BREAKING: FDA Loses The War on Ivermectin!

Remember when the FDA launched a massive social media campaign against Ivermectin?

Remember when we told you they were full of crap and harming Americans?

Fast forward 3-years and we are being vindicated.

But in one of the most egregious cases of “too little, too late” how many Americans were harmed or even died in the meantime as a result of what the FDA did?

This makes me sick.

Surely you remember the FDA’s most infamous Tweet ever: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all.  Stop it.”

Turns out, 3-years later and it’s the FDA who needs to “stop it”.

That is according to Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, MD, a plaintiff in a group of medical doctors who have sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the agencies’ unlawful attempts to block the use of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.

The lawsuit argues that the FDA has overstepped its authority and unjustifiably interfered with their medical practice.

The plaintiffs, Drs. Mary Talley Bowden, Paul E. Marik, and Robert L. Apter, are contesting the FDA’s portrayal of ivermectin as dangerous for human consumption. They note that the FDA has approved ivermectin for human use since 1996 for a variety of diseases. However, they allege that with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA began releasing documents and social media posts discouraging the use of the anti-viral drug for COVID-19 treatment.

🚨BREAKING: FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.

This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the… pic.twitter.com/HWYkkZLpoJ

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) March 22, 2024

RFK, Jr. has quoted the Tweet and wrote the following:

Ivermectin is not an exceptional case. The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma? https://t.co/LxpqLuvb6A

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) March 22, 2024

More here, from the Vigilant Fox:

Lawsuit Drops Bombshell on FDA’s Orwellian Lie About Ivermectin In a massive win for truth and medical freedom, the FDA has to remove ALL social media content and consumer advisories on ivermectin usage. Dr. McCullough previously said that the FDA should be sued for misleading the public by spreading misinformation on Ivermectin’s ability to treat COVID-19 – causing unnecessary deaths. Now, it’s happening. The complaint cites U.S. law, including the provision that the FDA “may not interfere with the authority of a health care provider to prescribe or administer any legally marked device to a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate health care practitioner-patient relationship.” Dr. Bowden (@MDbreathe), one of the plaintiffs in this lawsuit, writes: “FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history. This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”

Lawsuit Drops Bombshell on FDA's Orwellian Lie About Ivermectin

In a massive win for truth and medical freedom, the FDA has to remove ALL social media content and consumer advisories on ivermectin usage.

Dr. McCullough previously said that the FDA should be sued for misleading… pic.twitter.com/KlGiNnS9zY

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 22, 2024

I guess the FDA forgot that they were the ones who approved Ivermectin for Human Use way back in 1996?

What a joke!

The Gateway Pundit reports the following additional details on the big victory:

Claims were made that the initial article misrepresented the law by stating the FDA’s official stance against Ivermectin use without mentioning that doctors were allowed to administer the medicine.

U.S. law is cited in the complaint, including the provision that the FDA “may not interfere with the authority of a health care provider to prescribe or administer any legally marked device to a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate health care practitioner-patient relationship.”

On Thursday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reportedly agreed to remove all its previous social media posts and consumer advisories that specifically addressed the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19.

“FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history. This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship,” Dr. Bowden wrote on her social media.

The plaintiffs have recently received the signed court order and are preparing to issue a press release about it later today.

Meanwhile, here’s what we have reported since the very beginning:

TRUTH: Ivermectin Safe, Effective, Won The Nobel Prize and FDA Approved Since 1996!

So why are we now vindicated for telling the truth and a Government agency whose ONLY purpose for existing is to serve the people of the United States is now exposed for giving wrong and misleading and potentially deadly advice?

Because we don’t hate you.

Because we don’t hate the truth.

We love you and we love the truth.

We love publishing the truth.

We love LIFE.

Gee, I guess it’s really quite simple.

I’ve been shouting this from the rooftops since 2020 and it feels very good to now be vindicated — but it feels even better to know how many people we helped along the way:

TRUTH: Ivermectin Safe, Effective, Won The Nobel Prize and FDA Approved Since 1996!

Time for a reality check!

Truth check!

That’s what we do here at WeLoveTrump on all topics, and today’s topic is the REAL news about Ivermectin….

Real, unfiltered news with no bias.

Just the facts, ma’am!

Like this one for example:

Two Separate Doctors Claim OVER 100 Members of Congress Treated With Ivermectin!

Anyone else mad yet?

And today I have a new video to show you.

Someone sent this to me really explaining what Ivermectin is, it’s history and so much more.

They don’t want you to see this which is exactly why I’m sharing it with you.

Watch it here on Rumble:

Remember this disclaimer:

I am not a doctor.  I am not giving you medical advice.  I’m not saying any one thing will treat or cure COVID.  We clear?

