Is The FBI Destroying Crime Scene Evidence?

Ok, look I’m going to say right up front I don’t know what proper protocol is here, but this just seems “off” to me.

And I’m not the only one.

Photos have emerged of the FBI hosing down the spot where the alleged sniper (Crooks) was killed.

Perhaps they’ve already gathered all the evidence, but is this normal to just wipe it all out like this?

Laura Loomer doesn’t seem to think so:

Just a photo of the @FBI destroying the crime scene where the shooter opened fire to assassinate President Trump.

Unreal. pic.twitter.com/P1bwnsObNX

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) July 17, 2024

Do you trust the FBI to lead this investigation?

Does it seem like it’s going well so far?

The FBI was pressure washing off windows and vents for any gunshot residue this morning. pic.twitter.com/5Zz7R24cKz

— TheOracle (@TheOrac93482874) July 16, 2024

Maybe it is normal, I don’t know.

Would the FBI normally clean up a crime scene or would they gather all the evidence they need and then leave and leave it to some cleaning crew to come in and do the actual cleaning?

I don’t know….

Is this normal? Does law enforcement clean crime scenes? Why would the FBI clean a roof?
h/t @TheOrac93482874 pic.twitter.com/rhAxgCbTGo

— @amuse (@amuse) July 17, 2024

Meanwhile, the coverup has already begun, claiming that the FBI couldn’t possibly have had a sniper covering that building because the roof was too sloped.

An excuse so bad they are getting mercilessly mocked by everyone.

Nothing to see here, just Biden's #FBI destroying evidence again. pic.twitter.com/4h6JEJHXNo

— The Amish Texter™ ❌🇺🇸 (@the_amish_txtr) July 17, 2024

I guess the roof wasn’t too sloped for some pimply, wimpy, kid allegedly carrying an AR15?

But too tough for trained Secret Service snipers?

Oh ok!

Much steeper sloped roof perfectly ok for this cow:

A cow perfectly navigating a "sloped roof". The Deep State lies are just laughable at this point.

Never forget what Kim Clement said in 2014: "They fall in Fall".

Coming soon? pic.twitter.com/mECONxDG4V

— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 17, 2024

So sad.

This is going to get really ugly I think.

Remember what Kim Clement said….”They fall in Fall”.

Coming soon?

Does EVERYTHING finally unravel in Fall?

Including this?

If you want more, your head is going to explode after you read this:

Jovan Pulitzer: “Return Snipers Did NOT Kill Him” — “There Was A Second Malvo Shooter!”

This is an absolute bombshell report and interview….and for those of you who know me, I don’t throw that word around very often because I like it to retain it’s meaning and impact.

So I had Jovan Pulitzer back on my show today to discuss a full forensic audit of the Trump shooting.

There’s no one better out there to conduct a forensic audit than Jovan, and those of you who know him know that to be true.

The man leaves NO stone unturned and he thinks outside the box most people think in.

So I was fascinated to hear what he had to say about everything….and absolutely blown away by some of his early conclusions.

First up, while I had him I got his quick thoughts on Vice President JD Vance and while I won’t go into those in this article, I’ll say they very closely matched mine — and even my process for coming to the same conclusions.  So that was nice to see.

Ok now to the shooting….

The first thing I wanted to get off the table quickly was whether or not it was possible this was staged in any way by Team Trump.  A “sympathy shooting”.

Jovan quickly put that to bed with a firm no.

You can listen to the interview to hear exactly why, but I agree 100%.

So then we started talking about the “Balance of Possibilities” and applying Occam’s Razor to come to a theory of what likely happened here.

Jovan says in situations like this he likes to find the “Second Right Answer” meaning (I think) that the answer they give you at first, and the narrative they try to sell you, likely isn’t the truth.

So in this case, that means the 20 year old kid being the shooter, and being noticed by people in the crowd, and even confronted by police at one point, and now dead so case closed — that probably isn’t the right answer.

So what is?

Basically, this….

You need to listen to the interview in full (and maybe even twice — many people are telling me they are listening twice already, that’s how big this is becoming), but here’s the quick summary….

Jovan does not think the 20 year old kid was the Trump shooter.  He was the patsy.  Sure, he was allowed to carry the gun up there and get in position and ultimately got blown away.  But he wasn’t the Trump shooter.

Also, Jovan does not think the Snipers on the rooftop behind Trump are the ones who took out the kid.  He says if you look at the pictures of the kid after he was dead, all of the evidence (teeth pointing forward, etc) all suggest the kid was shot from behind.

