Paging Dr. Firmament!
Dr. Firmament, please report to the ER!
The information covered in this article is actually from 2014, but I just saw it today for the first time and wanted to pass it along to all of you.
Scientists have discovered an “impenetrable barrier” 11,500 km above the Earth.
For reference, the Moon is about 384,000 km away from the Earth.
I’m going to break this all down, the good the bad and the ugly, including my take on what this might mean, how it lines up with what Genesis tells us, and what it means for things like satellites, Moon travel, and more.
First, take a look at this:
Scientists Discover Impenetrable Barrier 11,500 km above #Earth http://t.co/4G9CZSSmeV #space #science pic.twitter.com/aneV5KzbxW
— Sci.News: Breaking Science News (@scidotnews) November 27, 2014
Here are more details, from Astronomy.com:
A team led by the University of Colorado (CU) Boulder has discovered an invisible shield some 7,200 miles (11,600 kilometers) above Earth that blocks so-called “killer electrons,” which whip around the planet at near-light-speed and have been known to threaten astronauts, fry satellites, and degrade space systems during intense solar storms.
The barrier to the particle motion was discovered in the Van Allen radiation belts, two doughnut-shaped rings above Earth that are filled with high-energy electrons and protons, said Daniel Baker of CU’s Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP). Held in place by Earth’s magnetic field, the Van Allen radiation belts periodically swell and shrink in response to incoming energy disturbances from the Sun.
As the first significant discovery of the Space Age, the Van Allen radiation belts were detected in 1958 by Professor James Van Allen and his team at the University of Iowa and were found to comprise an inner and outer belt extending up to 25,000 miles (40,200km) above Earth’s surface. In 2013, Baker led a team that used the twin Van Allen probes launched by NASA in 2012 to discover a third transient “storage ring” between the inner and outer Van Allen radiation belts that seems to come and go with the intensity of space weather.
The latest mystery revolves around an “extremely sharp” boundary at the inner edge of the outer belt at roughly 7,200 miles in altitude that appears to block the ultrafast electrons from breeching the shield and moving deeper toward Earth’s atmosphere.
“It’s almost like theses electrons are running into a glass wall in space,” said Baker. “Somewhat like the shields created by force fields on Star Trek that were used to repel alien weapons, we are seeing an invisible shield blocking these electrons. It’s an extremely puzzling phenomenon.”
The team originally thought the highly charged electrons, which are looping around Earth at more than 100,000 miles (160,900km) per second, would slowly drift downward into the upper atmosphere and gradually be wiped out by interactions with air molecules. But the impenetrable barrier seen by the twin Van Allen belt spacecraft stops the electrons before they get that far, said Baker.
The group looked at a number of scenarios that could create and maintain such a barrier. The team wondered if it might have to do with Earth’s magnetic field lines, which trap and control protons and electrons, bouncing them between Earth’s poles like beads on a string. They also looked at whether radio signals from human transmitters on Earth could be scattering the charged electrons at the barrier, preventing their downward motion. Neither explanation held scientific water, Baker said.
“Nature abhors strong gradients and generally finds ways to smooth them out, so we would expect some of the relativistic electrons to move inward and some outward,” said Baker. “It’s not obvious how the slow, gradual processes that should be involved in motion of these particles can conspire to create such a sharp, persistent boundary at this location in space.”
Let’s start in the best place to start….Genesis.
- Genesis 1:6: “And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.”
- Genesis 1:7: “And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.”
- Genesis 1:8: “And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.”
The Firmament described in Genesis has always fascinated me.
Many “scholars” or amateur scholars want to shrug off the Firmament by just calling it the “sky”.
But that doesn’t seem to be what Genesis is describing at all.
But an “impenetrable barrier”?
Now that sounds much more in line with what I read in those verses.
I had some fun discussing this with ChatGPT and pushing the AI to explain what this is:
Yes, the claim that scientists have discovered an “impenetrable barrier” about 11,500 kilometers (approximately 7,200 miles) above Earth is true. This discovery, made using data from NASA’s Van Allen Probes, reveals a boundary in the Van Allen radiation belts that acts as a shield, blocking high-energy electrons, known as “killer electrons,” from traveling closer to Earth. These electrons have the potential to damage satellites and other space equipment during intense solar storms.
