justice initiatives.

In addition to his professional success, Ackman is a vocal advocate for economic reform and corporate governance, consistently pushing for greater transparency and accountability in the corporate world. His ability to combine financial acumen with a commitment to positive social change sets him apart as a leader in the finance industry.

I always say, we need GOOD PEOPLE to speak up in all walks of life....

Doctors.

Lawyers.

Teachers.

Finance bros.

Nurses.

Construction workers.

Accountants.

In all walks of life, we need people to start speaking up to let everyone else know they are not alone.

Speak up to support Trump....

And speak out when something doesn't look right, like this.

And that's what Bill Ackman just did and I applaud him for it!

Here's what he just posted to Twitter:

When my last child was born, on the first day of her life we were told that she needed a HepB vaccine. It was not presented as a choice and I foolishly did nothing to stop the nurse. My older three daughters did not receive the vaccine at birth.

Those that question the growing, now 72-shot regimen for children are considered by some to be wackos and anti-vaxxers.

I think the skepticism is appropriate and prudent as we are obligated as parents to make sure that we are not causing harm to our children who are not capable of providing informed consent.

Our society needs to complete a careful review of vaccine protocols including the risks associated with the cumulative effect of all of the vaccines we are giving children.

We have been working for more than a year to find a credible and independent group to do such an investigation but so far have not been able to do so. If you can help us do this important work, please contact us at [email protected].

Bravo Bill, thank you!

You are 100% right, now keep going and keep the pressure on!

Millions of us stand behind you on this!

In fact, I just posted this earlier today about my friend VDarknessFalls.

Many of you may know him from Twitter/Telegram.

Check this out:

Prayers for my friend
@vDarknessFalls8

👇👇👇👇👇

We're convinced Salias' breathing issues and seizures came from the toxic Vitamin K shot they forced in him after birth. They tricked Bridgett into giving it to Salias when I was out of the room by telling Bridgett that they can't circumcise him because he'll have bleeding issues if they don't give it to him. Bridgett was adamant about circumcision, so of course she complied to no fault of her own. How was she suppose to know?

Of course, we feel like we failed Salias right out the gate.

"It's vitamin K, right?

Well, on the box, on one of them, because there are 3 different companies that make it, this was two of them. The main active ingredient is polysorbate 80. And that is, there are strong links to infertility, to autoimmune issues.

Polysorbate 80 is banned in a lot of countries, especially in injectables. And that's the main active ingredient in one of the vitamin K solutions.

And the other one on the vial, it says contains no more than 100 micrograms per liter, of aluminum.

And you combine that with the Hep B shot, which is 250 micrograms per liter of aluminum.

On day one, our children are getting 350 grams and if not more. And this is, this is just unheard of.

It blows my mind because aluminum has no place in our body. It's a known neurotoxin. It's a heavy metal."

Crimes Against Children
Crimes Against Humanity

People are waking up EVERYWHERE!

Keep the pressure on!

It's not just the COVID Vaxx that was toxic....it's all of them!

At the very least, cut them down and spread them out!

But they won't let you do that.

With our oldest child, I asked my doctor to simply spread the shots out so we didn't receive them all at once.

He got all red and blotchy in the face and suddenly turned into a bumbling mess.

It was so strange!

He refused to do it, but couldn't give me a reason why.

He said it would take up too much of my time and I'd have to pay a co-pay each time I came in.

So f*cking what, I said, that's fine I'll do it.  An extra $15 for each visit to not get Autism?  Ok!  I'm in!

And when I took that excuse away, the red blotchy spots got even worse and he actually stormed out of the room.

I have no doubt looking back on it now that the man had most likely been threatened by some medical group.

It's really sick what they're doing to us.

So it's time to speak up folks!

NO MORE OF THIS!

If you want to get vaccinated as a consenting adult over 18 years old, you go for it!

But as for the rest of us, leave us the hell alone!

RELATED REPORT:

Top 7 SCARY TRUTHS The CDC Does NOT Want You To Know About Covid-19 “Vaccines” and “Boosters”

Top 7 SCARY TRUTHS The CDC Does NOT Want You To Know About Covid-19 “Vaccines” and “Boosters”

Some people call it the plandemic. Others call it the scamdemic. Either way, most of the deaths did not come from the "novel" virus, but rather the toxic mRNA spike prions that invaded the vascular system of several billion people across the globe.

