Skip to main content
BoomMag: Readers and Fans
Advertise With Us Newsletter

WLT Report WLT Report

Advertise With Us Newsletter
We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

BREAKING: Japan Lands On The Moon! See It Here!

Well gee, I guess I was wrong….

I was fairly convinced that the 1969 Moon Landings were fake and that as the Bible tells us there is a Firmament surrounding our Earth, but turns out I was wrong on both accounts.

Sorry Genesis!

Yes indeed, much like India did last year, Japan has now landed on the Moon!

How embarrassing that I could be so wrong….

Errrrr, uhhhh excuse me, my apologies….those prior paragraphs were all written with tongue firmly implanted in cheek!

Except for one thing I wrote which was spot on:  Japan’s Moon Landing looks exactly like India’s Moon Landing from last year, and by that I mean fake as can be!

But that’s just my opinion, you decide for yourself….

ADVERTISEMENT

Here is the footage they are attempting to pass off as real footage from Japan’s Moon Landing:

It looks EXACTLY like India’s did!

Like some 1980s version of Atari Space Invaders!

Is that really the best they can do?

My Nintendo Switch has better graphics than this!

More here, this one includes footage from the lander itself as it tumbles towards the Moon:

Does that look real to you?

I guess we can quote Elon Musk here: “You know it’s real because it looks so fake!”

ADVERTISEMENT

Remember when he said that?  That was a real gem.

More footage here, and pay particular attention to how they are reporting this — they are not claiming these are simulated videos — they’re saying this is footage of the craft landing on the Moon:

More here:

I am apparently not the only person that thinks it looks super fake….or that it looks almost identical to India’s fake footage:

Backlash from the India footage got so bad last year they DID come out several days later to try to claim it was just a rendering of what it *would have* looked like, but by that point the damage was done.

ADVERTISEMENT

But they’re not stopping there….

Here is what they claim is a timelapse video shot from the Moon’s surface:

Sorry but it just looks SO fake!

And I see we’ve chosen to go with “no stars” in this one.

Always funny when they decide to include the stars or not.

Here’s what NBC News reported:

Japan’s moon lander nailed its tricky, “pinpoint” touchdown on the lunar surface, officials from the country’s space agency announced Thursday, but a newly released image revealed that the spacecraft became overturned in the process.

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, known as JAXA, confirmed that the mission achieved its goal of a precision landing within 100 meters (328 feet) of its target — a feat that could broaden the number of potential landing sites for future missions to the moon.

With the successful touchdown of the SLIM lander (short for Smart Lander for Investigating Moon), Japan became the fifth country in history to achieve a controlled or “soft” landing on the moon. Only the United States, the former Soviet Union, China and India can similarly boast about such an accomplishment.

The SLIM mission represents another giant leap forward in lunar exploration.

A wheeled rover that was released before the SLIM craft landed snapped a photo that appears to show the probe upside-down on the moon’s surface. As such, the lander’s solar panels are not angled properly to harness sunlight and power up the probe, according to JAXA.

ADVERTISEMENT

The agency said there is still a chance that the lander could recover and generate power as sunlight shifts in the coming days.

And from TechCrunch:

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Company shared the first image of its lander on the lunar surface, revealing that the spacecraft touched down on the moon upside-down.

It’s a remarkable recovery for the spacecraft, which experienced an “abnormality in the main engine” that affecting the landing orientation when it was just 50 meters above the lunar surface, JAXA said in an update Thursday. Despite this abnormality — which resulted in the spacecraft’s solar panels being unable to charge, because they are not oriented properly wit the sun — the country nevertheless became the fifth nation ever to pull off a soft landing on the moon.

Even after the main engine was lost, SLIM’s onboard software continued to autonomously guide the spacecraft’s descent. The lander touched down at a speed of around 1.4 meters per second or less, below the design range; but the lateral velocity and orientation were also outside the design range, resulting in the nose-down position.

Remarkably, the lander ended up just 55 meters east of the original target landing site. JAXA officials said that the main purpose of the SLIM mission, which was to demonstrate the pinpoint landing technology to within 100 meters accuracy, is therefore considered a success.

Now let’s have some fun and go back to India’s “Moon Landing”….

Read through this and tell me if this looks identical to what India originally tried to pass off as real footage and later claimed was just simulated images:

UPDATE: Did India Fake Its Moon Landing?

You want to know a very good indicator that something is, in fact, FAKE?

When all the big Fact-Checkers have to roll out their big “Fact Checks” to tell you it most definitely is not fake because we are Fact-Checkers and we said so!

That just happened again.

Last week India claimed to have landed on the Moon.

Incredible!

Historic!

The only problem was it gave the world this footage:

Many immediately said it looked SUPER fake.

Here is Stew Peters calling it out:

I also posted that it looked very fake to me.

A BAD fake:

India’s Moon Landing: Real or Fake?

Many clowned the images as saying it looked like a bad 1980's video game.

Others named the game as "Space Invaders" -- which was spot on.

The "useful idiots" were out in full force saying of course it was real imagery and we all just had "tin foil hats" on.

You gotta love the useful idiots.

But now after a week of getting clowned bad, it looks like they've taken a different approach.

Now LeadStories wants you to know this wasn't live footage at all, it was just a simulation that was broadcast live:

Ummmm, what?

LOL!

As usual, they go to incredible mental gymnastics to come up with these fact-checks.

"A Simulation Image was Broadcast Live"?

What does that even mean?

But let's Fact-Check the Fact-Checkers because there are a few big problems with this.

First, none of the live streams of the moon landing labeled that as "simulation" footage.

They all said "Livestream".

I checked last week and I just re-checked right now.

Not a single feed was labeled "Simulation".

