CNN Now Admits: THREE Weapons Fired At Trump Rally!

So the truth is slowly seeping out.

Even CNN is now admitting it looks like there were at least THREE shooters at Trump’s Butler, PA Rally.

We told you this over a week ago, but it’s nice to see the so-called “Mainstream Media” now figuring it out.

Actually, I don’t really believe that at all.

I believe the narrative they were trying to push about Crooks being the lone gunman has so thoroughly failed and been debunked that they are forced to now admit this because the forensic audio evidence is indisputable.

So here’s CNN now admitting it:

Three weapons fired at #Trump rally
3 shots from first
4 from second
1 from third (secret service sniper who took out shooter)
Per a CNN story that got buried a couple days ago.
Why is this not getting more analysis
Local sniper also fired? But local commissioner said local… pic.twitter.com/apEoZpWJAN

— Wisconsin Right Now (@wisconsin_now) July 21, 2024

Screenshots:

More from CNN here, talking about “Weapon C” — and for those who might be a little slow, that would be akin to “Shooter 3”:

Trump is in the middle of speaking when someone in the crowd is heard saying, “He’s got a gun.” As the video captures someone in the crowd repeating, “On the roof. He’s got a gun,” three shots ring out. A pause and five more shots in rapid succession are heard, along with a final shot of a different tone. “Stay under here,” an attendee says in the video. Forensic analysis suggests that as many as three weapons were fired at the rally (including, apparently, those fired as part of the response by law enforcement officials). The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final “acoustic impulse” was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution. The FBI said Sunday that the shooter acted alone.

Patrick Bet-David also had some excellent analysis on the “Second Shooter” and also on how the first shooter was able to get off so many shots.

Per PBD, some of the top shooters in the world would have difficulty shooting that fast.

Watch here:

Ok, so now let’s talk about WHY this is all leaking out now.

My take?

I believe they’re going to try and spin this “second shooter” (or third shooter as the case may be overall) as a second “good guy” shooter.

They desperately do not want you to consider a second “bad guy” shooter because that destroys the lone gunman, kid-who-snapped, narrative, and almost certainly cements a “Deep State Assassination Plot” narrative, with kid set up as the patsy narrative.

And that’s when all Hell breaks loose in this Country, if it’s found out that the Deep State put out a “hit” on President Trump.

So now that they can’t deny the forensic audio analysis people are doing, the only choice left to them is to say it was a second good-guy sniper who killed the kid.

You buying that?

Here’s Fox News pushing that theory:

FOX NEWS CONFIRMS: There Were At Least THREE Shooters!

Well, well, well….it looks like our reporting was SPOT ON once again….and about 5 days before Fox News figured it out.

Actually, I don’t want to imply that it was anything I did.

No, I simply talk to the right people and have good sources.

All the credit for this one goes to Jovan Pulitzer, who told me this back on Tuesday of this week in our interview that has since gone absolutely viral.

And for good reason.

Because Jovan was not only early in his analysis, but he was dead on in everything he was telling me.

Let’s take a moment to see the new update from Fox News and then I’ll tell you everything Jovan told me.

BREAKING: Fox News reports that a local sn*per team *did* fire a shot during the assas*ination attempt on Donald Trump.

The development appears to confirm that there were indeed three separate sho*ters as the incident unfolded.

According to Fox, a local sn*per tried taking… pic.twitter.com/3B0K7GV6ki

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 20, 2024

BREAKING: Fox News reports that a local sn*per team *did* fire a shot during the assas*ination attempt on Donald Trump.

The development appears to confirm that there were indeed three separate sho*ters as the incident unfolded.

According to Fox, a local sn*per tried taking out Crooks but missed.

A USSS sn*per was the one who took out Crooks in what they call a “one in a million shot.”

“We’re also told a local police sn*per took a single shot as well, but missed.”

Ok, so now let’s analyze what Jovan told me.

Because I think what’s happening here is what the MSM always does….

They slow drip the truth, and it’s never quite the real truth, it’s always some deviation of the real truth, but they have to slow drip it to move the narrative from what they initially told you — because they’re usually so wrong it takes a lot of effort and a long time for them to gradually drift towards the truth.

And the truth here is that Jovan believes there were indeed two snipers, but not in the way Fox News explains it.

Not two different snipers for the good guys….but two different snipers for the bad guys!

In other words, a second shooter who was the REAL shooter.  The kid was just the patsy, designed to distract everyone from the real shooter.

That’s Jovan’s take.

So why is Fox News now coming out and admitting there was a THIRD shooter?

Because it’s undeniable at this point that there were at least three shooters.

That dam has broken.

News was flooded on Friday with multiple people releasing forensic audio analysis proving at least three distinct shooters.

Like this:

BREAKING: Audio Analysis Is 100% Clear Trump& Crowd Were Shot At By Two Separate People

So that's why the MSM is now admitting it.

