Derek Johnson and Sheila Holmes Discuss Timing Of The Bruson Case — POST INAUGURATION!

A big thanks to a reader for bringing this to my attention….

I am going to show you a Post-Election Special live stream with Derek Johnson and Sheila Holmes, plus a lot of other people who come and go during the show.

Charlie Ward is hosting, and I have not traditional had a high view of Charlie Ward, but sometimes I have to apply what Jesus said in Luke 9:50 when he told the Disciples, “Do not stop him,” Jesus said, “for whoever is not against you is for you.”

I think the meaning of that verse is that if we cut out everyone who we disagree with one one particular thing or another, eventually we have no one left, so if they’re not actively working against you, and if they seem to be with you on the major issues, then do not stop them.

So for the purposes of this article and this video, that’s going to be my approach.

The same can be said for Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes, who I initially was quite impressed by but later had some reservations if we put it kindly.

But same applies to Dr. Jan.

They do not seem to be against us, so that will have to be good enough for now.

Derek Johnson has been rock solid these last four years, and I was very interested to hear his thoughts and Sheila Holmes’ thoughts on what comes next now that President Trump has won again.

They confirm it’s not over yet, big fights remain.

The Inauguration is not the end point either, but it’s the major milestone.

Sheila and Derek both seem to believe we will see a ruling on the Brunson Brothers case AFTER the Inauguration, claiming to have inside sources that are very reliable and even talking about NDAs that are in place.

That’s the part that was most interesting to me.

Will that end up being proven correct?

I do not know, and often times when I post things like this I’m posting them for posterity purposes, so we can all go back and look together if they play out (or if they don’t).  Let’s document this journey together and see who was a reliable source along the way as we do it.

This video is fairly long, but the part I found most interesting was from about the 30:00 minute mark through about the 1:30:00 minute mark, with the Brunson Case discussion falling somewhere around the 1:17:00-ish mark.

Watch here on Rumble:

I had Loy Brunson himself on my show a few days ago and he told me in no uncertain terms that the case is NOT dead yet!

Take a look….

RELATED REPORT:

Loy Brunson SCOTUS Case Is NOT Dead: “It’s Go Time!”

Loy Brunson SCOTUS Case Is NOT Dead: "It's Go Time!"

Loy Brunson was back on my show, The Daily Truth Report, yesterday with a fantastic message....

His Supreme Court case is NOT dead and could be pulled off the shelf at any moment!

Does it feel to anyone else like perhaps all the things we've been waiting on for the last 4 years are suddenly all going to strike roughly at the same time?

One right after the other in rapid fire, and the enemies within our country will be unable to withstand them all?

I'm starting to get that vibe in a big way!

First we get President Trump back into office and then everything starts to hit:

Elon Musk drops the mother of all Twitter files (as he recently hinted he would do)....

The Supreme Court suddenly pulls the Brunson Case off the shelf and unexpectedly rules on it, removing some 381 members from Congress for violating their oaths of office....

Meanwhile, Elon Musk and Vivek go to work on cutting out 90% of the Federal Government toxic waste....

And amidst all of that, the Boss himself, President Trump is doing his thing all at the same time, bringing down energy costs, rebuilding our military, closing the border, deporting hundreds of thousands of violent illegal immigrants....

Oh my!

Get excited my friends!

Here's Loy with more:

Backup here if needed on Rumble:

Here are the two links you need:

Letter writing campaigns 👉 https://loybrunson.com

Constitution revelations 👉 https://7discoveries.com

Please visit either of the websites listed above to join the Letter Writing Campaign!

We are aiming for 100 million letters sent to the Supreme Court and we need your help!

We need to show them that the majority of this country supports them and wants this action taken.

So just like voting, your action here is so important and it will be added to many others!

One voice alone is not powerful, but 100 million of us banded together can change the world!

Please send your letter here!

And here's more on Loy's work involving the Federal Reserve Bank system:

Want more?

We've been covering Loy Brunson and his brothers for a long time, please check this out:

INCREDIBLE: Meet Loy Brunson, One Of The Incredible Brunson Brothers!

Have you heard a lot about the Brunson Brothers (I also call them the TRUMPet Brothers) Supreme Court case....but don't know much about who they are?

Same here.

They kind of came onto the scene from nowhere (remember how Bo Polny keeps telling us it will happen "suddenly" and in a 24 hour period and how no one will see the plan coming? Well they certainly fit the bill!).

But the funny thing is they had some relative fame already as TRUMPet players before doing any of this work with the Supreme Court.

I've posted a little bit about their trumpet playing before, but now I want to introduce you to Loy Brunson, the Brunson brother who seems to be the Legal Eagle (not to take anything away from the other four).

But OH MY is he incredible!