I guess these Rocket Scientists just forgot that little detail, huh?

Right.

Or is it more likely that they got clowned so hard that they finally had to admit it was fake but claim they intended it to be fake all along?

You decide.

Here's another problem...

LeadStories points to the Stew Peters tweet in its Fact-Check as some sort of proof and even includes screenshots of the Tweet and an Archive Link of the Tweet as if Stew took it down.

He never took it down, it's still proudly posted.

Nice try LeadStories.

But here's the really key part.

They claim the Stew Peters Tweet was Fact-Checked with a "Community Note" on Twitter, and indeed it was -- but not for the reason you'd think.

Take a look:

So there is a Community Note saying the India Moon Landing was NOT faked because.....wait for it.....because these four sources all tracked it while it happened!

So you'd think you'd go to those 4 sources and you'd see live video or you'd see something saying the official video was labeled a simulation, but you don't see any of that.

All four links are just this....hours and hours of screens that look like mini EKG machines allegedly reading the "sound" of the Moon Lander from space:

And by watching hours of blips of sound on the screen that is supposed to be proof the landing was real.

You kidding me with this?

Something I could make myself in Garage Band on my iMac and post to YouTube and you'd have no idea what it was (kind of like this Chorizo image?) is the "proof" the India Moon Landing was real?

Really?

But here's my bigger question....

Why doesn't the Community Note simply say that was a Simulation video?

Wouldn't that have been a much simpler explanation?

But it doesn't say that.

Only LeadStories now says that one week later.

As your mom probably told you, "if you don't lie then you don't need to constantly remember what you said and when you were telling the truth".

Good advice.

NASA and the MSM should try following it, but at this point they're too far gone.

Shifting stories, shifting sand, imploding confidence.

One more comment before I wrap this up....

You want to shut people up about all this being fake?

How about instead of stupid Garage Band sound readings how about you just strap a GoPro to the window of one of these "space rockets" and give us a FULL FEED of the launch?

Go from launchpad to Moon landing with no cuts.

Oh you'd think we'd have a bunch of those by now, right?

But we don't.

Not a single one.

In fact, there's not even a single UNCUT video feed live from a rocket going from launch pad into "Space".

None exist.

They always "cut out" about halfway through and then "pop back on" once they're in "Space".

Don't trust what I say, go look it up for yourself, see what you find.

Oh NASA has a million reasons WHY you can't see that footage.

As usual, it's just too complicated for us plebs to understand.

You're right, I don't understand and I don't buy it.

If we have the technology to fly to the Moon and ride around on a Dune Buggy, we damn sure have the technology to strap a GoPro to a window and record the entire thing.

Instead what do we get?

We get.....this:

You want to shut people up?

You want to prove it's real?

Save you BS LeadStories "Fact Check" and just show us REAL, UNCUT video.

Until then, I'm going to continue to assume it's all fake.

Here was our original report:

India's Moon Landing: Real or Fake?

I know this happened a couple days ago, but I have purposely waited to cover this for a while.

I just keep looking at the footage and I am a bit stunned.

Do people really think this is real?

I suppose I should back up and frame this a bit more objectively: I'm going to show you the footage of India allegedly landing on the Moon this week and I want to know if you think it looks real or fake.

There, was that better?

More objective?

I'm trying but I'm sorry, this just looks SUPER fake to me.

Just watch for yourself and then we'll dig in.

From the Indian Express, here is the official footage.

Start at about the 6:20 minute mark:

Here's a different view, allegedly from the Lunar Probe.

Watch:

Ok, so first question's first...

Those are supposed to be real footage of the same event.

At least the second one looks a little more real, but why are there (super fake looking) stars in the first one:

But no stars seen in the second one?

And why can't any of these "space agencies" get their stories straight?

Why does NASA tell us it looks like this?

And this:

And why do some Astronauts say they could see stars and some say they couldn't?

Were they not briefed on what to say about that question by NASA?

I went off on a wild tangent about the stars, but that really wasn't the main point.

The main point is....why does the Indian Moon Landing video look so wildly FAKE?

I know, I know Elon...."you can tell it's real because it looks so fake":

Now there's a reason why I started this article with the official Indian News feed for the Moon Landing footage.

Because if I showed you the Tweets first you'd claim it wasn't real.

But it is and it looks wildly fake:

It looks MORE fake than the NASA footage from the 1960s and 70s.

Basically, this guy is spot on:

This guy says it looks like 1980s Pacman, but I disagree.

Pacman looked SHARP.

This is way worse:

I love watching the reaction videos:

Pacman was not quite right, but I gotta say "Space Invaders" is 100% spot on:

They are getting clowned SO HARD I have to be explicitly clear and tell you this video below is NOT the official video.

I know they look similar, but they're not the same thing:

This guy calls it "Low Tech CGI" and I think that's a good summary:

Very low tech.

Low tech and low budget.

Did you see Modi after the lander touched down?

Did you notice how he didn't clap right away?

I think he knew how absolutely fake it looked and he couldn't even bring himself to clap for a few seconds.

I think if you could have read his mind it would have said something like: "Are you freaking kidding me?  This is the footage they are showing to the world?  This is the best we could do?  I am so embarrassed right now...."

I love this guy's recap video:

"It looks so authentic!"

Now let's keep going...

Let's leave India for a second and come a little closer to home:

"Was The NASA Moon Landing Fake?"

Was the Moon Landing Fake?

That's not my question...

That was Patrick Bet-David's question to Avi Loeb, the author of "Interstellar".

I found the clip to be very fascinating.

The short answer from Avi?

No.

The reason?

Moon Rocks.

Yes, really.

