WATCH: Yelling And Screaming – Dems Protest Bill That Removes Adult Books From Schools

We’ve seen this before.

Liberals protecting smut books in school libraries.

It hasn’t gone away. The problem persists and it spreads.

These people are sick.

And they make me sick.

We see a whole room freak out in New Hampshire when Republican Representative Glenn Cordelli reads from a book that they allow for children at their school library.

“That’s too graphic for us adults! Give that back to little Johhny and Susie!”

Clown world on full display.

What Rep. Cordelli was pointing out was that there is a need to pass a bill that would prohibit these kind of adult-themed books, which are aimed at children.

Sadly, the New Hampshire House voted down that bill that would ban sexual content and nudity.

Boston Globe reports:

Cacophonous shouts filled the chamber Thursday afternoon as lawmakers in the New Hampshire House of Representatives debated a bill to give state officials expanded authority when parents challenge books available in local school districts.

The bill’s prime sponsor, Republican Representative Glenn Cordelli of Tuftonboro, said K-12 schools are making sexually explicit materials available to minors, and he argued such books could be contributing to rising rates of sexual violence.

To illustrate his point, he began reading a passage from Laurie Halse Anderson’s “Speak,” an award-winning 1999 young adult novel that explores a survivor’s sense of trauma and guilt after her sexual assault. He jumped straight into the protagonist’s firsthand account of being raped and scoffed at the notion that the book is available to middle schoolers.

The publisher indicates “Speak” is intended for readers 12-18 years old, and the story is about “consent, healing, and finding your voice.” It’s listed among TIME Magazine’s “best YA books of all time.”

House Speaker Sherman A. Packard repeatedly urged Cordelli to keep his remarks in their proper context, and he scolded the Democrats who shouted their objections.

Democratic Representative Lucy M. Weber of Walpole called for a vote on whether Cordelli should be allowed to continue. She said the members understood the point Cordelli was making, but the manner in which he made it was offensive to many and “triggering” to those who have themselves experienced sexual violence.

UNREAL. At a hearing in NH, State Rep Glenn Cordelli attempted to read from inappropriate books in school libraries. He gets shut down because it’s too graphic. The Democrats freak out and then all vote to not let him continue speaking.

Too graphic for a room of adults… pic.twitter.com/DWjgSiYCN2

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 16, 2024

Elon even commented below the post. And with that comes more views to this insanity.

And statsitically speaking, this will wake up more normies.

New Hampshire Bulletin adds:

The New Hampshire House voted down a bill Thursday that would bar schools from carrying certain books that include sexual conduct, nudity, and other content – and require that they set up processes to help parents flag and request to remove them.

The chamber voted to indefinitely postpone it, 187-162, which prevents it from returning this year.

Conservatives said it was a needed bill to empower parents to remove harmful materials. But Democrats and other opponents said it would encourage censorship.

“The N.H. House of Representatives today voted against a bill that would have created a state-run book banning process, and we commend them for affirming that New Hampshire schools are places of learning, not censorship,” said Gilles Bissonnette, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by Rep. Glenn Cordelli, a Tuftonboro Republican, House Bill 1419 would prohibit materials in schools that are “harmful to minors” and define that to cover a range of categories.

According to the bill, the content would be deemed harmful if “it predominantly appeals to the prurient, shameful, or morbid interest of minors”; if it “depicts or describes nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse” in ways that are “patently offensive” to teach to minors; and if it “lacks serious literary, scientific, medical, artistic, or political value for minors.”

The bill requires school boards to adopt a complaint process around harmful materials. Under that process, parents or guardians would need to write a complaint to the school principal outlining the material and how they believe it is harmful; the principal would then investigate and make a determination. The parent could then appeal that determination to the State Board of Education, a body whose members are appointed by the governor. The state board could make a final ruling overriding the principal’s finding.

If an educator were to continue providing the materials even after they are removed, they would be violating the educator code of conduct and could be disciplined by the state board, the bill stated.

The bill would also allow the Attorney General’s Office, the state Department of Education, or any aggrieved person to initiate a civil action against the school district if the school doesn’t adhere to the complaint process or continues to provide the material even after the complaint process has resulted in it being banned. 

That last paragraph is probably one of the reasons that bill wasn’t passed.

The following is a great example of how you handle the objections of those in the room.

You keep going and then you call them out!

They don’t want you to read the book the are giving to your children to read

“This school board doesn’t want to hear the pornographic book “It’s Perfectly Normal” being read to them because it’s disgusting, but they’re perfectly fine with groomers reading it to kids”. pic.twitter.com/UL3fiO9PKa

— Winnie Schola (@WinnieSchola) February 16, 2024