Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

COVID-19 Jab Manufacturer Halts Vaccine Projects, Cuts $1.1 Billion In Expenses

Moderna announced it will pause some products in its pipeline as it reduces “annual research and development expense by approximately $1.1 billion starting in 2027.”

With the steep decline in COVID-19 jab sales, the biotech company will prioritize 10 products for potential approval by 2027.

“Moderna now has five respiratory vaccines with positive Phase 3 results and expects to submit three for approval this year. In addition, we have five non-respiratory products in pivotal studies across cancer, rare diseases and latent vaccines with potential for approval by 2027. Our demonstrated probability of success in R&D has been higher than industry standards at every stage of development,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said.

“The size of our late-stage pipeline combined with the challenge of launching products means we must now focus on delivering these 10 products to patients, slow down the pace of new R&D investment, and build our commercial business,” he added.

“The decision to cut 20% from its R&D budget follows low sales and a disappointing outlook for vaccine revenue, forcing the company to discontinue five key programs,” citizen journalist UngaTheGreat wrote.

“This news has sent Moderna’s stock plummeting, with shares dropping by up to 17% during midday trading. The company plans to tackle cancer and rare diseases as it shifts focus beyond COVID,” he added.

Per CNBC:

ADVERTISEMENT

The biotech company said it expects 10 new product approvals through 2027. But Moderna said it will also pause work on some products in its pipeline and scrap others, as it aims to “pace ourselves” in new research and development spending.

The company aims to trim R&D spending to a range of $3.6 billion to $3.8 billion in 2027, down from an expected $4.8 billion at the end of this year, according to a release.

“You’re going to start seeing things come down because there are some studies that we are going to basically sunset and we’re not going to start,” Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel told CNBC, adding that the company is putting its latent product portfolio “on hold.” That refers to a category of viruses that linger inside patients for prolonged periods without causing any symptoms but can reactivate and cause serious health complications later in their lives.

WATCH:

Axios reports:

Many of its future vaccines aren’t moving quickly enough to bolster the top or bottom line.

The company’s second-quarter revenue totaled $241 million, a 43% drop from a year earlier, which it said was “primarily attributable to decreased sales of the Company’s COVID-19 vaccine.”

The upshot is that Moderna isn’t expected to turn a profit until 2028, according to a research note by Jefferies analyst Michael Yee cited by CNBC.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moderna’s stock fell over 12% Thursday, having tumbled from its all-time high above $449 in September 2021 — a wipeout of nearly $170 billion of market value over the three years.

RELATED REPORT:

Why Were Vaccine Manufacturers Given IMMUNITY For Vaccines Which Are “Unavoidably Unsafe”?

Sometimes the truth is right there under your nose, hidden in plain sight, and we just don’t connect the dots.

That’s exactly the case with vaccines, in my estimation.

According to Joe Rogan in the clip I’m going to show you below, vaccine manufacturers were given immunity for their vaccines AFTER admitting it was impossible to produce them in a safe manner.

Let that sink in for a minute….

And sometimes the best thing to use is an analogy.

Imagine Tesla comes out and says you know what, we just can’t make the upcoming “RoboTaxi” in a safe way.  We’ve tried!  But it still crashes 1 out of 100 times.  But, ummmm, we’ll make a ton of money selling it and we really want to sell it, so can you just give us immunity for any deaths we cause?

ADVERTISEMENT

That sounds insane, right?

Except, that’s basically what Joe Rogan describes for vaccines in the clip below.

Take a look:

Joe Rogan Raises SERIOUS Questions About the Childhood Vaccine Schedule

“There are so many of them. They give them to them so quickly. Like, from the moment they’re born, they want to bang them up with vaccines.”

What very few people know about the childhood vaccine schedule is that, in the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money.

For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing about $20 to injury lawsuits.

So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business.

President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably” unsafe.

This led to the signing of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, which gave vaccine manufacturers special liability protections.

“And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Robert Kennedy Jr. told Joe Rogan in a previous interview.

ADVERTISEMENT

Full screen video player here:

As usual, is it all about the Benjamins?

Seems like it.