This barrier is found at the inner edge of the outer Van Allen belt and appears to be very stable and persistent, almost like a “glass wall in space” that stops these electrons in their tracks. The nature of this barrier and why it forms at this specific location remain subjects of ongoing research. Scientists are exploring several theories, including the influence of Earth’s magnetic field and a phenomenon known as “plasmaspheric hiss,” which might help scatter the charged particles at this boundary.
ADVERTISEMENTThe discovery of this barrier is significant as it enhances our understanding of space weather and its effects on spaceborne and Earth-bound technologies and can be critical in planning future space missions to protect astronauts and satellites from high-energy particles (Astronomy Magazine) (University of Colorado Boulder) (Explore Deep Space).
ChatGPT confirmed the barrier surrounds the entire Earth:
Yes, the barrier is indeed around the entire Earth. It forms at the inner edge of the outer Van Allen radiation belt, which encircles the Earth. The Van Allen belts are zones of charged particles, primarily electrons and ions, that are captured by and held around Earth by its magnetic field. These belts extend around the planet, so the barrier that blocks high-energy electrons, described as an “impenetrable shield,” is a feature that surrounds Earth at a specific altitude in these belts (Astronomy Magazine).
So then I asked the most obvious question: If it is impenetrable, then how did we ever get through it to get to the Moon?
The term “impenetrable” in the context of the barrier discovered around the Earth in the Van Allen radiation belts doesn’t imply that nothing can physically pass through it. Instead, it refers to how this barrier stops highly charged, high-energy electrons—known as “killer electrons”—from moving further inward toward Earth’s atmosphere, which could be harmful to satellites and astronauts. This barrier effectively protects against specific types of radiation and particle energies but is not a barrier to spacecraft.
When it comes to human space travel, such as the missions to the Moon, spacecraft are designed to move quickly through the Van Allen belts, minimizing exposure to radiation. The Apollo missions, for example, passed through the belts on a trajectory that minimized radiation exposure and used the spacecraft’s shielding to protect the astronauts. The duration of exposure in the belts was also very brief, which helped to keep the radiation levels within safe limits. Therefore, while the barrier is “impenetrable” to certain high-energy particles, it does not stop spacecraft or other types of radiation and particles that don’t interact with the barrier in the same way (SciTechDaily).
Seems a bit odd to me….
It’s “impenetrable” only from the outside in, basically? Not from Earth heading out?
And it’s impenetrable for electrons, but just fine to penetrate with large objects (that are made up of electrons)?
I don’t know, sounds a little fishy to me!
Here’s more from ExploreDeepSpace:
Researchers say that an “extremely sharp” boundary at the inner edge of the outer belt at that altitude appears to block the ultrafast electrons from breeching the shield and moving deeper towards Earth’s atmosphere.
ADVERTISEMENT“It’s almost like theses electrons are running into a glass wall in space,” said Daniel Baker, director of CU-Boulder’s Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP).
Baker said the new discovery is somewhat like the shields created by force fields on Star Trek that were used to fend off alien weaponry.
“We are seeing an invisible shield blocking these electrons. It’s an extremely puzzling phenomenon,” Baker added in a Univ. of Colorado, Boulder press statement.
Twin probes The impenetrable barrier has been observed by the twin Van Allen belt probes launched by NASA in August 2012. A paper has been published in the Nov. 27 issue of Nature magazine, at: http://www.nature.com
As the study’s lead author, Baker said: “It’s not obvious how the slow, gradual processes that should be involved in motion of these particles can conspire to create such a sharp, persistent boundary at this location in space.”
“I think the key here is to keep observing the region in exquisite detail, which we can do because of the powerful instruments on the Van Allen probes,” Baker said. “If the Sun really blasts the Earth’s magnetosphere with a coronal mass ejection (CME), I suspect it will breach the shield for a period of time.”
Unusual phenomenon “It’s a very unusual, extraordinary, and pronounced phenomenon,” says John Foster, associate director of MIT’s Haystack Observatory – also an author of the published research paper.
“What this tells us is if you parked a satellite or an orbiting space station with humans just inside this impenetrable barrier, you would expect them to have much longer lifetimes. That’s a good thing to know,” Foster said in an MIT press release.
