It’s all too predictable.
A Secret Service whistleblower has now stated that not only should additional agents have been at President Trump’s Butler, Pennsylvania rally the day he was shot…
…BUT that the Secret Service director himself, Ronald Rowe, cut those agents from President Trump’s detail himself!
This is the same man who just testified before congress that no cuts were made.
Check out what Fox News’ Jesse Watters had to say about this…
Jesse Watters: We Have Evidence of a Secret Service Cover-Up
Ronald Rowe testified that the Secret Service didn't cut resources from Trump's detail.
Well, it turns out that the same guy “personally directed” Secret Service agents to be CUT.
So, he lied.
This was revealed by… pic.twitter.com/y8GY194xxL
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) August 2, 2024
And Just the News further reports this bombshell…
Missouri GOP Sen. Josh Hawley on Thursday claimed that a Secret Service whistleblower alleged that acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe ordered cuts to the agency’s threat assessment team, which contributed to the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump.
ADVERTISEMENT“The whistleblower claims that if personnel from [the Secret Service Counter Surveillance Division] had been present at the rally, the gunman would have been handcuffed in the parking lot after being spotted with a rangefinder,” Hawley wrote in a letter to Rowe. “The whistleblower also alleges retaliation against those within the Secret Service who expressed concern about security at President Trump’s events.”
So with Rowe claiming before congress that no cuts to President Trump’s Pennsylvania detail were made, and the whistleblower stating Rowe himself made those cuts…
…this would mean the director of the Secret Service lied to congress!
Shocking the head of a federal government organization might do such a thing, right?
Well, as the rabbit hole of the Secret Service’s failure to protect Predident’s Trump goes deeper, I just hope President Trump now has a good handle of who’s on his side, and more importantly…
…who isn’t.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!