Keep reading and it only gets so much worse:

You Will Be SICK To Learn How Much Pediatricians Are Paid For Vaccinating YOUR Kids!

Perhaps the ONLY good thing to come out of the Pandemic is the massive red pill currently happening about vaccines.

Not only the COVID jab, but ALL vaccines.

People are realizing this is not good, and it’s not normal.

And they just keep adding more!

Here is a visual depiction of a baby surrounded by all the shots it will have to get by the time it turns 5:

Enough is enough.

I’ve shared this story before, but I’ll share it one more time here because it’s directly relevant for what I’m about to show you….

When we had our first child, even back then I already knew vaccines were not safe.

I knew I probably couldn’t avoid them altogether, but I figured my next best option was to space them out.

I asked my doctor if we could deviate from the official “CDC” schedule by spacing the shots out.  I would (begrudgingly) still do them all, but instead of giving 3 on one day for example, space them out two weeks apart.

At first I got the runaround and all the BS reasons why that won’t work….

“That will be a lot of work for you having all those appointments.”  I don’t care, I replied.

“That will be extra cost, all the extra copays.”  I don’t care, I replied.

“That’s highly unusual.”  What’s the big deal, I replied?  Can you explain to me why we can’t do that?

That’s when his whole demeanor changed, he got all red and blotchy in the face, he started tripping over his own words, looked down and refused to look me in the face and angrily shouted “We don’t do that here!”

Wow, weird right?

Why have such an emotional response?

Isn’t your first duty to the health of your patients?

Well, it turns out it is NOT.

For most pediatricians, I’m sad to say, their first duty has changed and they now have two masters: The all-powerful US Dollar and Big Pharma!

How lovely.

That’s where RFK, Jr. comes in.

This guy is literally blowing the lid off this whole thing.

You have to see this latest short clip where he explains EXACTLY why Pediatricians won’t let you NOT vaccinate your kids (or even spread them out), and like almost everything else it all comes down to money:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr on the Real Reason Pediatricians Won’t Accept You If You Don’t 💉 Your Kids

“A typical pediatrician’s office makes about 50% of its funding from vaccines. Not actually from selling the individual vaccines, but from the traffic…And pediatricians who vaccinate 80 or 85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses…Huge amounts of money, hundreds of thousands of dollars that they make, making sure that 85% of the kids are vaccinated. And that’s why they throw you out of the office if you fight back. It’s not because they care so much about your particular kid, it’s that you’ll throw off the metrics and you’ll lose them their bonuses.”

At the end of the clip, he says go research the Blue Cross Blue Shield payment schedules that detail how big these bonus payments are — it’s all public record.

So I did.

I started with ChatGPT, which confirmed that what RFK, Jr. said is true….they do offer these “pay-for-performance” models (hey, it’s that what we call a QUID PRO QUO?  I thought those were bad or something) but it couldn’t give me the specifics on the dollar amounts:

Yes, some health insurance companies, including Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) and its regional affiliates, may provide incentives or bonuses to healthcare providers, including pediatricians, for meeting certain quality measures, including vaccination rates among their patients. These incentive programs are part of what’s often referred to as “value-based care” or “pay-for-performance” models.

Here’s what is generally known about such programs:

Incentive Programs for Vaccination Rates:

  1. Quality Improvement Programs: Many Blue Cross Blue Shield plans participate in quality improvement programs such as the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) or similar measures. HEDIS includes childhood immunization status as a quality measure. Providers who achieve high vaccination rates may receive higher reimbursement rates or bonuses.
  2. Performance-Based Bonuses: Pediatricians and clinics can receive bonuses for achieving high rates of vaccinations. These bonuses can be linked to the percentage of patients who are fully vaccinated according to the CDC’s immunization schedule.
  3. Reimbursement Adjustments: Some programs offer tiered reimbursement rates based on achieving specific targets. For example, a pediatric office might receive higher reimbursement for services provided if 80% or more of its patients are fully vaccinated by a certain age.
  4. Specific BCBS Programs: Blue Cross Blue Shield programs, like the Blue Quality Physician Program (BQPP) or the Quality-Based Reimbursement (QBR) program, vary by state and region. These programs generally assess various performance metrics, including immunization rates, to determine reimbursement levels or additional payments.