I'll let you watch below, but what I find most compelling is exactly what PBD brings up when he questions Loeb.

To me, the single-most compelling question or piece of evidence is not camera angles, or "wrong shadows" in old footage, or foot prints on the moon, or strange landscapes...

All of that is interesting, but to me it's not the PRIME thing.

To me, the primary question is a simple and basic one: why did we (we meaning all of Earth) go to the Moon in 1969 and then just never go back for over 50 years?

Have we EVER gone back?

Many say we haven't.

So....did we really go the first time?

THAT is the question.

Watch Pat ask Ari:

It's actually not the first time PBD has gone down this road.

Pat is a smart guy....VERY smart.

Intuitive.

I think he knows something is very wrong here.

Check out his prior interview with Bart Sibrel.

I think from that interview to this latest one with Ari, I sense Pat becoming more and more skeptical of the original Moon Landing story.

Maybe that's just me, but I can feel it.

Pat was skeptical to Bart about his claims it was fake, but flash forward and Pat now seems much more skeptical of the original story itself.

Check it out:

FACT CHECKED: So We Never Actually Landed On The Moon?

Earlier today I was joking around on Twitter and I posted this Tweet below...

Read this.

But read it slowly:

If you don't get it, read it again.

It's a joke.

A stolen joke, I admit it.

It was a throwaway joke from the inimitable Norm Macdonald.

Miss that guy so much, but at least we have YouTube.

Anyway, back to the serious topic at hand.

While I was joking in the tweet above, a very serious question remains: Did we truly go to the moon back in 1969?

I smell a FACT-CHECK coming!

Now you might think that's a crazy question, but if you start to dig into it you quickly realize there is a very logical, rational, and evidence-based argument to claim that no, we did not.

COULD not have done it even if we wanted to!

So I wanted to show this interview to you.

This is Patrick Bet David, a guy who I've really come to respect.

PBD plays it right down in the middle in this one, challenging his guest Bart Sibrel but doing it respectfully and allowing him to state his case.

And his case is remarkable clear.

Some people get caught up in analyzing the photos and the shadows and all this other nonsense or the reflections in the glass and claiming it was faked because of some really hard to follow technical details.

Sibrel doesn't do that.

He simply states a very clear and logical case that goes like this:

In order to believe we landed on the moon in 1969 you have to believe this simple claim:

That we went 1,000 times FARTHER than we can currently send astronauts today...

50 years ago...

On the first attempt...

With one-millionth the computing power of today's cell phone!

In fact, Werner von Braun, the lead scientist of the space mission for NASA, stated the odds of them going to the moon, successfully, with 1960s technolgoy, was a 1 in 10,000 chance!

That's your lead brainiac saying that!

There is no other example in history where we achieved a technological advancement and then 50 years later could not replicate it.

No other example in history.

In every other example, we are not only replicating it but exceeding it just a few years later.

Certainly, 50 years later the advancement from that first breakthrough is many multiples greater.

And yet, not so with the moon.

We haven't been back.

No other country has been back.

In fact, NASA now says the technology to do it "hasn't been invented yet!"

Why?

Because there's a massive thing called the Van Allen Radiation Belts that would cook you alive!

The clip of the NASA rocket scientist saying that is right in the video below.

So without further adieu, I give you Patrick Bet David asking Bart Sibrel: was the moon landing FAKED?

Watch here:

Backup here:

If that caught your attention, let's go much deeper...

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon...

WARNING!  WARNING!

Time for another installment of hard-hitting investigative journalism...where we aren't afraid to create a little cognitive dissonance along the way!

Some of you will be very bothered by this article...

"How dare he question the moon landings!"

Sorry folks, but we don't create the news here...we just report on it.

We also don't create the "truth"...we just seek it out and set it free.

So buckle up buttercup, this could get bumpy for a few of you.

I can already hear many others saying "it's about time Noah covered this!"

So here we go....

Did Buzz Aldrin just admit (again) that the moon landings were faked?

Well, it sure looks like it.

But we'll give you all the evidence and let you decide.

A clip of Buzz Aldrin on Conan O'Brien's Late Night Show from 2000 is suddenly going viral right now thanks to this post on TikTok:

@msmastafoxx

Wait Til The End...🧐 #MsMastaFoXX #MyCreatorLife #Buzz #buzzaldrin #Nasa #Conspiracy #conspiracytiktok #Woketok #Viral #fyp #conanobrien #MoonLanding

♬ original sound - MsMastaFoXX👁️Neocodeist👽CF

In the clip, Buzz pretty clearly says the video of the astronauts walking on the moon was fake.

I don't know how else you interpret that.

I mean, I know this is a comedy show, but nothing about this clip appears to be a joke or a bit.

Even Conan is taken aback and temporarily at a loss for how to respond (and it's his job to never be caught off guard as a talk show host).

So watch the clip for yourself.

And for anyone shouting "CONTEXT!" I've got you covered.

Here is the full interview to watch the segment in context:

The Reuters Fact-Check team has already investigated and determined what you heard Buzz say is totally "False".

Just another one we all got wrong!

God bless the fact-checkers, I don't know where we'd be without them!

So somehow they've labeled this as "False" despite the part I bolded below where they seem to even admit that the footage is, in fact, mostly made of animations.

This is their full report:

Social media users are sharing a video of astronaut Buzz Aldrin being interviewed by American television host Conan O’Brien and claiming that Aldrin discussing parts of the moon landing broadcasts being animated is proof that it was all faked.

He was referring to animations used by broadcasters at the time in their coverage of the moon landing, intercut with real footage. The moon landing did take place and men did walk on the moon.

Examples of the erroneous social media posts can be seen ( here ) and ( here ).

