Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

WE INVESTIGATE: Does President Obama’s Official “In The Bushes” Portrait Contain The Same Hidden Demons As King Charles’?

Ok, this is a wild one!

But is it true?

We’re going to Fact Check it!

So I’m guessing by now you’ve seen King Charles’ blood red, demonic official portrait.

Creepy enough that it’s almost entirely blood red and looks like him literally sitting amidst the flames of hell — oh, with a nice Monarch butterfly thrown in for good measure, because of course we need a good MK Ultra reference in there!

But then Internet sleuths found out that if you mirrored the image and put them side by side, it literally creates a Baphomet Demon that is hard to miss.

If you don’t know what I’m talking about you can read here and I will also copy the entire article down at the bottom:

Let’s Talk About King Charles’ Demonic New “Royal Portrait”

ADVERTISEMENT

But now those same Internet sleuths had another brilliant idea....

Remember the really weird official portrait of Barrack Hussein Obama where it looked like he was sitting in a bush?

That was weird.

All prior portraits looked classy.

Here is Trump vs. Obama:

But aside from just being weird, now people are claiming that the Obama portrait produces the same kind of mirrored demon image and we've missed it all these years.

Take a look:

ADVERTISEMENT

Zoom in:

Wow, right!

Now the only question is whether it's true....

So I took the image and brought it into Photoshop myself, cloned it, flipped it and matched them up and here's what I got:

If you compare that to what's shown in the Tweet above, you'll see the underlying image *IS* the same, but they've kind of shaded in where they want to make it more obvious.

Here's another view kind of showing the progression:

ADVERTISEMENT

So....how do we rate this one?

There's definitely something there, but it is by no means as obvious or overt as the King Charles image.

I say this is largely over-exaggerated.

But hey, perhaps they were just testing things out with the Obama image and then decided to press the envelope when they did King Charles' portrait!

That makes complete sense to me.

Actually, if you want to know the truth there is a scandal associated with the Obama portrait but it's not necessarily the mirror image thing.

The true scandal is that his left hand (which also shows left in the image) seems to have six fingers!

Can you see it?

The thumb is not visible, but we know it has a thumb.  Then we see 4 big fingers, and then where the pinky would be looks like a 6th finger folded under.

Once you see it, it's impossible to miss!

ADVERTISEMENT

Now why is that a big deal?

Two possible reasons....

One, it just shows like everything with Obama, it was a colossal failure!  They couldn't even get his picture right!

The other strange thing is that having 6 fingers is a trait associated with the Nephilim of the Bible.

Don't know who the Nephilim were/are?

Read this:

Jonathan Cahn: The Genesis 6:4 Connection and Why It Matters RIGHT NOW!

But you see, the Nephilim were also rumored to have had Six Fingers and Six Toes.

We know that from history and tradition, but also from the Bible.

2 Samuel 21:20 tells you the Nephilim Giants were even genetically different -- they had six fingers and six toes (Gee, kind of like 666?):

20 Then there was another battle at Gath, where there was a giant who loved to fight. He had six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot. 21 He defied the Israelites, and Jonathan, the son of David's brother Shammah, killed him.

So....is this portrait an intentional plan to link Obama to the Nephilim Giants?

As I said above, it's either one of two things: either a really bad and sloppy painter or this was intentional.

You decide!

And now back to Charles.

In case you missed it, I will put our full original report about his Demonic portrait below:

Let's Talk About King Charles' Demonic New "Royal Portrait"

I've put this off for a few days, but I'm now ready to dig in...

Let's officially talk about King Sausage Fingers' new "Royal Portrait".

I know, I know....it's so artistic!

"You just don't get it Noah!"

You're right, I don't.

It looks absolutely evil to me.

But I'm getting ahead of myself, let's all take a moment to view it together:

Ok, so if I didn't know any better I'd say that pretty much looks like "King" Charles burning in the eternal flames of Hell.

What a charming little portrait!

But that's not all, there's so much more hidden in here.

Wyatt on Twitter has a great little summary here:

Quick summary:

He appears soaked in blood.

Don't fail to notice the monarch butterfly at his shoulder (infamous MK Ultra symbol).

It looks like something that would be hanging on a wall in Hell.  (true!)

Also measuring about 8ft 6in by 6ft 6in - 666.

But we're still just surface level, let's go deeper.

Look what happens when you mirror the image and put them side-by-side:

Do you see it right in the middle?

A demonic, Baphomet looking beast!

How is this even possible?

But it gets even crazier.....

The demonic Baphomet Beast is visible when mirrored and merged rightside up AND upside down.

This is crazy, watch this:

Maybe even easier to see in Black & White?