Specific Data by Region:

  • BCBS of Michigan: In Michigan, BCBS offers incentive payments to providers who meet pediatric immunization goals. Providers can receive an additional amount per vaccinated child if they meet specific coverage rates (e.g., 80% or 90%).
  • BCBS of North Carolina: Offers performance-based incentive payments tied to immunization rates, which are part of the broader value-based payment model to ensure children are up-to-date with their vaccinations.
  • BCBS of Texas: The Blue Premier program incentivizes healthcare practices to increase preventive care measures, such as childhood immunization rates. Higher vaccination rates can lead to bonuses or higher reimbursements.

How to Get Specific Data:

  1. Direct Inquiries to BCBS Affiliates: Each BCBS affiliate (such as BCBS of Michigan, BCBS of Texas, etc.) may have specific programs with varying criteria. Direct contact with these affiliates can provide specific details.
  2. Review Publicly Available Contracts and Guidelines: Some BCBS affiliates publish their provider guidelines and performance metrics criteria online. Reviewing these documents can provide details on incentive structures.
  3. State Health Departments and Transparency Programs: Some states may require insurers to disclose performance metrics and related payment incentives, which can be accessed through state health department websites.

So I went to Grok.

And Grok delivered.

I’ll copy the full answer below but basically a pediatrician can get $40,000 for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of 2, and it jumps to $80,000 if they get to 200!

But drop below 63% and you lose all bonsues.

Yes, according to information available up to 2024, Blue Cross Blue Shield does offer financial incentives to pediatricians for vaccinating their patients, but there are specifics and context to consider:
  • Incentive Programs: Blue Cross Blue Shield has had performance-based incentive programs where pediatricians could receive bonuses for vaccinating children under the age of 2. A commonly cited figure from a 2016 program by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan mentioned a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating 100 patients under the age of 2. If the pediatrician managed to vaccinate 200 patients, this bonus could jump to $80,000.
  • Conditions for Bonuses: However, these bonuses come with conditions. Pediatricians would lose the entire bonus unless at least 63% of their patients under the age of 2 were fully vaccinated, which includes receiving the flu vaccine.
  • Context and Misconceptions: The figures and conditions mentioned have often been cited on social media and have led to some misconceptions. The actual payments and conditions can vary significantly by state, the specific Blue Cross Blue Shield plan, and over time. The numbers from 2016 were specific to one program and not necessarily representative of current or universal practices across all Blue Cross Blue Shield associations.
  • Purpose of Incentives: These incentives are part of broader quality care metrics, not solely focused on vaccination. They aim to encourage best practices in preventative care, which includes vaccinations among other health services like BMI assessments, developmental screenings, and more.
  • Current Data: Specific up-to-date figures for 2024 or detailed breakdowns post-2016 regarding how these incentives might have changed aren’t provided in the search results or X posts, but the practice of offering some form of incentive for vaccination rates as part of broader quality care initiatives continues to be part of how insurance companies operate.
  • Critical Perspective: While these incentives are designed to promote health care practices that prevent disease, they’ve also been criticized or viewed with skepticism by some who worry about the potential for financial incentives to influence medical decisions, possibly prioritizing quantity over individual patient care or consent.

And now you see why my doctor got so red and blotchy in the face and started shouting.

Because he was BANKING on that $40,000 or $80,000 and I was standing in his way.

You see, even if I got all the vaccines but spaced them out, we wouldn’t hit the 100% by Age 2 because we’d be spaced out to older ages.

And bye bye pay day.

Here is an MD backing up the truth of what Grok told us above:

Excuse me and (sorry Franklin) but how the FUCK is this even legal?

Incentivized pay to force vaccines on babies where parents don’t necessarily want them?

And despite the lies Big Pharma will tell you, they are NOT proven safe, quite the contrary!

This should be absolutely 100% criminal if you ask me.

Sick, sick stuff.

History will not look back kindly on what has been done here.

Evil greed and just one additional way for “Moloch” to kill children.

RELATED REPORT:

Marin County Defies CDC Vaccine Schedule, Experiences Decline in Autism Rates?