A longer video of the interview, dated May 17, 2000, can be seen on YouTube ( here ).

At the 1:29 mark, O’Brien says: “Let’s talk about this because this is fascinating. I remember very clearly; I think anybody who was alive at the time does. I remember my parents waking me up and we went down, and we watched you guys land on the moon.”

Aldrin responds: “No, you didn’t. Because there wasn’t any television, there wasn’t anybody taking the picture. You watched animation so you associated what you saw with… you heard me talking about, you know, how many feet we’re going to the left and right and then I said contact light, engine stopped, a few other things and then Neil said ‘Houston, tranquility base. The Eagle has landed.’ How about that? Not a bad line.”

The moon landing took place on July 20, 1969 with astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. NASA said in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. However, in 2009 NASA released a complete digital make-over of the original landing footage that clarifies the blurry and grainy images of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the surface of the moon ( here ).

A video compiled by CNN shows the available footage from the mission ( here ), including takeoff and the astronauts climbing down and walking on the moon.

An article ( here ) by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum explains the challenges of recording footage of the moon landing and walking.

NASA contracted with Westinghouse for a black and white camera costing $2.29 million to capture the iconic moment, according to the museum. Photographs of the camera, which was stored in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly near the ladder Armstrong can be seen climbing down, can be seen ( here ).

“For us today, we can thank technicians for having recorded the broadcast, though the tapes assumed to be of the highest quality were never located despite searches for them in the last few decades,” the article reads. “What we see now on YouTube or in films are high definition scans of those best available copies.”

An article by Vox ( here ) says some television networks built sets to recreate some of the moments that were not able to be captured on video.

The National Science and Media Museum discussed the Apollo 11 broadcast on its website ( here ): “Many broadcasters used simulations to flesh out their Apollo programming. Networks paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for scale models of Apollo command modules and rockets. During the broadcast, these were used to create simulations of the mission which were then intercut with real footage.”

“The thing to remember is what news was like in the late 1960’s, not 24-hour continuous coverage,” Margaret Weitekamp, Chair of the Space History Department at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, said by phone. “The coverage of that trip needed to be explained to the public without the ability for continuous relay of video we are now used to.”

“Animations would have been a part of a constellation of different ways that that story was told over a series of days. At the time, the coverage would have been combined with animations that helped provide a broader picture of what was being done. But this certainly doesn’t invalidate that those landings took place.”

There is no evidence that the moon landing was faked or that astronauts did not walk on the moon. However, there is plenty of evidence that it happened. Reports about the landing can be seen ( here ), ( here ) and ( here ).

Photographs of the moon landing can be seen ( here ), ( here ), and ( here ).

Reuters has previously debunked claims that the moon landing was faked ( here ), ( here ), ( here ).

VERDICT
False. Astronaut Buzz Aldrin explaining that broadcasters used animations during their coverage of the moon landing does not prove that it was faked.

But that's far from the first time Buzz has seemed to admit the whole thing was a fake.

You have to wonder if on his death bed Buzz will finally and unequivocally confess to the fake?

Watch this clip on Rumble where an 8-year old girl asks Buzz why we never went back to the moon after 1972...

A GREAT question!

Because there is no other example in recorded history where something new was discovered and then we just stopped going there.

Imagine discovering America in 1492 and then the Europeans just decided to never send another boat.

Right, didn't happen.

Would never happen.

Doesn't pass the smell test.

So watch this short clip where Buzz says the reason we never went back is because we never went in the first place!

It must have felt good to finally get that off his chest I guess?

And again, if you want the full context and full interview, I have that here:

Oh, then there was this gem...

Bart Sibrel (more on him in a minute) caught Buzz one day out on the street and he asked him something simple: swear on this Bible that you actual went to the moon.

Buzz becomes visibly agitated and then punches Bart in the face.

Watch:

https://twitter.com/HaymakerHub/status/1528208649306390528

Cause that's normal, right?

For more on Bart, his book Moon Man is a must read:

Bart is most famously known for his film: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon.

For anyone who believes the moon landings are 100% real and beyond any reproach, I challenge you to watch this 45 minute video and then report back to me.

I've never heard from anyone who has watched this and not had their eyes opened:

Backup here (since that will likely get taken down by the Tube):

And one more backup here:

Now let's examine the big Press Conference Buzz, Neil and the third guy had when they got back from WALKING ON THE FREAKING MOON!

You'd think they'd have smiles from ear to ear that simply wouldn't wipe off...right?

You know, something like how Sir Edmund Hillary looked after climbing Mount Everest -- see below:

Nope!

Instead they looked like this...☝️

You might say they looked exactly as you or I might look if you had just faked a Moon Landing and deceived and entire nation.

But that's just my take, you be the judge.

Do these look like guys who just walked on the Moon?

You can watch the whole solemn press conference here on Rumble -- it's stunning:

So...did Neil and Buzz and the third guy really walk on the Moon?

Or was it all faked?

And if it was faked, was it faked because....it has to be?

Perhaps because there is a FIRMAMENT over our world, like Genesis tells us?

It's literally in the first 7 verses of the Bible, almost as if God wanted to make it pretty hard to miss?

Genesis 1:

7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

Almost as if we couldn't be through the firmament, let alone get to the Moon, even if we wanted to?

If this is blowing your mind, then I'm only getting started.

Please keep reading...👇

Biblical Trees Beyond the Ice Wall…?

Our governments and the so-called "Elites" have lied to us for a long time about just about everything, and I think it's HIGHLY likely that they are lying to us about the shape of the Earth and the nature of where we live.

Everyone still ok?

Did we lose anyone?

Well buckle up buttercup because it's about to get wild!

This article is probably going to be one of the most controversial things I have posted in a long time.

