Election Night: Already Admitting Plan To Delay Results

According to The New York Times, we might not know the next president on election night.

I wonder why?

Are they just trying to get ahead of whats coming, their loss?

After all, they need to know how many fake votes they’ll need to add to win.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is saying whaat we’re all thinking.

He’s calling it “outrageous.”

He’s not a fan of the dramatic “wait-and-see” game, where your candidate’s in the far lead overnight then gets flipped after days of “counting”.

And even if there’s nothing fishy, DeSantis says the trust in elections takes a serious hit.

Just count them and post the results on election night, like it’s been for years.

BREAKING: The New York Times confirms that there won't be an immediate winner on election night, and early results could misleadingly suggest a Trump victory. However, this isn't necessarily a sign of flaws in the process but rather the result of stronger security measures needed…

— The General (@GeneralMCNews) September 14, 2024

Fox News reports:

Finding out who will be America’s 47th president could take quite some time after election night, if speculations from a recent New York Times article prove true.

With just over 50 days left until voters head to the ballot box in droves, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis says taking the counting beyond election night is “outrageous.”

“You’ll have one candidate that may have a big lead because of Election Day votes and then people wake up the next morning and say, ‘Yeah, my candidate’s up 6%,’ and then they keep counting the next day, and then they count more the next day, and then the lead flips,” he told “Sunday Morning Futures” host Maria Bartiromo.

“Even if there was nothing [wrong], even if it was all on the up and up, that destroys confidence on how these elections happen,” he continued. “So any of those states that are doing what The New York Times is saying, they are absolutely killing public trust in these elections.”

“Count the votes on election night and report the results.”

The Times article, published Friday, suggested the trend for the 2020 presidential election could echo into the 2024 faceoff, with an increasing likelihood that there will be “no clear and immediate winner on election night” and that “early returns could give a false impression of who will ultimately prevail.”

The lengthy return times and the blue or red election night mirage are predominantly credited to an increasing use of mail-in ballots over traditional in-person voting.

ADVERTISEMENT

NEW: The New York Times reports that election results will likely not be known on Election Night & the person who looks like the winner might not be.

Remarkable

The Times tells readers that the large delay in counting is because of “intense security measures,” not fraud.

“For… pic.twitter.com/oh6GmzqXZS

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 14, 2024

The media was trying to gaslight us two years ago about not knowing election results on election night.

Someone in the comments pointed out the facts though.

Florida will count 95% it's votes in a few hours, including a large number of VBM ballots. Brazil just counted 118 million votes in a few hours. France can count 70 million votes BY HAND in a few hours..

— SilverChairRebellion (@SilverVodoo) November 5, 2022

Even Tucker Carlson mentioned it back when he was on Fox News.

If France can use paper ballots and count them by hand, then why not the United States? (BTW France did away with ‘mail-in’ ballots in 1975, because they lead to voter fraud). @TuckerCarlson pic.twitter.com/4JJyjznixV

— Farm Girl Carrie 👩‍🌾 (@FarmGirlCarrie) August 18, 2022

Here’s an example of paper ballot voting in action:

O voto na França é de papel, inserido em uma urna transparente e limpa (Aliança no controle 🪖🥾)

Incrível, não é?

Assista ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/HV509KIj7r

— Yausha-God 🪖🥾 (@Yeshua88992) July 1, 2024