Article by S.D. Wells, republished with permission from Naturalnews.com

Another quiet Holocaust that nobody seemed to recognize, well, except for the natural health enthusiasts, who know better than to trust anything pushed by Big Pharma, especially when it's created in a criminal-run laboratory, then injected into the sheeple's "muscle tissue" to "build immunity."

Then came the wave of "misinformation," which really meant that all the truth-tellers and the whistleblowers who let everyone else know what the so-called "vaccines" really do, were labeled conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers and misinformation terrorists.

Meanwhile, Big Pharma, Big Media and Social Media swung the wrecking balls, destroying popular opinion and spreading ALL the misinformation about how hundreds of millions of people, who all happened to get the Covid jabs, "died suddenly" (from vascular clots, heart attacks, strokes and turbo cancer).

The scary truths the CDC, FDA, WHO and globalist eugenicists do not want you to realize

#1. Covid jabs are likely responsible for the strange, white, long and fibrous "protein" clots found in mRNA-vaccinated people's blood vessels, according to multiple embalmers over the past 3 years.

#2. Covid booster jabs impair your T-cells, blocking your body from fighting cancer and many other infections.

#3. Many deadly batches of China Flu jabs now found to be contaminated and deadly, according to evidence-based scientific research.

#4. Covid-19 mRNA vaccines never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards.

#5. Pharma's favorite script-spewing puppet and quackcine shill, Dr. Paul Offit, who created the previously-most-dangerous vaccine ever, the Rotateq Rotavirus jab, also rejects Covid jabs with concerns over... wait for it... heart failure (you can't make this stuff up).

#6. Half of all sheeple (naïve people) mRNA-vaccinated for Covid will continue making toxic, prion-mimicking spike proteins in their body forever, according to research out of the UK; in other words, half the vaxxed are literally walking bioweapons factories.

#7. COVID-19 vaccines have created a tri-fecta of deadly "alliance" that causes horrible, unpredictable and deadly side effects from the lethal combination of graphene, mRNA and nanotech.

A recent review of the Wuhan spike protein jabs, published in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, concluded that COVID-19 so-called “vaccination” increases one’s likelihood of suffering through a SARS-CoV-2 infection, plus, the booster shots were linked to higher levels of IgG4 antibodies, impairing the body’s ability to activate white blood cells.

In other words, the deadly clot shot jabs are also destroying the body’s natural defense against all kinds of infections and various types of cancer, including tumors. That's what all the regulatory agencies fear most, is that people will find all of this out.

It's Google, YouTube and Twitter that spread the misinformation, hiding the truth about the dangers of mRNA toxic stabs

When people look up this information online, 99 percent of them only find the misinformation spread by Google, Fakebook, YouTube, Twitter and the like. They're brainwashed. Then there's the TV and newspapers. They can't find the truth anywhere online, and even if they do, their favorite websites and doctors call it "misinformation."

Put it this way, if all the medical doctors in America explained to their patients, before they got the mRNA jabs, that the shots are STILL very experimental, nobody knows HOW LONG your tricked cells will keep producing millions of toxic spike protein prions, that they do NOT stay in your muscle tissue at the site of the injection, but spread throughout the vascular system, like a huge highway system of criminals, and invade your vital organs, clog your blood, clot your brain and strain the heart so bad you could "die unexpectedly," nary a soul would get that jab.

In essence, that's still not enough though, because the fear factor was wound up so badly that even healthy folks were terrified of the China Flu, even though it was no more "deadly" than the seasonal flu that goes around a few times a year. Got a fever and a sore throat? You might have the flu. Better stay home in bed and rest.

Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on the Vaccine Holocaust and the long-term effect of the Nazi "gas chambers" now known as Long-Vax-Syndrome. This has been a public service announcement from Natural Health News. #FindOutAboutToxicVaccines.

Sources for this article include:

Pandemic.news

NaturalNews.com

TheGatewayPundit.com

Expose.news

MORE:

FLASHBACK: Dr. Robert Malone, Joe Rogan and Dr. Zelenko!

If you missed Dr. Robert Malone on Joe Rogan's podcast, allow me to bring you up to speed.

