Skip to main content
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

“LUCKY LARRY”: Meet The Luckiest Man Alive


Have you heard of “Lucky Larry”?

That would be Larry Silverstein and “Lucky Larry” is Donald Trump’s nickname for him.

Allow me to explain why, and then you can see what you think….is he just the luckiest man to ever live?  Or something else going on here?

You be the judge.

In fact, I won’t explain it, I’ll let Grok explain it:

Larry Silverstein, a prominent real estate developer, is often referred to as “Lucky Larry” due to his involvement in the World Trade Center lease and the events of 9/11.

In July 2001, just two months before the 9/11 attacks, Silverstein signed a 99-year lease for the World Trade Center complex. This lease included a provision that required Silverstein to maintain terrorism insurance. After the attacks, he filed insurance claims and eventually received a settlement of nearly $4.6 billion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Critics argue that the timing of the lease and the insurance payout were too coincidental, leading to the nickname “Lucky Larry.” Some conspiracy theorists even suggest that Silverstein had prior knowledge of the attacks and benefited from them. However, these claims have been widely debunked, and there is no credible evidence to support them.

In summary, Larry Silverstein is called “Lucky Larry” due to the circumstances surrounding his acquisition of the World Trade Center lease and the subsequent insurance payout after the 9/11 attacks.

Surprisingly, even the Left-Leaning ChatGPT knows about “Lucky Larry” and is happy to tell you about him as well:

Larry Silverstein is often referred to as “Lucky Larry” due to an uncanny twist of fate. Silverstein is a real estate tycoon who owned the lease to the World Trade Center complex in New York City. In an incredibly fortunate turn of events, Silverstein had purchased insurance policies covering terrorist attacks for the World Trade Center just a few months before the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

After the attacks, Silverstein and his insurance companies were embroiled in legal battles over the payout, as there were questions regarding whether the attacks constituted one event or multiple events under the terms of the insurance policies. Eventually, Silverstein was awarded billions of dollars in insurance settlements, leading some to dub him “Lucky Larry” due to the fortuitous timing of his insurance policy purchases. However, it’s worth noting that the nickname is somewhat controversial, as many people see it as insensitive given the tragic loss of life and devastation caused by the 9/11 attacks.

Ok, so now let’s go deeper into WTC 7.

One of the biggest pieces of the 9/11 puzzle that never made sense was Building 7.

Building 7 redpilled a lot of people.

Building 7 was NOT hit by a plane.

It was also not next to the Twin Towers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Understand where Building 7 was:

So Building 7 is not hit by a plane and yet it falls later in the day just like the Twin Towers.

Set aside the debate about whether an airplane can cause Buildings 1 and 2 to collapse at free-fall speed, how exactly did they take down Building 7 a few blocks away?

Really?

That must be a pretty powerful plane!

But that’s not all.

Listen to this clip from Larry Silverstein where he talks about making the decision to “pull it”:

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/Phiteceen/status/1701166728246403350

Understand what “pull it” means…

Anyone watching that clip understands intuitively that “pull it” means to demo the building.

But when they later understood just how troublesome this clip was, they changed their tune and said no, no, “pull it” means pull the fire-fighters out of the building.

You decide:

Now here’s the piece that really destroys their story.

That building falls at near free-fall speed later in the day, just as Buildings 1 and 2 did earlier that morning.

How?

Most people come to the only conclusion a reasonable person could come to….

Simply put?

ADVERTISEMENT

Building 7 had already been wired up for a controlled demo prior to 9/11:

Is there some other explanation?

Do you see it a different way?

Still BeLIEve The Official 9/11 Story? You Won’t After Seeing This!

You don’t simply “get over” or “move on” from 9/11.

Especially when everything they’ve ever told you about it is a lie.

Don’t believe me?

Keep reading…

Because we will continue to investigate and report on the truth.

Shall we talk Building 7?

How it came down at free-fall speed, even though it was never hit by anything?

We won’t even get into that right now.

For now, I just want to cover the alleged video evidence of the crash and ask you to please compare the two videos that are shown in this clip.

Watch here on Rumble:

Backup here if that link doesn’t work:

https://twitter.com/UltraLandlord/status/1562136208364429313

Don’t trust your lying eyes folks!

If we rolled out Dan Rather to that gymnasium and he told you a whale really did pop up out of the floor and splash everyone in the gym, half of you would beLIEve it.

Don’t be deceived.

Also, remember this?

VIDEO FOUND: George W. Bush Admits Explosives Used In 9/11

Or how about this one?

EXPOSING The TRUTH About 9/11 (In Their Own Words)

Time to wake up folks...

Spread the word!

Now I leave you with this...

This is the "official story" they want you to believe.

You tell me, which is more insane....believing this story or questioning it?

Backup here on Rumble:



 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!