Newsweek Posts More Fake News: “Trump May Drop Vance For Nikki Haley”

What in the hell is going on over at Newsweek?

Are they even trying to print honest news anymore?

It seems not, at least by my estimation.

Whoever is in charge over there REALLY hates JD Vance, which tells me he must be an awesome, badass candidate!

(Sorry Franklin)

Because first they posted this nonsense:

Donald Trump may drop JD Vance for Nikki Haley, ex-Clinton adviser says https://t.co/VgVMOehFGj pic.twitter.com/FebFhSWwIp

— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 26, 2024

That article has ZERO basis in reality or fact.

Only hope by a Never-Trumper publication.

But then they went on a posting spree, seemingly attacking Vance all day long…..

Trust me when I say JD Vance is living in their head Rent Free and that should tell you all you need to know — President Trump made the RIGHT pick!

First was this:

"Couches for Kamala" video in response to JD Vance allegations goes viral https://t.co/KX3EHz1jTb

— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 26, 2024

Sounds hilarious to me!

What about knee pads?

Then this hit piece:

JD Vance suffers harsh blow in his own backyard https://t.co/D1LarJktoT pic.twitter.com/H6FJsqwO7k

— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 26, 2024

Then this one:

Picking JD Vance looks like a mistake, top conservative says https://t.co/HsYPSFAjj9 pic.twitter.com/MqBLNq9EDy

— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 26, 2024

Then ANOTHER about Trump swapping out JD Vance:

Can Donald Trump switch out JD Vance? Speculation swirls https://t.co/eTQvmHPA61 pic.twitter.com/U9zlXH1ZEC

— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 26, 2024

Looks to me like Newsweek is VERY nervous about JD Vance.

Hey Newsweek, might be wise to work on your poker face a bit, you’ve got a bit of a “tell”.

Oh, and perhaps study up on journalism?

Of course, the JD Vance obsession comes on the heels of this BULLSHIT report (Sorry Franklin):

BREAKING: Newsweek Now Says “Donald Trump might not have been shot after all”

Yes folks, they really said that.

Really posted it.

Really wrote it.

Absolutely sick and despicable.

But it’s true!

Take a look right here:

Donald Trump might not have been shot after all https://t.co/60KvtkhY1N pic.twitter.com/fObe2Jr3iG

— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 25, 2024

And in case they delete the Tweet and the article, let’s save a screenshot, ok?

Here’s a small snippet from the article where they attempt to justify their claim:

But on Wednesday, Wray testified before the House Judiciary Committee that it is not yet certain if Trump’s injury was caused by a bullet or shrapnel.

“To the best of your understanding, how close did the assassin’s bullet come to killing President Donald Trump?” California Rep. Kevin Kiley asked Wray.

Wray replied that his understanding was that either a bullet or a piece of shrapnel “is what grazed [Trump’s] ear.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Later in the hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan, the committee chairman, asked Wray if all eight bullets fired by the gunman had been accounted for.

These people are sick!

JUST IN: Newsweek suggests that Donald Trump was not actually hit by a bullet at his Pennsylvania rally.

Why believe your own eyes when you can listen to the media spoonfeed you lies?

Newsweek is trying to use FBI Director Wray's testimony to suggest that Trump was not actually… pic.twitter.com/Y4ZTBjDWAV

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 25, 2024

JUST IN: Newsweek suggests that Donald Trump was not actually hit by a bullet at his Pennsylvania rally.

Why believe your own eyes when you can listen to the media spoonfeed you lies?

Newsweek is trying to use FBI Director Wray’s testimony to suggest that Trump was not actually hit by a bullet and instead, may have been hit by ‘shrapnel.’

Wray said during his testimony that he was not completely certain “what grazed [Trump’s] ear” which Newsweek is now using to cast doubt in Americans’ minds.

The graphic below clearly shows the bullet paths perfectly lining up.

What do you think?