Justice Neil Gorsuch Signals Supreme Court May Rule Against DOJ, Help J6 Prisoners!

If Democrats didn’t have double standards, they wouldn’t have any standards at all!

So hypocrisy is nothing new for the Far Left, but it seems it is FINALLY being called out.

And by no less an authority than at least one Supreme Court Justice.

Finally!

But this is not just to win some intellectual debate, the fate of 350+ pro-Trump political prisoners hangs in the balance.

Here’s the latest….

During oral arguments in Fischer v. US, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch called out the Left’s insane double standards concerning other fairly recent events and tipped his hand about where the Supreme Court may rule in the latest Fischer v. US case.

Listen:

Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch nukes Joe Biden's DOJ over January 6th sentences:

Gorsuch lists multiple cases of folks who "obstructed a Congressional proceeding" without receiving a 20 year sentence.

1. Sit-ins at a trial (Kavanaugh protests)
2. Pulling a fire alarm (Rep.… pic.twitter.com/DWETkzi7JI

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) April 16, 2024

Some on social media found the Solicitor General’s responses to Gorsuch lacking.

Wow! Those weren’t ‘hypothetical’ examples.. they happened! She’s nauseating!

— 🇺🇸ProudArmyBrat (@leslibless) April 16, 2024

She might as well have said…

“Well it depends on who’s doing the pulling…”

— BABELonX (@twytrofBabble) April 16, 2024

These double standards aren’t exactly news to most.

Ever since the events of J6, many have called out the Left’s hypocrisy over other instances that involve their supporters.

Two tiered ‘justice’ system. pic.twitter.com/JQMOLgeFu4

— Marc 🇺🇸 (@gopher_marc) April 16, 2024

Biden’s DOJ didn’t just over-prosecute, they wrongfully prosecuted.

It’s the two-tiered system of justice we’ve been seeing to the extreme over the last 3 years.

Leftists might get arrested but they rarely get charged.

Whereas peaceful Trump supporters get decades in jail.

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) April 16, 2024

Funny how this 2 tiered justice works pic.twitter.com/qBcGmrAgV7

— Xman 🇺🇲🏳️‍🌈 (@PKITTY1776) April 16, 2024

There were also a few incidents that Justice Gorsuch forgot to mention.

"Antifa is just an idea"

— Sean Tannenbaum (@airturbulencia) April 16, 2024

It’s not looking good for the DOJ so far in a case that could reduce criminal charges against over 350 J6 protesters.

CNN has more about this most recent Supreme Court case:

Joseph Fischer, a former Pennsylvania police officer who brought the case to the Supreme Court, told the justices that by the time he arrived at the Capitol on January 6, Congress had already recessed. His lawyers said Fischer spent less than four minutes inside the building and that he advanced fewer than 25 feet.

Prosecutors paint a different picture. They say Fischer warned his police chief by text that the day might get violent. He texted that protestors should drag Democrats “into the street and have a mob trial.” Fischer captured a video on his own cell phone in which he can be heard yelling “charge!” before he ran into the Capitol, prosecutors say.

A grand jury returned a seven-count indictment against Fischer weeks after the attack that included charges of civil disorder; assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers as well as the obstruction charge. The case before the Supreme Court involves only that last charge.

My friends over at The Gateway Pundit had the best analysis I have seen so far:

The United States Supreme Court is holding arguments in Fischer v. US, a case that could reduce criminal charges filed against more than 350 Trump supporters who participated in the US Capitol protest on January 6, 2021.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Department of Injustice (DOJ) is using a statute called “obstructed a Congressional proceeding” to prosecute hundreds of these protesters simply for exercising their First Amendment rights. This statute is a serious felony with the potential of 20 years behind bars.

CNN notes that this case also has implications for President Donald Trump, who was charged by corrupt special counsel Jack Smith for exercising his First Amendment rights on that fateful day.

Justice Neil Gorsuch stole the show this morning by blowing up the foundation of the DOJ’s case against the nonviolent J6 protesters. While the Trump supporters simply exercised their freedom of speech, there were leftist individuals who committed actual felonies that the Biden regime gave a complete pass to.

Gorsuch threw out several meaningful real-life incidents involving these left-wing figures, including the unlawful sit-ins during a trial (which occurred during the Brett Kavanaugh hearing in 2018), Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) pulling a fire alarm to prevent a critical vote to keep the government open, hecklers during the State of the Union, and so-called “mostly peaceful” protests (BLM riots).

Gorsuch asked Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar whether those actions would qualify for 20 years in prison. Prelogar tried to spin her out of the questioning. She claimed that the DOJ would need to prove “corrupt intent” and whether these incidents qualified as a “meaningful” disruption of the proceedings.

Of course, all of these incidents recounted by Gorsuch met those qualifications, meaning the leftists, including Bowman, should have received years in prison. But Prelogar could not really answer Gorsuch’s queries unless she wanted to admit defeat.