Additional CU-Boulder study co-authors include Allison Jaynes, Vaughn Hoxie, Xinlin Li, Quintin Schiller, Lauren Blum and David Malaspina.
Now let’s address satellites.
Do I believe satellites are fake?
Of course not!
It seems rather undebatable that we have hundreds of satellites in space, however it’s also not debatable that the vast majority of internet traffic goes through deep sea underwater cables and NOT satellites.
Did you know that?
How must is “vast majority”?
How about 99%:
So I believe satellites are real, I believe they are INSIDE the Firmament, and I believe they currently play a rather minor (but growing) role.
RELATED:
Elon Musk’s Latest Starship Explodes — Did It Hit The Firmament?
Well folks, Elon Musk just sent up another massive starship rocket last night with 33 (interesting number) massive engines.
Let’s start with this incredible video of takeoff:
It took off….
Flew for a LONG time….
And then POOF, massive explosion!
It’s stunning to see, and I’ll show you in a minute.
But the real question is what made it suddenly explode right where it did?
The official story is it lost contact with control and blew itself up.
Lost huh?
https://twitter.com/blackberryxrp/status/1725873313199611920?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg
Hmmm, ok.
But many are asking: Did it hit the Firmament?
That’s not just Noah talking, that was actually TRENDING on Twitter:
Pretty incredible!
You do know about the Firmament right?
It’s right out of Genesis 1:6:
6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
In fact, here are ALL references to the Firmament in the Bible:
- Genesis 1:6: “And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters”.
- Genesis 1:7: “And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so”.
- Genesis 1:8: “And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day”.
- Genesis 1:14: “And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years”.
- Genesis 1:17: “And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth”.
- Psalms 19:1: “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork”.
- Psalms 150:1: “Praise God in his sanctuary: praise him in the firmament of his power”.
And yes, that does suggest there is WATER above, not “space” but that’s a topic for another time.
Many “scholars” over the years have tried to explain that away, saying it just refers to our “atmosphere”.
Hmmm, ok.
But it sure does seem odd that we seemingly can’t break through it!
Again, that’s not my take….that’s what I just saw.
Go ahead and watch for yourself, let me know what you think this looks like.
Shorter clip:
Longer clip:
Different view, longer clip:
https://twitter.com/MichaelDeLauzon/status/1725933432914554940
Wow, that is some explosion!
Definitely looks like it hits something solid and then spreads out, doesn’t it?
Did you know the founder of NASA (and ex-NAZI) Werner Von Braun put Psalm 119 on his tombstone:
What an interesting verse to choose!
Yes they do:
As a bit of a side note, this is ALL you need to see to know “Climate Change” is fake….
So….@elonmusk and @SpaceX try to pierce the firmament again. 💥📷 BOOM not even a dent 📷👌
But let’s talk about #ClimateChange for a moment….
They say you’re using too much carbon and you shouldn’t be allowed to have a Gas Stove…..
How much fucking carbon you think we just exploded in the sky with this?
About 10,000 gas stoves?
It’s all a scam folks!
Yeah, but YOU are not allowed to have a gas stove….
What a joke!
Now riddle me this…
We supposedly flew to the moon DOZENS of times back in the late 1960s and early 1970s, right?
I do have that correct, don’t I?
With a mere FRACTION of the computing power we have today.
Yet we just went all the time it seemed like!
How is it that now, 50+ years later, the smartest man alive can’t seem to get ONE rocket into actual space?
Oh sure, he can put satellites in low earth orbit, but he doesn’t seem to be able to get past the Firmament.
Why do you think that is?
Why isn’t he on the Moon already?
MUCH less intelligent people with MUCH less computing power did it all the time 50 years ago, why can’t Elon?
Things that make you go “hmmmmm”.
Let’s flashback to Elon’s PRIOR launch….where we asked the exact same question:
Did Elon Musk’s Rocket Just Hit The Firmament And Explode?
Stay with me on this one…
This is bound to ruffle some feathers because I’m killing some sacred cows in this post.
Actually, not even killing them, just asking a question.
But every time I ask this question it stirs up some deep and sometimes angry responses.
“How dare you [question Space]!”
Read that last one in a Greta voice.
But sorry folks, I have to ask the question.
Have we truly been to Space?
Have we truly been to the moon?
Oh I have no doubt we have thousands of satellites in orbit, but that’s in low Earth orbit.
