Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

“Oops!” Pfizer Apologizes For Illegally Pushing COVID Using Misleading Claims

Poor lil’ Pfizer.

They just made an oops, that’s all.

It could happen to anybody, right?

You’re not mad at them, are you, for pushing death jabs on millions?

It’s not like they knew this jab was dangerous, did they?

Time to forgive and forget?

No?

Hmmm, maybe they should give out coupons for free french fries too.

That should settle the matter once and for all.

That should make up for all the death, pain and heartache that affected millions, including elderly, children, babies, pregnant mothers and unborn children.

The Defender from UK reports:

A U.K. regulatory agency found that top Pfizer employees “brought discredit” on the pharmaceutical industry when they made misleading claims promoting an “unlicensed medicine” in tweets about the COVID-19 vaccine, The Telegraph reported Sunday.

The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), an independent, self-regulatory body established by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, ruled that the company breached five rules in its Code of Practice for advertising.

U.K. pharmaceutical industry watchdog UsForThem filed the complaint with the PMCPA in February 2023. The complaint pertained to 2020 tweets by top Pfizer executives, including U.K. Medical Director Berkeley Phillips. The tweets were still visible on social media when the complaint was filed.

The organization alleged that Pfizer “misleadingly and illegally promoted its COVID-19 vaccine” by reporting very high relative efficacy rates without providing information about absolute efficacy rates or required information about safety.

UsForThem said it was important to file this complaint two years later because “such misbehavior was even more widespread” than they had previously thought, extending “right to the top” of Pfizer’s U.K. operation and “was apparently continuing to this very day.”

Commenting on the significance of the findings, Daniel O’Conner of Trial Site News, which also covered the story, told The Defender, “Pfizer’s behavior throughout the pandemic has been truly outrageous. And of course the aim — big money.”

O’Connor said Pfizer’s “corporate behavior during the pandemic,” as revealed by this and other PMCPA rulings, is “just as insidious” as the problems with the regulatory pathways for the drugs and major flaws in the clinical trials themselves that Trial Site News has been tracking.

Pfizer has a clear track record of acting as an “unacceptable profiteering enterprise during the worst pandemic in a century,” he added. “The question we have is who empowered them in government.”

The complaint focused on a tweet Pfizer’s Phillips shared on Twitter, now X, originally made by a U.S.-based Pfizer employee. The tweet stated:

“Our vaccine candidate is 95% effective in preventing COVID-19, and 94% effective in people over 65 years old. We will file all of our data with health authorities within days. Thank you to every volunteer in our trial, and to all who are tirelessly fighting this pandemic.”

The PMCPA investigatory panel found that four Pfizer U.K. employees had re-tweeted the post and others had “liked” it. They said it was likely that members of the public and health professionals would have seen the tweet.

The panel agreed with the UsForThem’s allegations that the message had limited efficacy information and no safety information, in violation of rules about misleading the public and providing accurate safety data.

The panel also pointed out that the existing codes of conduct prohibit the promotion of medicines before their market authorization. Yet, in direct violation of the codes, Pfizer employees’ tweets resulted in “an unlicensed medicine being proactively disseminated on Twitter to health professionals and members of the public in the UK,” the panel found.

The tweets also violated Pfizer’s own policy that prohibits Pfizer employees from interacting with social media related to the company’s medicines and vaccines.

The PMCPA panel concluded that “Pfizer brought discredit upon and reduced confidence in the pharmaceutical industry,” which it noted is a serious censure that it reserves for serious violations such as this one where a company promoted a drug before it had even been authorized.

Cases found to have brought discredit on the industry are advertised in the medical, pharmaceutical and nursing press.

A Pfizer U.K. spokesman said that the company “fully recognises and accepts the issues highlighted by this PMCPA ruling,” and that it is “deeply sorry,” according to The Telegraph.

Pfizer also said it would review its employees’ use of social media to ensure they comply with current codes and to prevent such problems in the future.

The paper also reported that Phillips, whose re-tweet was primarily at issue, said the post was “accidental and unintentional.” He added, “That said, we immediately accepted the case ruling and do everything we can to ensure that our employees adhere to our strict social media policy and the industry Code of Practice when using their personal social media.”

Pfizer was reprimanded by the regulator over its unethical promotion of the COVID-19 vaccine six times.

On March 4, a few days after PMCPA announced its ruling on the 2020 tweets promoting the vaccine, the agency also announced a second ruling, finding Pfizer breached another clause in the code of conduct in a 2022 tweet by Pfizer UK that “failed to maintain professional standards.”