Because it was FANTASTIC!

No offense to Joe Rogan, but who would have expected an MMA fighter, actor and comedian would be doing CIRCLES around the so-called Mainstream Media and showing them what REAL journalism looks like.

It's incredible.

Joe Rogan conducts a better interview than anyone on any of the MSM channels, and it's not even close.

This is what real news looks like!

This is what real questions look like...

This is what an unfiltered and unscripted interview looks like.

You can be forgiven for not recognizing it because other than Rogan there is almost no one doing this anymore.

Now let's explore some clips:

[CENSORED]

True:

This one is a must-see:

[CENSORED]

More:

[CENSORED]

Exactly right:

This part needs extra attention:

Now watch as he explains how the government killed HCQ and ivermectin:

PCR testing fraud:

Are you awake yet?

Truth:

Dr. Malone even took time to praise Dr. Zelenko and his ZStack Zelenko Protocol.

Watch here on Rumble:

The ZStack is finally back in stock.

Dr. Zelenko: “Zinc Is The Bullet — It Kills The Virus. The Only Problem Is The Bullet Doesn’t Get To The Place Where It Needs To Be”

In the early days of COVID, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko became a hero for using hydroxychloroquine to save his patients.

Until his efforts were halted by a Democrat governor.

But Dr. Zelenko didn't let politicians stop him from helping sick people.

He kept working -- and found a legal, over-the-counter way to get patients what they need.

He called it "a gift from God in response to tyranny."

It's a combination of quercetin, zinc and vitamins -- he created what became the widely popular Z-Stack.

Why are quercetin and zinc so important for stopping viruses?

Watch Dr. Zelenko explain "the bullet and gun" approach for understanding zinc ionophores (transcript of highlights is below):

From the video:

"Zinc is the bullet - it kills the virus. The only problem is the bullet doesn't get to the place where it needs to be.

The virus is inside the cell. The enzyme is inside the cell. And the zinc on its own cannot get into the cell. You have a bullet without a gun - useless.

Now, it turns out there's a class of medications called 'zinc ionophores' or a class of substances called 'zinc ionophores' -- what they do -- is they open up a channel, a door, which allows zinc to go from outside the cell to inside the cell . . . 

. . . They're the guns that shoot the bullet. The bullet then gets into the cell and stops the virus enzyme from helping the virus replicate.

So you have a gun and bullet. Only the synergy of the two creates a functioning unit . . . 

. . . Patients were having trouble sourcing it, because it was four different ingredients that weren't always available in the same place. They had trouble finding the right doses.

It was a puzzle that was a little too complex for people to put together.

So I was asked as a necessity -- as a favor to people -- to produce something that has everything in one package.

It made sense to me, so with the help of my colleagues, we were able to produce a substance -- a compound called Z-Stack -- that has Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and most importantly has quercetin and zinc."

Carrying on Dr. Zelenko's legacy, Z-Stack is now available to everyone.

Z-Stack is:

-- Made of real, all-natural ingredients

-- Gluten-free

-- GMP-certified

-- Proudly made in the USA

To order Z-Stack directly from Dr. Zelenko's store, click here.

Click here to go directly to Dr. Zelenko's store.

Stay SAFE and stay HEALTHY!

(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the links in this article, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!)

Add your vote here:

NATIONAL POLL: Do You Support Dr. Malone Replacing Fauci?

And if you're looking for Ivermectin, check this out....it might just blow your mind:

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? We Read The Medical Journals And The Results Might Surprise You!

Ok, one quick confession: I didn't read all the medical journals....I had my buddy ChatGPT assist me to read 200 MILLION medical journals and scholarly articles.

But the results most definitely may stun you!

I've covered this topic before but it continues to fascinate me so I'm covering it again and going WAY deeper!

Can Ivermectin treat, stop, reverse or even CURE cancer?

**At the end of this article, I'll show you where you can GET Ivermectin for yourself**

First, I have to give my standard disclaimer:

I'm not a doctor.

I'm not even a scientist.

Nothing in this article has been evaluated or approved by the FDA -- but let's be honest, that probably just means you should pay EXTRA attention to it, right?

Ok, we all good with the disclaimer?

Ok good!

Now, why am I even investigating this?

Because the more I look into it, the more I find!