I’m asking whether there is a “Firmament” up there (as the Bible describes in multiple places, did you know that?).
If you don’t know about the Firmament, keep reading because I will give you more than you’ve ever wanted to know about it farther down below.
So please allow me to ask this question and set the stage for you.
Let’s start with the understanding that the Bible talks very clearly about there being a “Firmament” over Earth.
We’ll talk more about what that means in a minute, but start there.
Now I want you to think back to the 1969-1972 time period when we allegedly sent ship after ship of astronauts to the Moon.
Remember that?
Or if you weren’t alive, have you read about it?
Now riddle me this: why did we suddenly stop going?
We just got busy?
Got distracted?
Ran out of money?
We know it’s not any of those things.
So why did we stop going?
I’d love to hear your answers for that, but it’s one of the most basic unanswered questions of my lifetime.
Imagine the Europeans discover America back in the 1400’s and then just stopped sending boats?
Just decided to never go back?
Does that make any sense?
Hmmm…..
And one more question before I show you some videos of Elon’s rocket launch and ask my final question.
The one more question is this: how did we know how to shoot rockets off into space so well back in 1972 but we forgot how to do it with infinitely better technology in 2023?
Really, let that sink in a bit.
Remember the movie Apollo 11?
We had so many Apollo missions they got up Apollo 14.
Rocket after rocket after rocket.
But now?
Over 50 years later and lightyears (no pun intended) of tech advances under our belts and now we can’t even get the rocket into Space?
Say what now?
But that’s not just my opinion, that’ what CNBC just said….read this:
Elon Musk’s SpaceX on Thursday launched its Starship rocket for the first time, but fell short of reaching space after exploding in mid-flight. No crew were on board.
It’s the culmination of years of regulatory work and technological tests for SpaceX and the largest and most powerful rocket ever built.
The company made a first go at getting this launch off the ground on Monday, but a pressure valve in the Super Heavy booster apparently froze. SpaceX teams worked to resolve a number of unidentified issues to make a second attempt possible Thursday.
SpaceX leadership repeatedly stressed the experimental nature of the launch and said any result that involved Starship getting off the launchpad would be a success. The rocket flew for nearly 4 minutes and successfully separated from the Super Heavy booster, a key in-flight milestone, before suffering what the company called a “rapid unscheduled disassembly.”
Musk said the company “learned a lot” on Thursday and teased another test launch in “a few months.”
Now read that bold part again.
We sent 14 rockets to the moon by 1972, but now 50 years later we’ve gone backward and just getting off the launchpad would be a success?
What?
Hello…is anyone out there with critical thinking skills?
Does this make sense to anyone?
Keep reading for my ultimate question which ties back into the firmament, but first here is a video from SpaceX:
Ok, now I want to ask you a question…
Did Elon’s rocket just run smack dab into the Firmament and blow up?
Because that’s what it looks like to me.
Watch:
Sure does look like it hit something solid, doesn’t it?
Watch again here:
https://twitter.com/erockappel/status/1649090632366059520
This guy has a good point:
https://twitter.com/ThePlatypusCA/status/1649050686552936449
You don’t naturally just explode in mid air, do you?
Look folks, I’m just asking the question and based on everything I just listed above, I think it’s a fair question to ask: did we just shoot a massive rocket directly into the Firmament to see what would happen?
Elon says he got a ton of data from this launch.
Is that the data we were trying to get?
Are we in a Fishbowl and we’re trying to get data on just how big and thick and strong the Fishbowl is?
I’m not the only one asking the question.
Stew Peters just said the same thing:
For those of you who think it’s a crazy question to even ask, you may not be aware of this:
Did The CIA Just Admit The Firmament Exists?
Can we talk “Conspiracy Theories” for a minute?
Actually, I think we need to start calling them “Conspiracy Facts”.
So does Elon Musk.
Because they’re all being proven true!
Watch this from Elon:
He was speaking directly about Twitter, but this comment from @MrJohnDais nails it…if you think it was ONLY at Twitter and they’re not lying to you basically everywhere else, then I have a bridge to sell you in New York.
https://twitter.com/MrJohnDais/status/1607022217602146305
With that as background, now watch this…
First you have to understand what you are about to see.
These are all official government documents….some of them very recent.
And what do they say?