That ruling, also issued in response to a complaint filed by UsForThem, pertained to a series of three tweets posted on Pfizer UK’s Twitter feed that included a link to a Pulse Today article.

That tweet said:

“As the UK enters its first ‘unlocked winter’ since 2019, our [named senior Pfizer medical employee] explains the devastating impact that respiratory diseases can have during the colder months. Read more @PulseToday 👇 #WinterPressures.”

The tweet linked to a promotional article — reposted here — commissioned by Pfizer on a website for healthcare professionals, but wasn’t clearly marked as promotional content paid for by Pfizer.

The PMCPA in this case said it was concerned that the tweets were available to the general public when the material in the PulseToday article was intended for healthcare professionals. This violated the high standards created by the codes of conduct, regulators said.

In February 2023, the agency found that Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, Ph.D., made “misleading” and “unqualified” comments promoting the use of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for young children during an interview on the BBC.

So, you’re not happy with the free french fries idea for compensation?

How about this.

How about ALL of their assets seized and distributed to ALL those affected?

That’s the bare minimum, I think.

Then maybe we’ll say a prayer for Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla as he goes up his final steps.

Maybe.

I’m surprised those at Pfizer haven’t been greeted by a mob bearing pitchforks and a rope by now.

RELATED:

New Study Finds COVID Drug Paxlovid Does “Little or Nothing”

No matter how many times people who went against the grain regarding “the science” get redemption, it’s never enough.

The shots that were supposed to stop Covid don’t.

The drugs some talking heads said were ineffective turned out to be beneficial.

And now we come to the pharmaceutical “breakthrough” drug Paxlovid.

A new study from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) has indicated that Paxlovid, a combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, doesn’t help people with Covid-19.

Here is part of the conclusion in the study from NEMJ:

The time to sustained alleviation of all signs and symptoms of Covid-19 did not differ significantly between participants who received nirmatrelvir–ritonavir and those who received placebo.

Not many are surprised by the recent study.

It wasn’t long ago that making such an outrageous claim about an approved Covid remedy was grounds for being silenced on social media.

But even though that may not be the case any longer, the chances major media outlets will report on this failure is slim.

Even so, it’s another feather in the cap of everyone who questioned the efficacy of these new drugs.

Something else people were pointing out after Paxlovid hit the market was how it seemed to increase the chances of rebound infection of the disease it was supposed to deter.

What else is Paxlovid doing to those who take it?

Many were harassed for years about spreading “misinformation” concerning Covid and its potential remedies.

Is anyone ever going to be held accountable for approving drugs that, at best, are completely ineffective and a waste of money?

Here’s a blast from the past NBC News wrote about Paxlovid increasing the chances of “viral load rebound” nearly two years ago:

Scientific documentation about post-Paxlovid relapse has actually been available since last fall. Pfizer’s application to the FDA for emergency use authorization of Paxlovid stated that in the placebo-controlled clinical trial — which included 2,246 participants — “several subjects appeared to have a rebound in SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels around Day 10 or Day 14” after beginning treatment.

In a statement, Pfizer spokesperson Longley said that in Paxlovid’s clinical trial, the rare cases of the coronavirus rebounding soon after participants completed treatment occurred at a similar rate among those who received a placebo.

“We did not see an association between the observed viral load increase and subsequent severe disease,” Longley said. “Although it is too early to determine the cause, this suggests the observed increase in viral load is unlikely to be related to Paxlovid.”

Meanwhile….

TRUTH: Ivermectin Safe, Effective, Won The Nobel Prize and FDA Approved Since 1996!

EDITOR’S NOTE: KEEP READING AND I’LL SHOW YOU WHERE YOU CAN GET SAFE IVERMECTIN FROM A TRUSTED SOURCE…links below in this article!

Time for a reality check!

Truth check!

That’s what we do here at WeLoveTrump on all topics, and today’s topic is the REAL news about Ivermectin….

Real, unfiltered news with no bias.

Just the facts, ma’am!

Like this one for example:

Two Separate Doctors Claim OVER 100 Members of Congress Treated With Ivermectin!

Anyone else mad yet?

And today I have a new video to show you.

Someone sent this to me really explaining what Ivermectin is, it’s history and so much more.

They don’t want you to see this which is exactly why I’m sharing it with you.

Watch it here on Rumble:

Remember this disclaimer:

I am not a doctor.  I am not giving you medical advice.  I’m not saying any one thing will treat or cure COVID.  We clear?

