Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

JUST IN: Court Ruling Could Strip Big Pharma of Vaccine Immunity


I’m sure you know that you can’t sue Big Pharma manufacturers over injuries from vaccines.

They’ve got that locked down by paying out Congress, so they’re “immune” from lawsuits.

Ha! You can’t get us‘ is what they are basically saying.

Even if they kill 35,000,000.

That’s nearly 6 times more than they claimed the Germans killed in WW2.

I guess there’s no way God can turn this around, right?

ADVERTISEMENT

But just like this runner, who thought she had won, don’t celebrate too soon Big Pharma.

There’s no problem bigger than our God.

It just so happens that it was declared in 9th Circuit appeals court that the COVID shot was NOT a vaccine.

So then, if it’s not a vaccine then no vaccine immunity, right?

Big Pharma is now a lawsuits magnet?

 

Big Pharma must be quaking in their boots right now.

Here’s a number for Big Pharma, which used to represent how much they were willing to payout: $0.00

ADVERTISEMENT

Ironic.

They better get used to that number because that will probably reflect their bank accounts in the near future once they get sued to oblivion.

Gateway Pundit reports:

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has delivered a seismic decision that could reshape public health policy across the nation.

In a contentious case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the court has declared that mRNA COVID-19 injections do not qualify as vaccines under traditional medical definitions.

The case revolved around the LAUSD’s COVID-19 vaccination policy, which required all employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by a specified deadline.

The plaintiffs argued that the district’s vaccine mandate infringed upon their fundamental right to refuse medical treatment, as the mRNA injections do not prevent the transmission of COVID-19 but merely mitigate symptoms for the recipient.

ADVERTISEMENT

The court’s opinion, penned by Circuit Judge R. Nelson and supported by Judge Collins, asserts that the mRNA shots, marketed as vaccines, do not effectively prevent the transmission of COVID-19 but merely reduce symptoms in those who contract the virus. This crucial distinction undermines the foundational premise of the vaccine mandates enforced by various governmental and educational institutions.

Judge Nelson pointed out that the mandate was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s century-old ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a case that upheld the state’s right to enforce smallpox vaccinations due to their proven effectiveness in preventing disease spread. In contrast, the mRNA COVID-19 shots do not offer such public health benefits, thus failing the criteria established by Jacobson.

The ruling points out that traditional vaccines are designed to provide immunity and prevent transmission, which is not conclusively proven in the case of mRNA COVID-19 shots.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had modified the definition of “vaccine” to include the mRNA shots.

So, look at what the CDC did. Here’s the definition the CDC used on 26 August 2021:

  • Vaccine– “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
  • Vaccination– “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

Rather than admit the COVID-19 vaccine is not working as advertised, the CDC took a page out of Orwell’s 1984 and opted for new spin language.

Here is the new definition:

  • Vaccine– “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

There’s a reckoning coming for these vaccine pushers.

This has been going on for decades and people are just now realizing it…

Remember SIDS?

It’s not like these people view us as lab rats.

ADVERTISEMENT

They care about us.

They care about us like we’re their own beagles.



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!