When I first saw them come out so strong against Ivermectin, I knew it had to be pretty powerful and pretty good for humans in general!

I've never seen such an aggressive pushback by BigPharma, so I figured it probably did more than just treat COVID19.

Then I started seeing reports that it could treat cancer.

And I'm not just talking about posts on Twitter or TikTok....I'm talking about peer-reviewed medical journals!

I'll post my original report farther below, but first I want to show you what I found on ChatGPT.

I installed a special plugin that connects the OpenAI to a database of 200 million scholarly and medical journals and then I asked it to give me all peer reviewed medical journals that suggest Ivermectin can be effective in treating cancer.

I think you'll find this fascinating -- and for those of you who want the nitty gritty details, each article is linked so you can go read the full thing for yourself.

From ChatGPT:

Here are some scholarly articles focusing on the use of Ivermectin in treating cancer, organized by their publication date (newest first):

  1. The Detrimental Effect of Pre-Treatment with Ivermectin on Myocardial Ischemia
    • Publication Date: 2023-10-25
    • Authors: Sara Cheraghi, Shabnam Babataheri, H. Soraya
    • Abstract: This study explores the effects of Ivermectin (IVM) on cardiovascular diseases, particularly focusing on myocardial ischemia in both ex vivo and in vivo.
  2. Neuroprotective effects of ivermectin against transient cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats
    • Publication Date: 2023-09-27
    • Authors: Behdad Seyyedabadi, Shabnam Babataheri, Ismail Laher, H. Soraya
    • Abstract: Not available.
  3. Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells
    • Publication Date: 2023-09-23
    • Authors: Man-Yuan Li, Jiao Zhang, Xiao Lu, Dong Zhou, Xufeng Deng, Quan-xing Liu, J. Dai, Hong Zheng
    • Abstract: Not available.
  4. Outcome of Ivermectin in Cancer Treatment: An Experience in Loja-Ecuador (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2023-02-22
    • Authors: Yuliana Jiménez-Gaona, Oscar Vivanco-Galván, Gonzalo Morales-Larreategui, Andrea Cabrera-Bejarano, Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
    • Abstract: This paper analyzes the use of ivermectin-based antiparasitic as a cancer treatment in the rural area of the Loja province, Ecuador, and the medical opinion regarding its use in humans.
  1. Drug repurposing of ivermectin abrogates neutrophil extracellular traps and prevents melanoma metastasis (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2022-09-05
    • Authors: Hongjun Zhang, Xiaozhuo Xu, Rui Xu, T. Ye
    • Abstract: This study identifies Ivermectin (IVM) as significantly inhibiting neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation and preventing melanoma metastasis, with a focus on its effects on myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and CD8+T cells in a mouse melanoma model.
  2. Ivermectin: recent approaches in the design of novel veterinary and human medicines
    • Publication Date: 2022-09-05
    • Authors: M. C. Velho, Diego Fontana de Andrade, R. Beck
    • Abstract: This review discusses strategies proposed in the last decade to improve the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin and to explore its novel therapeutic applications, including in cancer and viral infections.
  3. Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via mitochondrial dysfunction (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2022-08-26
    • Authors: D. Lee, H. Kang, So Yi Kim, Myeong Jin Kim, Jae Woong Jeong, Woosol Chris Hong, S. Fang, Hyung Sun Kim, Yun-Sun Lee, H. Kim, Joon Seong Park
    • Abstract: This study evaluates the anticancer effects of the combination of ivermectin and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, indicating that ivermectin exerts synergistic effects with gemcitabine, preventing pancreatic cancer progression.
  4. Forging Ahead the Repositioning of Multitargeted Drug Ivermectin
    • Publication Date: 2022-05-16
    • Authors: S. Atmakuri, Shweta Nene, D. Khatri, S. B. Singh, V. Sinha, Saurabh Srivastava
    • Abstract: This review highlights the role of Ivermectin in unexplored avenues towards the repositioning of this multitargeted drug in cancer, viral, and bacterial infection, and malaria, providing insights into regulatory considerations of drug repurposing and current formulation strategies.
  1. Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment enhances antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer through mitochondria dysfunction (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2022-04-30
    • Authors: Daeun Lee, H. Kang, So Yi Kim, Myeong Jin Kim, Y. Lee, Hyung Sun Kim, Jung Min Lee, H. Kim, Joon Seong Park