Big shout out to my friends over at ThePeople’sVoice (hello Sean) who are the first I’ve seen to run with this story (source here).

It caught my eye in a big way, so I wanted to pass it on to you and also provide an additional Fact-Check on this incredible story.

Here is the Twitter post that first caught my eye:

That’s an incredible claim!

And it basically all boils down to two claims that you read together, which are that: (1) parents in Marin County, CA around the year 2000 started following a different (reduced or eliminated) childhood vaccination schedule than what the CDC pushes on the rest of us, and (2) that as a result, 20+ years later, they have experienced a counter-trend DECLINE in Autism rates compared to what is seen in the rest of the Country.

Wow, right?

So is it true?

It rings true to me just in my gut, but that’s not sufficient enough for a Fact-Check.

I will tell you right upfront that the evidence I was able to find is a bit “scant” at best, but that’s not surprising.  If something like this were true, you know they’d go to great lengths to scrub it from the Internet.

So here’s what I did find….

First, I was surprised to see that when I asked ChatGPT about the first claim, it confirmed the alternate vaccine schedule in Marin County around the year 2000 DID in fact occur:

I find that especially interesting given that the Far-Left ChatGPT would typically not admit something like this.

So that seems to be decent confirmation of the first claim.

Also, Marin County, CA is a VERY wealthy and VERY liberal area….and what do we know about ultra wealthy, white liberals?

We know that they LOVE telling you what to do (usually some horrific Far-Left trope) and then they themselves do the opposite.

For example, walls are racist and we need to bring as many migrants into the Country as possible! But….I have a massive wall around my huge house and I’m damn sure not housing any migrants here or even anywhere in my City!

That kind of hypocrisy.

So it doesn’t surprise me at all that they would do something like that in Marin County.  It’s textbook!

Then we have the second claim: Did Autism rates go down?

Well, according to this study published on the official PubMed.gov website….YES!

See the study here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32193763/

Leading expert Toby Rogers ties it all together:

Now let me wrap it all up by presenting a bit of the counter-argument by those who want to shoot holes in this.

Because that’s what we do here…I give you as much information as I can and I let you decide!

So I asked ChatGPT if the entire claim (part 1 and part 2) are true, and as you might expect it claimed there was no evidence to suggest a linkage between Claim 1 (reduced vaccines) and Claim 2 (reduced Autism).  Here’s what it told me:

There was a trend in Marin County, California, particularly around the early 2000s, where a significant number of parents opted out of the recommended childhood vaccination schedule or chose alternative schedules due to concerns about vaccine safety. This was part of a broader movement among some communities in the U.S., where vaccine hesitancy led to lower vaccination rates.

However, this deviation from the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule was not officially sanctioned or systematically adopted as a county policy. Instead, it reflected a growing movement among parents influenced by misinformation linking vaccines to autism—a link that has been thoroughly debunked by extensive scientific research.

Regarding autism rates, there is no credible evidence to suggest that Marin County, or any other community that adopted alternative vaccination schedules, experienced lower autism rates as a result. In fact, numerous studies have confirmed that vaccines do not cause autism. The apparent increase in autism diagnoses during the same period has been attributed to broader diagnostic criteria, increased awareness, and better diagnostic practices, rather than changes in vaccination practices.

It is important to note that lower vaccination rates in Marin County and similar communities have been associated with outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, underscoring the public health risks of not following the recommended vaccination schedules.

So that’s a pretty textbook reply, just spewing the “there is no credible link between vaccines and Autism” BS that we’ve heard for years.

Sorry, but I don’t find THAT CLAIM credible!

When I pressed on the issue, it responded by claiming that the decreased Autism rates were rather due to “access to private care” by the wealthy parents — yeah, because “private care” can stop Autism?

The study you referenced does not establish a causal link between changes in vaccination schedules and declining autism rates in wealthy white populations in Marin County. While the article notes a decline in autism rates in these demographics, it attributes the trend to factors like access to private care or alternative interventions rather than vaccination practices. The relationship between vaccination schedules and autism has been extensively studied, and no credible evidence supports a causal connection between vaccines and autism rates.