THIS is what all of our elected officials should sound like!

Can you imagine a Congress filled with 535 people like this guy?

Our country would change overnight!

We would be the shining city on a hill...the envy of all nations!

And yet we can a fat buffoon who can't even wear pants properly (you all know who I mean), pencil neck (you know him), bat-crazy Nancy and Chuckie Schumer.  Just to name a few.

But you have to check this guy out...

This may be one of the best videos you ever watch.

Listen as he explains how the Constitution literally solves EVERY problem we have...

Like taxes.

Many of you know this, but we didn't have the IRS until 1862!

Our country served perfectly well -- and thrived -- for over 100 years without taxes!

Why didn't we have them?

Because it turns out they are actually Unconstitutional!

Brunson explains.

It's all right in the Constitution!

He covers a ton of other topics too, but my favorite was his finding of what he calls the "Interpretation Clause" in the 9th Amendment.

He says he was the first to discover it, and I think he's right because I searched for "Interpretation Clause Constitution" and nothing comes up in search results.

And yet, there it is plain as day....ignored for decades and centuries!

We're not a perfect country and the Founding Fathers were not perfect people....BUT....I do believe they were divinely inspired by God to write that document and you'll be blown away as you listen to Loy Brunson explain more.

Watch and enjoy right here:

Backup on Rumble:

Pass it around and let's start waking some people up!

And now if you want more on the Supreme Court case, keep reading...

TRUMPet Supreme Court Case Moving Forward! TGP Confirmed!

Several weeks ago, I was one of the ONLY websites to tell you about Brunson v. Adams, the Supreme Court Case that may upend the 2020 election steal.

In fact, I was so early that many people doubted it was real.

Our articles are ALWAYS real.

If I can't vet the article, I don't run it.

And this was 100% vetted by the best source possible: the Supreme Court website!

That's kind of what it means to be a journalist....

You take in all the information and sometimes you break the story!

That's what we did here.

So much so that one comment I read to my article said: I don't think it's real, I haven't seen the Epoch Times or Gateway Pundit cover it!

Well....with all apologies to the commenter, the Epoch Times covered it shortly thereafter and The Gateway Pundit covered it today....again.

I'm still waiting for my apology from the commenter (I forget who it was, they are not memorable) but I won't stay up all night waiting.

In all seriousness, the story is VERY real and very exciting!

From my friends at The Gateway Pundit, here is Tim Canova:

While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. In contrast, a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.

The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.

It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for Justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” In addition to such institutional threats to the Supreme Court, several Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their personal security since the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Perhaps these institutional and security threats have provided powerful incentives for the Court to put Brunson v. Adams on its dockets as a shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the Court’s independence. Or perhaps conservatives on the Court are serious about using the Brunson case as a sword to remove public officials who they believe have violated their constitutional Oaths of office by rubber-stamping Electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference.

Moreover, recent weeks have brought a cascade of news suggesting the likelihood of an impending constitutional crisis that could be difficult to resolve without the Court’s intervention. It is now clear that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was colluding with social media giants Twitter and Facebook to censor news of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election – a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government. Meanwhile, the January 6th committee may soon send a criminal referral to the Justice Department to arrest President Trump even though his reinstated tweets are a reminder that he was not calling for insurrection but for peaceful protest on January 6th. More recently, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was reportedly working with Big Tech to censor election critics.

 

Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution — the supreme law of the land — to rig an election, the only recourse may be the Supreme Court or military tribunals.

 

As the Brunson lawsuit argues, all of Congress was put on notice prior to its January 6th vote by more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations.

Moreover, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was required to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18, 2020. That deadline was set by executive order and by Congress itself. When December 18th came and went without ODNI submitting its report, Congress should have started asking questions and investigating. In fact, DNI John Ratcliffe announced on that day that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of foreign election interference but were split as to its significance and whether such breach of national security was sufficient to overturn the outcome of the election. And yet there was no action whatsoever by Congress, no inquiry and no investigation. Instead, Congress approved the possibly fraudulent election results on January 6th without asking any questions of the DNI and the Intelligence Community.

When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt, Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. In contrast, in early 2021 Congress had nearly two weeks to investigate before the January 20th date of the Presidential Inauguration. Had Congress waited even just one more day to January 7th, they would have received the long-awaited ODNI report reflecting a split in the Intelligence Community and the DNI’s own conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered to influence the outcome of the presidential election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf, the Analytic Ombudsman for the Intelligence Community, concluded at the time, the Intelligence Community shamefully delayed their findings until after the January 6th Electoral College certification by Congress because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration. This paints a picture of collusion and conspiracy involving members of Congress and U.S. intelligence agencies to coverup evidence of foreign election interference and constituting the crime of High Treason.

The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.