    • Abstract: This study explores the combination of Ivermectin and gemcitabine in enhancing the antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer, focusing on mitochondria dysfunction.
  2. Topical ivermectin: an off-label alternative to treat neonatal Scabies in the era of permethrin resistance
    • Publication Date: 2022-02-21
    • Authors: A. Bassi, V. Piccolo, G. Argenziano, C. Mazzatenta
    • Abstract: This article discusses the use of topical ivermectin as an off-label alternative for treating neonatal Scabies, focusing on the era of permethrin resistance.
  3. Repurposing Ivermectin to augment chemotherapy’s efficacy in osteosarcoma
    • Publication Date: 2022-01-01
    • Authors: B. Hu, H. Tan, L. Yu, Q. Liao, W. Guo
    • Abstract: This research investigates the potential of repurposing Ivermectin to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in osteosarcoma, focusing on its effects on proliferation, migration, and apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells.
  4. Ivermectin induces apoptosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via mitochondrial pathway (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2021-12-01
    • Authors: Nana Xu, Mengmeng Lu, Jiaxin Wang, Yujia Li, Xiaotian Yang, Xiaoshuang Wei, J-L Si, Jingru Han, Xiaojuan Yao, Juanmei Zhang, Junqi Liu, Yanming Li, Hushan Yang, D. Bao
    • Abstract: This study examines the induction of apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by Ivermectin, focusing on the mitochondrial pathway.
  1. Progress in Redirecting Antiparasitic Drugs for Cancer Treatment (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2021-06-01
    • Authors: Haoyang Huang, Qing He, Binghua Guo, Xudong Xu, Yinjuan Wu, Xue-Rong Li
    • Abstract: This review discusses the redirection of conventional drugs, including Ivermectin, into cancer treatment, focusing on their anticancer potentials and underlying mechanisms.
  2. Computational Drug Repositioning and Experimental Validation of Ivermectin in Treatment of Gastric Cancer (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2021-03-31
    • Authors: Hanne-Line Rabben, G. Andersen, Aleksandr Ianevski, M. K. Olsen, D. Kainov, J. Grønbech, T. Wang, Duan Chen, Chun-Mei Zhao
    • Abstract: This study focuses on the repositioning of Ivermectin in the treatment of gastric cancer, combining computational predictions with in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches.
  3. Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2021-03-02
    • Authors: Dobrin D. Draganov, Z. Han, A. Rana, Nitasha R. Bennett, D. Irvine, Peter P. Lee
    • Abstract: This research shows that Ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death and enhances T cell infiltration into breast tumors, demonstrating synergy with immune checkpoint blockade.
  4. Antiviral Drug Ivermectin at Nanomolar Concentrations Inhibits Glycine-Induced Chloride Current in Rat Hippocampal Neurons (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2021-03-01
    • Authors: J. Bukanova, E. Solntseva, R. Kondratenko, V. Skrebitsky
    • Abstract: This study examines the effect of Ivermectin on chloride currents in rat hippocampal neurons, contributing to the understanding of its potential use in cancer treatment.
  1. Quantitative proteomics reveals a broad-spectrum antiviral property of ivermectin, benefiting for COVID-19 treatment (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2020-09-22
    • Authors: Na Li, Lingfeng Zhao, X. Zhan
    • Abstract: This study identifies ivermectin-related virus infection pathway alterations in human ovarian cancer cells, revealing its broad-spectrum antiviral property, including against COVID-19.
  2. Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2020-08-24
    • Authors: Dobrin D. Draganov, Z. Han, A. Rana, Nitasha R. Bennett, D. Irvine, Peter P. Lee
    • Abstract: This research demonstrates how Ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death and enhances T cell infiltration into breast tumors, showing synergy with immune checkpoint blockade.
  3. Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug
    • Publication Date: 2020-05-30
    • Authors: M. Juárez, Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera, G. Domínguez-Gómez, A. Chávez-Blanco, J. Díaz-Chávez, A. Dueñas-González
    • Abstract: This article supports the clinical development of Ivermectin as a repositioned cancer drug, highlighting its antitumor effects at clinically feasible concentrations.
  4. Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin (PDF)
    • Publication Date: 2020-01-01
    • Authors: Jian Liu, Kun Zhang, Lin Cheng, He Zhu, Tianmin Xu
    • Abstract: This review summarizes the antitumor effects of Ivermectin and its potential roles in cancer treatment, including its impact on various pathways and cellular functions.