In a related report, it is nice to see so many people red-pilling and speaking out on this issue:

MUST SEE: Top American Financier Now Speaking Out About Forced Childhood Vaccinations

Satan always overplays his hand…

Every.

Single.

Time.

So you can always take solace that when things look the worst, that’s likely the time when Evil has just overplayed its hand and the boomerang is about to swing back hard in the other direction, placing Satan farther behind than when he started.

I believe that just happened with vaccines.

Allow me to explain….

For decades, Americans endured a vastly increasing schedule of forced childhood vaccines.

Even if we didn’t like it, most of us just went along with it because they were mandated and you had to get them in order to send your kids to school.

And in reality, most people didn’t even give it a second thought.

Surely the medical doctors are only doing what’s best for me!

Right?

Enter 2020.

And all of a sudden one vaccine was forced upon the entire country.

One vaccine, three makers….

By the way, Moderna, Pfizer and J&J are all competitors right?

Can anyone explain to me how they all suddenly developed a vaccine for COVID all at the same time and all on their own?

Are we really supposed to beLIEve that?

Folks, it’s absolute HORSE-SHIT, and don’t get angry about my language that is the only descriptor accurate enough to use.

If you really believe that all three Big Pharma companies all just suddenly, overnight, developed vaccines for COVID all working independently of each other, and they all did it in record time and all finished at the same time….then you have just failed the IQ Test.  I’m sorry.

That’s hogwash!

Oh, and don’t forget that they were also so similar and so compatible that you could mix and match!

Remember that?

Got the J&J for your first dose?

No problem, get Moderna for your second dose!

You kidding me with this garbage?

And so many people FINALLY woke up from their slumber and started saying this isn’t right…

Perhaps it was when they were bribed with Krispie Kreme donuts if they would just go get the shot!

Or perhaps it was the fact that the shot was free….

NOTHING in life is free, you’re paying for it some way.

Or maybe it was the fact that you were told you’d be fired from your job (and many were!) if you didn’t take the jab!

What happened to My Body, My Choice?

Why were they so desperate to get this jab into your body?

So….millions of Americans FINALLY woke up from their slumber and realized something was wrong here, something was very, very wrong here.

And that’s where we pick up our story, because now that millions are awake, they’re not just questioning the COVID jab, now they’re questioning all forced vaccinations, including those on the smallest, weakest, most defenseless among us: Babies.

In fact, this might blow your mind, check out how much forced vaccinations on babies has increased over the last century:

Even since 1984 it’s a dramatic increase!

Enter Bill Ackman.

Many of you may know him, but he’s a very successful American financier.

Here is a short bio:

Bill Ackman is a renowned American financier, hedge fund manager, and philanthropist, known for his strategic investment acumen and impactful philanthropy. As the CEO and founder of Pershing Square Capital Management, Ackman has established himself as one of the most influential and successful investors in the finance industry.

Ackman graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College in 1988, where he earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Social Studies. He later received his MBA from Harvard Business School in 1992, further solidifying his strong academic foundation.

Career Accomplishments:

  1. Pershing Square Capital Management: Founded in 2004, Pershing Square Capital Management has grown into one of the most successful hedge funds in the world, managing billions in assets. Under Ackman’s leadership, the firm has delivered outstanding returns for its investors through astute market predictions and strategic investments.
  2. Herbalife Short Position: Ackman is well-known for his high-profile short position against Herbalife in 2012, where he publicly declared the company a pyramid scheme. Although the trade faced significant controversy, Ackman’s advocacy brought widespread attention to the issue of multi-level marketing companies.
  3. Successful Investments: Ackman’s investment prowess is evident in several high-profile successes, including his investments in companies like General Growth Properties, where his intervention helped the company emerge from bankruptcy and provided substantial returns for investors. His investment in Canadian Pacific Railway led to significant operational improvements and enhanced shareholder value.
  4. COVID-19 Market Prediction: In early 2020, Ackman made a bold and correct market prediction regarding the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. He implemented a strategic hedging strategy that resulted in a $2.6 billion profit for Pershing Square, demonstrating his foresight and strategic thinking.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at 100 Percent Fed Up.

View the original article here.


 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.