My friend AwakenedOutlaw verified it by doing it himself:

Just wild coincidences, right?

I don't think so.

I think this was meticulously planned and it's mind boggling to consider everything that went into this hellish portrait.

Of course we had that Royal Horse drenched in blood just a few weeks ago, anyone else remember that?

Now it all makes a lot more sense!

Here's more (enjoy Hell Charles!):

BREAKING: King Charles "Very Unwell", Funeral Currently Being Planned

Earlier today I brought you a report about a bloody white horse from an elite corps of the British Army known for their ceremonial duties and rigorous training running loose through the streets of London.

I commented that I don't know much about "Royal" affairs and ceremonies but that even to an uneducated lay person like myself, it seemed like a sign or omen that King Charles may soon be dead.  I'll copy that full report below in case you missed it.

I had no idea that just a few hours later news would break that says King Charles' funeral is currently being planned right now because he is so gravely ill.

Take a look:

Here are more details on the fast breaking story, from the NY Post:

King Charles’ health conditions are progressively deteriorating, leading Buckingham Palace officials to keep a regularly updated plan for his impending funeral — preparations for which started the day after Queen Elizabeth was buried, insiders said.

The 75-year-old monarch has remained largely out of the limelight since announcing his cancer prognosis in February to hide his declining condition, with multiple sources telling The Daily Beast the situation is “not good.”

“Of course he is determined to beat it and they are throwing everything at it. Everyone is staying optimistic, but he is really very unwell. More than they are letting on,” a source described as an old friend of the royal family told the outlet.

King Charles has never revealed what cancer he has been diagnosed with but admitted that it wasn’t prostate cancer, which is one of the most treatable forms of the disease.

The Firm has also been tight-lipped on his medical journey, but well-placed insiders and political commentators have publicly spoken about how the King is “responding really well” to treatment.

Behind the scenes, however, King Charles’ aides are regularly reviewing copies of a several-hundred-page document outlining his royal funeral plans, dubbed “Operation Menai Bridge.”

“The plans have been dusted off and are actively being kept up to date. It’s no more than what you would expect given the king has been diagnosed with cancer. But the circulation of them has certainly focused minds,” a former staffer with links to the serving courtiers told the Daily Beast.

The extremely detailed document was created the day after Queen Elizabeth was buried on Sept. 8, 2022 — and uses the longest-serving queen’s funeral as a field guide on to ensure Charles’ runs more smoothly.

Military officials confirmed to the Daily Beast that Operation Menai Bridge is being regularly updated, but emphasized it was standard procedure and that “it would be “absurd to read anything into” that fact.

All royal members of the plan have updated funeral plans that are categorized by bridge-based codewords, with Queen Elizabeth’s famously being “Operation London Bridge.”

The former Prince of Wales’ death plan is named for the suspension bridge that connects the island of Anglesey with the Welsh mainland.

Too soon for this?

TMZ confirms:

King Charles is reportedly not doing great amid his cancer battle -- so much so, in fact, that his aides are apparently dusting off his funeral plans and updating them regularly.

The Daily Beast put out a story Thursday that says His Royal Highness is in poor health as he continues ongoing treatments for his cancer -- which, at this point, remains a mystery. The only thing the Palace has said is that it isn't prostate cancer ... but it's unspecified.

While KC has been seen out and about these past few months after his diagnosis -- seemingly looking healthy and robust -- the Beast reports it's dire behind the scenes.

What reporter Tom Sykes says he's been hearing from friends of the King in recent weeks is that it's "not good." In fact, it's apparently so bad ... that Buckingham Palace is said to be updating Charles' funeral plans on a regular basis these days.

Those plans are written down somewhere, per the Beast, and it has a code name ... Operation Menai Bridge. There's also this ... the Beast reports that a separate document which has dos and don'ts from Queen Elizabeth II's funeral has also been floating around lately.

If true, it's pretty stunning ... especially since Charles has been carrying on with his Royal duties and putting on a brave face in public. Based on this ... it suggests that's all for show.

Do you remember when the Grim Reaper walked clearly by an open door at King Charles' coronation?

No joke, this is not edited:

I told you at the time that's too strange to not be a sign.

And here we are just a few short months later.

RIP Charles.

And now in case you missed it, here is the bloody white Royal horse we covered earlier today:

UK: Blood Red Horse and Big Ben Suddenly Stops Working

What in the world is going on in the United Kingdom?

Things have just been very "off" ever since we got King Charles, don't you think?

I don't follow the so-called "Royals" very closely, because I rather much don't care about them, but sometimes I can't escape it because it's too big and too strange to ignore.