And I'm ok with that.

I know some people will judge a book by its cover and immediately write this off, but I give you one caution before you do...

There is a famous quote I'd like to share with you that has been attributed to many different people over time, so I'm not sure who said it first, but it goes like this:

There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation.

Powerful.

Read that again and let it sink in.

If you want to remain in ignorance, write off an idea before you even look into it.  Surefire way to stay uninformed.

So let me begin with a question:

Why is no one allowed to go to Antarctica?

Oh sure you can go, but only to a few selection locations.  And NO further.  And only with a guide.

Why is that?

Why is it so important to protect whatever's down there?

Why have all the countries of the world signed on to a treaty about Antarctica?

Yes, even Russia and Ukraine, who are currently engaged in WW:III have agreed on one thing: something VERY important is down in Antarctica and we have to protect it and prevent anyone from going and exploring.

Why is that?

What could possibly be so important about ice?

Unless of course if they have lied to us about the shape of the Earth?

Unless Antarctica is not at the bottom of the "globe" but actually makes up the ring surrounding it?

Sounds crazy at first until you begin to investigate, and it very quickly becomes something that has you scratching your head.

Let's start with this video:

Think that's just some crazy Tik Tok video?

It's not.

You're probably familiar with Answers In Genesis, right?

They do NOT espouse a "flat Earth" world view, but they did publish this article titled:  "Stumped By Forests in Antarctica".

Here is a portion:

Forests in Antarctica? This frigid, forbidding continent is full of surprising evidences for the worldwide flood.

Is Antarctica on your bucket list of vacation destinations? It’s on mine!

What could possibly be of interest in Antarctica? After all, the continent at the bottom of the world is covered in ice and snow, and the temperatures are always below freezing. As the coldest, driest continent, it has one of the harshest environments on the planet and harbors a world of extremes. Turbulent winds and snowstorms can last days and even weeks, and the endless barren terrain makes Antarctica the world’s largest desert!

For half the year it’s a polar summer, when the unforgiving sun shines 24/7. Then, during the six months of the polar winter, the continent plunges into complete darkness.

So why would I be interested in visiting Antarctica? Well, to see rocks, of course! I’m a geologist.

Unlike the Arctic, which is simply an ice sheet floating on the ocean, Antarctica is composed of rock covered in ice and snow. Huge jagged mountain ranges jut up through nearly a mile of ice and snow, exposing rocks with all sorts of treasures, if you know what to look for.

Just two summers ago, a team was surprised to discover not just one but five “forests” piled on top of each other. They claimed the supposedly 260-million-year-old fossils represent a series of different forests that grew slowly and were buried one on top of the other over millions of years. They were looking for clues to understand how climate changes contributed to their extinction.

Finding such mysteries then putting them in the biblical perspective is why I love my profession and want to visit places most people would never consider.

Found—Fossil “Forests” of a Strange Extinct Plant

The team was led by Erik Gulbranson, a professor of geosciences at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, who set up camp in the central Transantarctic Mountains. They found several layers of tree stumps buried upright with parts of their roots still connected. They also found impressions of long, broad, flat leaves jumbled together in massive mats.1

These remains have been identified as fossils of an unusual extinct plant called Glossopteris, which is unlike any plant alive today. Pieces of this plant are commonly found in large Permian coal beds that are mined throughout the southern hemisphere, such as in Australia and South Africa.

The discovery of these plants wasn’t the big surprise. In previous expeditions the same team found similar “fossil” forests in the same rock unit in the central Transantarctic Mountains. Lab studies confirmed that all the fossil wood specimens belonged to the same genus, Glossopteris.

But their earlier analysis uncovered a surprise. The long-held assumption was that the Glossopteris plant was strictly deciduous (meaning its leaves drop annually in the autumn). Scientists made this assumption because they usually find their fossil leaves in mats, similar to thick mats on the floors of modern deciduous forests. The new analysis showed they were a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees. How could this be?

Based on their evolutionary assumptions about slow changes over millions of years, scientists suggested a possible explanation. They claimed that earth’s cooling climate had forced these late Permian polar forests to adapt to environmental stresses. The accumulation of these stresses ultimately caused their extinction.

There's a lot more out there than your government is telling you!

And of THAT I am 100% confident.

Here's another one, from the Christian Times:

A Christian geologist has argued that the recent discovery of fossilized tree stumps in Antarctica confirms the Bible's account of a global Flood.

Live Science reported last month that a team of scientists led by Erik Gulbranson, a paleoecologist at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, had discovered a forest of fossil trees in Antarctica, which is said to be an indication that the climate was warmer there in the past.

While the researchers have not dated the forest precisely yet, they surmised that it flourished about 280 million years ago before it was rapidly buried in volcanic ash, which preserved it down to the cellular level.

However, Dr. Tim Clarey, a research associate at the Institute for Creation Research (ICR), contended that the fossilized trees are more consistent with the Biblical account of a global flood just thousands of years ago.

"This discovery should be no surprise to those who take Genesis as literal history. The Bible clearly describes a global Flood that affected all land masses—why should Antarctica be an exception?" he wrote in an article published on ICR's website.

Clarey explained that dinosaur and mosasaur (massive swimming reptiles) fossils are found on every continent including Antarctica, which he says suggests that a much warmer global climate existed before the Great Flood.

He further noted that some creationists have tried to explain the presence of temperate climate fossils in Antarctica by claiming that the Earth had "rolled" on its axis during the Flood, resulting in the North Pole shifting from central Asia to its present position.

But Clarey pointed out that the temperate and tropical-type flora and fauna fossils, like dinosaurs, can also be found in central China — which he said would have been the north pole if the earth indeed rolled on its axis.