I could have kept going but I cut it off after 20 results.

I also asked it to sort the results by date with newest first, and we ended with 1/1/2020, which means these 20 articles all came out within the last 3 years.

How many more do we have in the past decade or two?

A lot.

Now here's my original report which gives you a ton more information:

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? New Evidence Might Surprise You!

Let's get something out of the way right up front in this article....

I'm not a doctor.

I'm not even a scientist.

Nothing in this article has been evaluated or approved by the FDA -- but let's be honest, that probably just means you should pay EXTRA attention to it, right?

Ok, we all good with the disclaimer?

Great!

I'm a reporter and I report on what I see....

And right now I'm seeing a ton of people talking about Ivermectin as a possible treatment for cancer.

Let me give a SECOND disclaimer: do NOT read this article and stop taking cancer treatments or stop doing what your doctor tells you to do.

Listen to you doctor!

But....Ivermectin has been called a "Wonder Drug" (more on that in a minute) and NINE new scientific, peer-reviewed studies are showing it may be effective in treating or curing cancer....AND it's safer that Aspirin!

So if it were me, and I can only tell you what I would do, but if it were me or one of my family members, we'd listen to our doctor but I think I'd also be taking a high dose of Ivermectin on the side.

Read this for more on how incredibly SAFE Ivermectin is:

INVESTIGATION: Can You OVERDOSE On Ivermectin?

Now let's dig in and I'll show you everything I'm seeing about Ivermectin and Cancer...

We start on Twitter but we will end with peer-reviewed, scientific studies.

Nine of them, to be exact.

Let's start here:

https://twitter.com/StewVet/status/1711943721430729088

Once again, I can only talk about what I would do, but I'm considering going on a high dose Ivermectin treatment once per year as preventative medicine:

And is this why Big Pharma hates it so much?

Now let's get scientific....

You know, REAL science, not "Fauci-ism".

From The Journal of Antibiotics, published 2/15/17:

Read the full article yourself here.

"...unmatched value of an extraordinary drug..."

"...Antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent..."

Folks, that isn't my take or someone on Twitter or TikTok.

That is a medical journal.

Let's do another one....

From PubMed:

Read the full article yourself here.

"...led many to describe it as a 'wonder' drug."

Let's do another...

From the NIH.gov:

Read the full article here.

"...powerful antitumor effects...in a variety of cancer cells."

I repeat, this is not MY opinion, this is a medical journal!

In fact, there are MANY articles that all come to the same conclusion, across multiple different types of cancers.

Here are 9 of them, from VigilantNews:

Papers reviewed:

You can see that FULL article over on MakisMD Substack here.

Now for the most obvious question:

Need LEGAL and SAFE Ivermectin? Read This!

We just reported yesterday that a new leaked report says airlines are looking to BRING BACK MASKS in October.

Yes, really.

I fully expect a new "planned-demic" will show up right in time for the 2024 election.

Oh they might not call it "COVID" again and probably they won't.

But I fully expect a new one to hit.

And I'm going to be prepared this time.

Whether it comes in the form of a bioweapon or something much more mundane like a tick bite or a Bill Gates' mosquito – you and your family need to be prepared. That’s where The Wellness Company comes in.

You know the Wellness Company and their great doctors – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Jim Thorp – are regularly in the media speaking out against the broken medical establishment.

Dr. Thorp, one of the nation’s leading critics of the corrupting influence of big pharma, believes that now – more than ever – people should be prepared for the next pandemic.

“I’ve strongly recommended “stock piling” critical medications including antibiotics since the turn of the century. This has been an incredible investment as many friends, family and patients have benefited.  Now, in summer of 2023, this recommendation is even more crucial.” – Dr. Jim Thorp

The Wellness Company and their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust and their new medical emergency kits are the gold standard when it comes to keeping you safe and healthy.

Be ready for anything, this medical emergency kit contains an assortment of live-saving medications – including ivermectin and Z-pak. The medical emergency kit provides a guidebook to aid in the safe use of all of these life-saving medications.