What do they describe?
First of all, they use the word “firmament” very frequently.
They also talk about explosions and trying to break through the firmament.
Hello, “Operation Fishbowl, Project Dominik”.
Then it gets even crazier…
What are the Government’s models for flying airplanes?
Their model takes several assumptions into account.
First, they assume the Earth isn’t moving.
Then they assume the Earth isn’t spinning.
Wow, double strike for the Globe model.
I’ll just let you watch (and all of these are publicly available records you can search out yourself!).
Watch here:
Strangely enough, this isn’t my only “Flat Earth” story today…
I don’t search these out.
I don’t control what Tim Pool tweets…
But he just posted about “the Firmament” today.
More on that in a minute…
First, does anyone believe this? 👇
NASA “Lost” The Technology To Go To The Moon?
Buckle up my friends!
Many of you are not going to handle this article well.
Sorry, but my mission remains the same as it was when I founded this site in 2015: to shine the light on TRUTH, wherever that takes us.
So in this article we’re going to talk about the Earth, space and whether there is a massive cover up about the shape of the Earth.
Before you think I’ve gone completely crazy, all I ask is for you to look and see.
And as I always say, I report…YOU decide.
Also, before you think I’ve also gone crazy with the image up above, here’s the deal.
This is from a recent video uploaded by Sean over at SGT Report.
I’m sure MANY of you know SGT Report and have probably listened to a number of Sean’s videos.
I believe Sean is one of the absolute best interviewers out there.
He’s not crazy and he’s not afraid to let his investigation into a story take him wherever the truth goes.
So a few months ago, Sean started talking with these guys who run a channel called the Founded Earth Brothers.
It used to be Flat Earth Brothers but they changed the name to Founded Earth Brothers to reach more people.
Sean started interviewing them and in the early interviews you Sean comes right out and says he thinks “Flat Earth” is a crazy thing to even be talking about.
But then?
But then they keep talking and keep doing interviews and today Sean refers to himself as a “Globe as you’re told skeptic”.
This latest video is honestly one of the best interviews on any topic I have heard in a long time.
Incredibly powerful and I challenge anyone to watch this and not at least start to have some questions going off in your head about whether everything we have been told is a lie.
I can’t possibly put everything they talk about into one article but I’m going to hit a few high points that might cause you to say “huh?”
They did for me.
First up, did you know that despite ALL of our incredible technology and science and all the satellites and everything we have allegedly up in space, did you know that we don’t have ONE single photo of the Earth?
It’s true.
Now I know what you’re thinking, sure we do! I’ve seen the textbooks!
Except what you don’t realize is that EVERY single photo of the Earth that you’ve ever seen has a disclaimer by it saying it is a “composite image”.
Meaning they didn’t just click a button on a camera and snap the pic….instead they took a bunch of smaller images and stitched them all together in a computer program.
Not one single real photo of Earth exists.
And since they’re making these photos in a computer program, perhaps that’s why all of the images look so different over the years:
Yes folks, those are all images NASA has tried to tell you are of the Earth.
Crazy, you wouldn’t think it would change color so much now would you?
But we’re just getting started.
Did you know there is also no live video feed showing the FULL Earth spinning in space?
Nope.
There are live feed videos but it’s always just of a slice of the Earth. Very odd.
You’d really think that with all our trips to space and all our satellites, we could turn on a camera, snap a normal picture and turn on a live feed to see the whole globe, right?
And speaking of those space trips, did you know after we went to the moon in 1972 we just chose to never go back.
Think about it.
Does that make sense to anyone?
No, I’m not joking.
Here is NASA Astronaut Don Pettit in a very famous clip saying “we don’t have the technology to go to the moon anymore.”
Watch for yourself:
Anyone buying this?
Can you think of any other example in life where we found a new land and just chose to never return?
Or can you think of any other example where from 1972 to 2021 our technology went BACKWARD?
We had the tech to land on the moon in 1972 but we don’t have it now in 2021?
WAKE UP FOLKS!
I know this is going to be hard for many to believe and the cognitive dissonance is going to be STRONG on this article and I’m ready for it.
I know the comments section is going to probably be a cesspool.
That’s fine.
I still have to serve the Red Pill whenever it’s needed.
And this is the biggest Red Pill out there.
Why?
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!