I’m a REPORTER.  I research and I report and I give you the full story open and honestly so YOU can decide.  Consult your doctor before taking any vitamin, supplement or medicine.  

Now let’s go to another video.

This woman below documented her own journey with Ivermectin on video.

She starts off looking not so good but makes a swift turnaround in just a few days.

This is not me talking, listen to her share and document her own story….

Here is the video from Rumble:

Now let’s talk about the MSM disinformation campaign, which is a nice way of saying “outright lies and propaganda”.

Look, I will give you one disclaimer before we get started:  I am a journalist and not anyone with any medical expertise.  I’m not a doctor and I’m not giving medical advice.  

I’m just presenting you with the results of my research that the MSM really seems to want to hide….

And I know how to do my research.

So let’s start with this:

Now let’s unpack all the lies the MSM has been telling you about Ivermectin.

You would assume based on all the MSM propaganda that Ivermectin is only approved for Horses and not Humans.

The only problem with that?

It’s not true.

Not even close.

Here’s the real truth:

Yes folks, that is a statement taken from PolitiFact’s very own fact-checking page about Ivermectin.

But what they do with their “Face Check” is so insidious….

Here’s how PolitiFact tries to claim that the TRUE statement is still somehow false, watch these mental gymnastics:

This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

It is true that ivermectin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration that year — but not to treat the coronavirus. The drug was approved for strongyloidiasis, a disease caused by a roundworm, and onchocerciasis, or river blindness, which is caused by a parasitic worm.

The drug was approved for humans under the brand name Stromectol, National Geographic reported, and since then it’s been recognized as a safe treatment for several tropical diseases caused by parasites. In 2015, two scientists even won a Nobel Prize for their discovery of ivermectin and its use to treat diseases caused by parasites.

But unlike, say, river blindness, COVID-19 is caused by a coronavirus, not by parasites. And as PolitiFact recently reported in a story exploring ivermectin, there’s no conclusive evidence that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.

The lying and the deception is just so evil, really makes me angry.

If you gave me a full year, I couldn’t come up with all the twists and turns these people take to turn the TRUTH into a lie.

It’s sickening.

Oh, and now 4 years later we have been 100% vindicated!

Have you seen this?

BREAKING: FDA Loses The War on Ivermectin!

But we're just getting started.

Next come the scare tactics and VERY misleading headlines.

Like this article from WIVB Channel 4 News:

After a recent resurgence in several states, health officials are warning residents to be aware of a dangerous of an unauthorized “treatment” for COVID-19 — often being taken with dangerous consequences.

It’s called ivermectin and it’s used to treat and prevent parasites in animals, the Food and Drug Administration explains. The tablets are not FDA approved for treatment of COVID-19 in humans and isn’t even an anti-viral drug — meaning it has no impact on the coronavirus. And because the large-concentration tablets are intended for large animals, these can be treacherous for humans.

In addition to not being authorized for treatment, there’s no evidence ivermectin treats COVID-19.

“There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. That is wrong.”

FDA The FDA and several state officials say they’ve seen an uptick in calamitous use of the drugs, particularly tablets used to treat parasitic worms in horses. While ivermectin is approved for humans to treat certain skin conditions (rosacea) and certain external parasites like head lice, the FDA warns this ivermectin is different than the one used in animals.

On Friday, the Mississippi Department of Health was forced to send out a warning to residents about the dangers of the drug after several poisonings.

The Mississippi Poison Control Center said at least 70% of recent ivermectin-related calls are tied to people taking livestock or animal formulations they bought a livestock supply stores or through online markets.

Eighty-five percent of callers had mild symptoms — these include rash, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain — but one person needed evaluation because of how much they’d taken.

More severe dangers of ivermectin ingestion include neurologic disorders, seizures, coma and death.

Use of ivermectin should only be taken if prescribed by a doctor for an FDA-approved use. Regardless of the usage and prescription, the FDA warns ivermectin overdose is still possible. Possible interaction with other medications is also a possibility.

I highlighted the key parts.

A 70% SURGE in Ivermectin Poison Center calls sounds like a lot doesn't it?

NPR even reports a 245% surge!  Oh my!

Sounds bad until you realize according to NPR that the 245% surge is going from 133 calls to 459 calls....NATIONWIDE!

According to the National Poison Data System (NPDS), which collects information from the nation's 55 poison control centers, there was a 245% jump in reported exposure cases from July to August — from 133 to 459.

Yes folks, out of 333 MILLION people, there were 459 calls to poison centers.

So 0.00000137% of the population.

And those are just calls.