So where does that leave things?

Simply this: there were at least one and maybe two other shooters.

Hello, grassy knoll!  We’ve got a new JFK.

But it makes total sense.

The kid was a very bad shot, nothing about his story lines up, and it’s highly unlikely that even at a (relatively) close distance for most good shooters, that he would make such a perfect shot on Trump.

Remember, it was only by the grace of God that Trump turned his head those 1-2 inches at the exact last moment, otherwise it would have been a PERFECT kill shot.

The trajectory of the bullet also tells a different story, but you have to watch the interview to have Jovan explain that in detail.  We went over it multiple times.

In short, Jovan thinks this was the work of an expert gunman farther away.

The kid was the cover story.

The real shots came from the expert sniper farther out.

And then either that sniper or someone else took out the kid, because of course we need a dead assailant to say “case closed!”

And now the kicker…..

Jovan also thinks that second shooter was likely done Malvo-style.

Do you remember Malvo?

The DC shooter?

The guy who they couldn’t catch because he shot out of a small hole in the back of his car?

Jovan thinks something exactly like that happened here.

There would be no chance of it being caught on video surveillance or cell phone anywhere.  Not out in the open.

Just a Cadillac DeVille perhaps, parked maybe 300 yards out with the perfect line of sight?

Oh my!

I told you this was a bombshell.

Folks, if Jovan is right about even 50% of this, then you have a conspiracy the likes of which could tear this country apart!

But the truth must come out, at all costs.

We talked about a ton more, including Trump body doubles, what Trump should do next, whether Trump immediately goes into a bunker for his 2nd Term, Bitcoin, crypto, the US Dollar, and a lot more!

This was truly one that blew me away, and in no part due to anything I did or said — this was all my guest and he absolutely blew the lid off this thing.

Please watch here:

Backup on Twitter here:

Incredible chat with Jovan Pulitzer breaking down the Trump shooting…
"RETURN SNIPERS DID NOT KILL HIM!"@JovanHPulitzer
WATCH HERE
👇 pic.twitter.com/QGVAzHIayu

— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 16, 2024

Incredible chat with Jovan Pulitzer breaking down the Trump shooting…
“RETURN SNIPERS DID NOT KILL HIM!”@JovanHPulitzer
WATCH HERE
👇 pic.twitter.com/QGVAzHIayu

— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 16, 2024

If you want more, follow Jovan on Rumble here: https://rumble.com/c/JovanHuttonPulitzer

And Telegram here: https://t.me/JovanHuttonPulitzer

I would really love to hear what you all think!

Please leave a comment below.

And SHARE to get this word out.

Thank you.

And if you missed my last interview with Jovan, you can catch that here — he’s quickly becoming a great new friend:

My EXCLUSIVE Interview With Jovan Pulitzer

A few days ago, I published a look back at the 2020 Election and all the “election fraud” that may or may not have been captured at the time.

One of the leading experts in that work was Jovan Pulitzer, and I re-ran this report to remind people just how much evidence we have already gathered and confirmed:

FLASHBACK: Jovan Pulitzer: It’s Not the ‘Watermarks’ on the Ballots – It’s Better!

I met Jovan in person last year at an event we were both at, and he's truly one of the best people to chat with.

We had an absolute blast chatting about all things politics and really digging into the mechanics of the 2020 Steal....often chatting for 2+ hours in between sessions of the event we were attending.

I told him we needed to have that same chat live on my show and life got in the way and we never made it happen...until now.

When he saw me run that article above, he reached out and we finally connected to do this chat live on my show!

And I am SO EXCITED to show it to you!

We went for almost 3 hours and I was absolutely fascinated all the way through.  The time flew by!

I have multiple pages of notes, but here are some highlights:

We talked about his Christmas 2023 visit to Mar-a-Lago and his meeting with President Trump in his secret back office.

People, Paper, Programs -- he explains what this means in the interview.

We talked about the results of his Arizona audit (440,000 discrepancies out of 2,000,000 votes, and 70/30 of those swinging to Biden!)

Voter Fraud vs. Election Fraud

Is it "watermarks" or something much more?

20 different factors!

The "stochastic pixel"

We spent a lot of time talking about Jovan's incredible inventions and patents (you have no idea all this man has done!)

And a ton more!

We also talked about his two books, which I will put links for down below.

I then asked him the million dollar question: if they stole it in 2020, what will stop them from stealing it again in 2024?

The answer is something every single patriot needs to hear right now.

At the end, we did a rapid fire set of questions where I asked him "White hat or Black hat".....