I’m a REPORTER.  I research and I report and I give you the full story open and honestly so YOU can decide.  Consult your doctor before taking any vitamin, supplement or medicine.  

Now let’s go to another video.

This woman below documented her own journey with Ivermectin on video.

She starts off looking not so good but makes a swift turnaround in just a few days.

This is not me talking, listen to her share and document her own story….

Here is the video from Rumble:

Now let’s talk about the MSM disinformation campaign, which is a nice way of saying “outright lies and propaganda”.

Look, I will give you one disclaimer before we get started:  I am a journalist and not anyone with any medical expertise.  I’m not a doctor and I’m not giving medical advice.  

I’m just presenting you with the results of my research that the MSM really seems to want to hide….

And I know how to do my research.

So let’s start with this:

Now let’s unpack all the lies the MSM has been telling you about Ivermectin.

You would assume based on all the MSM propaganda that Ivermectin is only approved for Horses and not Humans.

The only problem with that?

It’s not true.

Not even close.

Here’s the real truth:

Yes folks, that is a statement taken from PolitiFact’s very own fact-checking page about Ivermectin.

But what they do with their “Face Check” is so insidious….

Here’s how PolitiFact tries to claim that the TRUE statement is still somehow false, watch these mental gymnastics:

This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

It is true that ivermectin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration that year — but not to treat the coronavirus. The drug was approved for strongyloidiasis, a disease caused by a roundworm, and onchocerciasis, or river blindness, which is caused by a parasitic worm.

The drug was approved for humans under the brand name Stromectol, National Geographic reported, and since then it’s been recognized as a safe treatment for several tropical diseases caused by parasites. In 2015, two scientists even won a Nobel Prize for their discovery of ivermectin and its use to treat diseases caused by parasites.

But unlike, say, river blindness, COVID-19 is caused by a coronavirus, not by parasites. And as PolitiFact recently reported in a story exploring ivermectin, there’s no conclusive evidence that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.

The lying and the deception is just so evil, really makes me angry.

If you gave me a full year, I couldn’t come up with all the twists and turns these people take to turn the TRUTH into a lie.

It’s sickening.

But we’re just getting started.

Next come the scare tactics and VERY misleading headlines.

Like this article from WIVB Channel 4 News:

After a recent resurgence in several states, health officials are warning residents to be aware of a dangerous of an unauthorized “treatment” for COVID-19 — often being taken with dangerous consequences.

It’s called ivermectin and it’s used to treat and prevent parasites in animals, the Food and Drug Administration explains. The tablets are not FDA approved for treatment of COVID-19 in humans and isn’t even an anti-viral drug — meaning it has no impact on the coronavirus. And because the large-concentration tablets are intended for large animals, these can be treacherous for humans.

In addition to not being authorized for treatment, there’s no evidence ivermectin treats COVID-19.

“There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. That is wrong.”

FDA The FDA and several state officials say they’ve seen an uptick in calamitous use of the drugs, particularly tablets used to treat parasitic worms in horses. While ivermectin is approved for humans to treat certain skin conditions (rosacea) and certain external parasites like head lice, the FDA warns this ivermectin is different than the one used in animals.

On Friday, the Mississippi Department of Health was forced to send out a warning to residents about the dangers of the drug after several poisonings.

The Mississippi Poison Control Center said at least 70% of recent ivermectin-related calls are tied to people taking livestock or animal formulations they bought a livestock supply stores or through online markets.

Eighty-five percent of callers had mild symptoms — these include rash, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain — but one person needed evaluation because of how much they’d taken.

More severe dangers of ivermectin ingestion include neurologic disorders, seizures, coma and death.

Use of ivermectin should only be taken if prescribed by a doctor for an FDA-approved use. Regardless of the usage and prescription, the FDA warns ivermectin overdose is still possible. Possible interaction with other medications is also a possibility.

I highlighted the key parts.

A 70% SURGE in Ivermectin Poison Center calls sounds like a lot doesn’t it?

NPR even reports a 245% surge!  Oh my!

Sounds bad until you realize according to NPR that the 245% surge is going from 133 calls to 459 calls….NATIONWIDE!

According to the National Poison Data System (NPDS), which collects information from the nation’s 55 poison control centers, there was a 245% jump in reported exposure cases from July to August — from 133 to 459.

Yes folks, out of 333 MILLION people, there were 459 calls to poison centers.

So 0.00000137% of the population.

And those are just calls.

According to the bold part of the Channel 4 article, 85% of those people who called or had symptoms had MILD symptoms like a rash.

The horror!

According to the article, only ONE person needed a further evaluation.

But is this what you hear in the MSM?

No.

If you listed only to the MSM fear-porn, you’d think we had a crisis of Ivermectin deaths.