Like when the world was forced to see King "Sausage Fingers":

What Happened To King Charles’ Fingers?

You know I'm covering that story....

Or the recent strangeness about Kate's (alleged, cough cough) AI video and how she hasn't been truly seen since last Christmas?

Serious Question: Is This Kate?

Now here's the latest....

All of this happened yesterday and I'm now diving in to break it all down.

Yesterday, in the UK, a bizarre and alarming incident occurred when two horses, one white and one black, bolted through the streets of London. The white horse was notably covered in a vivid red substance, which many initially thought to be blood. These horses belonged to the Household Cavalry, an elite corps of the British Army known for their ceremonial duties and rigorous training. The incident reportedly began when the horses, spooked by the noise from a nearby construction site, threw off their riders and raced through the city center. This resulted in chaos as they collided with vehicles, including a double-decker bus and taxi, and injured several people.

Theories and speculations about what actually happened have been widespread. Some conspiracy theorists have suggested that the red substance on the white horse was not blood but paint, implying a deliberate act. They have also linked this incident to previous ominous events, predicting "dark omens" and drawing connections to historical incidents. However, it is important to note that these theories are speculative and not supported by concrete evidence.

The incident has raised questions about how such well-trained military horses could break free like that. The explanation provided by authorities is that the horses were spooked by the noise from a nearby construction site, which is a common cause of such incidents. Horses are known to be sensitive to loud noises and sudden movements, and even the most well-trained horses can react unpredictably in such situations.

As for the red substance on the white horse, the most likely explanation, based on available evidence, is that it was blood. The horse likely sustained injuries during the incident, possibly from colliding with vehicles or other objects. This is supported by reports stating that two of the horses, including the white one named Vida, were in serious condition and required medical attention.

Here's what the horse looked like after it broke free:

Ok, so let's break down a few things...

First, that is an extremely well-trained horse, part of an elite corps of the British Army.

What could spook it so badly that it could break free and they could not get it back under control?

And the obvious related question, what caused all the red?

It's either blood or paint.

Blood seems more likely if something organically happened and they lost control.

Paint seems more likely if they wanted to stage the incident for some reason.

Many commented that it felt like something straight out of Game of Thrones:

And no, it does not bode well for King Charles.

As I mentioned above, I don't closely follow the "Royals" but I do know they use specific colored horses for specific messages and rituals and ceremonies to send certain messages.

It doesn't really take too much imagination to understand what a riderless white horse dripping in blood might specify, now does it?

Ok, ok I'll spell it out.

Riderless = no King

White Horse = white often symbolizing the peak of Royalty (i.e. the King)

Bloody = King is dead

Now look, I'm not saying this means King Charles is dead, I'm just saying that is the imagery conveyed here.

But perhaps as Sigmund Freud famous said, "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar (and not a penis!)".

Oddly enough though, that wasn't the only strange thing that happened across the pond yesterday.

The iconic Big Ben suddenly stopped working.

At 9am.

Then it started back up and incorrectly chimed 11 times, leading many to see the 9/11 connection:

Look, I'm not trying to create a conspiracy, I'm just reporting.

It is a bit odd.

From The Daily Mail, here is more:

Big Ben's clock stopped for more than hour today, leaving Westminster sleuths baffled.

The timepiece in the structure was frozen at 9am until gone 10am, before its hands were seen being moved forwards to display the correct time.

A House of Commons spokesman admitted that the dials on what is formally known as the Great Clock of Westminster were 'temporarily displaying the incorrect time' before the issue was rectified.

The hourly strikes of the bells were also paused and will resume at midday. They too reportedly malfunctioned by performing 11 chimes at 10.06am.

The quirk has occurred despite the fact that the clock, tower and bells were refurbished in 2022.

The clock's stoppage, along with news that five Household Cavalry horses have run loose in Central London, prompted social media users to joke that it is the 'end of days'.

Another wrote: 'Horses running wild, Big Ben has stopped. It will be zombies next.'

A third said: 'A white horse covered in blood is running through the streets of London and Big Ben has stopped; if the ravens leave Tower Green it's end days.'

The clock is housed in the Elizabeth Tower, which was known simply as the Clock Tower until 2012, when it was renamed to mark the late Queen's Diamond Jubilee.

The delay in the bells re-starting is due to the need to reset the mechanism that powers them.

A House of Commons spokesperson said: 'We are aware that the clock dials on the Elizabeth Tower were temporarily displaying the incorrect time this morning.

'Teams worked quickly to rectify the issue and carried out servicing to the mechanism, which has now completed.

My friend MJ Truth noted that the date just happened to also be 666.

How charming:

So...what do you all think?

Much ado about nothing or very strange?

,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.