According to the bold part of the Channel 4 article, 85% of those people who called or had symptoms had MILD symptoms like a rash.

The horror!

According to the article, only ONE person needed a further evaluation.

But is this what you hear in the MSM?

No.

If you listed only to the MSM fear-porn, you'd think we had a crisis of Ivermectin deaths.

The truth is the polar opposite.

Anyone else REALLY tired of being lied to?

It's why I'm here.

I will continue to shout the truth from the rooftops!

But I'm not done yet.

Did you know that Ivermectin has actually been listed even by the corrupt WHO as one of the most "essential medicines" out there?

It's true, you can read it right here until they take it down.

But I'm not done yet!

Let's cut right to the chase and go to a medical journal to see the true toxicity data on Ivermectin in humans.

Seems like something JOURNALISTS should do, don't you think?

Let's go to INCHEM.org, the WHO's own website for "Internationally Peer Reviewed Chemical Safety Information".

They lay it out in black and white and even a non-medical person like me can understand it.

Now let's go down to Section 7.2 of their report which is about Toxicity in Humans:

I'm going to bold the key part:

  7.2 Toxicity
       7.2.1 Human data
             7.2.1.1 Adults
                     Amounts approaching the therapeutic doses in 
                     animals (100 to 200 ðg/kg bodyweight) are not 
                     hazardous to humans.  Ingestions of large 
                     quantities (10 to 100 times the animal 
                     therapeutic dosage) may produce symptoms 
                     resembling those observed in animal toxicology 
                     studies at high toxic levels.
                     
                     An adult female accidentally self-injected a 
                     small quantity (approximately 200 ðg/kg) 
                     subcutaneously.  Twelve hours later she 
                     experienced colicky pain with nausea but 
                     recovered within 12 hours (MSD, 1988).
                     
                     Clinical studies of oral ivermectin given in 
                     doses from 2 to 200 ðg/kg (maximum 12 mg) have 
                     shown a pattern of adverse experiences that 
                     included only one serious event (transient 
                     stupor).  The remaining adverse experiences were 
                     considered not serious and were chiefly of the 
                     type expected based on the characteristics of 
                     the underlying disease and the responses seen 
                     after treatment with other microfilaricidal 
                     drugs, except for reports of "depression" (not 
                     psychiatrically tested) in four patients in open 
                     studies (MSD, 1988).
             7.2.1.2 Children
                     A 16-month-old boy weighing 15 kg ingested 
                     approximately 100 to 130 mg of ivermectin (as an 
                     injectable solution).  Ten hours post-ingestion 
                     he had mydriasis in one pupil, with frequent 
                     vomiting, pallor, 35°C temperature, tachycardia, 
                     somnolence and variable blood pressure.  He 
                     developed urticaria the following day, and had 
                     recovered after three days (MSD, 1988).

Let's start with the very first line: even if you take the ANIMAL dosage, it is "not hazardous to humans".

Case closed folks.

Seriously, why is this not front page news?

Is it because Ivermectin WORKS and actually treats COVID-19 and they can't let that happen?

Now the big question....where can you get it?

Here you go:

Critical Medications Every American Should Have On Hand (Including Ivermectin) – And How To Get Them Prescribed

Ask the average, well-prepared patriot what they stock up on in case of an emergency and the answers might be something like:

  • Food

  • Water

  • Ammo

  • And precious metals

But even the most prepared Americans are sorely lacking the critical medications that can protect them from anthrax, tick bites, COVID and even bioweapons.

And it’s not because of a lack of knowledge either.

If you want a simple antibiotic, then you better be prepared to jump through hoops to prove why you need it, thanks to the influence of big pharma.

Luckily a small group of patriotic doctors, pharmacists and business leaders have had enough with the corrupting influence of big pharma.

As champions of medical freedom, The Wellness Company has made it easy for Americans to get the critical medications they need.

That’s why they created the prescription medical emergency kit.

Inside you’ll find an assortment of 8 critical, life-saving prescriptions you need to keep you and your loved ones safe.

The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit includes:

  • Ivermectin 18mg – 7 compounded capsules

  • Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (generic Augmentin) 875/125 mg – 28 tablets

  • Azithromycin (generic Z-Pak) 250 mg – 12 tablets

  • Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg – 60 capsules

  • Metronidazole (generic Flagyl) 500 mg – 30 tablets

  • Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (generic Bactrim) 800/160 mg – 28 tablets

  • Fluconazole (generic Diflucan) 150 mg – 2 tablets

  • Ondansetron (generic Zofran) 4mg – 6 tablets


,

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.