UPDATE: Alvin Bragg Files NEW Motion, Case Hinges On Convicted Liar?

All that we need to know about Alvin Bragg’s case is that the entire charade essentially rests on the testimony of convicted liar Michael Cohen.

Attorneys for President Trump have been petitioning the court to exclude the testimony of Michael Cohen in President Trump’s upcoming political trial.

In response, Alvin Bragg has filed a new motion to make sure that Cohen’s testimony is included in the trial.

President Trump’s legal team accused Bragg’s office of prosecutorial misconduct in a strongly worded letter sent to the Manhattan DA.

I couldn’t agree more—Bragg’s case is a politically motivated scam, and, dare I say, racially motivated. Every single DA prosecuting Trump is African-American. Every single one. Willis, James, Bragg.

I am sensing a clear pattern here, and I don’t like it. Prosecutors should be fair, balanced, and above all, just in their pronouncements—what each of these DAs is doing to President Trump has never been seen before. Here’s what we currently know:

TRUMP LAWYER: An attorney for former President Trump sent an 11-page letter to New York D.A. Alvin Bragg Jr., accusing him and his office of "prosecutorial misconduct." MORE: https://t.co/3P3ZKECpBa pic.twitter.com/jgcc8FJ5ss

— NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) March 6, 2024

Trump's defense is gearing up for the New York criminal trial and submitted a massive motion in limine focused in large part on precluding or limiting Michael Cohen's expected testimony in the Bragg Prosecution. pic.twitter.com/3j84yAjhgm

— Robert Gouveia Esq. (@RobGouveiaEsq) March 1, 2024

Manhattan DA doubles down on Michael Cohen as star witness in ‘hush money’ Trump trial https://t.co/BwMvxbhrwV

— New York Post (@nypost) March 5, 2024

The Epoch Times featured a portion of Bragg’s motion:

“In an argument that reads more like a press release than a legal filing, defendant makes the obviously unsupportable request that the court preclude one of the people’s witnesses from testifying at trial on the ground that defendant anticipates that he will disbelieve the witness’s expected testimony.”

New York court reporter Erik Uebelacker shared the opinion of Trump-hating judge Arthur Engoron and claimed that Michael Cohen was a ‘credible’ witness—nothing could be further from the truth.

Manhattan prosecutors cited Judge Arthur Engoron in their defense of Michael Cohen testifying at Donald Trump's upcoming criminal trial.

In Engoron's civil fraud ruling, he said he found Cohen to be "credible."

"Michael Cohen told the truth." https://t.co/eFuSNGZFeT pic.twitter.com/w0lAbVM78D

— Erik Uebelacker (@Uebey) March 5, 2024

Newsmax provided the Trump legal team’s response:

“This dereliction of duty renders you fully unfit to serve as District Attorney, and exposes innocent citizens, like Mr. Weisselberg, to irreparable and life-altering harm,” Blanche wrote.

“Today, your office has forced Mr. Weisselberg into pleading guilty to nonexistent perjury offenses by threatening him with years in state prison should he not succumb to your demands.”