They have to.

They can't keep this genie in the bottle, it's already out.

So what's they're only other option.

Spin it with misinformation.

Admit to three shooters, but claim the third one was a good guy sniper.

The truth is almost always a complete 180 from whatever narrative the MSM is telling you.

Here's the real truth and we had it from Jovan back on Tuesday:

Jovan Pulitzer: "Return Snipers Did NOT Kill Him" -- "There Was A Second Malvo Shooter!"

This is an absolute bombshell report and interview....and for those of you who know me, I don't throw that word around very often because I like it to retain it's meaning and impact.

So I had Jovan Pulitzer back on my show today to discuss a full forensic audit of the Trump shooting.

There's no one better out there to conduct a forensic audit than Jovan, and those of you who know him know that to be true.

The man leaves NO stone unturned and he thinks outside the box most people think in.

So I was fascinated to hear what he had to say about everything....and absolutely blown away by some of his early conclusions.

First up, while I had him I got his quick thoughts on Vice President JD Vance and while I won't go into those in this article, I'll say they very closely matched mine -- and even my process for coming to the same conclusions.  So that was nice to see.

Ok now to the shooting....

The first thing I wanted to get off the table quickly was whether or not it was possible this was staged in any way by Team Trump.  A "sympathy shooting".

Jovan quickly put that to bed with a firm no.

You can listen to the interview to hear exactly why, but I agree 100%.

So then we started talking about the "Balance of Possibilities" and applying Occam's Razor to come to a theory of what likely happened here.

Jovan says in situations like this he likes to find the "Second Right Answer" meaning (I think) that the answer they give you at first, and the narrative they try to sell you, likely isn't the truth.

So in this case, that means the 20 year old kid being the shooter, and being noticed by people in the crowd, and even confronted by police at one point, and now dead so case closed -- that probably isn't the right answer.

So what is?

Basically, this....

You need to listen to the interview in full (and maybe even twice -- many people are telling me they are listening twice already, that's how big this is becoming), but here's the quick summary....

Jovan does not think the 20 year old kid was the Trump shooter.  He was the patsy.  Sure, he was allowed to carry the gun up there and get in position and ultimately got blown away.  But he wasn't the Trump shooter.

Also, Jovan does not think the Snipers on the rooftop behind Trump are the ones who took out the kid.  He says if you look at the pictures of the kid after he was dead, all of the evidence (teeth pointing forward, etc) all suggest the kid was shot from behind.

So where does that leave things?

Simply this: there were at least one and maybe two other shooters.

Hello, grassy knoll!  We've got a new JFK.

But it makes total sense.

The kid was a very bad shot, nothing about his story lines up, and it's highly unlikely that even at a (relatively) close distance for most good shooters, that he would make such a perfect shot on Trump.

Remember, it was only by the grace of God that Trump turned his head those 1-2 inches at the exact last moment, otherwise it would have been a PERFECT kill shot.

The trajectory of the bullet also tells a different story, but you have to watch the interview to have Jovan explain that in detail.  We went over it multiple times.

In short, Jovan thinks this was the work of an expert gunman farther away.

The kid was the cover story.

The real shots came from the expert sniper farther out.

And then either that sniper or someone else took out the kid, because of course we need a dead assailant to say "case closed!"

And now the kicker.....

Jovan also thinks that second shooter was likely done Malvo-style.

Do you remember Malvo?

The DC shooter?

The guy who they couldn't catch because he shot out of a small hole in the back of his car?

Jovan thinks something exactly like that happened here.

There would be no chance of it being caught on video surveillance or cell phone anywhere.  Not out in the open.

Just a Cadillac DeVille perhaps, parked maybe 300 yards out with the perfect line of sight?

Oh my!

I told you this was a bombshell.

Folks, if Jovan is right about even 50% of this, then you have a conspiracy the likes of which could tear this country apart!

But the truth must come out, at all costs.

We talked about a ton more, including Trump body doubles, what Trump should do next, whether Trump immediately goes into a bunker for his 2nd Term, Bitcoin, crypto, the US Dollar, and a lot more!

This was truly one that blew me away, and in no part due to anything I did or said -- this was all my guest and he absolutely blew the lid off this thing.

Please watch here:

Backup on Twitter here:

Incredible chat with Jovan Pulitzer breaking down the Trump shooting...
"RETURN SNIPERS DID NOT KILL HIM!"@JovanHPulitzer
WATCH HERE
👇 pic.twitter.com/QGVAzHIayu

— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 16, 2024

Incredible chat with Jovan Pulitzer breaking down the Trump shooting...
"RETURN SNIPERS DID NOT KILL HIM!"@JovanHPulitzer
WATCH HERE
👇 pic.twitter.com/QGVAzHIayu

— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 16, 2024

If you want more, follow Jovan on Rumble here: https://rumble.com/c/JovanHuttonPulitzer