He contended that the entire globe was warmer before the global Flood and that the forces that are required to explain the shift on the Earth's axis has not been resolved and remains a speculation.

Gulbranson, who specializes in geochemistry techniques, noted that the plants found in Antarctica were so well-preserved that some of the amino acid building blocks that made up the trees' proteins can still be extracted.

Clarey argued that the secular science community cannot provide a viable explanation for such discoveries.

"How could proteins and original amino acids survive for millions of years?" he asked. "These trees were buried rapidly during the global Flood described in Genesis. Temperate and tropical plants and animals were caught up and quickly buried in the ash, mud, and sand that engulfed them in this cataclysmic event. These fossils remind us that God's Word is true," he went on to say.

Another video:

https://www.tiktok.com/@cardeecuebrav1/video/7118792799650106670?is_from_webapp=v1&item_id=7118792799650106670&lang=en

But....but....we went to the Moon!

How can this be?

Right, about that:

And this:

And this:

Let's go back to the Bible:

And now let's go to my friend Dave Weiss.

I had a brand new guest on my show recently over at The Daily Truth Report...Dave Weiss who goes by the name "Flat Earth Dave".

If you got a little triggered at what I just typed, go back up and read that quote again.

Because here's the deal...

My mission here from Day 1 has always been to follow the truth anywhere we find it.

And that is never more true than when the truth we find is (1) in direct conflict with what the powers-that-be want you to think and (2) in complete alignment with the Bible.

And that's what we have here.

Mind blown yet?

We're only just getting started.       and open I don't love the term "Flat Earth" because it carries with it a lot of mockery and nonsense, but I do like the term "Biblical Model of the Earth".

I also like doing my own research.

Dave and I chatted for over an hour and my goal was just to ask questions and open up the topic in a way that might lead many people to realize this isn't crazy at all -- and in fact, is much more legitimate than you may have ever imagined.

Some of the things we discussed are why can a compass only point north?  Ever wondered that?  If a compass is just a magnet, why do they only point north, why never a compass that points south?

Unless...it were not possible?

We break it down in the video.

We also talk about why perhaps the Georgia Guidestones HAD to be demolished right now...

Why?

Because they had a hole in the center that always lined up to the north star.

The only problem with that?

Science has been telling us the north star shifts each year by small degrees, but enough that over the 40 years that Guidestones were up that the hole should no longer have lined up -- not even close.

Except....it still did.

Perfectly aligned.

Almost as if we lived on a still, flat Earth, with the sun, moon and stars set above us -- exactly the way the Bible describes.

My favorite part was when we looked at the emergency landing of airplanes.

This is the one I think will probably open the most eyes.

Sixteen different examples of planes making emergency landings and guess what?

By their normal flight plans, they landed in places they should not have been anywhere close to.

Except...if you look at a Flat Earth model of the world, then they landed almost exactly where they were supposed to be, in a direct line flight path.

Sixteen of them!

I could go on and on, but I want to turn you loose to watch this one yourself.

Remember the principal from above before you watch:

There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation.

You can watch here on Rumble:

And for those YT fans...

Here on YouTube (if they keep it up):

You can find Dave online here:

Direct Link to The Flat Earth Sun, Moon & Zodiac Clock app - https://qrco.de/bbizVA

Social Media Profiles:
Website - https://www.FlatEarthDave.com
Twitter - https://twitter.com/thefepodcast/
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/theflatearthpodcast/
Facebook - https://facebook.com/theflatearthpodcast/

YouTube Channel: DITRH (Deep Inside The Rabbit Hole)
https://www.youtube.com/c/DITRH/videos

And now I'd like to dig in even more to what the BIBLE has to say about the place we live...

Through and through, the Bible describes a still, stationary, flat plane.

But don't just take my word for it.

I want to give you some extra info from Rob Skiba who was an absolute genius when it came to this.

First, I want to address why this is even important in the first place.

Good question, right?

Why would yours truly even be spending any time on this?

From Rob Skiba's TestingTheGlobe he answers that really well:

Before we begin, I must say it quite literally astounds me that Christians can't see why this Flat Earth Controversy is important to nail down. Why does this matter? Well, just off the top of my head:

1) Genesis is the foundation of ALL that we believe in the Bible to be true. If Genesis is wrong, then it ALL crumbles under a faulty foundation. Genesis says NOTHING - zip, zero, nadda - about the Earth being set in motion (orbit or rotation) around the sun. In fact, the sun doesn't even show up until AFTER the Earth is already in place with life ALREADY in existence. Genesis says the sun, moon and stars were placed INSIDE the SAME firmament within which that Earth was formed, not outside of it. Thus, we have a completely enclosed system, within which the sun, moon and stars move, NOT the Earth. You can Yoga-Jujitsu-Wrestle Mania twist and distort the text into pretzels all you want, but it won't change what it says.

2) IF what we are seeing concerning the Flat Enclosed Earth thesis is true, then we are all there is. We are center stage. We are the main attraction and there can be NO argument as to whether or not there is a Creator. None. His existence could not possibly become more blatantly obvious than in this model.

3) IF the Flat Enclosed Earth thesis is true, evolution goes out the window and the theory of Ancient Alien seeders is obliterated. In this regard, I believe we become painfully aware of the Great Deception... and will NOT be fooled by it.

4) IF the Flat Enclosed Earth thesis is true, then we can NOT EVER trust NASA or the government about ANYTHING and we will finally be forced to fully trust YHWH's Word as our sole source for truth and stop trying to bend and manipulate it to fit false paradigms.