The truth is the polar opposite.

Anyone else REALLY tired of being lied to?

It’s why I’m here.

I will continue to shout the truth from the rooftops!

But I’m not done yet.

Did you know that Ivermectin has actually been listed even by the corrupt WHO as one of the most “essential medicines” out there?

It’s true, you can read it right here until they take it down.

But I’m not done yet!

Let’s cut right to the chase and go to a medical journal to see the true toxicity data on Ivermectin in humans.

Seems like something JOURNALISTS should do, don’t you think?

Let’s go to INCHEM.org, the WHO’s own website for “Internationally Peer Reviewed Chemical Safety Information”.

They lay it out in black and white and even a non-medical person like me can understand it.

Now let’s go down to Section 7.2 of their report which is about Toxicity in Humans:

I’m going to bold the key part:

  7.2 Toxicity
       7.2.1 Human data
             7.2.1.1 Adults
                     Amounts approaching the therapeutic doses in 
                     animals (100 to 200 ðg/kg bodyweight) are not 
                     hazardous to humans.  Ingestions of large 
                     quantities (10 to 100 times the animal 
                     therapeutic dosage) may produce symptoms 
                     resembling those observed in animal toxicology 
                     studies at high toxic levels.
                     
                     An adult female accidentally self-injected a 
                     small quantity (approximately 200 ðg/kg) 
                     subcutaneously.  Twelve hours later she 
                     experienced colicky pain with nausea but 
                     recovered within 12 hours (MSD, 1988).
                     
                     Clinical studies of oral ivermectin given in 
                     doses from 2 to 200 ðg/kg (maximum 12 mg) have 
                     shown a pattern of adverse experiences that 
                     included only one serious event (transient 
                     stupor).  The remaining adverse experiences were 
                     considered not serious and were chiefly of the 
                     type expected based on the characteristics of 
                     the underlying disease and the responses seen 
                     after treatment with other microfilaricidal 
                     drugs, except for reports of "depression" (not 
                     psychiatrically tested) in four patients in open 
                     studies (MSD, 1988).
             7.2.1.2 Children
                     A 16-month-old boy weighing 15 kg ingested 
                     approximately 100 to 130 mg of ivermectin (as an 
                     injectable solution).  Ten hours post-ingestion 
                     he had mydriasis in one pupil, with frequent 
                     vomiting, pallor, 35°C temperature, tachycardia, 
                     somnolence and variable blood pressure.  He 
                     developed urticaria the following day, and had 
                     recovered after three days (MSD, 1988).

Let’s start with the very first line: even if you take the ANIMAL dosage, it is “not hazardous to humans”.

Case closed folks.

Seriously, why is this not front page news?

Is it because Ivermectin WORKS and actually treats COVID-19 and they can’t let that happen?

Now the big question….where can you get it?

Here you go:

Critical Medications Every American Should Have On Hand (Including Ivermectin) – And How To Get Them Prescribed

Ask the average, well-prepared patriot what they stock up on in case of an emergency and the answers might be something like:

• Food

• Water

• Ammo

• And precious metals

But even the most prepared Americans are sorely lacking the critical medications that can protect them from anthrax, tick bites, COVID and even bioweapons.

And it’s not because of a lack of knowledge either.

If you want a simple antibiotic, then you better be prepared to jump through hoops to prove why you need it, thanks to the influence of big pharma.

Luckily a small group of patriotic doctors, pharmacists and business leaders have had enough with the corrupting influence of big pharma.

As champions of medical freedom, The Wellness Company has made it easy for Americans to get the critical medications they need.

That’s why they created the prescription medical emergency kit.

Inside you’ll find an assortment of 8 critical, life-saving prescriptions you need to keep you and your loved ones safe.

The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit includes:

• Ivermectin 18mg – 7 compounded capsules

• Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (generic Augmentin) 875/125 mg – 28 tablets

• Azithromycin (generic Z-Pak) 250 mg – 12 tablets

• Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg – 60 capsules

• Metronidazole (generic Flagyl) 500 mg – 30 tablets

• Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (generic Bactrim) 800/160 mg – 28 tablets

• Fluconazole (generic Diflucan) 150 mg – 2 tablets

• Ondansetron (generic Zofran) 4mg – 6 tablets

• 1 virtual consult for the kit prescription from a doctor you can trust

• 1 Emergency Medication Guidebook written by our Chief Medical Board for safe use

The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit has medicines that can be used to treat:

• Anthrax

• Bacterial Vaginosis

• Bite Wounds

• Bronchitis

• Chlamydia

• Clostridioides difficile

• Colitis

• COVID – 19

• Gonorrhea

• Giardiasis

• Lice

• Nausea & Vomiting

• Pharyngitis

  Load More