From anthrax to tick bites to COVID and even to a bioweapon like the plague – the Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency kit is exactly what you need to have on hand to be prepared.

Rest assured knowing that you have emergency antibiotics, antivirals and anti-parasitics on hand to help keep you and your family safe from whatever the globalists throw at us next!

The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit includes: 

  • Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (generic Augmentin) 875/125 mg - 28 tablets
  • Azithromycin (generic Z-Pak) 250 mg - 12 tablets
  • Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg - 60 capsules
  • Metronidazole (generic Flagyl) 500 mg - 30 tablets
  • Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (generic Bactrim) 800/160 mg - 28 tablets
  • Ivermectin 18mg - 7 compounded capsules
  • Fluconazole (generic Diflucan) 150 mg - 2 tablets
  • Ondansetron (generic Zofran) 4mg - 6 tablets
  • 1 virtual consult from a doctor you can trust
  • 1 Emergency Medication Guidebook written by our Chief Medical Board for safe use.

The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit treats:

  • Anthrax
  • Bacterial Vaginosis
  • Bite Wounds
  • Bronchitis
  • Chlamydia
  • Clostridioides difficile
  • Colitis
  • COVID - 19
  • Gonorrhea
  • Giardiasis
  • Lice
  • Nausea & Vomiting
  • Pharyngitis
  • Pinworms
  • Plague (bioterror)
  • Pneumonia
  • Rickettsial Infections
  • Scabies
  • Shigella Infection
  • Sinusitis
  • Skin Infection
  • Strep Throat
  • Syphilis
  • Tetanus
  • Tick Exposure
  • Tonsillitis
  • Traveler’s Diarrhea
  • Trichomoniasis
  • Tularemia (bioterror)
  • Urinary Tract Infection
  • Vaginal Candidiasis
  • Viral Upper Respiratory Infection

Don’t be caught unprepared. Don’t be reliant on the broken and corrupt medical industrial complex. Don’t regret not acting today.

Order The Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency Kits today!

(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and ordering through the links below, which benefits WLT Report. We appreciate your support!)

RELATED:

👇

We Were RIGHT About Ivermectin From Day One!

PAGING DOCTOR FLIP-FLOP!

DOCTOR FLIP-FLOP, PLEASE REPORT TO THE OPERATING ROOM!

In a 180 degree flip-flop a politician would be jealous of, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now admits doctors can prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

Yes, really.

During the COVID-19 plandemic, the FDA did everything possible to prevent doctors from prescribing the antiviral to treat COVID-19.

The corrupt agency compared people seeking ivermectin to horses.

Image

The federal government, mainstream media, Big Tech, and pharmacies created numerous barriers to prevent COVID-19 patients from obtaining ivermectin for treatment.

After millions of Americans lined up to take the experimental COVID-19 shots, the FDA changed course to say doctors can prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19.

According to The Epoch Times, the "'FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID,' Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit."

From The Epoch Times:

The government is defending the FDA's repeated exhortations to people to not take ivermectin for COVID-19, including a post that said "Stop it."

The case was brought by three doctors who allege the FDA unlawfully interfered with their practice of medicine with the statements. A federal judge dismissed the case in 2022, prompting an appeal.

"The fundamental issue in this case is straightforward. After the FDA approves the human drug for sale, does it then have the authority to interfere with how that drug is used within the doctor-patient relationship? The answer is no," Jared Kelson, representing the doctors, told the appeals court.

The FDA explicitly stated that ivermectin "isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19."

However, the agency attempted to excuse its corruption.

"FDA made these statements in response to multiple reports of consumers being hospitalized, after self medicating with ivermectin intended for horses, which is available for purchase over the counter without the need for prescription," Honold said.

In an interview with Maria Bartiromo, Senator Ron Johnson described the destruction caused by the actions of the FDA.

"The doctors I've been dealing with and talking to for yours now, they believe that probably hundreds of thousands of Americans lost their lives because they were denied early treatment," Johnson said.

"And they were denied it because the FDA sabotaged, for example, ivermectin. And they said, come on, you all, you're not a cow, you're not a horse. You know, this is supposedly horse medicine. No, this was a Nobel Prize-winning medicine that could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives."


, ,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.