5) If heliocentricity IS false, then Scripture IS true. If Scripture IS true, and can thus be taken literally, why should we not take it just as literal when it describes the earth as fixed, not moving, set on a foundation of pillars, carved as a "circle" with edge boarders inside something with four corners, enclosed under a dome?

The next question often tied to the first one is "Why would anyone lie about this?"

Again Skiba answers:

Along with those emotions comes an all too common question: Why?? What’s the motivation to lie to us about the shape and nature of our world? To me, the motivation is quite clear:

1) First get people to doubt YHWH's Word by destroying the very foundation of our Bible: Genesis - specifically the Creation account.

2) Set up a new paradigm, where God is out and "science" is in. Evolution removes YHWH from the equation.

3) When evolution finally runs its course and becomes utterly bankrupt, introduce the idea of "Intelligent Design" but deny the True Designer His due credit and place it rather on "Ancient Aliens."

4) Promote the Ancient Alien theme as much as possible in all forms of media by perpetuating the concept of Earth as a tiny "blue marble" orbiting an average sun in an average galaxy among trillions of other galaxies in an ever expanding Universe. With so much "potential for life to exist" in such a vast expanse, the idea of alien scientists being our creators seems a lot more plausible over time and heavy indoctrination.

5) The stage is set for our "alien creators" to return and bestow upon us their "miracles, signs and wonders" in order to convince us all the more that all religions are false. We then put our trust in them. Finally, when Christ does return, we are all convinced that He is the enemy and our united world gathers together to make war with Him.

Wow, sound familiar?

Sound like anything currently happening the world?

It does to me.

I said earlier that the Bible is a "flat earth book" through and through.

Now let me back that up.

Again from Skiba's TestingTheGlobe, I give you all relevant scriptures:

Scriptures concerning the nature of the heavens/sky above and their relationship to the earth:

Job 9:
6 Which shaketh the earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof tremble.
7 Which commandeth the sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars.
8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea.

Job 22:14 Thick clouds are a covering to him, that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit {Hebrew: "chug"} of heaven.
Job 22:14 (HCSB) Clouds veil Him so that He cannot see, as He walks on the circle of the sky.
Job 22:14 (ASV) Thick clouds are a covering to him, so that he seeth not; And he walketh on the vault of heaven.

Job 26:
7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.
8 He bindeth up the waters in his thick clouds; and the cloud is not rent under them.
9 He holdeth back the face of his throne, and spreadeth his cloud upon it.
10 He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end.
11 The pillars of heaven tremble and are astonished at his reproof.
12 He divideth the sea with his power, and by his understanding he smiteth through the proud. 13 By his spirit he hath garnished the heavens; his hand hath formed the crooked serpent.

Job 37:18 Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?

Genesis 1:

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

Genesis 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

Genesis 8:2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;

2 Samuel 22:8 Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations of heaven moved and shook, because he was wroth.

Psalm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Psalm 29:10 The LORD sitteth upon the flood; yea, the LORD sitteth King for ever.

Psalm 78:

21 Therefore the Lord heard this, and was wroth: so a fire was kindled against Jacob, and anger also came up against Israel;
22 Because they believed not in God, and trusted not in his salvation:
23 Though he had commanded the clouds from above, and opened the doors of heaven,

24 And had rained down manna upon them to eat, and had given them of the corn of heaven. 25 Man did eat angels' food: he sent them meat to the full.

Psalm 104:

1 Bless the Lord, O my soul. O Lord my God, thou art very great; thou art clothed with honour and majesty.
2 Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the heavens like a curtain:
3 Who layeth the beams of his chambers in the waters: who maketh the clouds his chariot: who walketh upon the wings of the wind:

Psalm 148:4 Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens.

Proverbs 8:27 When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set {Hebrew: "chaqaq"} a compass {Hebrew: "chug"} upon the face of the depth:
Proverbs 8:27 (ESV) When He established the heavens, I was there, When He inscribed a circle on the face of the deep.

Isaiah 13:13 Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.

Isaiah 40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
Isaiah 40:22 (ISV) He's the one who sits above the disk of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers. He's the one who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to live in,

Isaiah 44:24 Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am
the Lord that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;

Isaiah 45:12 I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.

Isaiah 48:13 Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together.

Isaiah 66:1 Thus saith the Lord, The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me? and where is the place of my rest?

Ezekiel 1:26 And above the firmament that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire stone: and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man above upon it.

Amos 9:6 It is he that buildeth his stories in the heaven, and hath founded his troop in the earth; he that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: The LORD is his name.
Amos 9:6 (ASV) it is he that buildeth his chambers in the heavens, and hath founded his vault upon the earth; he that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth; Jehovah is his name.

Amos 9:6 (ESV) it is he that buildeth his chambers in the heaven, and hath founded his vault upon the earth; he that calleth for the waters of the sea and poureth them out upon the face of the earth; the LORD is his name.
Amos 9:6 (Darby) It is he that buildeth his upper chambers in the heavens, and hath founded

his vault upon the earth; he that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: Jehovah is his name.
Amos 9:6 (NASB) The One who builds His upper chambers in the heavens And has founded His vaulted dome over the earth,

He who calls for the waters of the sea And pours them out on the face of the earth, The Lord is His name.

Scriptures concerning the nature of the earth below the firmament:

Job 9:6 Which shaketh the earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof tremble.
Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing. Job 26:10 He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end.

Job 28:24 For he looketh to the ends of the earth, and seeth under the whole heaven;
Job 37:3 He directeth it under the whole heaven, and his lightning unto the ends of the earth.

Job 38:
1 Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,
2 Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
3 Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me.
4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. 5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?
6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;
7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

Job 38:13 That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it?

Genesis 1:
9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

1 Samuel 2:8 He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are
the Lord's, and he hath set the world upon them.

2 Samuel 22:16 And the channels of the sea appeared, the foundations of the world were discovered, at the rebuking of the Lord, at the blast of the breath of his nostrils.

1 Chronicles 16:30 Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable, that it be not moved. Psalm 18:15 Then the channels of waters were seen, and the foundations of the world were

discovered at thy rebuke, O Lord, at the blast of the breath of thy nostrils.
Psalm 75:3 The earth and all the inhabitants thereof are dissolved: I bear up the pillars of it. Selah.

Psalm 93:1 The Lord reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the Lord is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.

Psalm 96:

9 O worship the Lord in the beauty of holiness: fear before him, all the earth.
10 Say among the heathen that the Lord reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall not

be moved: he shall judge the people righteously.
11 Let the heavens rejoice, and let the earth be glad; let the sea roar, and the fulness thereof.

Psalm 102:25 Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth: and the heavens are the work of thy hands.

Psalm 104:
5 Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.
6 Thou coveredst it with the deep as with a garment: the waters stood above the mountains.
7 At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they hasted away.
8 They go up by the mountains; they go down by the valleys unto the place which thou hast founded for them.
9 Thou hast set a bound that they may not pass over; that they turn not again to cover the earth.

Psalm 136:
6 To him that stretched out the earth above the waters: for his mercy endureth for ever.

Proverbs 8:
27 When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set {Hebrew: "chaqaq"} a compass {Hebrew: "chug"} upon the face of the depth: - (ESV) When He established the heavens, I was there,
When He inscribed a circle on the face of the deep.
28 When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep:
29 When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:

Isaiah 11:12 And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.

Isaiah 13:13 Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.

Isaiah 40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:
Isaiah 40:22 (ISV) He's the one who sits above the disk of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers. He's the one who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to live in,

Isaiah 43:6 I'll say to the north, 'Give them up'! and to the south, 'Don't keep them back!' Bring my sons from far away and my daughters from the ends of the earth—

Daniel 4:

10 Thus were the visions of mine head in my bed; I saw, and behold a tree in the midst of the earth, and the height thereof was great.
11 The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof reached unto heaven, and the sight thereof to the end of all the earth:

Jonah 2:6 I went down to the bottoms of the mountains; the earth with her bars was about me for ever: yet hast thou brought up my life from corruption, O Lord my God.

Matthew 4:
8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;
9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

Matthew 24:31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

John 17:24

Father, I desire that they also, whom thou hast given me, may be with me where I am, to behold my glory which thou hast given me in thy love for me before the foundation of the world.

Revelation 1:7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.

Revelation 7:1 And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.

Revelation 20:8 He will go out to deceive Gog and Magog, the nations at the four corners of the earth, and gather them for war. They are as numerous as the sands of the seashore.

Scriptures concerning the nature of the sun, moon and stars:

Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

Genesis 1:
14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. 16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

Deuteronomy 4:19 And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the Lord thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven.

Joshua 10:13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.

Judges 5:20 They fought from heaven; the stars in their courses fought against Sisera.

Psalms 19:
1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
4 Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun,
5 Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race.
6 His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.

Psalm 136:
7 To him that made great lights: for his mercy endureth for ever:
8 The sun to rule by day: for his mercy endureth for ever:
9 The moon and stars to rule by night: for his mercy endureth for ever.

Psalm 147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.
Psalm 148:3 Praise ye him, sun and moon: praise him, all ye stars of light.
Ecclesiastes 1:5 The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose.

Isaiah 13:9 Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it.
10 For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.

Isaiah 38:8 Behold, I will bring again the shadow of the degrees, which is gone down in the sun dial of Ahaz, ten degrees backward. So the sun returned ten degrees, by which degrees it was gone down.

Ezekiel 32:
7 And when I shall put thee out, I will cover the heaven, and make the stars thereof dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not give her light.
8 All the bright lights of heaven will I make dark over thee, and set darkness upon thy land, saith the Lord God.

Daniel 8:10 And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them.

Joel 2:10 The earth shall quake before them; the heavens shall tremble: the sun and the moon shall be dark, and the stars shall withdraw their shining:

Joel 3:15 The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdraw their shining.

Amos 5:26 But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves.

Habakkuk 3:11 The sun and moon stood still in their habitation: at the light of thine arrows they went, and at the shining of thy glittering spear.

Matthew 24:29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

Acts 7:43 Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.

1 Corinthians 15:41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory.

Revelation 1:20 The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.

Revelation 6:13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.

Revelation 8:
10 And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters;
11 And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.
12 And the fourth angel sounded, and the third part of the sun was smitten, and the third part of the moon, and the third part of the stars; so as the third part of them was darkened, and the day shone not for a third part of it, and the night likewise.

Revelation 9:1 And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit.

Revelation 12:4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.

Again, applying no preconceived notions upon the text, how do you imagine a newcomer to the Scriptures would view the heavens, earth, sun, moon and stars just based on what you've read here? Would he see a spinning, heliocentric, globular Earth in an ever expanding universe? Or would he see something vastly different? I believe – without a doubt – he would see something completely different from what we’ve all been taught to believe. If this is not already abundantly clear to you, the remainder of this document will explain why.

If I were to be perfectly honest here, I'd have to say that I do not get a spherical globe, spinning around in an endless void of space from my reading of the above Scriptures. The Bible seems to be telling us, in no uncertain terms, that we live on a still (as in stationary), flat, enclosed earth. The following explains why I believe this way.

Oh, and as to "why would they lie about it?"

Here you go:

Wow, I told you there was a lot!

Love to know what you think...

 

Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

log in

Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in
Leave a comment
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing!
We invite you to become a WLT Report insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.